Cryogenic Etching Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
Cryogenic Etching for Deep Structures: Patents, Leaders and Open Claim Space
36.3% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees together hold 1,191 of the 3,280 records in scope — a dense core surrounded by a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants. Volume ran from 112 records in 2017 to a peak of 160 in 2025. The 2021-to-2024 window shows a 16% decline (77 to 65), but 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete under the ~18-month publication lag, so a slowdown reading should stop at 2024.
- 1MEMJET TECH LTD13.8%
- 2ZAMTEC7.0%
- 3SEMICON COMPONENTS IND LLC6.5%
- 4SILVERBROOK RESEARCH PTY LTD5.2%
- 5INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG3.9%
See the full cryogenic etching for deep structures analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on cryogenic etching patents
What is cryogenic etching used for in deep silicon structures?
Cryogenic etching cools the substrate, typically well below room temperature, during plasma etching so that sidewall passivation forms more effectively and the etch profile stays vertical over deep, high-aspect-ratio features. It is used for through-silicon vias, MEMS trenches and, notably in this dataset, inkjet printhead nozzle structures. The technique is one of two dominant approaches for deep reactive-ion etching, the other being the room-temperature Bosch process with its alternating etch and passivation cycles.
How does cryogenic etching differ from the Bosch process?
The Bosch process alternates etch and passivation steps at room temperature, producing the characteristic scalloped sidewalls that this dataset’s search terms specifically target. Cryogenic etching instead relies on continuous low-temperature operation to form a thin passivation layer in situ, generally producing smoother sidewalls with less scalloping but requiring tighter substrate-temperature control. Patent filings in this space often address exactly that trade-off — profile smoothness versus process-window sensitivity.
Who are the leading patent filers in cryogenic etching for deep structures?
The ranked list covers 100 companies, with the leading assignee holding 453 of the 3,280 records in scope and the top five together holding 36.3% of all records. The field includes semiconductor equipment makers, device manufacturers and, historically, inkjet printhead companies whose deep-etch fabrication overlaps with semiconductor process chemistry. Several of the largest historical filers show no filings in the most recent tracked year, so current leadership may differ from cumulative leadership.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cryogenic Etching for Deep Structures covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.