https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/current-collectors-and-composite-foils-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Batteries & Energy Storage
Current collector and composite foil patents: who is still filing after the 2023 peak
  • Filing has turned over. activity peaked at 1,917 families in 2023 and every major assignee tracked shows a double-digit to near-90% year-on-year decline into the latest period.
  • Ownership is concentrated but consolidating. co-assignee pairs cluster around SK, Panasonic-Sanyo and LG Energy Solution-LG Chem, pointing to internal group filing rather than external cross-licensing.
  • The claim space sits almost entirely inside H01M. 19,989 of 24,786 records sit in batteries and cells, leaving capacitor (H01G) and coating-process (C23C, B05D) branches comparatively open.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
24.8K
Published Records
26%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+8%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1,440 records) with 2024 (1,551) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 24,786 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this dataset covers

This landscape draws on 24,786 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine current collector or composite foil terminology with claim language on coating adhesion, carbon primers, thickness reduction, puncture safety or conductivity, filed under H01M4, H01M50 or C23C14. The scope is deliberately narrow: it is not every battery electrode patent, but the subset where the collector or foil itself, rather than the active material, is the inventive subject.

Filings entered the United States Patent and Trademark Office most heavily, followed by the European Patent Office, with the PCT route, China, Canada and Australia trailing behind. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend line understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional floors, not final counts.

Filing trend by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD2,720
  2. 2SAMSUNG SDI CO LTD1,371
  3. 3CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) LIMITED838
  4. 4TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK833
  5. 5PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD796
  6. 6NINGDE AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY LTD717
  7. 7CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO LTD619
  8. 8LG CHEM LTD572
  9. 9NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD553
  10. 10SK ON CO LTD525
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Current Collectors and Composite Foils covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 24,786-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those families split across IPC subclasses.

A 2023 peak followed by a broad pullback

Annual filings rose from 813 in 2017 to a peak of 1,917 in 2023, with 2022 already at 1,799 - meaning growth had flattened well before the visible peak. The decline since is not an artefact of publication lag alone: assignee-level momentum data shows double-digit to near-90% year-on-year drops carrying into the latest tracked year, which points to a genuine slowdown in new filing rather than a reporting gap.

A 2023 peak followed by a broad pullback05001,0001,5002,0008132017201820192020202120221,9172023202420251502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H01M dominates; coating and alloy classes are thin by comparison

H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) accounts for 19,989 of the 24,786 records, roughly eight in ten. H01G (capacitors) holds a distant second at 1,133, with C23C, B05D, C22C, C01B, C25D and H01B each under 320. That imbalance is a filing map, not a technical judgement: the coating-process and electroplating classes are thin because fewer applicants have chosen to claim there, not because the underlying deposition techniques are unimportant to collector performance.

H01M dominates; coating and alloy classes are thin by comparisonH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells19,98980.6%H01G · Capacitors1,1334.6%C23C · Coating & surface deposition3121.3%B05D · Coating processes2841.1%C22C · Alloys2381.0%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…2320.9%C25D · Electroplating & electroforming1880.8%H01B · Cables, conductors & insulators1780.7%Other2,79611.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 24,786 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Current Collectors and Composite Foils covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Current Collectors and Composite Foils with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about current collectors and composite foils and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative filing

A representative composite current collector claim

Filed by Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited · 2022-03-17
US20220085384A12022-03-17

US20220085384A1 - Composite current collector, electrode plate and electrochemical device

CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) LIMITED

The present application discloses a composite current collector, an electrode plate and an electrochemical device. The composite current collector includes an organic support layer and a metal conductive layer disposed on at least one surface of the organic support layer; and the composite current collector has a brittleness parameter C of 0.01<=C<=0.5. The composite current collector provided by the present application has relatively high mechanics and mechanical properties which having good electrical conductivity and current collection performance, which can improve preparation yield of the composite current collector, the electrode plate and the electrochemical device and their reliability.Abstract reproduced from the published application.

US20220085384A1 — patent drawing 1US20220085384A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20140170488A1Collector, electrode structure, non-aqueous electrolyte cell, and electricity storage component556
2US20030099884A1Battery structures, self-organizing structures and related methods437
3US6402795B1Plating metal negative electrodes under protective coatings396
4US6252762B1Rechargeable hybrid battery/supercapacitor system368
5US6413285B1Layered arrangements of lithium electrodes340
6US5744258AHigh power, high energy, hybrid electrode and electrical energy storage device made therefrom317
7US6214061B1Method for forming encapsulated lithium electrodes having glass protective layers291
8US20090186267A1Porous silicon particulates for lithium batteries286
9US20030165744A1Flexible thin printed battery and device and method of manufacturing same272
10US20130171502A1Hybrid electrode and surface-mediated cell-based super-hybrid energy storage device containing same263

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current filing activity.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Current Collectors and Composite Foils covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal check

What the data actually indicates

Three read-throughs from the filing trend, the IPC split and the citation table, framed for a filing or freedom-to-operate decision.

Filing momentum
1,917 → 150
peak year vs. latest partial year

The pullback is broad, not one company retrenching

Every assignee tracked in the momentum data - from Samsung SDI to CATL to Toyota - shows a year-on-year decline in the latest period, several exceeding 80%. That breadth suggests a category-wide pause in new filing rather than a single competitor exiting the space.

Read with the 18-month publication lag in mind.
Claim concentration
19,989 of 24,786
records classified under H01M

Battery-cell claims crowd out adjacent framing

Roughly eight in ten families sit in H01M. Capacitor-side claims (H01G) and pure coating-process claims (C23C, B05D) are filed far less often, which is either unclaimed opportunity or a sign that those routes have not proven commercially decisive enough to protect separately.

Compare against the IPC breakdown above.
Prior art weight
556 citations
on the most-cited record in this set

The oldest collector patents still anchor freedom-to-operate review

The most-cited records date to the 2000s and early 2010s and concern basic collector structure and layered lithium electrode arrangements. New filings in coating adhesion or thickness reduction still have to clear this older art before a novelty argument holds.

Citation counts favour age; treat as influence, not current relevance.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to current collectors and composite foils, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Current Collectors and Composite Foils covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignees

Who is filing, and who has stepped back

Recent-year momentum shows a consistent pattern: established battery makers built large collector-foil portfolios through 2022-2023 and have since cut new filing sharply, even as they remain the largest cumulative holders.

Momentum leader by volume
31 in latest year
Samsung SDI, -89% YoY

Large filers are pulling back fastest

Samsung SDI, CATL and LG Energy Solution each still filed double-digit family counts in the latest tracked year, but each also posted a year-on-year decline of 75% or more, the steepest drops among the group tracked.

Momentum reflects the most recent, partial year.
Group filing pattern
40 shared families
SK Innovation + SK On co-assignee pair

Co-filing sits inside corporate groups, not across them

The strongest co-assignee pairs - SK Innovation with SK On, Panasonic with Sanyo, LG Energy Solution with LG Chem - are all intra-group relationships. That points to internal R&D and joint-venture filing structures rather than cross-company licensing deals.

10 co-assignee pairs identified in total.
Slowest to retreat
4 in latest year
Toyota, -94% YoY

Even low-volume filers are cutting back

Toyota's filing count was already modest and has fallen further, the steepest percentage decline in the tracked group. That is consistent with a category-wide pause rather than a shift of activity toward any single remaining filer.

Read percentage changes alongside absolute volume.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Based on the IPC composition, these adjacent areas carry far fewer families than the core H01M classes.
Capacitor-grade composite foil laminatesElectroplated collector surface finishing (C25D)Carbon primer coating processes (B05D)Alloy-based collector substrates (C22C)Non-metallic conductive coatings (C01B)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.31-89%
Ningde Amperex Technology Limited (ATL)17-76%
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.15-75%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL)13-79%
SK Innovation Co., Ltd.9-89%
Toyota Motor Corporation4-94%
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.2-86%
LG Chem, Ltd.1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Current Collectors and Composite Foils covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next steps

Where to take this next

The trend and assignee data point to specific follow-up work depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for a filing opening.

Check the coating-process white space against your own claims

C23C and B05D together hold under 600 of the 24,786 families. If your work involves carbon primer or adhesion coating steps rather than collector structure itself, this branch is worth a closer novelty search before assuming it is crowded.

Explore coating-process filings in Eureka

Map the CATL composite current collector claim against your design

US20220085384A1's brittleness-parameter claim is specific and citable. A design that avoids the stated brittleness range, or uses a different support-layer material entirely, is the most direct way to test whether it actually reads on your product.

Pull the full claim set in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Current Collectors and Composite Foils covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on current collector and composite foil patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Current Collectors and Composite Foils covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Current Collectors and Composite Foils in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole current collectors and composite foils corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.