https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/containers-and-orchestration-rootless-container-runtime-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Containers & Orchestration
Rootless container runtime patents: who is filing and where the claim space still sits open
Get a prior-art report on your approach
20
Published Records
-57%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
7
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (7 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the rootless container runtime patent record actually shows

Rootless container runtimes let container processes run without root privileges on the host, closing off a class of privilege-escalation risk that has made container security teams nervous since the technology went mainstream. The patent record here is small and recent: 20 published records in scope, with almost no activity before the filing burst that peaked in 2021. That size matters for how the data should be read — this is not a mature, deeply layered field like general container orchestration, it is a narrower slice where a handful of assignees have staked out early claims.

The technology composition leans heavily on core data-processing infrastructure claims (G06F) rather than niche application classes, and the assignee ranking shows one clear leader well ahead of a short tail of single- or double-digit filers. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the softening visible in 2025 and 2026 in the raw counts understates whatever filing activity is still working through the pipeline.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1EDGY BEES LTD8
  2. 2International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)5
  3. 3Siemens AG2
  4. 4Infinera Corporation2
  5. 5Cvidya (Amdocs)2
  6. 6IBM (China) Co., Ltd.1
  7. 7FIRST DRAFT LAW INC1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Containers & Orchestration: Rootless Container Runtime Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

The counts below cover all 20 published records in scope for the search string, spanning receiving offices in the United States, Israel, WIPO (PCT) filings and the EPO.

A short, sharp filing burst rather than sustained growth

Filings were essentially flat until 2021, when they reached a peak of 7 for the year. By 2024 — the most recent year that can be treated as complete given publication lag — the count had fallen to 3, a decline of 57% over that three-year window. Readers should not treat 2025 and 2026 figures as evidence of further decline; those years are still filling in.

A short, sharp filing burst rather than sustained growth024680201720182019202072021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in core data processing, with a vision-recognition overlap

G06F (electric digital data processing) appears in 90.0% of the 20 records in scope, making it the dominant classification by a wide margin. G06V (image/video recognition) overlaps in 35.0% of records, while G01C, G06K and G06N each appear in only 5.0% — a single record apiece — marking those as thin, exploratory branches rather than established claim territory.

Concentrated in core data processing, with a vision-recognition overlapG06F · Electric digital data processi…1890.0%G06V · Image/video recognition735.0%G01C · Distance, navigation & gyrosco…15.0%G06K · Data recognition & presentation15.0%G06N · Computing based on AI models15.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 20 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Containers & Orchestration: Rootless Container Runtime Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Containers & Orchestration: Rootless Container Runtime Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about containers & orchestration: rootless container runtime patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative filing
US12487844B22025-12-02

US12487844B2 — Image management for container runtimes

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION

The patent covers an approach for managing container images across runtimes: a first image is downloaded from an image repository, its content data and management data are extracted and separated, and both are stored in an image-sharing file system only when the content data is not already present there. Where the content data is already stored, only the management data is written, avoiding duplicate storage of shared image layers.Filed by International Business Machines Corporation, published 2025-12-02.

US12487844B2 — patent drawing 1US12487844B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2024042508A1Geosynchronization of an aerial image using localizing multiple features147
2WO2022074643A1Improving geo-registration using machine-learning based object identification125
3US20240020968A1Improving geo-registration using machine-learning based object identification101
4US20220374282A1Container runtime optimization10
5US20220398081A1Distroless microservice for small footprint targets4
6EP4099163A1Method and system for detecting and eliminating vulnerabilities in individual file system layers of a contain…4
7US20260133051A1Geosynchronization of an aerial image using localizing multiple features3
8US20250259069A1Systems and methods for secure, segregated reversible machine learning ai2
9WO2022253537A1Method and system for identifying and addressing vulnerabilities in individual file system layers of a contai…2
10US11900173B2Container runtime optimization2

Citation counts favour older filings inside any searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on later work, not as a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Containers & Orchestration: Rootless Container Runtime Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

Reading the leaderboard and the technology mix together

Three figures from this dataset matter more than the raw counts on their own: how far ahead the leader sits, how the claim space splits by classification, and how citation weight concentrates in a small number of records.

Assignee concentration
8 vs 2
leader vs fifth place

One clear leader, a thin tail behind it

The ranked field covers 7 companies. The leading assignee holds 8 records while the fifth-ranked company holds only 2, indicating that most of the ranked group has filed in the low single digits. This is a small enough field that a new entrant with a well-drafted claim can still shape the landscape.

Based on the 7-company assignee ranking
Filing momentum
7 → 3
2021 peak to 2024

A burst year, not a steady climb

Filings peaked at 7 in 2021 and had dropped to 3 by 2024, a 57% decline across that span. That pattern is consistent with an early land-grab followed by consolidation onto fewer, more considered filings rather than a technology losing relevance.

2021–2024 filing count, publication-lag adjusted
Technology mix
90.0%
of 20 records classed G06F

Claims sit in core infrastructure, not niche applications

Nine in ten of the 20 records in scope carry a G06F classification, covering core electric digital data processing. The 35.0% overlap into G06V image recognition suggests a secondary cluster of filings tying container runtimes to vision or edge-inference workloads, while G01C, G06K and G06N remain single-record branches.

IPC subclass shares, records may carry multiple classes
Citation weight
147 citations
top-cited record

Citation weight sits outside the core runtime claims

The most-cited records in this corpus are geo-registration and aerial-imaging filings, not core container-runtime patents; the highest-cited runtime-specific record, a container runtime optimization filing, carries 10 citations. That gap is a reminder that citation counts here measure influence within a broader searched corpus, not importance to rootless runtime design specifically.

Citation counts across most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to containers & orchestration: rootless container runtime patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Containers & Orchestration: Rootless Container Runtime Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The figures above describe what has already been filed. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper into the specific claims and the white space around them.

Map the claim language around the leader's portfolio

The leading assignee's 8 records are the natural starting point for a design-around review, since they set the boundary the rest of the ranked field is filing around.

Explore the portfolio in Eureka

Check the thin branches before committing a filing strategy

G01C, G06K and G06N each hold a single record. A claim drafted precisely in one of these branches faces far less prior art than one filed into the crowded G06F space.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Watch for the 2025–2026 filings still working through publication

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent two years in this dataset understate real activity. Recheck this landscape once those cohorts have caught up.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Containers & Orchestration: Rootless Container Runtime Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about rootless container runtime patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Containers & Orchestration: Rootless Container Runtime Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Containers & Orchestration: Rootless Container Runtime Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole containers & orchestration: rootless container runtime patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.