Conveyor and Sortation Patents: Who Leads, Where Filing Peaked 2026
- Filing peaked in 2022 at 35 records and has declined every year since, with 2026 sitting at a partial count of 1 — a sign the core mechanical claim space may already be occupied.
- B65G conveying mechanics dominate at 346 of 360 records while control systems (G05B, 38), robotics (B25J, 23) and sensor-integrated analysis (G01N, 12) remain comparatively thin adjacent branches.
- The oldest, most-cited patent still leads by a wide margin US6401936B1's divert apparatus claim carries 308 citations, nearly four times the next tier of foundational singulation and modular-conveyor patents.
Filing growth compares 2021 (26 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 360 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
A mature mechanical core with thin adjacent branches
This dataset covers 360 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from filings that combine conveyor or sortation system claims with language around throughput, singulation, gentle handling, energy efficiency or modular layout. Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked at 35 records in 2022, and has declined since — a pattern that should be read alongside the roughly 18-month gap between filing and publication, which always makes the most recent year look thinner than it will eventually prove to be.
The technology composition is heavily weighted toward core conveying mechanics: B65G accounts for 346 of the records, dwarfing postal and object sorting (B07C, 51), control systems (G05B, 38) and robotics (B25J, 23). Analysis-and-testing (G01N), business-process (G06Q), digital-processing (G06F) and centrifuge-related (B04B) subclasses each sit in single or low double digits, marking the branches least occupied by existing claims.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Filing volume in this corpus rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2022, and has not returned to that level since — a pattern worth reading against the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication, which understates the most recent year in any such trend.
A peak in 2022, then a pull-back
Filings climbed from 4 in 2017 toward a peak of 35 in 2022, then eased off through to a partial 2026 count of 1. That shape points to a technology whose core mechanical claim space filled up in the early 2020s rather than one still accelerating.
Conveying mechanics dominate, control and robotics trail
B65G (conveying and material handling) accounts for the large majority of records at 346, with B07C (postal and object sorting) a distant second at 51. G05B control systems (38) and B25J manipulators (23) show that automation and robotics overlays exist but remain a minority share of the claim space; G01N, G06Q, G06F and B04B are each in single or low double digits, marking thinner-claimed adjacent branches.
Shares are the percentage of the 360 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Conveyor and Sortation Systems with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about conveyor and sortation systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patents other filings had to work around
Singulation conveyor system with rollers of different roller cross-sectional profiles
A singulation conveyor built from multiple rollers, including a first and second roller of differing cross-sectional profile — one defined by a sleeve mounted around the roller circumference with a dowel positioned between sleeve and roller. The differing profiles create the mechanical differential used to separate items along the line.Filed by Intelligrated Headquarters, LLC, 2021-04-08 — illustrates how recent refinements layer structural detail on top of decades-old divert and accumulator mechanics.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6401936B1 | Divert apparatus for conveyor system | 308 |
| 2 | US6701214B1 | Driver board control system for modular conveyer with address-based network for inter-conveyor communication | 82 |
| 3 | US6629018B2 | Selective advance intelligent singulator | 78 |
| 4 | US6193054B1 | Modular accumulator conveyor system | 78 |
| 5 | US20090000912A1 | Method and Apparatus for Non-Linear Unit-Level Sortation in Order Fulfillment Processes | 74 |
| 6 | US7035714B2 | Integrated conveyor bed | 74 |
| 7 | US6056106A | Conveyor system for clinical test apparatus | 72 |
| 8 | US6827202B2 | Methods and apparatus for controlling conveyor zones | 65 |
| 9 | WO2016033172A1 | Robotic carton unloader | 64 |
| 10 | US6609607B2 | Article separation conveyor | 63 |
Ranked by citation count within the searched dataset; older filings accumulate citations simply by being available longer, so treat this as a map of influence rather than a current leaderboard.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern says about this field
Three figures in this dataset matter more than the raw counts: where citations concentrate, how thin the adjacent IPC branches are, and how flat recent-year momentum looks across the named assignees.
Influence sits with one foundational filing
The divert apparatus patent's citation count is nearly four times the next-highest record in this corpus. That gap suggests the mechanical divert concept became a reference point that most later singulation and sortation claims had to work around or build on.
Conveying mechanics crowd out sensor integration
Core conveying claims outnumber material-analysis claims by close to thirty to one in this corpus, even though both subclasses appear in the same search. That imbalance points to comparatively open claim space where in-line sensing meets mechanical sortation.
Major integrators show no fresh filings
Intelligrated, Dematic, Fortna, Siemens, UPS and Vanderlande each show zero recorded filings in the most recent tracked year. Combined with the 2022 peak, this points to portfolios that are largely defended rather than still being built out.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to conveyor and sortation systems, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where it has gone quiet
Filing in this space concentrates among a small set of material-handling integrators and logistics operators, several of whom show no new filings in the most recent tracked year — consistent with a field where the mechanical core is largely staked out and defended rather than still being actively expanded.
Collaboration is limited and inventor-driven
The strongest co-assignee links pair a corporate assignee with named individual inventors rather than joint corporate filings, and the pair counts themselves are low. That points to a field where portfolios are built in-house rather than through cross-company joint development.
Major integrators show flat recent activity
Intelligrated, Dematic, Fortna, Siemens, UPS and Vanderlande all register zero filings in the latest tracked year, with Siemens specifically flagged at -100% year-on-year. This is consistent with the broader 2022 filing peak rather than a sign any one of these firms has exited the space.
US filing leads by a wide margin
Half the dataset's records were filed through the United States, with EPO (63), WIPO PCT (33), Canada (32) and Australia (17) forming the next tier. That spread marks the US as the primary freedom-to-operate check for most new entrants in this field.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligrated Headquarters, LLC | 0 | — |
| Dematic Corp. | 0 | — |
| Fortna Systems Inc. | 0 | — |
| Siemens AG | 0 | -100% |
| United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (UPS) | 0 | — |
| Vanderlande Industries | 0 | — |
| Laitram, L.L.C. | 0 | — |
| Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis next
The filing trend and IPC composition point to a mature mechanical core with specific thin branches. The next steps depend on whether you are filing, defending, or scouting for acquisition targets.
Check freedom-to-operate against the citation leaders
Before filing a new singulation or divert mechanism, run the oldest, most-cited records in this corpus against your claim draft — their structural language has already been tested against decades of subsequent filings.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaScope a filing in the under-claimed branches
Sensor-integrated in-line checks and software-layer throughput claims sit in far thinner IPC territory than core conveying mechanics, and may offer cleaner claim space for a first mover.
Explore white space in EurekaFrequently asked questions
The most-cited record in this dataset is US6401936B1, a divert apparatus for conveyor systems, with 308 citations — far ahead of the next tier, which includes a modular conveyor network control patent and two singulation-related patents each in the high seventies. High citation counts inside a searched corpus tend to favour older filings simply because they have had more years to accumulate references, so treat these as markers of foundational influence rather than current market leadership. Several named assignees, including Intelligrated, Dematic and Siemens, show no filings in the most recent tracked year, which is more consistent with a mature, defended portfolio than with active new claiming.
Filing activity peaked at 35 in 2022 and has declined in the years since, with only a partial count of 1 recorded for 2026. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one or two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be, so some caution is warranted before calling this a definitive decline. Even allowing for that lag, the shape of the curve — rising steadily to a mid-decade peak rather than climbing to the present — suggests the core mechanical claim space is largely occupied rather than still expanding.
Relative to the 346 records in the core B65G conveying subclass, adjacent IPC areas are thin: material analysis and testing (G01N) has only 12 records, centrifuge-related handling (B04B) has 5, and digital data processing (G06F) has 9. That gap indicates sensor-integrated in-line quality or property checks, and software-layer throughput or fault-prediction claims layered on top of physical sortation hardware, are comparatively open. A first mover combining a measured in-line property with a real-time mechanical divert decision would be filing into thinner prior art than a purely mechanical singulation claim.
US20210101752A1, assigned to Intelligrated Headquarters, LLC and filed in 2021, claims a singulation conveyor using rollers with differing cross-sectional profiles — specifically a sleeve-and-dowel roller construction that differs from an adjacent roller on the same line. It blocks designs that use deliberately mismatched roller geometry to create the friction or timing differential needed for singulation. It does not reach singulation achieved through variable belt-speed zones, pneumatic diverts, or vision-guided timing control, so systems built on those mechanisms sit outside this particular claim's structural language.
The United States leads by a wide margin with 180 records in this dataset, followed by the European Patent Office at 63 and WIPO PCT filings at 33. Canada (32) and Australia (17) follow, with a smaller but notable count of 10 through the Austrian patent office. This distribution reflects where major material-handling integrators and e-commerce fulfilment operators concentrate their filing budgets, and it is a reasonable proxy for where enforcement risk and freedom-to-operate checks matter most for a new entrant.
Research Conveyor and Sortation Systems in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole conveyor and sortation systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.