Controlled Atmosphere Storage Patents: Who Leads, Trends 2026
- Filing peaked in 2017 at 10 records and has not returned to that level since, though publication lag means the most recent year understates true filing activity.
- One leader holds 22 records against a fifth-place count of 8 and a tenth-place count of 1 — a steep drop-off after the top of a 14-company ranking.
- 83.8% of the 68 records sit in A23B food preservation while control-systems classes like G05D and sensing class G01N each cover under 6% — a narrow band of technical crowding next to open adjacent ground.
What this landscape covers
Controlled atmosphere storage for produce works by holding oxygen, carbon dioxide and sometimes ethylene within narrow bands inside a sealed room, slowing respiration and delaying ripening or spoilage. The patent activity captured here sits at the intersection of that storage practice and the instrumentation used to run it: oxygen setpoint control, chlorophyll fluorescence monitoring, room gas-tightness, storage-disorder detection, nitrogen generation and monitoring sensors. This is a specialised corner of postharvest technology, not the whole of cold-chain patenting.
68 published records fall within scope across the 2015-01-01 to 2026-07-31 window, ranked into 14 distinct assignees. The set is small enough that individual filings move the picture, and the newest year is a partial one, so any read on momentum has to account for the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 68 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.
Filing trend, 2017–2026
Filings ran at 10 in 2017, the peak observed in this dataset, and the trend since has not sustained that level. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the tail years — including the most recent, 2026 — will read lower than the eventual filed total once later publications catch up.
IPC subclass composition
A23B (food preservation) covers 83.8% of the 68 records, by far the densest single class. A23L (foods and beverages) follows at 27.9%, with B65D and B65B packaging classes each in the mid-teens. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, these shares add to more than 100% of the record total — that is expected and is the same denominator used in the chart.
Shares are the percentage of the 68 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Controlled Atmosphere Cold Storage of Produce with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about controlled atmosphere cold storage of produce and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records in this set
Dynamic controlled atmosphere method and apparatus
The present invention relates to a method and an apparatus for controlling the atmosphere in a space, in particular a closable space at least partially filled with agricultural or horticultural products. An optimal oxygen partial pressure and/or optimal temperature for storing produce is determined based on measurements of solely a carbon dioxide partial pressure.Filed by Federal University of Santa Maria; published 2022-09-08.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20120097050A1 | Dynamic control system and method for controlled atmosphere room | 51 |
| 2 | US20130013099A1 | Storage of respiratory produce | 41 |
| 3 | WO2011113915A1 | Storage of respiratory produce | 32 |
| 4 | WO2017198793A1 | Automatical in SITU control of the confined environment of metabolically active produce | 15 |
| 5 | US20120325086A1 | System and method of operation for controlled atmosphere storage | 14 |
| 6 | US20150257401A1 | Control apparatus for controlled atmosphere cells for storing perishable items | 12 |
| 7 | US20190216105A1 | Automatical in situ control of the confined environment of metabolically active produce | 10 |
| 8 | US20180220665A1 | Monitoring state of produce within transport containers | 10 |
| 9 | EP2918179A1 | Control apparatus for controlled atmosphere cells for storing perishable items | 9 |
| 10 | EP2547213B1 | Storage of respiratory produce | 8 |
Citation counts reward older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on the field's early framing, not as a measure of current commercial weight.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns worth acting on before drafting a new claim in this space.
One assignee dominates, then a steep drop
The leading assignee holds 22 records; by fifth place the count is already down to 8, and tenth place holds just 1. That is a landscape with a clear incumbent and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, rather than several evenly matched competitors.
Activity has not returned to its 2017 high
2017 is the peak year observed in this dataset at 10 filings. Later years run lower, though the most recent years are understated by the roughly 18-month gap between filing and publication, so the true recent trend is not yet fully visible.
Food-preservation claims are dense; control and sensing are thin
A23B food preservation covers 83.8% of the 68 records, but G05D (non-electric variable control), A01J, F24F and G01N each sit at 5.9% or below. Instrumentation and control-side claims are comparatively open relative to the core storage-method claim space.
Collaboration clusters around two research partnerships
The strongest co-assignee links pair Katholieke Universiteit Leuven with a Flemish postharvest research centre, appearing together on 13 and 12 records respectively across two name variants of that centre. A separate, smaller pairing links two individual inventors on 3 records.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to controlled atmosphere cold storage of produce, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee landscape
14 assignees make up the full ranking returned for this dataset — academic groups, an Italian storage-equipment maker, and individual inventors sit alongside each other, with no recorded filing activity from the tracked assignees in the latest year.
A university research group sets the pace
The top-ranked assignee in this set holds 22 records, well ahead of the field, much of it built jointly with a Flemish postharvest research centre it repeatedly co-files with.
A mid-tier of equipment and applied-research filers
Fifth place holds 8 records. This band includes equipment makers such as an Italian controlled-atmosphere room specialist alongside applied research groups, distinct from the academic leader above.
Single-filing entrants make up most of the ranking
By tenth place the count drops to a single record, and several named assignees — including university groups from Brazil and individual inventors — sit at this level, indicating narrow, defensive or one-off filing rather than sustained programs.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Katholieke Universiteit Leuven | 0 | — |
| VLAAMS CENT VOOR BEWARING VAN TUINBOUWPRODEN | 0 | — |
| MITSUBISHI AUSTRALIA | 0 | — |
| VLAAMS CENT VOOR BEWARING VAN TUINBOUWPRODUCTEN VZW | 0 | — |
| ISOLCELL | 0 | — |
| SCHAEFER JAMES C | 0 | — |
| UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA | 0 | — |
| VERLINDEN BERT | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a concentrated core and several thinner adjacent branches. Two directions are worth pursuing before committing drafting resources.
Map the incumbent's claim boundaries precisely
Before filing near the dense A23B core, pull the full claim scope of the leading assignee's family and its research-partner co-filings to see exactly where the oxygen-setpoint and gas-tightness claims stop.
Explore assignee claim maps in EurekaTest draft claims against the under-claimed branches
Sensing, control-system tie-ins and disorder-detection classes carry far fewer records than the core storage method — run a candidate claim through prior-art search on those specific subclasses before assuming freedom to operate.
Run a claim check in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
Within this 68-record dataset, one assignee — a university-linked research group — leads with 22 records, well ahead of the rest of the 14-company ranking. Much of that position comes from repeated co-filing with a Flemish postharvest research centre rather than a single large portfolio filed alone. Below the leader, counts fall quickly: fifth place holds 8 records and tenth place holds just 1, so the field is better described as one strong incumbent plus a long tail of smaller filers than as several evenly matched competitors.
The peak year observed is 2017, with 10 filings, and later years have not matched that level in the raw data. However, publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any dataset like this will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be once pending applications publish. There are not enough complete recent years in this set to state a reliable growth rate, so treat the recent-year numbers as a floor, not a final answer.
A23B, the core food-preservation class, covers 83.8% of the 68 records in scope, making it by far the most crowded area — most oxygen-setpoint and basic atmosphere-control claims sit here. Packaging classes B65D and B65B each cover under a fifth of records, and control- and sensing-related classes such as G05D, A01J, F24F and G01N each sit at 5.9% or below. That gap suggests instrumentation, control-system integration and disorder-detection methods are comparatively open relative to the core storage method itself.
US20220282883A1, filed by Federal University of Santa Maria and published 2022-09-08, describes a method and apparatus for controlling the atmosphere in a closed space holding agricultural or horticultural products, where an optimal oxygen partial pressure and/or temperature is derived solely from carbon dioxide partial pressure measurements. That single-sensor-input approach is the specific technical angle to check against before designing a control scheme that infers oxygen setpoints from CO2 readings alone. It is one of the more recent filings in this dataset and sits alongside several older, more heavily cited records on dynamic atmosphere control.
The leading assignee by record count is the university group holding 22 records, most built through sustained co-filing with a Flemish postharvest research centre — together they form the strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset, appearing on 13 and 12 joint records across two recorded name variants. An Italian controlled-atmosphere equipment maker also appears in the mid-tier of the ranking, representing the applied-equipment side rather than the academic-research side. None of the tracked assignees show recorded filings in the latest year, consistent with the broader publication-lag effect rather than a genuine stop in activity.
Research Controlled Atmosphere Cold Storage of Produce in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole controlled atmosphere cold storage of produce corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.