https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/cryogenic-and-multilayer-insulation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Thermal Insulation Materials
Cryogenic and Multilayer Insulation Patents: Who Holds the Ground and Where It's Open
  • 27.8% of all 180 records sit with just five assignees, but the ranked list runs 100 companies deep — concentration at the top, a long tail beneath it.
  • Filings peaked in 2018 at 12 and the 2021-to-2024 span shows a -100% swing; treat 2025-2026 as still filling in, not as a real decline.
  • F17C pressure vessels lead at 27.2% of records, but B32B layered products (21.1%) and H01B insulators (7.8%) show where claim density thins out.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
180
Published Records
28%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (9 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 180 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers 180 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine multilayer insulation, cryogenic insulation or vacuum-jacketed pipe terminology with specific technical elements — radiation shield layers, layer density, outgassing rate, boil-off rate, spacer material or vacuum retention. That combination narrows the field to documents making concrete engineering claims rather than general thermal-management filings, which is why the total is modest next to broader insulation searches.

The scope spans cryogenic storage vessels, vacuum-jacketed pipe systems, spacecraft and industrial multilayer insulation blankets, and the spacer and shield materials that sit inside them. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the largest single office, with Europe, the WIPO PCT route, Japan and Germany all carrying meaningful volume — evidence that this is filed as an internationally contested space, not a domestic niche.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1CABOT CORP11
  2. 2UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR NAT AERONAUTICS & SPACE ADMINISTRATION11
  3. 3THERMOPAC10
  4. 4SLADE ROBERT ANDREW9
  5. 5FEE MICHAEL GRAEME9
  6. 6VICTORIA LINK LTD9
  7. 7HAMILTON KENT ANTHONY8
  8. 8ESCOLA SUPERIOR DE ENFERMAGEM DO PORTO8
  9. 9TOKITAE LLC8
  10. 10BADCOCK RODNEY ALAN8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic and Multilayer Insulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 180 records: how filing activity has moved year on year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 12 in 2018, then eased. The 2021-to-2024 span shows a -100% change on the figures in scope; because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 are undercounted and should not be read as an active slowdown.

Filing trend, 2017-202603691222017122018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

F17C (pressure vessels & gas storage) leads at 27.2% of the 180 records, followed by F16L (pipes & pipe fittings) at 23.3% and B32B (layered products & laminates) at 21.1%. H01F, F25D, H01B, B65B and G01N each cover a smaller share; since records can carry multiple classes, these figures sum to more than 100%.

IPC subclass compositionF17C · Pressure vessels & gas storage4927.2%F16L · Pipes & pipe fittings4223.3%B32B · Layered products & laminates3821.1%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…2715.0%F25D · Refrigerators & cooling147.8%H01B · Cables, conductors & insulators147.8%B65B · Packaging & wrapping116.1%G01N · Material analysis & testing105.6%Other10457.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 180 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic and Multilayer Insulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Cryogenic and Multilayer Insulation with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cryogenic and multilayer insulation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative Filing
US6521077B12003-02-18

Method for insulating a cryogenic container (US6521077B1)

LYDALL, INC.

Describes a method and a packaged multilayer insulation blanket for insulating cryogenic tanks, pipes or other extreme-temperature elements. The blanket alternates heat-reflective foil layers with microfiberglass spacer material, sandwiched between two sealed plastic sheeting layers that define an evacuated inside space around the insulation.Assigned to Lydall, Inc.; published 2003-02-18.

US6521077B1 — patent drawing 1US6521077B1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6485805B1Multilayer insulation composite112
2US4036617ASupport system for an elongated cryogenic envelope97
3US5277959AComposite flexible blanket insulation83
4US5030518AMulti-layer thermal insulation, especially for spacecraft76
5US6521077B1Method for insulating a cryogenic container71
6US4046407AElongated cryogenic envelope55
7US6742926B1Methods of testing thermal insulation and associated test apparatus54
8US20140352329A1Temperature-stabilized storage systems with regulated cooling51
9US3540615APanelized high-performance multilayer insulation48
10WO1999036725A1Multilayer insulation composite47

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references; treat them as a measure of influence within this corpus, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic and Multilayer Insulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Reading the concentration, trend and citation data together points to where claim space is occupied and where it is not.

Concentration
27.8% / 50.6%
top 5 / top 10 share of 180 records

Leadership is real but not locked in

The top five assignees hold 27.8% of all 180 records and the top ten hold 50.6% — meaningful concentration, but with 100 companies appearing in the ranking, over half the field is held by entities outside that top tier. A new entrant is not filing into a two-player market.

Based on the full 100-company assignee ranking
Trend
-100%
2021 → 2024 change

Read the recent years cautiously

Filing peaked in 2018 at 12 and the 2021-to-2024 span shows a -100% swing on these figures. Because publication trails filing by around 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts are still incomplete and should not be treated as evidence the field has gone quiet.

Peak year: 2018 at 12 filings
Technology mix
27.2% F17C
share of 180 records

Storage vessels dominate, insulators trail

F17C pressure-vessel claims and F16L pipe claims together account for the bulk of filing activity. H01B cable/insulator claims and B65B packaging claims sit at 7.8% and 6.1% respectively, which is thin coverage relative to the core vessel and pipe categories.

Classes overlap; shares are of the 180-record total
Citation signal
112 citations
US6485805B1, most-cited record

Foundational blanket-composite claims still anchor the field

The most-cited records describe multilayer insulation composites and support systems for cryogenic envelopes dating back decades. Their citation counts reflect longevity in a searched corpus, not that the underlying claims remain the most commercially active route today.

Top five citation counts range from 71 to 112
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cryogenic and multilayer insulation, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic and Multilayer Insulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee ranking runs 100 companies deep, from a leader at 11 records down through a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants. Recent-year momentum across the most active named assignees shows zero filings in the latest year for each — consistent with the publication lag rather than a sign the leaders have exited.

Leader
11 records
top-ranked assignee

A narrow lead, not a monopoly

The top-ranked assignee holds 11 records against a fifth-place figure of 9 and a tenth-place figure of 8 — a gentle gradient rather than a cliff, meaning the field is contestable near the top.

Fifth place: 9 records · Tenth place: 8 records
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships identified

A small cluster files jointly

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the data, with the strongest pairing appearing across nine shared records and two others at eight — evidence of a research partnership structure rather than isolated inventors.

Strongest pair: 9 shared records
Filing geography
US 55 · EPO 34
leading receiving offices

US and Europe carry the bulk of filings

The United States receives the largest single share of filings, with the European Patent Office and the WIPO PCT route also carrying substantial volume, followed by Japan and Germany — a filing footprint that spans all three major markets.

WIPO PCT: 17 · Japan: 14 · Germany: 10
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These sit adjacent to the dense F17C/F16L/B32B core but show thinner coverage in the composition data.
outgassing-rate test methodsspacer material density optimisationvacuum retention monitoringradiation shield layer stacking sequencesboil-off rate reduction for small-bore pipe
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Cabot Corporation0
AEROGEL CARD D O O0
THERMOPAC0
Victoria Link Ltd0
FEE MICHAEL GRAEME0
Tokitae LLC0
WALSH ROWAN MARTIN0
SLADE ROBERT ANDREW0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic and Multilayer Insulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

This landscape identifies structure — concentration, trend and composition. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, a filing strategy, or tracking a specific competitor.

Check freedom-to-operate against the cited core

The highest-cited records describe foundational multilayer blanket and support-system claims. Any new filing on blanket composites or cryogenic envelope support should be checked against these before drafting.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Track the co-filing cluster

A small group of assignees files jointly and repeatedly. Watching this cluster's activity is a faster read on where the research frontier is moving than watching the full 100-company ranking.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed branches

Outgassing-rate methods and vacuum-retention monitoring show thinner coverage than the core vessel and pipe classes. A claim drafted specifically around test methodology may face less prior art.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic and Multilayer Insulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on cryogenic and multilayer insulation patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic and Multilayer Insulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Cryogenic and Multilayer Insulation in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole cryogenic and multilayer insulation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.