Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This landscape draws on 408 published records filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine cryogenic air separation, molecular sieve prepurification, argon recovery and flexible-operation claims under IPC classes F25J3, B01D53 and C01B13. The scope is narrow by design: it isolates the process-engineering core of an air separation unit — column integration, specific power consumption and argon recovery — rather than every patent that merely mentions oxygen or nitrogen production.
Publication activity lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the final year in the trend understates real filing volume. Reading the trend line therefore means treating the last one to two years as provisional and weighting the 2017-2023 span more heavily when judging direction.
Two views of the same 408-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 31 in 2018, held near the middle of that range through 2022 at 19, and show no renewed acceleration through the most recent complete years — consistent with a technology whose core claim space was staked out early and has since seen incremental rather than expansive filing.
F25J (gas liquefaction and separation) appears on 97.1% of the 408 records, confirming this is squarely a gas-separation corpus. C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) and B01D (separation processes) each cover roughly 15% of records, reflecting the argon-purification and molecular-sieve claims that cross into those classes. Smaller counts in F01K, B01J, F23C, G05B and C01C mark thinner but present overlap with power-plant integration, catalysis, combustion and control-system claims.
Shares are the percentage of the 408 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cryogenic air separation units and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA method and apparatus for increasing argon recovery in which an impure argon stream is separated from air within a cryogenic air separation unit and purified within an integrated, multi-stage pressure swing adsorption system to produce product-grade argon with high argon recovery levels.Filed by Praxair Technology, Inc., published 2018-07-10.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4477265A | Argon purification | 119 |
| 2 | US6240744B1 | Process for distillation of multicomponent fluid and production of an argon-enriched stream from a cryogenic … | 116 |
| 3 | US4533375A | Cryogenic air separation with cold argon recycle | 89 |
| 4 | US5159816A | Method of purifying argon through cryogenic adsorption | 82 |
| 5 | US5440884A | Cryogenic air separation system with liquid air stripping | 59 |
| 6 | US6612113B2 | Integrated method of air separation and of energy generation and plant for the implementation of such a method | 53 |
| 7 | EP0341854A1 | Air separation process using packed columns for oxygen and argon recovery | 49 |
| 8 | US6351971B1 | System and method for producing high purity argon | 48 |
| 9 | WO2013040645A1 | Integrated chemical looping air separation in large-scale oxy-fuel plants | 45 |
| 10 | US5469710A | Cryogenic rectification system with enhanced argon recovery | 44 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; treat this list as a signal of influence on later argon-recovery work, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Four things worth knowing before drafting claims or scoping freedom-to-operate in this space.
The leading assignee holds 251 of the ranked records; by fifth place that figure is down to 11 and by tenth place just 3. This is not a gradual long tail — it is a single dominant filer sitting well above everyone else in the ranking.
Filing volume peaked in 2018 and has not recovered that level since, with the 2022 midpoint sitting at 19. Recent-year figures for the most active named filers all show zero filings in the latest year, though this partly reflects publication lag.
All five most-cited records in this corpus address argon purification or argon-enriched cryogenic streams, several dating to the 1980s and 1990s. New filings in argon recovery inherit a dense, long-established citation network.
Beyond the core F25J gas-separation class, roughly one in seven records also carries a C01B (inorganic compounds) or B01D (separation processes) class, marking where molecular-sieve and argon-purification claims cross technical boundaries.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cryogenic air separation units, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranking is dominated by one industrial gas major, with a long tail of individual inventors and university filers behind it. Co-assignee pairs point to a small, stable inventing team rather than a broad collaborative network.
The top-ranked assignee's 251 records dwarf the rest of the ranking; no other filer approaches that volume, and the gap to fifth place (11 records) is the clearest signal in this dataset of where claim density actually sits.
The strongest co-assignee pairings recur across roughly 17-19 shared filings each, suggesting a compact internal team rather than shifting external collaboration — useful context when tracing inventorship on specific claims.
Behind the industrial gas majors, the ranking includes individually named inventors and at least one university-affiliated filer, indicating pockets of academic or independent-inventor activity outside the corporate core.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Praxair Technology, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 0 | — |
| PROSSER NEIL M | 0 | — |
| KROMER BRIAN R | 0 | — |
| HANDLEY JAMES R | 0 | — |
| LUO YANG | 0 | — |
| L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Étude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude | 0 | -100% |
| Linde AG | 0 | -100% |
This landscape identifies where claim density sits and where it does not. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision requires going deeper on specific claim language.
The five most-cited records all concern argon purification; any new argon-recovery filing should be checked claim-by-claim against these before drafting.
Explore prior art in EurekaWith one assignee holding 251 of the ranked records, understanding exactly what its most recent claims cover is more useful than the aggregate count alone.
Search assignee portfolios in EurekaControl-system, combustion and catalysis overlaps with core ASU claims are thin in this corpus — worth a targeted search before assuming the space is clear.
Run a white-space search in EurekaOne industrial gas company holds a clearly dominant position in this dataset, with 251 records in a 37-company ranking versus 11 for the fifth-ranked filer. That gap is unusually steep rather than a gradual taper, meaning freedom-to-operate work in this field should start with that single filer's portfolio before moving to the long tail of smaller filers and individual inventors. The concentration is measured in patent family records within the ranked set, not as a percentage of all published documents.
No. Filing volume peaked in 2018 at 31 records and has not returned to that level since, sitting at 19 by the 2022 midpoint of the trend. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the final year or two in any trend understates true activity, but the multi-year plateau visible before that lag window is a genuine signal that filing has flattened rather than accelerated.
US10018413B2, assigned to Praxair Technology, Inc. and published in 2018, covers a method and apparatus for increasing argon recovery by separating an impure argon stream within a cryogenic air separation unit and purifying it using an integrated, multi-stage pressure swing adsorption system. It is a representative example of how PSA integration has been used to lift argon recovery yields rather than a foundational or singularly blocking patent. Anyone designing an integrated argon-PSA recovery process should review its specific claim scope directly rather than relying on the abstract alone.
Based on IPC composition in this dataset, control-system integration with ASU turndown, combustion-linked heat recovery from waste streams, and catalytic pretreatment ahead of molecular sieve beds all show thin representation relative to the core gas-separation claims. These overlaps each account for a small single-digit percentage of the 408 records in scope, suggesting lighter claim density there than in core distillation and argon-purification claims. That said, thin representation in a search corpus is a starting hypothesis for a design search, not a guarantee of open white space.
The five most-cited records in this corpus are all argon purification or argon-enriched stream patents, several originating in the 1980s and 1990s, including US4477265A and US6240744B1. Argon recovery from cryogenic air separation is a narrower, more technically constrained problem than bulk oxygen or nitrogen separation, so early foundational solutions tend to accumulate citations from every subsequent improvement. This is a signal of historical influence within the searched corpus, not necessarily of current commercial relevance.
Go past this page: query the whole cryogenic air separation units corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.