Book a demo

DED In-Process Quality Control Patent Snapshot 2026

DED In-Process Quality Control Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
DED In-Process Quality Control Patent Snapshot in 2026

The patent evidence snapshot for directed energy deposition (DED) in-process quality control is extremely nascent, with only 6 patent families on record and a small set of aerospace and academic filers holding essentially all documented activity. Filing has been highly sporadic, with a modest uptick visible in 2024–2025 that warrants watching given publication lag.

6
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

GKN Aerospace leads a highly concentrated, early-stage field

GKN Aerospace Services Ltd holds the top position with 2 patent families, placing it ahead of every other identified applicant — each of whom holds a single family. The top five filers collectively account for 86% of the combined total across the ranked applicants visible in this query, signalling that this space is controlled by a very small group.

There is virtually no tier gap to speak of: four of the six applicants are tied at one family each, meaning the leader’s advantage is thin and the field remains open to new entrants who move decisively.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1GKN Aerospace Services Ltd2
2JB Institute of Inventors Association1
3Rolls-Royce Corporation1
4Rolls-Royce PLC1
5Sathish Kumar Parimi1
6Nitte (Deemed to be University)1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

GKN Aerospace’s focus on image-data processing and additive manufacturing process control, combined with Rolls-Royce’s dual-entity presence in powder metallurgy, suggests that aerospace OEMs are the primary IP holders — but their combined volume is too small to constitute a defensive moat.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are subject to publication lag and will likely undercount actual activity; 2025 figures should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Sporadic filing history with a potential 2024–2025 inflection, anchored in additive manufacturing IP

The trend chart and technology composition together reveal a field that has seen almost no sustained filing activity for most of its recorded history, with the technology mix dominated by additive manufacturing classes.

Annual filing trend

Two families were filed in 2017, followed by a complete gap through 2023. A single family appeared in 2024 and three in 2025 — but given the 18–24 month publication lag, the 2025 figure is provisional and the apparent uptick should not yet be read as a confirmed trend reversal.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 3 in 2025.22017020180201902020020210202202023120243202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B33Y (additive manufacturing) accounts for all 6 families, confirming DED process control as the core subject. Secondary branches — B22F (powder metallurgy), B23K (welding/brazing), B29C (plastics shaping), and G06T (image processing) — each appear in 2 families, reflecting the multi-disciplinary nature of in-process monitoring. Lower-frequency branches such as A61B, G06N, H01L, and H02J represent single-family observations at the periphery.

Technology compositionB33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D printing) leads with 6; B22F · Powder metallurgy 2.B33Y · Additive manufact…6B22F · Powder metallurgy2B23K · Welding, solderin…2B29C · Shaping of plastics2G06T · Image data proces…2A61B · Diagnosis & surgery1G06N · Computing based o…1H01L · Semiconductor dev…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
GB2568536APublished 2019-05-22

Defect detection and correction

Gkn Aerospace Services Limited

Boundary detection for an object manufactured by 3D printing comprises receiving 21 an, IR or near-infrared, first image of a first layer of the object. A computer aided design (CAD) model representing the object is sliced 23 into slices, a slice corresponding to the first layer is selected 24 and output 25 as a second image having a border representing an… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Defect detection and correction — patent drawingDefect detection and correction — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Defect detection and correction2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · GKN Aerospace Services Ltd

GKN Aerospace Services Ltd

GKN Aerospace holds 2 patent families — the largest position in the corpus. Its technical emphasis spans plastics shaping (B29C), additive manufacturing process control (B33Y50), and image data processing (G06T7), indicating a sensor-and-vision-based approach to in-process monitoring. No recent momentum signal is available in the applicant-momentum data for GKN, suggesting its filings predate the 20242025 window.

families: 2
Challenger · Rolls-Royce (Corp & PLC)

Rolls-Royce (Corp & PLC)

Rolls-Royce Corp and Rolls-Royce PLC together account for 2 patent families filed as a coordinated intra-group pair. Both entities share identical technology focus in powder metallurgy (B22F10, B22F12, B22F5), pointing to a materials-process-control angle rather than vision-based monitoring. Both entities are flagged as new entrants in the applicant-momentum data, meaning their filings fall within the most recent activity window.

families: 1 each
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
JB Institute of Inventors AssociationNitte (Deemed to be University)+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.