Book a demo

Conversion Coating Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Conversion Coating Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/conversion-coatings-and-metal-pretreatment-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Coatings & Surface Treatment
Conversion Coating and Metal Pretreatment Patents
  • Filings peaked in 2017 at 29 and have since fallen sharply, with 2021's 19 filings dropping to 3 by 2024 — an 84% decline over that span, though 2025-26 figures are still filling in due to publication lag.
  • The top 5 assignees hold 44.3% of all 871 records, and the top 10 hold 60.7% — this is a field where a handful of players have built dense, overlapping claim positions rather than one dominant leader.
  • C23C coating and surface deposition touches 89.8% of records, while narrower classes like C23G cleaning of metal surfaces sit at just 2.9% — a sign of where claim density thins out.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
871
Published Records
44%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-84%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (19 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 871 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the patent record shows

Conversion coating and metal pretreatment technology sits at the intersection of corrosion resistance and environmental compliance: much of the claim activity in this dataset traces back to the search for chromium-free alternatives to hexavalent chromium passivation. The 871 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with the bulk of activity concentrated in a handful of assignees who have built layered claim positions around zirconium-based coatings, non-chromate compositions and paint adhesion performance. Publication lag means the most recent one to two years understate real filing activity.

Filing volume peaked in 2017 and has declined markedly since, a pattern consistent with a technology area where core chemistries have been claimed and the remaining activity is incremental — refinements to bath composition, rinse-water reduction, and application-specific formulations rather than new foundational approaches.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1THE BOEING CO145
  2. 2HENKEL KGAA81
  3. 3HENKEL CORP66
  4. 4JFE STEEL CORP50
  5. 5COMMONWEALTH SCI & IND RES ORG44
  6. 6BETZDEARBORN INC44
  7. 7CHEMETALL GMBH37
  8. 8LONZA INC24
  9. 9PRC DESOTO INTERNATIONAL INC19
  10. 10NIHON PARKERIZING CO LTD19
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conversion Coatings and Metal Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 871-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses when a single record can carry several classifications.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings peaked at 29 in 2017. By 2021 annual filings had fallen to 19, and by 2024 — the most recent year that can be treated as complete — to just 3, an 84% decline over that three-year window. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months.

Filing trend, 2017-2026081523302920172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C23C (coating and surface deposition) appears in 89.8% of the 871 records, making it the dominant classification by a wide margin. C09D (coatings, paints and inks) and C25D (electroplating and electroforming) follow at 15.7% and 9.8% respectively, while narrower process classes such as C23G (cleaning of metal surfaces) at 2.9% and B32B (layered products) at 4.9% see comparatively light claim activity. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to more than 100% of the record total.

IPC subclass compositionC23C · Coating & surface deposition78289.8%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks13715.7%C25D · Electroplating & electroforming859.8%B05D · Coating processes829.4%C23F · Corrosion & metal removal606.9%C01G · Compounds of other metals505.7%B32B · Layered products & laminates434.9%C23G · Cleaning of metal surfaces252.9%Other15017.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 871 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conversion Coatings and Metal Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Conversion Coatings and Metal Pretreatment with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about conversion coatings and metal pretreatment and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art

Representative Filing
US5472524A1995-12-05

US5472524A — Non-chromated cobalt conversion coating method and coated articles

THE BOEING COMPANY

A process for forming a cobalt conversion coating on a metal substrate — aluminum, magnesium, or cadmium- and zinc-plated substrates — to impart corrosion resistance and paint adhesion, developed explicitly as a replacement for the chromic acid process. The coating solution uses a cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex in an aqueous bath held at pH 7.0 to 7.2.Assigned to The Boeing Company, published 1995-12-05.

US5472524A — patent drawing 1US5472524A — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5584946AChromium-free conversion coating treatment of aluminum134
2US5380374AConversion coatings for metal surfaces123
3US4921552AComposition and method for non-chromate coating of aluminum122
4US5415702ABlack chromium-containing conversion coatings on zinc-nickel and zinc-iron alloys120
5US5221371ANon-toxic corrosion resistant conversion coating for aluminum and aluminum alloys and the process for making …116
6US4992116AMethod and composition for coating aluminum108
7US5451431AComposition and process for treating metal surfaces75
8US6309476B1Composition and method for metal coloring process72
9US5298092ANon-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates65
10US20030234063A1Non-toxic corrosion-protection conversion coats based on cobalt64

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings — treat them as a signal of foundational status, not current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conversion Coatings and Metal Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the concentration and trend data mean

The numbers point to a mature, consolidated field where the remaining opportunity lies in narrower process claims rather than core chemistry.

Concentration
44.3% of 871 records
held by top 5 assignees

Filing activity is concentrated but not monopolised

The top 5 assignees account for 44.3% of all 871 records, and the top 10 for 60.7%. That leaves nearly 40% of the field spread across 90 further ranked assignees, suggesting room for new entrants to build defensible positions in adjacent process steps rather than head-on with the leaders' core compositions.

Based on the full 100-assignee ranking.
Trend
-84% (2021→2024)
filing decline, complete years

A field past its filing peak

Annual filings fell from 19 in 2021 to 3 in 2024, an 84% decline across the last three years that can be treated as complete. Combined with a 2017 peak of 29, this points to a technology whose foundational chemistries — chromium-free passivation, zirconium-based coatings — are largely claimed, with new filings now addressing narrower refinements.

2025-26 figures are still filling in due to publication lag.
Technology mix
89.8% vs 2.9%
C23C vs C23G record share

Coating deposition dominates; cleaning processes are thin

C23C (coating and surface deposition) touches 89.8% of records, while C23G (cleaning of metal surfaces) sits at just 2.9%. The gap suggests that pretreatment cleaning steps — often a prerequisite to any conversion coating process — carry comparatively light claim density relative to the coating chemistries themselves.

Shares are of all 871 records; a record may carry several IPC classes.
Jurisdictions
220 US filings
leading receiving office

US and EPO dominate the filing map

The United States leads with 220 filings, followed by the EPO at 165 and Canada at 87. WIPO/PCT filings at 76 indicate a meaningful share of applicants are pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than filing nationally only.

Receiving office counts, not deduplicated to family level.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to conversion coatings and metal pretreatment, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conversion Coatings and Metal Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it is open

A small set of industrial and chemicals assignees dominate the ranked list, with corrosion-focused specialists and aerospace OEMs both represented among the leaders. Recent-year filing activity from the most prominent names has dropped to zero, consistent with the broader decline in the trend data.

Leader
145 records
leading assignee

A clear top position

The leading assignee holds 145 records, well ahead of fifth place at 44 and tenth place at 19. This gap between first and fifth suggests one organisation has built a substantially broader portfolio than its nearest peers, likely spanning multiple coating chemistries and application methods.

Counted in records, from the 100-company ranking.
Momentum
0 in latest year
across leading assignees

Leading filers have gone quiet recently

Several of the most prominent assignees in the ranking show zero filings in the latest year, including one with a -100% year-over-year change. This aligns with the broader decline from 2017's peak and suggests the leaders consider their core claim positions largely settled, at least for now.

Recent-year momentum reflects publication lag.
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
identified in the dataset

Collaboration is limited and specialty-chemical-led

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest pairing tied to a specialty chemicals company working alongside a chemical management firm. Most filing activity in this field is done by single assignees rather than joint applicants.

Strongest pair recorded 10 joint filings.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches with comparatively light IPC density relative to the core coating classes, based on this dataset's composition figures.
Rinse-water reduction chemistriesPhosphate-free pretreatment for mixed-metal assembliesZirconium-based coating adhesion promotersCleaning processes ahead of conversion coating (C23G)Non-chromate cobalt complex formulations
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
The Boeing Company0
Henkel Corp (US)0
Henkel KGaA0-100%
JFE Steel Corporation0
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)0
BetzDearborn Inc0
Chemetall GmbH0-100%
Lonza Inc0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conversion Coatings and Metal Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a consolidated field with a declining filing trend, but the specifics matter for freedom-to-operate and whitespace decisions.

Map claim scope against the leading assignee's portfolio

With one assignee holding 145 records against a field of 871, understanding exactly which claim elements it has covered — and which it has not — is the first step before filing in adjacent chemistries.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Check the under-claimed sub-areas against your own formulation

Cleaning processes and rinse-water reduction show comparatively light IPC density. If your work touches these steps, a closer claim-by-claim comparison is worth running before committing to a filing strategy.

Run a whitespace search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conversion Coatings and Metal Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about conversion coating patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conversion Coatings and Metal Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Conversion Coatings and Metal Pretreatment in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole conversion coatings and metal pretreatment corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.