https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/continuous-casting-mould-behaviour-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Continuous Casting
Continuous Casting Mould Behaviour Patents: Who Leads and Where Filings Are Slowing
  • Concentrated at the top. The five most active filers account for 64.4% of all 191 records in scope, and the top ten reach 79.6%.
  • Filing momentum has cooled. Filings fell from 6 in 2021 to 2 in 2024, a 67% drop over that span, though 2025-26 figures are still filling in.
  • Almost everything sits in one class. 93.7% of records carry the B22D metal-casting classification, leaving alloy (C22C) and heat-treatment (C21D) claims comparatively thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
191
Published Records
64%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-67%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
JP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (6 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 191 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent set covers

This landscape tracks patent filings and publications addressing continuous casting mould behaviour: initial shell formation, mould flux chemistry, oscillation marks, heat flux profiles, copper plate wear and mould taper design. The search combines mould/mold construction terms with the specific behavioural and defect terms practitioners use to describe what happens at the meniscus and along the copper plate during solidification. It captures 191 records published between 2015 and mid-2026.

The scope favours process and equipment claims over pure metallurgy: a record needs both a mould-side term and a behavioural or defect term to qualify, which is why the technology composition below is dominated by B22D casting classifications rather than alloy composition classes.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1KAWASAKI STEEL CORP30
  2. 2POHANG IRON & STEEL CO LTD26
  3. 3JFE STEEL CORP25
  4. 4ABB AB21
  5. 5NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION21
  6. 6NIPPON STEEL STAINLESS STEEL CORP11
  7. 7MITSUBISHI MATERIALS CORP5
  8. 8NISSHIN STEEL CO LTD5
  9. 9FOSECO INTERNATIONAL LTD4
  10. 10THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIV OF ILLINOIS4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Casting Mould Behaviour covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Annual filing counts and IPC subclass distribution across the 191 records in scope, drawn from publication dates rather than priority dates.

Filings by year

Activity peaked in 2018 at 10 filings. The 2021-to-2024 window shows a clear pullback, from 6 down to 2, a 67% decline over three years. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent bars understate real activity.

Filings by year03581072017102018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

B22D (metal casting) appears on 93.7% of the 191 records, confirming this is fundamentally a casting-process dataset. C22C (alloys) reaches 14.1%, and the remaining subclasses -- heat treatment, material testing, metal extraction, rolling and steelmaking -- each sit under 4%. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to well over 100%.

Technology composition by IPC subclassB22D · Metal casting17993.7%C22C · Alloys2714.1%C21D · Heat treatment of metals73.7%G01N · Material analysis & testing52.6%C22B · Metal extraction & refining42.1%B21B · Metal rolling31.6%B22B21.0%C21C · Steelmaking21.0%Other115.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 191 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Casting Mould Behaviour covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Continuous Casting Mould Behaviour with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about continuous casting mould behaviour and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US8210238B22012-07-03

US8210238B2 -- Continuous casting machine and method using molten mold flux

POSCO CO., LTD

A continuous casting machine and method using molten mold flux, wherein the continuous casting machine includes a mold cover for covering an upper portion of a mold; a mold flux melting unit for melting mold flux to be supplied into the mold; and a mold flux delivery unit for supplying the mold with the molten mold flux melted in the mold flux melting unit, wherein the delivery unit includes an injection tube with one end connected to the mold flux melting unit and the other end positioned in the mold through the mold cover, and an injection tube heater for heating the injection tube.Filed by POSCO CO., LTD, published 2012-07-03.

US8210238B2 — patent drawing 1US8210238B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20090084517A1Cooling control system for continuous casting of metal45
2US20050133192A1Tundish control28
3US5579824AContinuous casting process with vertical mold oscillation17
4EP0372506A2Method for oscillation of mold of vertical continuous caster17
5US3620290ALubricants for continuous metal-casting operations15
6JP1986092756AContinuous casting method of preventing surface cracking of ingot and casting mold14
7WO2005062846A2Tundish control13
8US20050045303A1Method for producing ultra low carbon steel slab13
9JP1990290656AMethod for oscillating mold for vertical type continuous casting13
10US4460034AMold for continuous casting13

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus rather than of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Casting Mould Behaviour covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern tells you

Three observations that follow directly from the assignee, class and trend data above.

Concentration
64.4% of 191 records
held by top 5 filers

A small group holds most of the claim space

The five most active assignees account for 64.4% of all 191 records, and that share climbs to 79.6% once the next five are added. For a new entrant, this means the core casting-process claims -- mould construction, flux delivery, oscillation control -- are already dense with prior art from a handful of steelmakers and equipment suppliers.

Ranking covers 59 companies total.
Momentum
-67% (2021-2024)
filings, 2021 to 2024

Filing activity has pulled back from its 2018 peak

After peaking at 10 filings in 2018, output declined to 6 by 2021 and to 2 by 2024, a 67% drop over that three-year window. Recent-year momentum tables for individual leaders show several dropping to zero filings in the latest tracked year, though 2025-26 counts are still filling in as publications catch up to filing dates.

Peak year: 2018 at 10 filings.
Technology Mix
93.7% B22D
of 191 records

Claims cluster tightly in one casting subclass

B22D (metal casting) touches 93.7% of the 191 records in scope, while alloy composition (C22C) reaches only 14.1% and heat treatment (C21D) just 3.7%. That imbalance suggests the mechanical and process side of mould behaviour is heavily claimed, while composition-side and post-cast treatment angles have drawn far less attention from filers in this dataset.

Shares sum above 100% because records can carry multiple IPC classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to continuous casting mould behaviour, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Casting Mould Behaviour covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is open

Assignee activity here spans integrated steelmakers, foundry-supply specialists and a smaller set of research and equipment entities, with a long tail of single or occasional filers behind the leaders.

Leader
30 records
top-ranked assignee

One filer sets the pace

The top-ranked assignee holds 30 of the 191 records in scope, well ahead of fifth place at 21 and tenth place at 4. That gap between first and fifth suggests a genuine leader rather than a tightly bunched group at the very top.

Fifth place: 21 records. Tenth place: 4 records.
Long Tail
59 companies ranked
in the assignee ranking

A wide base of occasional filers

Below the leaders, the ranking spreads across 59 companies, many holding only a handful of records each. This is typical of a mature process area: the core mechanics are established, and later entrants patent narrower refinements rather than foundational equipment.

Ranking is the complete set returned for this dataset, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
identified

Co-filing is limited and mostly bilateral

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest of these recur just two or three times. Joint filing is not a major pattern here; most records carry a single corporate assignee, sometimes alongside a named individual inventor.

Strongest pairs recur 2-3 times each.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas to watch
Branches with thin representation relative to the core B22D casting claims, based on the IPC composition above.
Mould flux-to-alloy interaction claimsPost-cast heat treatment couplingIn-mould material analysis/sensingCopper plate wear diagnosticsTaper design for non-standard alloys
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Kawasaki Steel Corporation0
Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (POSCO)0
JFE Steel Corporation0-100%
ASEA Brown Boveri (ABB)0
Nippon Steel Corporation0
Nippon Steel Stainless Steel Corporation0
Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd.0
Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Casting Mould Behaviour covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for a filing angle.

Map the leader's claim boundaries

With one assignee holding 30 of 191 records, understanding exactly what its core mould-construction and flux-delivery claims cover is the first step before drafting anywhere near this space.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

Composition-side and post-cast treatment classes sit well below the dominant B22D share, suggesting room for narrower, defensible claims rather than head-on competition with core casting-process patents.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing activity

Filings dropped 67% between 2021 and 2024, but publication lag means 2025-26 data is still incomplete. Re-checking this trend in a future cut will show whether the pullback is real or an artifact of the reporting lag.

Track filing trends in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Casting Mould Behaviour covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Casting Mould Behaviour covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Continuous Casting Mould Behaviour in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole continuous casting mould behaviour corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.