Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (6 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 503 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Crosslinked gel fracturing fluids use a base polymer, typically guar or a guar derivative, joined by a borate or zirconate crosslinker to build high-temperature viscosity that carries proppant into a fracture. The claims in this field cluster around three practical problems: getting the crosslink to form after the fluid is placed rather than at the surface, breaking that same gel cleanly once the job is done, and stopping the residual polymer from damaging the formation face as filter cake. The 503 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off and were pulled using terms tied to borate and zirconate crosslinking, delayed gelation, breaker chemistry and the operating conditions — high-temperature viscosity, proppant settling, filter-cake damage — that define whether a formulation actually works downhole.
Most of the claim volume sits inside two IPC subclasses tied to the fluid chemistry itself and the wellbore application, which is expected given how narrowly the search terms target crosslinker and breaker mechanisms rather than surface equipment or pumping hardware.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 503 records: how filing activity moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Filings peaked at 24 in 2017 and fell across the following years. Taking 2021 (6 filings) through 2024 (1 filing) — the last year publication has largely caught up with — activity dropped 83%. Years after 2024 are not yet fully published, since publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so the apparent near-zero counts for 2025 and 2026 understate real activity and should not be read as the field going quiet.
C09K (materials for miscellaneous applications, covering the fracturing fluid formulations themselves) appears on 86.1% of the 503 records, and E21B (earth and rock drilling, the wellbore application) on 51.5%. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, these shares add to more than 100%; smaller subclasses — C08J polymer processing, C07F organo-metallic compounds, C08B polysaccharides, B01F mixing, C08K polymer additives and C12N microorganisms — each cover under 5% of records, marking the chemistry and delivery-mechanism detail that is comparatively under-claimed relative to the core formulation.
Shares are the percentage of the 503 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about crosslinked gel fracturing fluids and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patent describes improving borate crosslinked fracturing fluid breaker mechanisms by including a cation-releasing material. Released cations complex with the hydroxide or carbonate pH buffers used in the borate system, lowering fluid pH; the drop in pH uncrosslinks the polymer and can trigger or accelerate an enzyme breaker where one is present. In one embodiment the cations are divalent and are released slowly over time, giving a delayed break rather than an immediate one.Filed by Superior Energy Services and granted in 2003, this record sits inside the same breaker-mechanism cluster as several of the most-cited documents in this landscape.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5373901A | Encapsulated breakers and method for use in treating subterranean formations | 410 |
| 2 | US6357527B1 | Encapsulated breakers and method for use in treating subterranean formations | 312 |
| 3 | US6138760A | Pre-treatment methods for polymer-containing fluids | 221 |
| 4 | US6060436A | Delayed borate crosslinked fracturing fluid | 199 |
| 5 | US7275596B2 | Method of using degradable fiber systems for stimulation | 162 |
| 6 | US20080296024A1 | Procedures and Compositions for Reservoir Protection | 151 |
| 7 | US20060157248A1 | Well treatment with dissolvable polymer | 145 |
| 8 | US7527103B2 | Procedures and compositions for reservoir protection | 141 |
| 9 | US5445223A | Delayed borate crosslinked fracturing fluid having increased temperature range | 115 |
| 10 | US5259455A | Method of using borate crosslinked fracturing fluid having increased temperature range | 109 |
Citation counts favour older filings by construction — a document published in the late 1990s has had two decades longer to accumulate citations than one from 2020 — so treat this table as a map of foundational influence, not of current filing activity.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once family counts, filing dates and IPC codes are read together.
Just five assignees account for half of all 503 records in scope, and the ranked top 10 hold 72.6%. A newcomer targeting borate or zirconate crosslink chemistry head-on is filing into a crowded, well-defended space rather than open ground.
From a 2017 peak of 24 filings, volume fell to 1 by 2024 — the last year publication has substantially caught up with. Recent-year momentum for the largest assignees shows zero filings in the latest tracked year across the field's biggest holders, consistent with a maturing claim set rather than a data artefact.
C09K materials claims cover 86.1% of records while adjacent process classes such as C08J polymer processing (4.8%) and B01F mixing (3.0%) are comparatively thin. That gap is where formulation-adjacent process and delivery-mechanism claims remain less contested.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to crosslinked gel fracturing fluids, with the prior art for and against each one.
A small set of oilfield service majors carries most of the filing volume; the remaining share is a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants.
The top-ranked assignee holds 113 of the 503 records in scope, more than four times the fifth-place holder's 26. That gap suggests a defended core portfolio rather than a contested top spot.
Filings drop off steadily from fifth place (26) to tenth (21), rather than falling off a cliff — several oilfield-service and chemical suppliers maintain comparable filing programmes just below the top five.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest links sit between related entities of the same corporate group rather than between independent companies — cross-company joint filing is rare in this field.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Holdings LLC | 0 | — |
| Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Co. (Saudi Aramco) | 0 | — |
| Schlumberger Technology Corporation | 0 | — |
| Schlumberger Technology B.V. | 0 | — |
| Schlumberger Canada Limited | 0 | — |
| Schlumberger Holdings Limited | 0 | — |
| Independence Oilfield Chemicals LLC | 0 | — |
The landscape points to a mature, concentrated core and a thinner set of adjacent process claims. Two directions follow from that.
The most-cited records in this dataset cluster tightly around encapsulated and delayed breaker chemistry. Anyone designing a new breaker system should trace how those foundational claims have been narrowed or worked around since grant.
Explore breaker chemistry in EurekaC08J, B01F and C08K each cover under 5% of the 503 records despite sitting directly adjacent to the core formulation claims. A freedom-to-operate check focused on mixing, delivery and additive-loading claims is likely to surface less prior art than a search on crosslinker chemistry alone.
Run a white-space search in EurekaFiling activity is concentrated among a small number of large oilfield-service companies. The single largest assignee in this dataset holds 113 of the 503 records in scope, and the top five assignees together hold 50.3% of all records. Beyond the top ten, who hold 72.6% combined, the remaining assignees each hold comparatively few filings, forming a long tail rather than a second cluster of major holders.
Filing peaked at 24 records in 2017 and has declined since. Comparing 2021 (6 filings) to 2024 (1 filing), the last year publication has largely caught up with, activity fell 83%. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the very low counts shown for 2025 and 2026 are not yet reliable evidence of the field going quiet — but the decline through 2024 is real and predates that lag.
A borate crosslinked fracturing fluid uses a borate ion to link polymer chains, typically guar-based, into a gel viscous enough to carry proppant at high temperature and then break cleanly once the job is finished. The chemistry matters for patent purposes because most of the claim volume in this landscape — 86.1% of the 503 records touch the C09K materials class — sits on exactly this crosslink-and-break mechanism, making it the most heavily defended part of the field.
The thinnest IPC subclasses in this dataset — C08J polymer processing, C07F organo-metallic compounds, C08B polysaccharides, B01F mixing and C12N microorganisms, each under 5% of the 503 records — sit adjacent to the dominant C09K and E21B classes rather than replacing them. That pattern suggests formulation-adjacent process claims, delivery equipment and biopolymer-based systems are less contested than the core crosslinker chemistry itself, though a full freedom-to-operate review is still needed before filing.
US6642185B2 claims a borate crosslinked fracturing fluid breaker mechanism that uses a cation-releasing material to lower the fluid's pH over time, which uncrosslinks the gel and can trigger an accompanying enzyme breaker. It does not block borate crosslinking generally or enzyme breakers generally; it covers the specific combination of a cation-releasing, pH-lowering trigger used to control the timing of the break. Formulations that achieve delayed breaking through a different mechanism, such as encapsulated oxidizers or temperature-triggered breakers without a cation-release step, sit outside its literal claim scope, though a full claim chart is needed to confirm freedom to operate for any specific formulation.
Go past this page: query the whole crosslinked gel fracturing fluids corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.