Book a demo

Coordinate Measuring & 3D Scanning Patents: Leaders vs Long Tail 2026

Coordinate Measuring & 3D Scanning Patents: Leaders vs Long Tail 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/coordinate-measuring-and-3d-scanning-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Sensors & Instrumentation
Coordinate measuring and 3D scanning patents: who holds the claim space and where filings have gone quiet
  • Filing has cooled since its 2018 peak of 15. the midpoint year 2022 sits at just 4, and momentum among the six most-active assignees reads zero in the latest full year — a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
  • G01B dominates almost completely. 112 of 113 records sit in length-and-dimension measurement, with image processing (G06T, 9), navigation (G01C, 9) and control systems (G05B, 10) present only as secondary classifications.
  • The oldest cited patents still carry the most weight. the five most-cited records date to 1987–1998 and each carry over 100 citations, meaning current filers are building on three-decade-old laser probe and CMM inspection art.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
113
Published Records
62%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-80%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 113 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A narrow, well-picked-over field

Coordinate measuring machines and 3D scanning metrology form a tightly defined patent space: 112 of 113 families classify under G01B, the length-and-dimension measurement subclass, with everything else — image processing, navigation, control systems — appearing as secondary tags rather than a distinct filing centre. The search string ties the topic to specific technical problems: point cloud registration, measurement uncertainty, probe compensation, scanning speed and reflective-surface handling. That specificity is why the dataset is small and why its citation graph reaches back to foundational laser-probe and CMM patents from the late 1980s and 1990s.

Filing offices split across the United States (48), Europe (28) and China (13), with WIPO PCT filings (9) suggesting a modest share of applicants pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection. The filing trend has flattened rather than grown: a 2018 peak of 15 gave way to a midpoint of 4 by 2022, and recent-year filing counts recorded against the most active named assignees all read zero — though publication lag of roughly 18 months means the most recent year understates true filing activity.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1MITUTOYO CORP22
  2. 2CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIELLE MESSTECHNIKE GMBH17
  3. 3RENISHAW PLC13
  4. 4FARO TECHNOLOGIES INC10
  5. 5HEXAGON TECH CENT GMBH8
  6. 6CYBEROPTICS CORP7
  7. 7HEXAGON INNOVATION HUB GMBH4
  8. 8GENERAL ELECTRIC CO3
  9. 9POLITECNICO DI TORINO3
  10. 10QUALITY VISION INTERNATIONAL INC3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coordinate Measuring and 3D Scanning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

113 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, concentrated almost entirely in one IPC subclass and skewed toward a small number of filing offices.

A field that peaked in 2018 and has not recovered

Filings rose to 15 in 2018, then declined toward a midpoint of 4 by 2022. With 0 recorded for 2026 (a partial year) and momentum flat across the most active assignees, the near-term filing curve is either genuinely cooling or waiting on publications still in the 18-month pipeline.

A field that peaked in 2018 and has not recovered048111552017152018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

G01B carries almost the entire dataset

112 of 113 records sit under G01B (measuring length and dimensions). Secondary classifications — G01N materials testing (13), G05B control systems (10), G01C navigation (9) and G06T image processing (9) — show where CMM and scanning claims intersect with adjacent disciplines, but none approaches G01B's density.

G01B carries almost the entire datasetG01B · Measuring length & dimensions11299.1%G01N · Material analysis & testing1311.5%G05B · Control & regulating systems108.8%G01C · Distance, navigation & gyrosco…98.0%G06T · Image data processing & genera…98.0%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…65.3%G06F · Electric digital data processi…54.4%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery32.7%Other1210.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 113 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coordinate Measuring and 3D Scanning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Coordinate Measuring and 3D Scanning with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about coordinate measuring and 3d scanning and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The prior art current filers must clear

Representative recent filing
US20230127538A12023-04-27

Method of estimating uncertainty of coordinate measurement (US20230127538A1)

MITUTOYO CORPORATION

The application describes a method for estimating measurement uncertainty on a coordinate measuring machine by interpolating a maximum permissible length measurement error across measurement dimensions, using variable values captured at known measurement-condition values to calculate the error at an unmeasured third condition value.Filed by Mitutoyo; published 2023-04-27.

US20230127538A1 — patent drawing 1US20230127538A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4733969ALaser probe for determining distance281
2US5510977AMethod and apparatus for measuring features of a part or item230
3US5471406AMethod of measuring elemental shapes of a workpiece on a coordinate measuring machine147
4US5861956ARetroreflector for use with tooling ball109
5US4991304AWorkpiece inspection method107
6US6086283AUniversal joint for coordinate measuring device62
7US5797191AParallel kinematic structure for spatial positioning devices and method of initializing same61
8US4866643AMethod for automatic compensation of probe offset in a coordinate measuring machine58
9US5313410AArtifact and method for verifying accuracy of a positioning apparatus50
10US6741363B1Method and an apparatus for the optical detection of a contrast line44

Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of age in the corpus; read them as markers of foundational influence, not current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coordinate Measuring and 3D Scanning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once family counts, citation weight and IPC composition are read together.

Concentration
112 / 113
records in G01B

Nearly the whole corpus sits in one subclass

Length-and-dimension measurement (G01B) is not just the leading category — it is almost the entire dataset. Secondary IPC tags in image processing, control systems and navigation appear as features bolted onto a G01B core, not as independent filing centres.

IPC composition, evidence summary
Momentum
15 → 4
peak (2018) vs midpoint (2022)

Filing has flattened since the 2018 peak

The trend line does not show a growing field. From a peak of 15 in 2018, annual filings dropped to 4 by the 2022 midpoint, and the most-active named assignees each show zero filings in the latest recorded year.

Filing trend, evidence summary
Prior art depth
100+
citations on each top-5 record

Current claims sit on decades-old foundations

The five most-cited records date from 1987 to 1998 and each carry over 100 citations — laser probe distance measurement and CMM inspection methods that any new probe-compensation or reflective-surface claim will likely need to distinguish from.

Most-cited records, evidence summary
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to coordinate measuring and 3d scanning, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coordinate Measuring and 3D Scanning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

A field led by instrument makers, not software entrants

The named assignees are metrology equipment manufacturers rather than software or vision-only entrants, and recent-year activity has gone quiet across the board.

Instrument incumbents
0
latest-year filings across top assignees

The largest CMM makers show no recent activity in this dataset

Mitutoyo, Carl Zeiss Industrial Metrology, Renishaw, FARO Technologies, Hexagon Technology Center and Werth Vision Instruments (Hexagon-related) each register zero filings in the latest recorded year, consistent with the broader flattening of the filing trend rather than any single company's retreat.

Recent-year momentum, evidence summary
Academic collaboration
2 co-filings
strongest co-assignee pairs

One university lab appears repeatedly in co-assignee pairs

Politecnico di Torino appears alongside individual named inventors in the strongest co-assignee pairings in the dataset, each recurring twice — a pattern suggesting a small, stable academic-industry research group rather than a broad collaboration network.

Co-assignee pairs, evidence summary
Filing geography
48 US / 28 EP
leading receiving offices

US and European filings dominate over China and PCT

The United States (48) and the European Patent Office (28) account for the bulk of receiving-office activity, with China (13) and WIPO PCT (9) trailing — a filing footprint typical of an established instrument-manufacturing base rather than an emerging-market growth story.

Receiving offices, evidence summary
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Secondary IPC classes with low record counts suggest room to file, but confirm freedom-to-operate against the G01B core before committing claim language.
Real-time point cloud registration for moving partsProbe compensation under thermal driftReflective-surface scanning without spray coatingUncertainty propagation across multi-sensor fusionScanning-speed vs accuracy trade-off control loops
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Mitutoyo Corporation0
Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik GmbH0
Renishaw plc0
FARO Technologies, Inc.0
Hexagon Technology Center GmbH0
Werth Messtechnik GmbH0
Hexagon Metrology0
HEXAGON METROLOGY A B (SE)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coordinate Measuring and 3D Scanning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset flags concentration and flattening filing activity; the next step is testing specific claim language against this prior art.

Check freedom-to-operate on probe compensation claims

The dense, decades-old citation graph around laser probe measurement means new probe-compensation filings need careful novelty checks against 1990s-era CMM patents still actively cited today.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Map the quiet incumbents before they re-file

Zero latest-year filings across the largest named assignees could mean a lull, publication lag, or a shift to filing under different subsidiaries — worth tracking rather than assuming retreat.

Track assignee activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coordinate Measuring and 3D Scanning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coordinate Measuring and 3D Scanning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Coordinate Measuring and 3D Scanning in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole coordinate measuring and 3d scanning corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.