Book a demo

Crop Phenotyping Precision Agriculture Patent Snapshot

Crop Phenotyping Precision Agriculture Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Crop Phenotyping Precision Ag Patent Snapshot in 2026

This is a highly concentrated, nascent corpus with 24 patent families dominated by two applicants — Agri Victoria Services and KWS SAAT — who together account for the large majority of activity. Filing has been intermittent rather than sustained, signalling an early-stage field where a small number of well-targeted filings can establish meaningful positional advantage.

24
Patent families in scope
70%
Top visible applicants share
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Two organizations lead a highly concentrated nascent field

Agri Victoria Services Pty Ltd and KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA sit in a commanding tier-one position, together representing the vast majority of the ranked corpus. No other single applicant comes close to their volume, making this one of the most top-heavy competitive structures observable in an agricultural-technology corpus of this size.

The top five filers account for 70% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, an extreme concentration level. Beyond the top two, every remaining applicant holds a single patent record, producing a sharp cliff between the leaders and a long tail of one-off individual inventors and academic filers.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Agri Victoria Services Pty Ltd10
2KWS SAAT SE & CO KGAA9
3DEERE & CO2
4SAYALI PRAKASH SHINDE1
5DR ARVIND KUMAR TRIPATHI1
6DR POOJA KARKI1
7DR ABHA THAKUR1
8DR STUTI PATHAK1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
9Vishwakarma Institute of Technology1
10DR KULDEEP KUMAR1
11DR SONALI SHARMA1
12DR JYOTI SHARMA1
13Mineral Earth Sciences LLC1
14DR SHIVANI SHARMA1
15MS GURVINDER KAUR1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions imply that any new entrant seeking relevance in this space must either differentiate by technology route — particularly in branches the leaders have not emphasized — or pursue collaborative pathways with the academic inventors who populate the long tail.

Note that filings from the most recent 18–24 months are typically under-counted due to publication lag, so the apparent low volume in 20242025 should not be read as a decline. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Intermittent filing pattern with material science and imaging at the core

The filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that has seen concentrated bursts of activity rather than steady growth, anchored by optical analysis and image-recognition methods.

Annual filing trend

Activity peaked in 2022 with the single largest annual cohort on record, bookended by a modest 2017–2018 cluster and near silence in 2019–2021. Years 2024–2025 show only one record each, consistent with the expected publication lag for recently filed applications; the apparent quietening should not be interpreted as a real decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 10 in 2022.420178201802019020200202110202202023120241202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

Material analysis and testing (G01N) and image/video recognition (G06V) are jointly the leading branches, followed closely by soil-working agriculture (A01B) and horticulture and forestry (A01G). Image data processing (G06T) and bioinformatics (G16B) round out the upper tier. Drone-related branches (B64C, B64D) and AI-model computing (G06N) are present but sparse, indicating room for integration of autonomous sensing and machine-learning approaches.

Technology compositionG01N · Material analysis & testing leads with 11; G06V · Image/video recognition 11.G01N · Material analysis…11G06V · Image/video recog…11A01B · Soil working in a…10A01G · Horticulture & fo…10G06T · Image data proces…9G16B · Bioinformatics6G01B · Measuring length …4G01S · Radar, sonar & po…4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US12119086B2Published 2024-10-15

Method and system for performing data analysis for…

Kws Saat SE & CO. Kgaa

The invention relates to a method for performing data analysis for plant phenotyping of single plants in a field and a data acquisition and evaluation system for performing data analysis for plant phenotyping of single plants in a field. Further, the invention relates to a mobile platform for use in the data acquisition and evaluation system. The method… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method and system for performing data analysis for… — patent drawingMethod and system for performing data analysis for… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Plant phenotyping techniques using mechanical mani…16
2Method and system for performing data analysis for…16
3Systems and Methods for Automated Hyperspectral Ve…10
4Systems and methods for automated hyperspectral ve…9
5Plant phenotyping techniques using optical measure…9
6用于进行植物表型分型数据分析的方法和系统5
7System and method/process for in-field measurement…3
8Method and system for performing data analysis for…3

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Agri Victoria Services Pty Ltd

Agri Victoria Services Pty Ltd

Agri Victoria Services holds 10 patent records — the highest count in the corpus — and entered as a new entrant with all activity concentrated in the recent window. Its technical focus is anchored in optical material analysis (G01N 21) and image/video recognition (G06V 20, G06V 10), indicating a sensor-plus-vision strategy for in-field phenotyping. The new-entrant trajectory combined with immediate volume leadership signals a deliberate and rapid IP build-out rather than incremental expansion.

patent records: 10
Challenger · KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA

KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA

KWS SAAT holds 9 patent records and is the closest rival to Agri Victoria. Its emphasis falls on soil-working agronomy methods (A01B 79), field-level image recognition (G06V 20), and data recognition (G06K 9), reflecting a more agronomic and data-management orientation compared to Agri Victoria’s sensing-first approach. Momentum data places KWS SAAT outside the tracked new-entrant cohort, suggesting a more established filing history in adjacent areas that feeds into this corpus.

patent records: 9
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Deere & CoMineral Earth Sciences LLC+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own crop phenotyping Patent Snapshot?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.