Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (18) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 266 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Continuous flow chemistry replaces batch reactors with small-volume, high-surface-area channels that give tight control over residence time and heat transfer. Patent activity in this dataset spans microreactor hardware, scale-up ("numbering up") strategies, and in-line analytical methods, filtered to records that combine flow-reactor terminology with process-intensification language under the B01J, B01F and C07B classification codes. The result is a corpus weighted toward equipment and process claims rather than the specific molecules made inside them.
266 patent families were published across the window, concentrated overwhelmingly in chemical and physical process claims (IPC B01J) rather than in any single downstream chemistry. Filing offices skew toward the United States and Europe, with China and WIPO PCT filings forming a secondary tier — a pattern consistent with a technology still largely controlled by process-equipment specialists rather than commodity chemical producers.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 266-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings split across the IPC subclasses that define the field's technical scope.
Filings rose to 37 in 2018, the high point of the window, then settled to a midpoint of 17 by 2022 — flat-to-declining momentum rather than a growth curve. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the final year or two in any such trend understates true activity, but the multi-year plateau before that lag effect kicks in is real.
B01J (chemical/physical processes and catalysis) appears in 243 of 266 families, far ahead of C07C (92), C07B (60) and C07D (40). Mixing/stirring apparatus (B01F, 20) and lab-scale apparatus (B01L, 14) are minor but present, indicating claim activity is anchored in reactor and process hardware rather than in any single class of reaction chemistry.
Shares are the percentage of the 266 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about continuous flow chemistry and microreactors and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA process for the preparation of 3-methacryloxypropyldimethylchlorosilane by reacting allylmethacrylate with dimethylchlorosilane over a hydrosilylation catalyst, run in the absence of a peroxide. Separate feed streams of the two reactants contact inside a continuous flow reactor in the presence of catalyst, and product is drawn off continuously rather than in batch.Filed by GEO Specialty Chemicals UK Limited, 2017-07-13.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5580523A | Integrated chemical synthesizers | 592 |
| 2 | US6399031B1 | Continuous flow reactor having a plurality of alternating bends | 113 |
| 3 | WO1995026796A1 | Integrated chemical synthesizers | 109 |
| 4 | US6765113B2 | Production of aromatic carboxylic acids | 107 |
| 5 | US6828143B1 | Nanoscale chemical synthesis | 92 |
| 6 | US20170064949A1 | Performic acid on-site generator and formulator | 62 |
| 7 | WO1997038955A1 | Supercritical hydrogenation | 51 |
| 8 | US20050042149A1 | Nanoscale chemical synthesis | 50 |
| 9 | US6156933A | Supercritical hydrogenation | 37 |
| 10 | WO2002006201A1 | Production of aromatic carboxylic acids | 34 |
Citation counts reflect the searched corpus and favour older filings; a high count signals influence on later filers, not present-day commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the filing pattern, IPC mix and citation structure — useful for deciding where a freedom-to-operate search needs to go deep versus where it can move quickly.
The peak year (2018, 37 families) sits well ahead of the 2022 midpoint (17), and momentum tracking shows several of the most active historical assignees at zero filings in the latest tracked year. This is a mature filing pattern rather than an emerging one.
With B01J present in the large majority of families and organic-synthesis classes (C07C, C07B, C07D) each appearing in a minority, the claim space is weighted toward apparatus and process-condition claims rather than toward specific reaction chemistries run through the equipment.
The most-cited record in the corpus predates the bulk of the filing window and concerns integrated chemical synthesizers broadly, not a narrow reaction. Later filers are citing back to this foundational architecture rather than displacing it with newer core designs.
The United States and the European Patent Office together receive more filings than China, India and Australia combined, consistent with continuous flow expertise concentrated among specialty process-equipment and fine-chemical firms headquartered in those regions.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to continuous flow chemistry and microreactors, with the prior art for and against each one.
Co-filing patterns point to a small number of durable research partnerships rather than a broad, fragmented field. Recent-year momentum, however, shows even the most active historical filers pulling back.
The strongest co-assignee pair in the corpus links a national research organisation with an industrial partner, appearing together 13 times — evidence of a sustained joint R&D programme rather than opportunistic co-filing.
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year, with some recording a full -100% year-on-year drop. Given the ~18-month publication lag, this understates true activity, but the pattern across the whole leaderboard is consistent enough to note.
At 266 families, this is not a crowded landscape by the standards of high-filing categories, and the co-filing structure suggests activity is concentrated among a handful of research-institute and specialty-chemical pairings rather than spread across many independent filers.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas Swan & Co. Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) | 0 | -100% |
| Corning Incorporated | 0 | -100% |
| Shanghai Huihe Huade Biotechnology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) | 0 | — |
| The Boeing Company | 0 | — |
| E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company | 0 | — |
| Degussa AG | 0 | — |
The landscape points to where claim density is heavy and where it thins out. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision needs a closer read of the specific claims involved.
With 243 of 266 families touching this subclass, any new reactor or process-condition design should be checked against the dense B01J claim set before development spend, not after.
Explore B01J prior art in EurekaIn-line analytics, numbering-up manifolds and multi-phase microreactors show lighter filing density than core reactor hardware — worth a targeted search against your specific process.
Search white space in EurekaIn this dataset, a record is captured when it combines flow-reactor terminology (continuous flow reactor, microreactor synthesis) with process-intensification language such as residence time, heat transfer, or scale-up numbering up, under IPC codes B01J19, B01F33 or C07B61. A batch process patent that happens to mention heat transfer would not qualify unless it also claims a continuous flow configuration. The distinction matters for freedom-to-operate work because many chemistries are claimed in both batch and flow variants by different assignees.
Filings rose to 37 in 2018, the high point of this window, then eased to a midpoint of 17 by 2022. This pattern is typical of a technology where the core reactor architectures — the equipment claims captured heavily under IPC B01J — were substantially staked out earlier in the decade, leaving later filers to compete for narrower process-condition or application-specific claims. Remember that publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one or two years in this trend will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be.
The most-cited record in this corpus, US5580523A on integrated chemical synthesizers, has accumulated 592 citations and predates most of the filing activity tracked here, making it a foundational reference rather than a recent filing. Beyond citation counts, co-assignee data shows a small number of durable pairings — most notably a national research organisation filing repeatedly alongside an industrial partner — pointing to sustained joint programmes rather than a single dominant commercial filer. A full assignee ranking with family counts is rendered separately on this page.
The IPC composition shows B01J (chemical and physical processes) present in the large majority of families, while related sub-areas — in-line analytics integration, numbering-up manifold design, multi-phase gas-liquid microreactors, and flow synthesis of heterocyclic compounds under C07D — appear far less often. That lighter density does not guarantee an easy filing, but it suggests these branches have not been as heavily claimed as core reactor hardware, making them worth a targeted prior-art search before committing to a design.
The filing trend and recent-year momentum data both point toward maturity rather than continued growth: the 2018 peak of 37 families has not been matched since, the 2022 midpoint of 17 is roughly half that, and every one of the top tracked assignees shows zero filings in the latest year. That said, the ~18-month publication lag means the very latest year understates real activity, and a moderate total of 266 families over the window is not so large that meaningful claim space is fully exhausted.
Go past this page: query the whole continuous flow chemistry and microreactors corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.