Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (1,440 records) with 2024 (1,551) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 24,786 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape draws on 24,786 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine current collector or composite foil terminology with claim language on coating adhesion, carbon primers, thickness reduction, puncture safety or conductivity, filed under H01M4, H01M50 or C23C14. The scope is deliberately narrow: it is not every battery electrode patent, but the subset where the collector or foil itself, rather than the active material, is the inventive subject.
Filings entered the United States Patent and Trademark Office most heavily, followed by the European Patent Office, with the PCT route, China, Canada and Australia trailing behind. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend line understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional floors, not final counts.
Two views of the same 24,786-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those families split across IPC subclasses.
Annual filings rose from 813 in 2017 to a peak of 1,917 in 2023, with 2022 already at 1,799 - meaning growth had flattened well before the visible peak. The decline since is not an artefact of publication lag alone: assignee-level momentum data shows double-digit to near-90% year-on-year drops carrying into the latest tracked year, which points to a genuine slowdown in new filing rather than a reporting gap.
H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) accounts for 19,989 of the 24,786 records, roughly eight in ten. H01G (capacitors) holds a distant second at 1,133, with C23C, B05D, C22C, C01B, C25D and H01B each under 320. That imbalance is a filing map, not a technical judgement: the coating-process and electroplating classes are thin because fewer applicants have chosen to claim there, not because the underlying deposition techniques are unimportant to collector performance.
Shares are the percentage of the 24,786 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about current collectors and composite foils and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe present application discloses a composite current collector, an electrode plate and an electrochemical device. The composite current collector includes an organic support layer and a metal conductive layer disposed on at least one surface of the organic support layer; and the composite current collector has a brittleness parameter C of 0.01<=C<=0.5. The composite current collector provided by the present application has relatively high mechanics and mechanical properties which having good electrical conductivity and current collection performance, which can improve preparation yield of the composite current collector, the electrode plate and the electrochemical device and their reliability.Abstract reproduced from the published application.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20140170488A1 | Collector, electrode structure, non-aqueous electrolyte cell, and electricity storage component | 556 |
| 2 | US20030099884A1 | Battery structures, self-organizing structures and related methods | 437 |
| 3 | US6402795B1 | Plating metal negative electrodes under protective coatings | 396 |
| 4 | US6252762B1 | Rechargeable hybrid battery/supercapacitor system | 368 |
| 5 | US6413285B1 | Layered arrangements of lithium electrodes | 340 |
| 6 | US5744258A | High power, high energy, hybrid electrode and electrical energy storage device made therefrom | 317 |
| 7 | US6214061B1 | Method for forming encapsulated lithium electrodes having glass protective layers | 291 |
| 8 | US20090186267A1 | Porous silicon particulates for lithium batteries | 286 |
| 9 | US20030165744A1 | Flexible thin printed battery and device and method of manufacturing same | 272 |
| 10 | US20130171502A1 | Hybrid electrode and surface-mediated cell-based super-hybrid energy storage device containing same | 263 |
Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current filing activity.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the filing trend, the IPC split and the citation table, framed for a filing or freedom-to-operate decision.
Every assignee tracked in the momentum data - from Samsung SDI to CATL to Toyota - shows a year-on-year decline in the latest period, several exceeding 80%. That breadth suggests a category-wide pause in new filing rather than a single competitor exiting the space.
Roughly eight in ten families sit in H01M. Capacitor-side claims (H01G) and pure coating-process claims (C23C, B05D) are filed far less often, which is either unclaimed opportunity or a sign that those routes have not proven commercially decisive enough to protect separately.
The most-cited records date to the 2000s and early 2010s and concern basic collector structure and layered lithium electrode arrangements. New filings in coating adhesion or thickness reduction still have to clear this older art before a novelty argument holds.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to current collectors and composite foils, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum shows a consistent pattern: established battery makers built large collector-foil portfolios through 2022-2023 and have since cut new filing sharply, even as they remain the largest cumulative holders.
Samsung SDI, CATL and LG Energy Solution each still filed double-digit family counts in the latest tracked year, but each also posted a year-on-year decline of 75% or more, the steepest drops among the group tracked.
The strongest co-assignee pairs - SK Innovation with SK On, Panasonic with Sanyo, LG Energy Solution with LG Chem - are all intra-group relationships. That points to internal R&D and joint-venture filing structures rather than cross-company licensing deals.
Toyota's filing count was already modest and has fallen further, the steepest percentage decline in the tracked group. That is consistent with a category-wide pause rather than a shift of activity toward any single remaining filer.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. | 31 | -89% |
| Ningde Amperex Technology Limited (ATL) | 17 | -76% |
| LG Energy Solution, Ltd. | 15 | -75% |
| Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL) | 13 | -79% |
| SK Innovation Co., Ltd. | 9 | -89% |
| Toyota Motor Corporation | 4 | -94% |
| Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | 2 | -86% |
| LG Chem, Ltd. | 1 | — |
The trend and assignee data point to specific follow-up work depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for a filing opening.
C23C and B05D together hold under 600 of the 24,786 families. If your work involves carbon primer or adhesion coating steps rather than collector structure itself, this branch is worth a closer novelty search before assuming it is crowded.
Explore coating-process filings in EurekaUS20220085384A1's brittleness-parameter claim is specific and citable. A design that avoids the stated brittleness range, or uses a different support-layer material entirely, is the most direct way to test whether it actually reads on your product.
Pull the full claim set in EurekaThe dataset shows filings rising from 813 in 2017 to a peak of 1,917 in 2023, with the prior year, 2022, already nearly as high at 1,799 - meaning growth had flattened before the visible peak. Recent-year momentum data shows every major assignee tracked posting a year-on-year decline into the latest period, several exceeding 80%, which points to a broad slowdown rather than one company's retreat. Some of the drop in the most recent one or two years is also a publication-lag artefact, since filings typically take around 18 months to appear in the record, so the true 2025-2026 filing volume is understated here.
Samsung SDI, CATL (China's Contemporary Amperex Technology), LG Energy Solution, SK On (formerly SK Innovation's battery unit) and Toyota all appear as active filers in the recent-year momentum data, with Samsung SDI, CATL and LG Energy Solution the largest by recent volume. Ownership also clusters inside corporate groups: the strongest co-assignee pairings are SK Innovation with SK On, Panasonic with Sanyo, and LG Energy Solution with LG Chem, reflecting joint-venture or internal R&D filing structures rather than cross-licensing between separate companies.
A composite current collector replaces or augments the traditional solid metal foil with a layered structure, typically an organic or polymer support layer coated with a thin metal conductive layer, aimed at reducing weight and improving safety under mechanical stress such as puncture. CATL's US20220085384A1 is a representative example, claiming a specific brittleness parameter range for such a structure. These are filed as distinct inventions from electrode active-material patents because the collector's mechanical and conductive properties are treated as a separate engineering problem, governed by different IPC classes such as H01M50 and C23C14.
The IPC composition shows H01M (batteries and cells) accounts for 19,989 of the 24,786 families, roughly eight in ten, while capacitor-related claims under H01G sit at 1,133 and coating-process classes such as C23C and B05D each hold under 320. That gap suggests capacitor-grade composite foils, electroplated surface finishing under C25D, and carbon-primer coating processes are comparatively under-claimed relative to core battery-cell collector structure, though a full freedom-to-operate check is still needed before assuming any branch is genuinely open.
Citation counts in this dataset are useful but skewed toward older filings simply because they have had more years to accumulate citations; the most-cited record here, US20140170488A1, has 556 citations partly for that reason. A high citation count signals a patent's historical influence on later filings and is a good starting point for a prior-art search, but it should not be read as a measure of which technology is most commercially important today. Newer filings in fast-moving sub-areas like thickness reduction or puncture safety may be highly relevant despite having far fewer citations so far.
Go past this page: query the whole current collectors and composite foils corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.