Book a demo

Controlled Atmosphere Storage Patents: Who Leads, Trends 2026

Controlled Atmosphere Storage Patents: Who Leads, Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/controlled-atmosphere-cold-storage-of-produce-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Postharvest Preservation
Controlled Atmosphere Cold Storage of Produce Patents
  • Filing peaked in 2017 at 10 records and has not returned to that level since, though publication lag means the most recent year understates true filing activity.
  • One leader holds 22 records against a fifth-place count of 8 and a tenth-place count of 1 — a steep drop-off after the top of a 14-company ranking.
  • 83.8% of the 68 records sit in A23B food preservation while control-systems classes like G05D and sensing class G01N each cover under 6% — a narrow band of technical crowding next to open adjacent ground.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
68
Published Records
EP
Leading Jurisdiction
14
Active Filers Ranked
2017
Peak Filing Year

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Controlled atmosphere storage for produce works by holding oxygen, carbon dioxide and sometimes ethylene within narrow bands inside a sealed room, slowing respiration and delaying ripening or spoilage. The patent activity captured here sits at the intersection of that storage practice and the instrumentation used to run it: oxygen setpoint control, chlorophyll fluorescence monitoring, room gas-tightness, storage-disorder detection, nitrogen generation and monitoring sensors. This is a specialised corner of postharvest technology, not the whole of cold-chain patenting.

68 published records fall within scope across the 2015-01-01 to 2026-07-31 window, ranked into 14 distinct assignees. The set is small enough that individual filings move the picture, and the newest year is a partial one, so any read on momentum has to account for the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1KATHOLIEKE UNIV LEUVEN22
  2. 2VLAAMS CENT VOOR BEWARING VAN TUINBOUWPRODEN15
  3. 3MITSUBISHI AUSTRALIA13
  4. 4ISOLCELL9
  5. 5SCHAEFER JAMES C8
  6. 6OPTIFLUX NV7
  7. 7VLAAMS CENT VOOR BEWARING VAN TUINBOUWPRODUCTEN VZW7
  8. 8UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA7
  9. 9VERLINDEN BERT1
  10. 10FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA CAMOBI1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Controlled Atmosphere Cold Storage of Produce covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 68 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings ran at 10 in 2017, the peak observed in this dataset, and the trend since has not sustained that level. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the tail years — including the most recent, 2026 — will read lower than the eventual filed total once later publications catch up.

Filing trend, 2017–20260358101020172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

A23B (food preservation) covers 83.8% of the 68 records, by far the densest single class. A23L (foods and beverages) follows at 27.9%, with B65D and B65B packaging classes each in the mid-teens. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, these shares add to more than 100% of the record total — that is expected and is the same denominator used in the chart.

IPC subclass compositionA23B · Food preservation5783.8%A23L · Foods & non-alcoholic beverages1927.9%B65D · Containers & packaging1217.6%B65B · Packaging & wrapping1116.2%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…45.9%A01J · Dairy equipment34.4%F24F · Air conditioning & ventilation34.4%G01N · Material analysis & testing34.4%Other57.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 68 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Controlled Atmosphere Cold Storage of Produce covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Controlled Atmosphere Cold Storage of Produce with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about controlled atmosphere cold storage of produce and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this set

Representative Filing
US20220282883A12022-09-08

Dynamic controlled atmosphere method and apparatus

FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA

The present invention relates to a method and an apparatus for controlling the atmosphere in a space, in particular a closable space at least partially filled with agricultural or horticultural products. An optimal oxygen partial pressure and/or optimal temperature for storing produce is determined based on measurements of solely a carbon dioxide partial pressure.Filed by Federal University of Santa Maria; published 2022-09-08.

US20220282883A1 — patent drawing 1US20220282883A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Ranked by citation count
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20120097050A1Dynamic control system and method for controlled atmosphere room51
2US20130013099A1Storage of respiratory produce41
3WO2011113915A1Storage of respiratory produce32
4WO2017198793A1Automatical in SITU control of the confined environment of metabolically active produce15
5US20120325086A1System and method of operation for controlled atmosphere storage14
6US20150257401A1Control apparatus for controlled atmosphere cells for storing perishable items12
7US20190216105A1Automatical in situ control of the confined environment of metabolically active produce10
8US20180220665A1Monitoring state of produce within transport containers10
9EP2918179A1Control apparatus for controlled atmosphere cells for storing perishable items9
10EP2547213B1Storage of respiratory produce8

Citation counts reward older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on the field's early framing, not as a measure of current commercial weight.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Controlled Atmosphere Cold Storage of Produce covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting a new claim in this space.

Concentration at the top
22 vs 8 vs 1
leader vs 5th vs 10th place

One assignee dominates, then a steep drop

The leading assignee holds 22 records; by fifth place the count is already down to 8, and tenth place holds just 1. That is a landscape with a clear incumbent and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, rather than several evenly matched competitors.

Ranking covers all 14 assignees returned by the data endpoint.
Peak filing year
10 filings
in 2017, the peak year

Activity has not returned to its 2017 high

2017 is the peak year observed in this dataset at 10 filings. Later years run lower, though the most recent years are understated by the roughly 18-month gap between filing and publication, so the true recent trend is not yet fully visible.

Trend window: 2017-2026, most recent year partial.
Class crowding
83.8%
of 68 records in A23B

Food-preservation claims are dense; control and sensing are thin

A23B food preservation covers 83.8% of the 68 records, but G05D (non-electric variable control), A01J, F24F and G01N each sit at 5.9% or below. Instrumentation and control-side claims are comparatively open relative to the core storage-method claim space.

Shares are of the 68-record total; a record may carry multiple classes.
Co-filing structure
10 co-assignee pairs
identified in this set

Collaboration clusters around two research partnerships

The strongest co-assignee links pair Katholieke Universiteit Leuven with a Flemish postharvest research centre, appearing together on 13 and 12 records respectively across two name variants of that centre. A separate, smaller pairing links two individual inventors on 3 records.

Counts reflect records naming both parties as co-assignees.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to controlled atmosphere cold storage of produce, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Controlled Atmosphere Cold Storage of Produce covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape

14 assignees make up the full ranking returned for this dataset — academic groups, an Italian storage-equipment maker, and individual inventors sit alongside each other, with no recorded filing activity from the tracked assignees in the latest year.

Leader
22 records
top-ranked assignee

A university research group sets the pace

The top-ranked assignee in this set holds 22 records, well ahead of the field, much of it built jointly with a Flemish postharvest research centre it repeatedly co-files with.

See assignee ranking table for full detail.
Mid-field
8 records
fifth-ranked assignee

A mid-tier of equipment and applied-research filers

Fifth place holds 8 records. This band includes equipment makers such as an Italian controlled-atmosphere room specialist alongside applied research groups, distinct from the academic leader above.

Ranking based on 68 records in scope.
Long tail
1 record
tenth-ranked assignee

Single-filing entrants make up most of the ranking

By tenth place the count drops to a single record, and several named assignees — including university groups from Brazil and individual inventors — sit at this level, indicating narrow, defensive or one-off filing rather than sustained programs.

14 assignees total in the ranking.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Adjacent branches with thin coverage relative to the core storage-method claim space:
chlorophyll fluorescence-based ripeness sensingon-site nitrogen generator integrationroom gas-tightness verification methodsstorage-disorder early-detection algorithmsnon-electric variable control (G05D) tie-in claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven0
VLAAMS CENT VOOR BEWARING VAN TUINBOUWPRODEN0
MITSUBISHI AUSTRALIA0
VLAAMS CENT VOOR BEWARING VAN TUINBOUWPRODUCTEN VZW0
ISOLCELL0
SCHAEFER JAMES C0
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA0
VERLINDEN BERT0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Controlled Atmosphere Cold Storage of Produce covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated core and several thinner adjacent branches. Two directions are worth pursuing before committing drafting resources.

Map the incumbent's claim boundaries precisely

Before filing near the dense A23B core, pull the full claim scope of the leading assignee's family and its research-partner co-filings to see exactly where the oxygen-setpoint and gas-tightness claims stop.

Explore assignee claim maps in Eureka

Test draft claims against the under-claimed branches

Sensing, control-system tie-ins and disorder-detection classes carry far fewer records than the core storage method — run a candidate claim through prior-art search on those specific subclasses before assuming freedom to operate.

Run a claim check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Controlled Atmosphere Cold Storage of Produce covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Controlled Atmosphere Cold Storage of Produce covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Controlled Atmosphere Cold Storage of Produce in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole controlled atmosphere cold storage of produce corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.