Conversion Coating Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filings peaked in 2017 at 29 and have since fallen sharply, with 2021's 19 filings dropping to 3 by 2024 — an 84% decline over that span, though 2025-26 figures are still filling in due to publication lag.
- The top 5 assignees hold 44.3% of all 871 records, and the top 10 hold 60.7% — this is a field where a handful of players have built dense, overlapping claim positions rather than one dominant leader.
- C23C coating and surface deposition touches 89.8% of records, while narrower classes like C23G cleaning of metal surfaces sit at just 2.9% — a sign of where claim density thins out.
Filing growth compares 2021 (19 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 871 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the patent record shows
Conversion coating and metal pretreatment technology sits at the intersection of corrosion resistance and environmental compliance: much of the claim activity in this dataset traces back to the search for chromium-free alternatives to hexavalent chromium passivation. The 871 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with the bulk of activity concentrated in a handful of assignees who have built layered claim positions around zirconium-based coatings, non-chromate compositions and paint adhesion performance. Publication lag means the most recent one to two years understate real filing activity.
Filing volume peaked in 2017 and has declined markedly since, a pattern consistent with a technology area where core chemistries have been claimed and the remaining activity is incremental — refinements to bath composition, rinse-water reduction, and application-specific formulations rather than new foundational approaches.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 871-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses when a single record can carry several classifications.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings peaked at 29 in 2017. By 2021 annual filings had fallen to 19, and by 2024 — the most recent year that can be treated as complete — to just 3, an 84% decline over that three-year window. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months.
IPC subclass composition
C23C (coating and surface deposition) appears in 89.8% of the 871 records, making it the dominant classification by a wide margin. C09D (coatings, paints and inks) and C25D (electroplating and electroforming) follow at 15.7% and 9.8% respectively, while narrower process classes such as C23G (cleaning of metal surfaces) at 2.9% and B32B (layered products) at 4.9% see comparatively light claim activity. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to more than 100% of the record total.
Shares are the percentage of the 871 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Conversion Coatings and Metal Pretreatment with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about conversion coatings and metal pretreatment and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art
US5472524A — Non-chromated cobalt conversion coating method and coated articles
A process for forming a cobalt conversion coating on a metal substrate — aluminum, magnesium, or cadmium- and zinc-plated substrates — to impart corrosion resistance and paint adhesion, developed explicitly as a replacement for the chromic acid process. The coating solution uses a cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex in an aqueous bath held at pH 7.0 to 7.2.Assigned to The Boeing Company, published 1995-12-05.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5584946A | Chromium-free conversion coating treatment of aluminum | 134 |
| 2 | US5380374A | Conversion coatings for metal surfaces | 123 |
| 3 | US4921552A | Composition and method for non-chromate coating of aluminum | 122 |
| 4 | US5415702A | Black chromium-containing conversion coatings on zinc-nickel and zinc-iron alloys | 120 |
| 5 | US5221371A | Non-toxic corrosion resistant conversion coating for aluminum and aluminum alloys and the process for making … | 116 |
| 6 | US4992116A | Method and composition for coating aluminum | 108 |
| 7 | US5451431A | Composition and process for treating metal surfaces | 75 |
| 8 | US6309476B1 | Composition and method for metal coloring process | 72 |
| 9 | US5298092A | Non-chromated oxide coating for aluminum substrates | 65 |
| 10 | US20030234063A1 | Non-toxic corrosion-protection conversion coats based on cobalt | 64 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings — treat them as a signal of foundational status, not current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the concentration and trend data mean
The numbers point to a mature, consolidated field where the remaining opportunity lies in narrower process claims rather than core chemistry.
Filing activity is concentrated but not monopolised
The top 5 assignees account for 44.3% of all 871 records, and the top 10 for 60.7%. That leaves nearly 40% of the field spread across 90 further ranked assignees, suggesting room for new entrants to build defensible positions in adjacent process steps rather than head-on with the leaders' core compositions.
A field past its filing peak
Annual filings fell from 19 in 2021 to 3 in 2024, an 84% decline across the last three years that can be treated as complete. Combined with a 2017 peak of 29, this points to a technology whose foundational chemistries — chromium-free passivation, zirconium-based coatings — are largely claimed, with new filings now addressing narrower refinements.
Coating deposition dominates; cleaning processes are thin
C23C (coating and surface deposition) touches 89.8% of records, while C23G (cleaning of metal surfaces) sits at just 2.9%. The gap suggests that pretreatment cleaning steps — often a prerequisite to any conversion coating process — carry comparatively light claim density relative to the coating chemistries themselves.
US and EPO dominate the filing map
The United States leads with 220 filings, followed by the EPO at 165 and Canada at 87. WIPO/PCT filings at 76 indicate a meaningful share of applicants are pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than filing nationally only.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to conversion coatings and metal pretreatment, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where it is open
A small set of industrial and chemicals assignees dominate the ranked list, with corrosion-focused specialists and aerospace OEMs both represented among the leaders. Recent-year filing activity from the most prominent names has dropped to zero, consistent with the broader decline in the trend data.
A clear top position
The leading assignee holds 145 records, well ahead of fifth place at 44 and tenth place at 19. This gap between first and fifth suggests one organisation has built a substantially broader portfolio than its nearest peers, likely spanning multiple coating chemistries and application methods.
Leading filers have gone quiet recently
Several of the most prominent assignees in the ranking show zero filings in the latest year, including one with a -100% year-over-year change. This aligns with the broader decline from 2017's peak and suggests the leaders consider their core claim positions largely settled, at least for now.
Collaboration is limited and specialty-chemical-led
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest pairing tied to a specialty chemicals company working alongside a chemical management firm. Most filing activity in this field is done by single assignees rather than joint applicants.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| The Boeing Company | 0 | — |
| Henkel Corp (US) | 0 | — |
| Henkel KGaA | 0 | -100% |
| JFE Steel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) | 0 | — |
| BetzDearborn Inc | 0 | — |
| Chemetall GmbH | 0 | -100% |
| Lonza Inc | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a consolidated field with a declining filing trend, but the specifics matter for freedom-to-operate and whitespace decisions.
Map claim scope against the leading assignee's portfolio
With one assignee holding 145 records against a field of 871, understanding exactly which claim elements it has covered — and which it has not — is the first step before filing in adjacent chemistries.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaCheck the under-claimed sub-areas against your own formulation
Cleaning processes and rinse-water reduction show comparatively light IPC density. If your work touches these steps, a closer claim-by-claim comparison is worth running before committing to a filing strategy.
Run a whitespace search in EurekaCommon questions about conversion coating patents
A conversion coating is a chemical treatment that converts the outer layer of a metal substrate into a protective, adherent layer, typically to improve corrosion resistance and paint adhesion before further processing. Common chemistries include chromate, phosphate, and increasingly chromium-free alternatives based on zirconium or cobalt compounds. The patent record in this space is dominated by IPC class C23C (coating and surface deposition), which appears in 89.8% of the 871 records reviewed here, reflecting how central deposition chemistry is to this technology area.
Filings peaked at 29 in 2017 and dropped to 3 by 2024, an 84% decline over the 2021-2024 span for which complete data is available. This pattern is typical of a field where foundational chemistries — chromium-free passivation and zirconium-based coatings among them — were claimed earlier in the period, leaving later filers to pursue narrower, incremental improvements. It is worth noting that 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the true recent trend is understated rather than necessarily flat or falling.
The ranked list covers 100 assignees, with the leader holding 145 records compared to 44 for the fifth-placed company and 19 for tenth place. The top 5 combined account for 44.3% of all 871 records, and the top 10 account for 60.7%, indicating meaningful concentration without a single company controlling the majority of the field. Several of these leading assignees, however, show zero filings in the most recent year, suggesting their core claim positions are largely established rather than still expanding.
Chromium-free passivation refers to corrosion-protection chemistries developed to replace hexavalent chromium, which is subject to increasing regulatory restriction. Several of the most-cited records in this dataset, including patents on non-chromate aluminum coatings and cobalt conversion coating methods, were filed specifically as chromium replacements, which is why they carry high citation counts as foundational prior art. Anyone filing in this space should expect dense prior art around core chromium-free chemistries and should look instead at process refinements, application methods, or narrower sub-areas such as rinse-water reduction where claim density is lighter.
Based on IPC composition, coating deposition chemistry itself (C23C) is heavily claimed at 89.8% of records, while surface cleaning processes that precede conversion coating (C23G) sit at only 2.9%, and layered product structures (B32B) at 4.9%. This gap suggests that process steps adjacent to the core coating chemistry, such as pretreatment cleaning methods and multi-layer adhesion structures, carry comparatively lighter claim density and may offer more room for new filings than the core chemistries themselves.
Research Conversion Coatings and Metal Pretreatment in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole conversion coatings and metal pretreatment corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.