Confidential Computing for Accelerators Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
Confidential Computing for Accelerators Patents: Who Leads and Where Filings Concentrate
76.3% of records sit with just five assignees out of 131 records in scope — this is a field defined by a small group of chipmakers, not a broad ecosystem. Filings climbed from nothing in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2020, then eased. Using the exact figures in the record, 2021's 19 filings fell to 9 by 2024 — a 53% decline across a window that is fully published. Treat 2025 and 2026 as still filling in rather than as evidence of a continued slide.
- 1INTEL CORP71
- 2MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC14
- 3ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC6
- 4SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS LLC5
- 5PIECE FUTURE PTE LTD4
See the full confidential computing for accelerators analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about this landscape
Who holds the most patents in confidential computing for accelerators?
One assignee leads this landscape with 71 of the 131 records in scope, far ahead of the fifth-ranked filer at 4 records. The top five assignees combined hold 76.3% of all records, and the top ten reach 89.3%, so this is a field where a small number of chipmakers control most of the claim space. The full ranking covers 39 companies, including memory makers, processor vendors and a few infrastructure and telecom filers with narrower but relevant portfolios.
Is patent filing in this area growing or slowing down?
Filing activity rose sharply to a peak of 22 records in 2020, then declined to 9 by 2024 — a 53% drop across that fully published three-year window. Because patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the lower counts shown for 2025 and 2026 are still filling in and should not be read as continued decline. The honest read is that the field cooled from an unusually active 2019-2021 period rather than that innovation has stopped.
What technology areas does this patent search actually cover?
The underlying search combines attestation and encryption terms — device attestation, encrypted device memory, link encryption — with accelerator-specific operational terms such as bounce buffer, memory bandwidth, multi-tenant isolation, trusted driver, performance overhead and address translation service. This targets patents that engineer trust boundaries specifically around accelerator memory and interconnects, rather than general-purpose cryptography or generic trusted-execution-environment filings. G06F and H04L are the dominant IPC classes, appearing on 71.0% and 48.9% of the 131 records respectively.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Confidential Computing for Accelerators covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.