Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (190 records) with 2024 (133) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,437 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Confidential computing patents in this dataset sit at the intersection of trusted execution environments, remote attestation and memory encryption, filtered to records that also address performance overhead, side-channel resistance or multi-party data handling. The 1,437 families span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with filing concentrated in the United States, China, Europe and PCT applications, plus smaller volumes routed through Hong Kong and India.
Filing rose sharply into 2020 and has trended down or flat since, with the most recent year understated by the usual 18-month gap between filing and publication. Reading the trend line requires treating the last one to two years as incomplete rather than as evidence of a genuine falloff.
Two views of the same 1,437 families: how filing has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim volume.
From 43 families in 2017, filing climbed to a peak of 228 in 2020, sat at 147 by the 2022 midpoint, and has fallen since — a pattern consistent with an early land-grab phase followed by consolidation rather than continued expansion.
G06F (electric digital data processing) appears in 1,116 records and H04L (digital information transmission) in 802, together accounting for the bulk of filings. G06Q, G06N, H04W, G06T, G09C and G05B trail well behind, which is where claim density thins out.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,437 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about confidential computing and secure enclaves and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing covers remote attestation for a TEE created inside a virtualized environment: a trusted bootloader appliance provisions a TEE virtual computing instance in response to a software process's request, and attestation runs in two stages — first against the trusted bootloader appliance by the host hardware platform, then against the provisioned environment itself.Filed by VMware; published 2021-12-23.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20200082270A1 | Verifiable Deep Learning Training Service | 300 |
| 2 | US20190156301A1 | Real-time cryptocurrency exchange using trusted hardware | 190 |
| 3 | US20170230179A1 | Password triggered trusted encrytpion key deletion | 186 |
| 4 | US20160350534A1 | System, apparatus and method for controlling multiple trusted execution environments in a system | 161 |
| 5 | US20180114012A1 | Trusted packet processing for multi-domain separatization and security | 153 |
| 6 | US20120163589A1 | System and method for implementing a trusted dynamic launch and trusted platform module (TPM) using secure en… | 150 |
| 7 | US20140096182A1 | Systems and methods for distributed trust computing and key management | 129 |
| 8 | US20180239897A1 | Performance of distributed system functions using a trusted execution environment | 116 |
| 9 | US20190042937A1 | Methods and apparatus for federated training of a neural network using trusted edge devices | 116 |
| 10 | US20180114013A1 | Extending packet processing to trusted programmable and fixed-function accelerators | 112 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — treat this as a map of historical influence, not of what matters most today.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns worth acting on before drafting new claims or scoping freedom-to-operate.
Filing peaked at 228 families in 2020 and has fallen in most years since, reaching 16 in the latest (partial) year. New entrants are filing into a space where the core TEE and attestation mechanics are already well covered, which raises the bar for what counts as a novel claim.
Several of the assignees with the largest historical portfolios show zero filings in the latest year or a -100% year-on-year drop, and even the most active recent filer shows a -67% decline. That is consistent with either portfolio maturity or a pause ahead of the next architectural shift.
G06F and H04L between them cover the great majority of records, meaning enclave and attestation mechanics are heavily claimed under data-processing and transmission classifications. G06N (AI-adjacent) and G09C (ciphering) carry a fraction of that volume, which is where mechanically adjacent claims are thinner.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links sit between affiliated entities under the same corporate group rather than between independent companies. Cross-company joint filing on confidential computing is the exception, not the norm.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to confidential computing and secure enclaves, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing concentrated among a small group of technology and cloud vendors, but recent-year activity has dropped off across nearly all of them.
The assignee ranking is led by large technology and cloud vendors together with their affiliated entities, several of which appear multiple times under related corporate names. That pattern — a parent and its subsidiaries filing separately — is common enough here to affect how concentrated the ranking looks at first glance.
The assignee with the most filings in the latest year still shows a -67% year-on-year decline, and several other large historical filers show zero filings in the same period. No assignee in the momentum data is currently scaling up.
The United States receives the largest share of filings (591), followed by China (244) and the European Patent Office (221), with WIPO PCT filings (168) indicating a meaningful share of applicants seeking multi-jurisdiction coverage from the outset.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 1 | -67% |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Alipay (Hangzhou) Digital Service Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0 | — |
| Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| NEC Laboratories Europe GmbH | 0 | — |
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | 0 | — |
| Red Hat, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
The filing record raises questions that are worth running down before committing to a drafting or freedom-to-operate strategy.
The most-cited records in this corpus, including the deep-learning training and multi-domain TEE filings, are the ones most likely to have spawned continuations and licensing activity worth checking before filing adjacent claims.
Explore the citation networkGiven the 18-month publication lag, the true 2025-2026 filing volume will not be visible for another year or more. Re-running this trend periodically is the only way to tell a genuine slowdown from a reporting gap.
Track filing trends over timeG06N, G09C, G06T and G05B carry a fraction of the volume seen in G06F and H04L. That is where a narrowly drafted claim is more likely to clear prior art, provided the underlying technical contribution genuinely sits in that branch.
Scope a claim in EurekaThis dataset counts 1,437 published patent families filed between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, matched against terms covering trusted execution environments, secure enclaves and confidential computing together with memory encryption, remote attestation, performance overhead, side-channel resistance and multi-party data handling. Filing rose from 43 families in 2017 to a peak of 228 in 2020, then declined toward 16 in the most recent, still-incomplete year. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true count for the last one to two years will be higher once later filings publish.
The assignee ranking is dominated by large technology and cloud vendors and their affiliated entities, several of which appear as separate but related filers under the same corporate group. Recent-year momentum data shows that even the most active of these filers is currently in decline year-on-year, and several others show zero filings in the latest year. That combination — large historical portfolios with cooling recent activity — suggests the core claim space has already been staked out rather than being actively contested.
No, not on the evidence here: filing peaked at 228 families in 2020, sat at 147 by 2022, and has fallen since, with the latest year showing only 16 filings. Some of that recent drop reflects publication lag rather than a genuine stop in filing activity, since patents filed in 2025 and 2026 may not yet be published. Still, the multi-year decline from the 2020 peak, well before the lag window, points to a real slowdown in new filing rather than purely a reporting artefact.
The IPC composition shows heavy concentration in G06F (1,116 records) and H04L (802), with G06Q, G06N, H04W, G06T, G09C and G05B each carrying far fewer filings. That gap suggests thinner claim density around AI-model attestation inside enclaves, multi-party data handling across federated TEEs, and lightweight attestation schemes for wireless or edge devices. A first claim in one of these adjacent branches is more likely to clear prior art than another claim on core enclave provisioning or attestation mechanics, provided it is drafted around a genuine technical contribution in that specific branch.
US20210397698A1 covers a two-stage remote attestation method for a trusted execution environment created inside a virtualized computing instance: a trusted bootloader appliance provisions the TEE in response to a software process's request, the host hardware platform attests the bootloader appliance first, and a second attestation stage then covers the provisioned environment itself. Anyone building attestation flows for virtualized or cloud-hosted enclaves should read the claims closely, since the two-stage bootloader-then-environment structure is the specific mechanism at issue, not remote attestation in general. Designing around it typically means moving to a single-stage attestation flow or attesting the environment directly without an intermediate bootloader appliance stage.
Go past this page: query the whole confidential computing and secure enclaves corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.