Book a demo

DED In-situ Process Monitoring Patent Snapshot 2026

DED In-situ Process Monitoring Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
DED In-situ Process Monitoring Patent Snapshot in 2026

The patent corpus for directed energy deposition in-situ process monitoring is nascent, with only 4 patent families on record and GKN Aerospace Services holding the largest single position. The United Kingdom is the dominant filing jurisdiction, and Rolls-Royce’s recent entries signal early-stage competitive broadening in what remains a highly open field.

4
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United Kingdom
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

GKN Aerospace leads a highly concentrated, early-stage field

GKN Aerospace Services Ltd holds the top-ranked position with 2 patent records, accounting for half the identifiable corpus. The top five filers collectively account for all of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, reflecting extreme concentration in a field that has attracted only a handful of applicants to date.

There is effectively no tier gap to speak of: all remaining filers — JB Institute of Inventors Association, Rolls-Royce Corp, and Rolls-Royce PLC — each hold a single patent record. The absence of a mid-tier signals that no challenger has yet built a material portfolio behind the leader.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1GKN Aerospace Services Ltd2
2JB Institute of Inventors Association1
3Rolls-Royce Corp1
4Rolls-Royce PLC1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

GKN Aerospace’s position, focused on additive manufacturing process control and image-based monitoring, suggests an early-mover advantage in aerospace-grade DED quality assurance. However, with so few total families, even a modest new filing campaign by any entrant could materially shift rankings.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and likely under-represent current activity; the 20242025 data points should be treated as floors rather than final counts. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Sparse filing history with a recent revival and a dominant additive-manufacturing classification

The annual filing trend and technology composition together reveal a field that produced an initial cluster of activity in 2017, then went dormant, and has only recently seen renewed filings in 2024–2025. The IPC mix confirms that additive manufacturing classifications anchor the corpus, with secondary branches in image processing and powder metallurgy.

Annual filing trend

Two filings appeared in 2017, followed by zero activity through 2023, then single filings in 2024 and 2025. Given publication lag, 2024–2025 counts are almost certainly undercounted and should not be read as the full picture of current activity.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2017.22017020180201902020020210202202023120241202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B33Y (additive manufacturing) covers all 4 records, marking it as the defining classification. B29C (shaping/plastics — here applied to extrusion-based AM process control) and G06T (image data processing) each cover 2 records, pointing to vision-based monitoring as the core technical approach. B22F (powder metallurgy), G06N (AI models), and A61B (diagnosis/surgery) each appear once, indicating exploratory adjacent applications.

Technology compositionB33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D printing) leads with 4; B29C · Shaping of plastics 2.B33Y · Additive manufact…4B29C · Shaping of plastics2G06T · Image data proces…2A61B · Diagnosis & surgery1B22F · Powder metallurgy1G06N · Computing based o…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
GB2568536APublished 2019-05-22

Defect detection and correction

Gkn Aerospace Services Limited

Boundary detection for an object manufactured by 3D printing comprises receiving 21 an, IR or near-infrared, first image of a first layer of the object. A computer aided design (CAD) model representing the object is sliced 23 into slices, a slice corresponding to the first layer is selected 24 and output 25 as a second image having a border representing an… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Defect detection and correction — patent drawingDefect detection and correction — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Defect detection and correction2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · GKN Aerospace Services Ltd

GKN Aerospace Services Ltd

GKN Aerospace Services holds 2 patent records, the largest position in the corpus, concentrated in B29C 64 (AM process shaping), B33Y 50 (AM data/control), and G06T 7 (image data processing). This combination indicates a vision-based, closed-loop monitoring approach for DED quality assurance. No momentum data was available for the prior period, so trajectory cannot be directly compared, but its early 2017 filings established the field’s initial prior-art baseline.

patent records: 2
Challenger · Rolls-Royce (combined entities)

Rolls-Royce Corp & Rolls-Royce PLC

Rolls-Royce Corp and Rolls-Royce PLC each hold 1 patent record and are both tagged as new entrants in the most recent filing window, indicating their DED monitoring activity is a recent strategic addition. Their technical focus spans B22F 10, B22F 12, and B22F 5 — all powder metallurgy subclasses — pointing to process monitoring integrated with metal powder feed and layer formation rather than optical/vision approaches. The intra-group co-filing structure suggests a coordinated global filing strategy.

patent records: 1 each
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
GKN Aerospace Services LtdJB Institute of Inventors Association+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own DED monitoring Snapshot?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.