https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/confidential-computing-and-secure-enclaves-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Confidential Computing
Confidential Computing and Secure Enclave Patents: Filing Trends and Who Still Owns the Claim Space
  • Filing has cooled since 2020. 228 families filed that year against 43 in 2017 and just 16 in the most recent (partial) year — publication lag means the last year or two will rise, but the multi-year decline from the 2020 peak is real.
  • Momentum has stalled even among the largest filers. Assignees who built the largest portfolios show 0 filings or steep year-on-year drops in the latest year, including a -100% YoY reading for more than one named filer.
  • Claims cluster in two IPC subclasses. G06F (1,116 records) and H04L (802) dominate; G06Q, G06N, H04W, G06T, G09C and G05B each carry a fraction of that volume, marking where enclave-adjacent claim space is comparatively open.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,437
Published Records
38%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-30%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (190 records) with 2024 (133) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,437 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the filing record shows

Confidential computing patents in this dataset sit at the intersection of trusted execution environments, remote attestation and memory encryption, filtered to records that also address performance overhead, side-channel resistance or multi-party data handling. The 1,437 families span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with filing concentrated in the United States, China, Europe and PCT applications, plus smaller volumes routed through Hong Kong and India.

Filing rose sharply into 2020 and has trended down or flat since, with the most recent year understated by the usual 18-month gap between filing and publication. Reading the trend line requires treating the last one to two years as incomplete rather than as evidence of a genuine falloff.

Annual filings, 2017-2026
  1. 1INTEL CORP237
  2. 2ALIPAY (HANGZHOU) INFORMATION TECH CO LTD84
  3. 3ADVANCED NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD84
  4. 4ANT BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO LTD73
  5. 5ANTCHAIN TECHNOLOGY PTE LTD71
  6. 6INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION54
  7. 7NEC CORP53
  8. 8MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC42
  9. 9HUAWEI TECH CO LTD42
  10. 10RED HAT INC34
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Confidential Computing and Secure Enclaves covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,437 families: how filing has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim volume.

Filings peaked in 2020, then declined

From 43 families in 2017, filing climbed to a peak of 228 in 2020, sat at 147 by the 2022 midpoint, and has fallen since — a pattern consistent with an early land-grab phase followed by consolidation rather than continued expansion.

Filings peaked in 2020, then declined06312518825043201720182019228202020212022202320242025162026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

G06F and H04L carry almost all the volume

G06F (electric digital data processing) appears in 1,116 records and H04L (digital information transmission) in 802, together accounting for the bulk of filings. G06Q, G06N, H04W, G06T, G09C and G05B trail well behind, which is where claim density thins out.

G06F and H04L carry almost all the volumeG06F · Electric digital data processi…1,11677.7%H04L · Digital information transmissi…80255.8%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…16811.7%G06N · Computing based on AI models926.4%H04W · Wireless communication networks332.3%G06T · Image data processing & genera…100.7%G09C · Ciphering & secret communicati…60.4%G05B · Control & regulating systems40.3%Other151.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,437 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Confidential Computing and Secure Enclaves covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Confidential Computing and Secure Enclaves with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about confidential computing and secure enclaves and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited and most representative filings

Representative filing
US20210397698A12021-12-23

System and method for remote attestation in trusted execution environment creation using virtualization technology

VMWARE LLC

The filing covers remote attestation for a TEE created inside a virtualized environment: a trusted bootloader appliance provisions a TEE virtual computing instance in response to a software process's request, and attestation runs in two stages — first against the trusted bootloader appliance by the host hardware platform, then against the provisioned environment itself.Filed by VMware; published 2021-12-23.

US20210397698A1 — patent drawing 1US20210397698A1 — patent drawing 2
View filing details
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20200082270A1Verifiable Deep Learning Training Service300
2US20190156301A1Real-time cryptocurrency exchange using trusted hardware190
3US20170230179A1Password triggered trusted encrytpion key deletion186
4US20160350534A1System, apparatus and method for controlling multiple trusted execution environments in a system161
5US20180114012A1Trusted packet processing for multi-domain separatization and security153
6US20120163589A1System and method for implementing a trusted dynamic launch and trusted platform module (TPM) using secure en…150
7US20140096182A1Systems and methods for distributed trust computing and key management129
8US20180239897A1Performance of distributed system functions using a trusted execution environment116
9US20190042937A1Methods and apparatus for federated training of a neural network using trusted edge devices116
10US20180114013A1Extending packet processing to trusted programmable and fixed-function accelerators112

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — treat this as a map of historical influence, not of what matters most today.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Confidential Computing and Secure Enclaves covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting new claims or scoping freedom-to-operate.

Filing momentum
228 → 16
peak year to latest year

The land-grab phase has passed

Filing peaked at 228 families in 2020 and has fallen in most years since, reaching 16 in the latest (partial) year. New entrants are filing into a space where the core TEE and attestation mechanics are already well covered, which raises the bar for what counts as a novel claim.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Assignee activity
-100% YoY
recent-year drop, multiple large filers

Even leading filers have gone quiet

Several of the assignees with the largest historical portfolios show zero filings in the latest year or a -100% year-on-year drop, and even the most active recent filer shows a -67% decline. That is consistent with either portfolio maturity or a pause ahead of the next architectural shift.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Claim concentration
1,116 vs 802
G06F vs H04L record counts

Two subclasses hold nearly all the claim density

G06F and H04L between them cover the great majority of records, meaning enclave and attestation mechanics are heavily claimed under data-processing and transmission classifications. G06N (AI-adjacent) and G09C (ciphering) carry a fraction of that volume, which is where mechanically adjacent claims are thinner.

IPC composition
Collaboration patterns
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is rare and clusters within corporate families

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links sit between affiliated entities under the same corporate group rather than between independent companies. Cross-company joint filing on confidential computing is the exception, not the norm.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to confidential computing and secure enclaves, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Confidential Computing and Secure Enclaves covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who has built portfolios here, and who has stopped

Filing concentrated among a small group of technology and cloud vendors, but recent-year activity has dropped off across nearly all of them.

Historical scale
1,437 families
total in the ranking

A handful of large corporate filers built most of the volume

The assignee ranking is led by large technology and cloud vendors together with their affiliated entities, several of which appear multiple times under related corporate names. That pattern — a parent and its subsidiaries filing separately — is common enough here to affect how concentrated the ranking looks at first glance.

Assignee ranking
Recent momentum
-67% YoY
most active recent filer

Activity has slowed even at the top

The assignee with the most filings in the latest year still shows a -67% year-on-year decline, and several other large historical filers show zero filings in the same period. No assignee in the momentum data is currently scaling up.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Filing geography
591 US
leading receiving office

Filing is US-led with substantial China and EPO volume

The United States receives the largest share of filings (591), followed by China (244) and the European Patent Office (221), with WIPO PCT filings (168) indicating a meaningful share of applicants seeking multi-jurisdiction coverage from the outset.

Receiving offices
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before drafting
Branches with comparatively thin filing density relative to the core TEE and attestation claims.
Side-channel resistance in shared enclave hardwareMulti-party data handling across federated TEEsAI model attestation inside secure enclaves (G06N overlap)Enclave-aware image/video processing (G06T overlap)Lightweight attestation for wireless edge devices (H04W overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.1-67%
Intel Corporation0-100%
Alipay (Hangzhou) Digital Service Technology Co., Ltd.0-100%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited0
Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd.0
NEC Laboratories Europe GmbH0
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)0
Red Hat, Inc.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Confidential Computing and Secure Enclaves covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The filing record raises questions that are worth running down before committing to a drafting or freedom-to-operate strategy.

Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited filings

The most-cited records in this corpus, including the deep-learning training and multi-domain TEE filings, are the ones most likely to have spawned continuations and licensing activity worth checking before filing adjacent claims.

Explore the citation network

Watch for the next filing wave

Given the 18-month publication lag, the true 2025-2026 filing volume will not be visible for another year or more. Re-running this trend periodically is the only way to tell a genuine slowdown from a reporting gap.

Track filing trends over time

Test claims in the thinner IPC branches

G06N, G09C, G06T and G05B carry a fraction of the volume seen in G06F and H04L. That is where a narrowly drafted claim is more likely to clear prior art, provided the underlying technical contribution genuinely sits in that branch.

Scope a claim in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Confidential Computing and Secure Enclaves covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about confidential computing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Confidential Computing and Secure Enclaves covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Confidential Computing and Secure Enclaves in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole confidential computing and secure enclaves corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.