Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (6 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 191 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks patent filings and publications addressing continuous casting mould behaviour: initial shell formation, mould flux chemistry, oscillation marks, heat flux profiles, copper plate wear and mould taper design. The search combines mould/mold construction terms with the specific behavioural and defect terms practitioners use to describe what happens at the meniscus and along the copper plate during solidification. It captures 191 records published between 2015 and mid-2026.
The scope favours process and equipment claims over pure metallurgy: a record needs both a mould-side term and a behavioural or defect term to qualify, which is why the technology composition below is dominated by B22D casting classifications rather than alloy composition classes.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Annual filing counts and IPC subclass distribution across the 191 records in scope, drawn from publication dates rather than priority dates.
Activity peaked in 2018 at 10 filings. The 2021-to-2024 window shows a clear pullback, from 6 down to 2, a 67% decline over three years. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent bars understate real activity.
B22D (metal casting) appears on 93.7% of the 191 records, confirming this is fundamentally a casting-process dataset. C22C (alloys) reaches 14.1%, and the remaining subclasses -- heat treatment, material testing, metal extraction, rolling and steelmaking -- each sit under 4%. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to well over 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 191 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about continuous casting mould behaviour and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA continuous casting machine and method using molten mold flux, wherein the continuous casting machine includes a mold cover for covering an upper portion of a mold; a mold flux melting unit for melting mold flux to be supplied into the mold; and a mold flux delivery unit for supplying the mold with the molten mold flux melted in the mold flux melting unit, wherein the delivery unit includes an injection tube with one end connected to the mold flux melting unit and the other end positioned in the mold through the mold cover, and an injection tube heater for heating the injection tube.Filed by POSCO CO., LTD, published 2012-07-03.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20090084517A1 | Cooling control system for continuous casting of metal | 45 |
| 2 | US20050133192A1 | Tundish control | 28 |
| 3 | US5579824A | Continuous casting process with vertical mold oscillation | 17 |
| 4 | EP0372506A2 | Method for oscillation of mold of vertical continuous caster | 17 |
| 5 | US3620290A | Lubricants for continuous metal-casting operations | 15 |
| 6 | JP1986092756A | Continuous casting method of preventing surface cracking of ingot and casting mold | 14 |
| 7 | WO2005062846A2 | Tundish control | 13 |
| 8 | US20050045303A1 | Method for producing ultra low carbon steel slab | 13 |
| 9 | JP1990290656A | Method for oscillating mold for vertical type continuous casting | 13 |
| 10 | US4460034A | Mold for continuous casting | 13 |
Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus rather than of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three observations that follow directly from the assignee, class and trend data above.
The five most active assignees account for 64.4% of all 191 records, and that share climbs to 79.6% once the next five are added. For a new entrant, this means the core casting-process claims -- mould construction, flux delivery, oscillation control -- are already dense with prior art from a handful of steelmakers and equipment suppliers.
After peaking at 10 filings in 2018, output declined to 6 by 2021 and to 2 by 2024, a 67% drop over that three-year window. Recent-year momentum tables for individual leaders show several dropping to zero filings in the latest tracked year, though 2025-26 counts are still filling in as publications catch up to filing dates.
B22D (metal casting) touches 93.7% of the 191 records in scope, while alloy composition (C22C) reaches only 14.1% and heat treatment (C21D) just 3.7%. That imbalance suggests the mechanical and process side of mould behaviour is heavily claimed, while composition-side and post-cast treatment angles have drawn far less attention from filers in this dataset.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to continuous casting mould behaviour, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee activity here spans integrated steelmakers, foundry-supply specialists and a smaller set of research and equipment entities, with a long tail of single or occasional filers behind the leaders.
The top-ranked assignee holds 30 of the 191 records in scope, well ahead of fifth place at 21 and tenth place at 4. That gap between first and fifth suggests a genuine leader rather than a tightly bunched group at the very top.
Below the leaders, the ranking spreads across 59 companies, many holding only a handful of records each. This is typical of a mature process area: the core mechanics are established, and later entrants patent narrower refinements rather than foundational equipment.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest of these recur just two or three times. Joint filing is not a major pattern here; most records carry a single corporate assignee, sometimes alongside a named individual inventor.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Kawasaki Steel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (POSCO) | 0 | — |
| JFE Steel Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| ASEA Brown Boveri (ABB) | 0 | — |
| Nippon Steel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Nippon Steel Stainless Steel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for a filing angle.
With one assignee holding 30 of 191 records, understanding exactly what its core mould-construction and flux-delivery claims cover is the first step before drafting anywhere near this space.
Explore assignee claims in EurekaComposition-side and post-cast treatment classes sit well below the dominant B22D share, suggesting room for narrower, defensible claims rather than head-on competition with core casting-process patents.
Run a white-space search in EurekaFilings dropped 67% between 2021 and 2024, but publication lag means 2025-26 data is still incomplete. Re-checking this trend in a future cut will show whether the pullback is real or an artifact of the reporting lag.
Track filing trends in EurekaOne assignee leads with 30 of the 191 records in this dataset, noticeably ahead of the fifth-ranked filer at 21. The five most active assignees combined account for 64.4% of all records, and the top ten reach 79.6%. This is a concentrated field: a small group of integrated steelmakers and equipment suppliers controls most of the documented claim space, and the remaining activity is spread thinly across 59 ranked companies in total.
Filings peaked at 10 in 2018 and have since pulled back, falling from 6 in 2021 to 2 in 2024 -- a 67% decline over that three-year window. That said, publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete and should not be read as confirmation of a continued slowdown. The safest read is that the field cooled through the early 2020s relative to its 2018 peak, with the very latest trend still unresolved.
US8210238B2, assigned to POSCO, covers a continuous casting machine and method that delivers molten mould flux directly into the mould through a heated injection tube, rather than adding solid flux that melts in place. Key elements include a mould cover, a separate flux-melting unit, and an injection tube with its own heater. For anyone designing a flux-delivery system, the claims are most relevant if your design also melts flux externally and delivers it through a covered, heated conduit into the mould cavity; delivery mechanisms that add flux in solid form at the meniscus sit outside this specific claim structure.
Relative to the dominant B22D metal-casting classification, which touches 93.7% of the 191 records, classes like heat treatment (C21D, 3.7%), material analysis and testing (G01N, 2.6%), and metal extraction and refining (C22B, 2.1%) are comparatively thin. Practically, this points to under-claimed territory around post-cast heat treatment coupled to mould conditions, in-mould sensing and diagnostics, and flux-alloy interaction claims -- areas adjacent to the core casting mechanics but not yet heavily occupied.
Highly concentrated at the top and long-tailed below it. The leading assignee holds 30 records, the top five combined hold 64.4% of all 191 records in scope, and the top ten hold 79.6%. Below that, the ranking extends to 59 companies, many with only a handful of filings each, which is typical of a process technology area where the foundational mechanics were established early and later filers patent narrower refinements.
Go past this page: query the whole continuous casting mould behaviour corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.