https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/cryogenic-air-separation-units-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Chemical Process Engineering
Cryogenic Air Separation Unit Patents: Leaders, Filing Trends and Open Ground
  • One assignee dominates. the leading filer holds 251 records against a fifth-place count of just 11 — a steep drop-off rather than a gradual taper.
  • Filings peaked in 2018 at 31 and have since flattened. the 2022 midpoint of 19 sits well below peak, with no sign of a renewed filing wave.
  • Argon purification patents dominate the citation record. the five most-cited documents in this set are all argon recovery or argon-enriched stream processes, some dating to the 1980s and still drawing citations.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
408
Published Records
-92%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
37
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent set covers

This landscape draws on 408 published records filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine cryogenic air separation, molecular sieve prepurification, argon recovery and flexible-operation claims under IPC classes F25J3, B01D53 and C01B13. The scope is narrow by design: it isolates the process-engineering core of an air separation unit — column integration, specific power consumption and argon recovery — rather than every patent that merely mentions oxygen or nitrogen production.

Publication activity lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the final year in the trend understates real filing volume. Reading the trend line therefore means treating the last one to two years as provisional and weighting the 2017-2023 span more heavily when judging direction.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1PRAXAIR TECH INC251
  2. 2AIR PROD & CHEM INC83
  3. 3LINDE AG17
  4. 4LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE16
  5. 5ERICKSON DONALD C11
  6. 6ERICKSON DONALD CHARLES10
  7. 7THE UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE8
  8. 8PROSSER NEIL MARK6
  9. 9JIBB RICHARD JOHN4
  10. 10NEWCASTE INNOVATION LTD3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic Air Separation Units covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 408-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A 2018 peak, then a plateau

Filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 31 in 2018, held near the middle of that range through 2022 at 19, and show no renewed acceleration through the most recent complete years — consistent with a technology whose core claim space was staked out early and has since seen incremental rather than expansive filing.

A 2018 peak, then a plateau01020304042017312018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in gas separation, with inorganic-chemistry and filtration overlap

F25J (gas liquefaction and separation) appears on 97.1% of the 408 records, confirming this is squarely a gas-separation corpus. C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) and B01D (separation processes) each cover roughly 15% of records, reflecting the argon-purification and molecular-sieve claims that cross into those classes. Smaller counts in F01K, B01J, F23C, G05B and C01C mark thinner but present overlap with power-plant integration, catalysis, combustion and control-system claims.

Concentrated in gas separation, with inorganic-chemistry and filtration overlapF25J · Gas liquefaction & separation39697.1%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…6315.4%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…6115.0%F01K · Steam & thermal power plants102.5%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …92.2%F23C · Combustion apparatus92.2%G05B · Control & regulating systems71.7%C01C · Ammonia, cyanides & nitrogen c…61.5%Other4310.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 408 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic Air Separation Units covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Cryogenic Air Separation Units with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cryogenic air separation units and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents every design-around search returns

Representative filing
US10018413B22018-07-10

US10018413B2 — Increasing argon recovery via integrated PSA

PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

A method and apparatus for increasing argon recovery in which an impure argon stream is separated from air within a cryogenic air separation unit and purified within an integrated, multi-stage pressure swing adsorption system to produce product-grade argon with high argon recovery levels.Filed by Praxair Technology, Inc., published 2018-07-10.

US10018413B2 — patent drawing 1US10018413B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4477265AArgon purification119
2US6240744B1Process for distillation of multicomponent fluid and production of an argon-enriched stream from a cryogenic …116
3US4533375ACryogenic air separation with cold argon recycle89
4US5159816AMethod of purifying argon through cryogenic adsorption82
5US5440884ACryogenic air separation system with liquid air stripping59
6US6612113B2Integrated method of air separation and of energy generation and plant for the implementation of such a method53
7EP0341854A1Air separation process using packed columns for oxygen and argon recovery49
8US6351971B1System and method for producing high purity argon48
9WO2013040645A1Integrated chemical looping air separation in large-scale oxy-fuel plants45
10US5469710ACryogenic rectification system with enhanced argon recovery44

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; treat this list as a signal of influence on later argon-recovery work, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic Air Separation Units covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Four things worth knowing before drafting claims or scoping freedom-to-operate in this space.

Concentration at the top
251 vs 11
leader vs fifth place

One filer, then a steep drop

The leading assignee holds 251 of the ranked records; by fifth place that figure is down to 11 and by tenth place just 3. This is not a gradual long tail — it is a single dominant filer sitting well above everyone else in the ranking.

Ranking covers 37 companies total.
Filing momentum
31 → 19 → declining
peak (2018) vs midpoint (2022)

Past the peak, not accelerating

Filing volume peaked in 2018 and has not recovered that level since, with the 2022 midpoint sitting at 19. Recent-year figures for the most active named filers all show zero filings in the latest year, though this partly reflects publication lag.

Most recent year (2026) is a partial year.
Citation concentration
5 of 5 top-cited on argon
top-cited records

Argon purification anchors the prior art

All five most-cited records in this corpus address argon purification or argon-enriched cryogenic streams, several dating to the 1980s and 1990s. New filings in argon recovery inherit a dense, long-established citation network.

Oldest top-cited record: US4477265A, cited 119 times.
Cross-class overlap
15.4% and 15.0%
C01B and B01D share of 408 records

Purification claims straddle two extra IPC classes

Beyond the core F25J gas-separation class, roughly one in seven records also carries a C01B (inorganic compounds) or B01D (separation processes) class, marking where molecular-sieve and argon-purification claims cross technical boundaries.

Shares exceed 100% combined because records carry multiple IPC classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cryogenic air separation units, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic Air Separation Units covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the ground is open

The ranking is dominated by one industrial gas major, with a long tail of individual inventors and university filers behind it. Co-assignee pairs point to a small, stable inventing team rather than a broad collaborative network.

Dominant filer
251 records
leader in a 37-company ranking

A single leader well ahead of the field

The top-ranked assignee's 251 records dwarf the rest of the ranking; no other filer approaches that volume, and the gap to fifth place (11 records) is the clearest signal in this dataset of where claim density actually sits.

Ranking is the full 37-company list returned by the data endpoint.
Stable inventing core
19 co-filings
strongest co-assignee pair

A small, consistent inventor team

The strongest co-assignee pairings recur across roughly 17-19 shared filings each, suggesting a compact internal team rather than shifting external collaboration — useful context when tracing inventorship on specific claims.

10 co-assignee pairs identified in total.
Long tail
37 ranked filers
companies, individuals and universities

Individual inventors and one university sit in the tail

Behind the industrial gas majors, the ranking includes individually named inventors and at least one university-affiliated filer, indicating pockets of academic or independent-inventor activity outside the corporate core.

Includes named individual inventors alongside corporate assignees.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Based on thin representation in the IPC composition and citation data, these branches carry comparatively light claim density in this corpus.
Control-system integration with ASU turndown (G05B overlap)Combustion-linked heat recovery from ASU waste streams (F23C overlap)Catalytic pretreatment ahead of molecular sieve beds (B01J overlap)Ammonia-linked nitrogen product integration (C01C overlap)Steam-cycle coupling for flexible ASU operation (F01K overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Praxair Technology, Inc.0-100%
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.0
PROSSER NEIL M0
KROMER BRIAN R0
HANDLEY JAMES R0
LUO YANG0
L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Étude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude0-100%
Linde AG0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic Air Separation Units covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

This landscape identifies where claim density sits and where it does not. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision requires going deeper on specific claim language.

Run a design-around check on the top-cited argon patents

The five most-cited records all concern argon purification; any new argon-recovery filing should be checked claim-by-claim against these before drafting.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Track the dominant filer's recent claim language

With one assignee holding 251 of the ranked records, understanding exactly what its most recent claims cover is more useful than the aggregate count alone.

Search assignee portfolios in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed IPC overlaps

Control-system, combustion and catalysis overlaps with core ASU claims are thin in this corpus — worth a targeted search before assuming the space is clear.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic Air Separation Units covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on cryogenic air separation patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic Air Separation Units covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Cryogenic Air Separation Units in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole cryogenic air separation units corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.