Book a demo

Constant-Current LED Driver Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Constant-Current LED Driver Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/constant-current-led-driver-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Lighting & Power Electronics
Constant-Current LED Driver Patents: Who Files, What They Claim, and Where the Room Is

A data-backed look at constant-current LED driver patents: filing trends since 2017, the IPC composition across driver and lighting classes, assignee concentration, and where claim space remains open.

502
Published Records
12%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-71%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (14 records) → 2024 (4); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 502 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the constant-current LED driver patent record shows

Constant-current LED driver patents sit at the intersection of lighting circuit design and power conversion: a driver has to hold current steady across a dimming range, a temperature swing, and often a mains-voltage variance, while fitting inside a fixture that keeps shrinking. The 502 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, filed almost entirely under H05B (electric heating and lighting circuits), with secondary claim activity in power conversion (H02M), lighting-device components (F21V) and display control (G09G). That spread says the core current-regulation circuit is the dominant claim target, and everything else — the fixture, the light source form factor, the display backlight application — is filed as a secondary layer on top of it.

Filing activity peaked in 2018 and has trended down since, though the two most recent years are still filling in as publications lag behind filing by roughly 18 months. Receiving-office data shows China well ahead of the United States, South Korea, Europe and the WIPO PCT route, which matters for anyone deciding where enforcement or freedom-to-operate risk actually concentrates.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1INVENTRONICS HANGZHOU16
  2. 2OSRAM SYLVANIA INC14
  3. 3SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD11
  4. 4MOLEX INC10
  5. 5SIGNIFY HOLDING BV8
  6. 6OSRAM GMBH7
  7. 7TCL CHINA STAR OPTOELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD7
  8. 8TRIDONIC AG7
  9. 9GE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS LLC6
  10. 10NXP BV6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Constant-Current LED Driver Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 502-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight now.

Filing trend: a 2018 peak, then a real pullback

Filings ran at 31 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 37 in 2018, and by the last fully comparable window had dropped from 14 in 2021 to 4 in 2024 — a 71% fall over that three-year span. Treat 2025 and 2026 as undercounted rather than as evidence the field has gone quiet; publication lag alone would produce a similar-looking drop-off in any recent segment.

Filing trend: a 2018 peak, then a real pullback010203040312017372018201920202021202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

IPC composition: one dominant class, several thinner adjacents

H05B appears in 99.0% of the 502 records, confirming that almost every filing touches the core lighting-circuit class regardless of its other claims. Below that, F21V (8.8%), F21Y (6.6%), F21S (5.8%), G09G (5.8%) and H02M (5.8%) each cover a modest slice, while H01L (4.0%) and B60Q (2.6%) are the thinnest — semiconductor-device integration and vehicle-lighting application are claimed far less often than the core circuit itself.

IPC composition: one dominant class, several thinner adjacentsH05B · Electric heating & lighting ci…49799.0%F21V · Lighting device components448.8%F21Y · Light-source form (index)336.6%F21S · Non-portable lighting devices295.8%G09G · Display control circuits295.8%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)295.8%H01L · Semiconductor devices204.0%B60Q · Vehicle lighting & signalling132.6%Other9719.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 502 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Constant-Current LED Driver Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Constant-Current LED Driver Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about constant-current led driver patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Filing
US9622303B12017-04-11

US9622303B1 — Current mirror and constant-current LED driver system for constant-current LED driver IC device

NXP B.V.

Embodiments of a current mirror for a constant-current light-emitting diode (LED) driver system and a constant-current LED driver integrated circuit (IC) device having the current mirror are described. In one embodiment, a current mirror includes at least one current mirror cell. Each of the at least one current mirror cell includes semiconductor circuits configured to generate an output current based on a reference current and a control module configured to alternately and continuously charge the semiconductor circuits in response to non-overlapping clock signals.Filed by NXP B.V., published 2017-04-11. Claims a specific current-mirror-cell architecture using alternating, non-overlapping clock signals rather than the current-regulation concept broadly.

US9622303B1 — patent drawing 1US9622303B1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20100231136A1Line voltage dimmable constant current LED driver150
2US20110080111A1Configurable load control device for light-emitting diode light sources145
3US6980181B2LED drive circuit116
4US8492988B2Configurable load control device for light-emitting diode light sources103
5CN101668369A一种高效率恒流LED驱动器97
6US20020105373A1LED drive circuit96
7CN102076138A一种市电输入LED恒流驱动器91
8EP2315497A1An LED driver circuit having headroom/dropout voltage control and power factor correction81
9US7439945B1Light emitting diode driver circuit with high-speed pulse width modulated current control78
10US7042165B2Driver circuit for LED vehicle lamp73

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside this searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Constant-Current LED Driver Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the same dataset, aimed at where to file, who to watch, and what claim space is still open.

Concentration
11.8%
of 502 records held by the top 5 assignees

No single company controls the core circuit

The ranked leader holds 16 records out of 502, and the combined top 5 account for just 11.8% of all records in scope. That is a long tail rather than a chokepoint: useful for a new entrant, because it means the current-regulation art is not locked up by one or two players, but it also means prior art is scattered across many small filers rather than concentrated where a single search would find it.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Filing momentum
-71%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Volume has genuinely cooled, not just lagged

The drop from 14 filings in 2021 to 4 in 2024 is a comparison between two years both old enough to be considered complete, so it is a real decline rather than a publication-lag artefact. Combined with a 2018 peak of 37, the shape is a technology that filed heavily through the late 2010s and has since slowed — worth checking against your own roadmap before assuming this space is still accelerating.

2021-2024 window, hero trend card
Claim geography
99.0% H05B
share of records carrying the core lighting-circuit class

The circuit class is universal; everything else is a layer

Almost every record in scope touches H05B, so differentiation happens in the secondary classes: power conversion (H02M, 5.8%), display control (G09G, 5.8%), or vehicle lighting (B60Q, 2.6%). A claim strategy that only targets the core circuit is filing into the most crowded part of the field; the thinner adjacents are where narrower, more defensible claims are still available.

IPC composition, 502 records
Filing geography
234 CN filings
vs. 115 US, 48 KR, 30 EP, 21 PCT, 13 IN

China leads receiving-office volume by a wide margin

China accounts for the largest single share of receiving-office filings, with the United States and South Korea next. Anyone assessing freedom-to-operate risk should weight a China-first search accordingly, since a US-only or EP-only clearance search would miss most of the corpus.

Receiving office data
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to constant-current led driver patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Where filers cluster together
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Inventronics (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.YAO XIAOLI1
Inventronics (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.REN LIJUN1
Inventronics (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.HUA GUICHAO1
Inventronics (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.GE LIANGAN1
Molex IncorporatedBLOUNT CHRISTOPHER1

Co-assignee pairing is rare in this dataset — five pairs total, the strongest tied to a single Chinese driver-IC filer working with individual named inventors. That points to a field where most patenting happens inside one organisation rather than through joint ventures or cross-licensing partnerships.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Constant-Current LED Driver Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset behind this page can be queried further inside Patsnap Eureka for claim-level detail, freedom-to-operate checks, or a narrower slice by assignee or jurisdiction.

Check freedom-to-operate before filing

Run the current-mirror and dimming-control claim families against a specific driver topology to see which claims actually read on your design.

Explore in Eureka

Track the assignees still active post-2021

Filing volume dropped through 2024, but the ranked leaders did not all pull back equally — isolate which ones kept filing.

Explore in Eureka

Map the thinner IPC adjacents

B60Q and H01L carry the least claim density in this set; a targeted search there can surface narrower, less contested filing room.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Constant-Current LED Driver Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Questions practitioners ask about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Constant-Current LED Driver Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Constant-Current LED Driver Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole constant-current led driver patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.