https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/cpap-and-sleep-apnea-therapy-devices-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Medical Equipment
CPAP and Sleep Apnea Therapy Device Patents: Concentration, Trends and Filing Gaps
  • 78.6% of the field sits with five companies. 276 of 351 records in scope belong to the top five assignees — this is a concentrated field, not a fragmented one.
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 24 records and has declined since. the 2022 midpoint of 11 confirms the trend is flat-to-down, not a temporary dip.
  • Humidification and sterilising classes trail the core A61M class by a wide margin. A61L sterilising claims cover just 15.7% of records, leaving room below the dominant A61M devices class.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
351
Published Records
79%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-83%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the CPAP patent record shows

The dataset covers 351 published records filed between 2015 and 2026 across the intersection of CPAP devices, auto-titration algorithms, mask leak compensation, humidification and adherence-data claims. Filing activity is concentrated: five companies account for 78.6% of all records, and the top ten hold 87.7%. This is a field where the core claim space around positive airway pressure delivery and humidification hardware is largely occupied by a small set of long-standing filers, while adjacent classes — water treatment, filtration, pipe fittings — show far lighter activity.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in the trend line understate real filing activity; the decline from the 2021 peak is still directionally real even after allowing for that lag.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1RESMED PTY LTD128
  2. 2FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD73
  3. 3SOCLEAN INC50
  4. 4SIERRA MEDICAL TECH15
  5. 5FRESCA MEDICAL INC10
  6. 6SOMNETICS INTERNATIONAL INC9
  7. 7HUMAN DESIGN MEDICAL LLC8
  8. 8KLEMPERER WALTER G6
  9. 9INCEPTUS INC5
  10. 10AEIOMED INC4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on CPAP and Sleep Apnea Therapy Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The trend line and IPC breakdown below are drawn directly from the 351 records in scope. Class shares are calculated against the full record total, not against each other, since a single record can carry several IPC classes.

A peak-and-decline filing pattern

Filings rose from 10 in 2017 to a peak of 24 in 2021, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 11. The most recent years are undercounted due to publication lag, but the shape of the curve — rise, peak, retreat — is consistent with a field where the dominant claim space has already been staked out by the leading assignees.

A peak-and-decline filing pattern06131925102017201820192020242021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

A61M dominates; sterilising and diagnosis trail

A61M (devices for body fluids) appears in 99.4% of records, confirming this is fundamentally a device-hardware field. A61L sterilising and disinfecting claims (15.7%), A61B diagnosis and surgery (7.4%) and A62B rescue and life-saving (7.1%) form a second tier. Water treatment, mixing and filtration classes (B01F, C02F, F16L, B01D) each sit at or below 3.4%, marking them as comparatively lightly claimed relative to the core hardware classes.

A61M dominates; sterilising and diagnosis trailA61M · Devices for body fluids34999.4%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting5515.7%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery267.4%A62B · Rescue & life-saving257.1%B01F · Mixing & stirring123.4%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment113.1%F16L · Pipes & pipe fittings113.1%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…102.8%Other5214.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 351 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on CPAP and Sleep Apnea Therapy Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on CPAP and Sleep Apnea Therapy Devices with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cpap and sleep apnea therapy devices and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
US20120097156A12012-04-26

US20120097156A1 — Positive airway pressure therapy mask humidification systems and methods

SOMNETICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

The present inventions provide positive airway pressure therapy apparatus to humidify the pressurized air delivered to a user during various positive airway pressure therapies and corresponding methods. The apparatus may be configured to administer CPAP, BPAP, autoPAP, PPAP, and other positive airway pressure therapies.Filed by Somnetics International, this filing sits squarely in the humidification-plus-delivery claim space that dominates the dataset's A61M classification.

US20120097156A1 — patent drawing 1US20120097156A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6718974B1CPAP humidifier having sliding access drawer404
2US5231979AHumidifier for CPAP device348
3US20060096596A1Wearable system for positive airway pressure therapy214
4US20110180068A1Breathable gas apparatus with humidifier173
5WO2007019625A1Humidifier and/or flow generator for CPAP device143
6US20020020930A1CPAP humidifier140
7US20090194106A1Humidifier and/or flow generator for CPAP device134
8US7478635B2Breathing assistance apparatus131
9US20080257346A1Acoustic attenuation chamber123
10US20100154796A1Humidifier tub for CPAP device122

Citation counts favour older records inside any searched corpus and should be read as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a marker of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on CPAP and Sleep Apnea Therapy Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once concentration, timing and technology composition are read together.

Concentration
78.6% of 351 records
held by top 5 assignees

The core claim space is already staked out

With five assignees holding 276 of 351 records, new entrants filing on core CPAP delivery and humidification hardware are filing into dense, well-cited prior art. The leader alone holds 128 records — well ahead of the fifth-place assignee at 10.

Concentration figures are counted in records, not families.
Timing
Peak 2021 at 24, easing since
filing trend 2017-2026

Filing momentum has cooled from its 2021 high

The climb from 10 filings in 2017 to 24 in 2021 was followed by a pullback toward 11 at the 2022 midpoint. Recent-year momentum data shows several leading assignees at zero filings in the latest year, though publication lag means 2025-2026 counts are still incomplete.

Read the final one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.
Technology mix
A61L at 15.7% vs A61M at 99.4%
share of 351 records

Sterilising and diagnosis claims are a distant second tier

Almost every record touches core A61M device hardware, but sterilising/disinfecting (A61L), diagnosis (A61B) and rescue equipment (A62B) each cover well under a fifth of records. Water treatment and filtration classes sit lower still, near 3%.

Shares add up past 100% because records carry multiple IPC classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cpap and sleep apnea therapy devices, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on CPAP and Sleep Apnea Therapy Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where it thins out

The assignee ranking covers 89 companies drawn from the full record set. The gap between the leader and the field is wide, and the lighter-claimed IPC branches point to where a new filer has more room to work.

Leader
128 records
top assignee

A single filer dominates the ranking

The leading assignee holds 128 of 351 records — more than the combined total of the second through fifth-place holders. Co-assignee pairs tied to this leader recur with named individual inventors, suggesting a stable internal R&D team rather than shifting external partnerships.

Fifth place sits at 10 records, a steep drop from the leader.
Mid-field
10 to 4 records
fifth to tenth place

A tight second tier, then a long tail

Fifth place holds 10 records and tenth place holds 4, a gentle slope compared with the cliff below the leader. Below tenth place the ranking spreads across many single- and low-digit filers.

308 of 351 records — 87.7% — sit with the top ten alone.
Momentum
0 filings, -100% YoY
several leading assignees, latest year

Leading filers show zero recent-year activity

Several of the most active historical assignees, including the top two ranked filers, show zero filings in the latest year and a -100% year-on-year change. This is consistent with the broader post-2021 decline, though publication lag means some of this is reporting delay rather than a genuine stop.

Treat the final year of any assignee's trend as provisional.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Technology branches with filing share well below the dominant A61M class
Humidifier water reservoir sterilisation methodsAdherence-data telemetry integrationAuto-titration algorithm tuningMask leak compensation sensingFiltration media for CPAP airflowPipe-fitting connectors for humidified air paths
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
ResMed Pty Ltd0-100%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd0-100%
SoClean Inc0
Inceptus Inc0
SIERRA MEDICAL TECH0
Somnetics International Inc0
Fresca Medical Inc0
Human Design Medical LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on CPAP and Sleep Apnea Therapy Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy or identifying a filing gap.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top assignees

With 78.6% of records held by five companies, any new humidification or delivery-hardware filing should be checked against the leader's claim set first, then against the fifth-to-tenth tier.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka →

Map the lightly-claimed IPC branches in detail

Water treatment, filtration and pipe-fitting classes each sit near 3% of records — worth a closer claim-by-claim read before assuming the space is genuinely open.

Explore white space in Eureka →

Watch for renewed filing after the 2021-2022 pullback

Several leading assignees show zero recent-year filings; publication lag means this could reverse. Track the next 12-18 months for a rebound.

Set up monitoring in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on CPAP and Sleep Apnea Therapy Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about CPAP patent activity

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on CPAP and Sleep Apnea Therapy Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research CPAP and Sleep Apnea Therapy Devices in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole cpap and sleep apnea therapy devices corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.