Book a demo

DED Closed-Loop Deposition Control Patent Snapshot 2026

DED Closed-Loop Deposition Control Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
DED Closed-Loop Deposition Control Patent Snapshot in 2026

This is a narrow, highly concentrated field with 14 patent families on record, where Norsk Titanium AS holds a commanding single-entity majority. Activity surged in 2020 and has since eased, leaving a small but technically defined corpus with identifiable adjacent branches that remain largely unaddressed.

14
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Norsk Titanium dominates an early-stage, thinly populated field

Norsk Titanium AS leads the applicant ranking with 11 patent families, placing it far ahead of the two other filers on record — JB Institute of Inventors Association and Guangdong Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Technology Co., Ltd., each with 1 patent family.

The top five filers account for 100% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, indicating extreme concentration with no meaningful second tier. The gap between the leader and all other applicants is substantial enough that a single new entrant filing a cluster of applications could immediately become the second-largest player.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Norsk Titanium AS11
2JB Institute of Inventors Association1
3Guangdong Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Technology Co., Ltd.1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Norsk Titanium’s visible position, rooted in welding-process and additive-manufacturing IPC classes, suggests that its core closed-loop standoff-distance monitoring approach defines the current state of the art. Challengers entering this space will need to differentiate on sensing modality, control architecture, or material system to avoid directly contesting Norsk Titanium’s existing claims.

The most recent filing periods should be treated as under-counted due to standard patent publication lag of 18–24 months; the apparent absence of activity in 20232025 does not necessarily reflect a genuine halt in R&D. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A single-year filing spike defines the corpus; additive manufacturing and welding dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend reveals an unusual concentration of activity in 2020, while the technology composition chart shows that the corpus is built almost entirely on additive manufacturing and welding/brazing IPC classes, with a sparse tail of adjacent branches.

Annual filing trend

All recorded activity concentrated in 2020 (the corpus peak year), with 3 additional families appearing in 2025. Periods before 2020 and between 2021 and 2024 show no recorded filings; the 2025 entry and any recent years should be interpreted cautiously given publication lag.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 11 in 2020.020170201802019112020020210202202023020243202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B33Y (Additive manufacturing / 3D printing) and B23K (Welding, soldering and brazing) together account for the overwhelming share of patent records in the corpus, reflecting the process-control origins of the field. A61B, B22F, G01B, and G06N each appear with a single record, indicating early-stage or opportunistic coverage rather than systematic investment in those branches.

Technology compositionB33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D printing) leads with 14; B23K · Welding, soldering & brazing 12.B33Y · Additive manufact…14B23K · Welding, solderin…12A61B · Diagnosis & surgery1B22F · Powder metallurgy1G01B · Measuring length …1G06N · Computing based o…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
AU2020298772B2Published 2026-01-22

Standoff distance monitoring and control for direc…

Norsk Titanium As

Additive manufacturing systems with standoff distance monitoring and control, which can be responsive, dynamic, and in real-time. These technologies can use a standoff distance measurement system to real-time monitor, read, or interrogate a workpiece or a substrate on which the workpiece is positioned, as the workpiece is moved past a directed energy… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Standoff distance monitoring and control for direc…7
2Standoff distance monitoring and control for direc…2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Norsk Titanium AS

Norsk Titanium AS

Norsk Titanium AS holds 11 patent families concentrated in B23K (welding and brazing processes) and B33Y (additive manufacturing apparatus and methods), reflecting its proprietary Rapid Plasma Deposition wire-arc DED platform. The technology focus spans both process execution (B33Y10, B23K10) and apparatus definition (B33Y30), suggesting a vertically integrated IP strategy covering the deposition process and the equipment that delivers it. No momentum data is available for recent periods.

families: 11
Challenger · JB Institute of Inventors Association

JB Institute of Inventors Association

JB Institute of Inventors Association holds 1 patent family with a technology focus spanning A61B (diagnosis and surgery), B33Y50 (additive manufacturing data processing), and G06N20 (machine learning), indicating an AI-augmented closed-loop approach with potential cross-domain application including medical device manufacturing. This represents a qualitatively distinct entry point from Norsk Titanium’s process-hardware focus, though its single-family position makes it an early-stage presence rather than a competitive threat.

families: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Guangdong Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Technology Co., Ltd.JB Institute of Inventors Association+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.