Book a demo

CEMS Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

CEMS Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/continuous-emission-monitoring-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Process Analytics
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Patents: Leaders, Filing Trends and Open Claim Space
  • Concentrated but not locked up. The top 5 assignees hold 32.1% of all 386 records in scope, and the top 10 hold 44.6% — leaving more than half the field to a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2022 peak. Filings peaked at 34 in 2022; the 2021→2024 span shows a 17% decline (23 to 19), though 2025-2026 figures are still filling in as publications lag filing.
  • Control and data layers now outweigh the sensor itself. G05B control systems (22.5%), G06Q data processing (19.2%) and G06N AI-based computing (10.9%) together touch more records than combustion control (F23N, 7.8%), pointing to where the claim activity has moved.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
386
Published Records
32%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-17%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (23 records) with 2024 (19) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 386 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the CEMS patent record actually shows

Continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) patenting spans a hardware core — extractive sampling, dilution probes, stack gas analyzers — and an increasingly software-heavy shell built around calibration drift checks, availability requirements and data acquisition. The 386 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, giving a decade-plus view of how claim activity has shifted from analytical hardware toward control logic and reporting infrastructure.

Filing offices skew toward China and the United States, with meaningful volume also routed through the EPO, PCT and India, which signals a technology still being filed for multi-jurisdiction industrial and regulatory compliance markets rather than a single home market.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1STRONG FORCE IOT PORTFOLIO 2016 LLC68
  2. 2SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO20
  3. 3AUGURY SYSTEMS LTD13
  4. 4GOYEN CONTROLS CO PTY LTD12
  5. 5EXERGETIC SYST11
  6. 6ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL INC11
  7. 7APPLIED MATERIALS INC10
  8. 8EVONIK SUPERABSORBER LLC9
  9. 9PASON SYST9
  10. 10TAIYUAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 386-record dataset: the pace of filing over time, and where those filings sit across the IPC classification system.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 19 in 2017 to a peak of 34 in 2022, then eased to 19 by 2024 (a 17% decline from 2021's 23) before the still-incomplete 2025-2026 count of 10, which understates true recent activity because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.

Filing trend, 2017-20260102030401920172018201920202021342022202320242025102026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition across 8 subclasses

G01N material analysis and testing leads at 37.3% of records, followed by G05B control systems at 22.5% and G06Q business/data processing at 19.2%. Records commonly carry more than one class, so these shares sum to well over 100% of the 386-record base — the overlap itself shows how tightly sensing, control and data reporting are now claimed together.

IPC composition across 8 subclassesG01N · Material analysis & testing14437.3%G05B · Control & regulating systems8722.5%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…7419.2%H04L · Digital information transmissi…5113.2%G06F · Electric digital data processi…4812.4%G06N · Computing based on AI models4210.9%G01D · Measuring (general) & recording318.0%F23N · Combustion control307.8%Other35993.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 386 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about continuous emission monitoring systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A representative claim and the most-cited records

Representative Record
US5596154A1997-01-21

US5596154A — Dilution control method and apparatus

ENVIROPLAN, INC.

An apparatus and method for maintaining a constant dilution ratio for a dilution probe used in a continuous emission monitoring system. The apparatus includes a regulator for regulating the flow of dilution gas to the probe, a mechanism for measuring changes in gas density of the emission gas and a mechanism for determining an adjusted flow rate for the dilution gas based on the measured changes in gas density to control the dilution ratio.Filed by Enviroplan, Inc.; granted 1997-01-21. One of the earliest dilution-probe control patents in the dataset and a frequent reference point for later drift-compensation claims.

US5596154A — patent drawing 1US5596154A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20200348662A1Platform for facilitating development of intelligence in an industrial internet of things system732
2US20210157312A1Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and methods for industrial environments715
3US20220108262A1Industrial digital twin systems and methods with echelons of executive, advisory and operations messaging and…386
4CN104655495A一种煤岩高温高压真三轴压裂渗流试验装置与试验方法280
5WO2021108680A1Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and methods for industrial environments210
6US20230176550A1Quantum, biological, computer vision, and neural network systems for industrial internet of things176
7WO2020227429A1Platform for facilitating development of intelligence in an industrial internet of things system163
8US20060053791A1Method and apparatus for the production of energy145
9US6455851B1Spectroscopic remote sensing exhaust emission monitoring system142
10WO2022236064A2Quantum, biological, computer vision, and neural network systems for industrial internet of things121

Citation counts favour older filings inside any searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting a new claim or scoping freedom-to-operate.

Concentration
32.1% / 44.6%
Top 5 / Top 10 share of 386 records

The top of the field is dense, the rest is open

With the leader alone holding 68 records and the field dropping to 11 by fifth place and 9 by tenth, the concentration is front-loaded rather than evenly spread. Below the top 10, claim space thins out quickly across the remaining 90 ranked assignees.

Useful for scoping who to monitor versus who to design around.
Momentum
-17% (2021→2024)
Filing change, complete years only

Growth has cooled from the 2022 peak

The 2022 peak of 34 filings has not been sustained; the 2021-2024 comparison shows a 17% pullback. Treat 2025-2026 counts as provisional, since publication lag means recent-year activity is still being filed in.

Do not read the tail years as proof of a shrinking field.
Composition
37.3% G01N
Share of 386 records

Sensing still leads, but control and software are catching up

Material analysis and testing (G01N) remains the largest single class, but G05B control systems, G06Q data processing and G06N AI-based computing collectively cover a comparable share of records, showing claims have broadened beyond the analyzer itself into how readings are controlled, reported and modelled.

Drafting strategy should account for overlap across these classes, not treat them as separate silos.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to continuous emission monitoring systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked leaders span industrial IoT platforms, oil and gas majors, analytical instrument makers and process-control specialists — a mix that reflects CEMS's position at the intersection of environmental compliance and industrial data infrastructure.

Leader
68 records
Leading assignee

One clear leader, then a sharp drop-off

The leading assignee's 68 records dwarf the fifth-place count of 11, indicating a single large filer has built a substantial position while the rest of the top 10 compete much closer together.

Recent-year momentum for this leader has slowed sharply year-on-year.
Tail
90 of 100 ranked
Below the top 10

A long tail of narrow filers

The ranking runs to 100 companies total, and beyond the top 10's 44.6% combined share, the remainder file in small numbers — often single records — spanning universities, regional utilities and instrument specialists.

This is where freedom-to-operate searches need the most manual review, not less.
Geography
China 107 · US 97
Leading receiving offices

Filing is split across two primary markets

China and the United States lead receiving-office counts, with the EPO, WIPO/PCT, India and Australia each carrying a meaningful secondary share — consistent with a technology tied to national emissions-compliance regimes as much as to any single manufacturing base.

Multi-office filing strategy should be assumed for any serious competitor here.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth watching
Sub-areas where filing density is lower relative to the compliance and monitoring workload they cover
calibration drift auto-compensationAI-based emissions data validationmulti-pollutant dilution ratio controlavailability-requirement reporting automationedge analytics for stack gas data
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Strong Force IOT Portfolio 2016 LLC1-67%
Saudi Arabian Oil Co (Saudi Aramco)0
Augury Systems Ltd0
Goyen Controls Co Pty Ltd0
Exergetic Systems0
LANG FRED D0
Rosemount Analytical Inc0
Applied Materials Inc0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or competitor tracking.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on the leader's portfolio

With 68 records concentrated in one assignee, any new dilution-probe or drift-compensation filing should be checked against that portfolio specifically before drafting claims.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Scope claims in the under-claimed control-and-data overlap

G05B, G06Q and G06N classes show rising overlap with core G01N sensing claims but lower absolute density than the sensing core itself, suggesting room for narrowly-scoped control or AI-validation claims.

Map white space in Eureka

Track momentum, not just headcount

Several formerly active filers show zero filings in the latest year; pair the ranking with year-on-year momentum before assuming a competitor is still active.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about CEMS patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole continuous emission monitoring systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.