Book a demo

DED Part Inspection (CT/NDT) Patent Snapshot 2026

DED Part Inspection (CT/NDT) Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
DED Part Inspection (CT/NDT) Patent Snapshot in 2026

The DED part inspection (CT/NDT) patent space is highly concentrated, with a small number of aerospace-sector players accounting for virtually all activity. Filing volume peaked in 2021 and has since eased, signalling a maturing but still narrow field with meaningful adjacent white space.

8
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

BAE Systems commands an outsized lead in a tightly held niche

BAE Systems PLC holds the top position with 5 patent families, followed by GKN Aerospace Services Ltd with 2 and JB Institute of Inventors Association with 1. Together these three applicants account for the entire corpus of 8 patent families in scope.

The top five filers hold 100% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total — an extreme concentration ratio that confirms this is an early-stage, specialist niche rather than a broadly contested technology field. There is no meaningful second tier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1BAE Systems PLC5
2GKN Aerospace Services Ltd2
3JB Institute of Inventors Association1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

BAE Systems’ commanding position, built primarily around additive manufacturing process control and powder metallurgy, suggests the company has used patent protection to establish a defensive perimeter around DED inspection workflows. GKN Aerospace’s focus on image data processing represents the closest challenger angle.

Filing data from the most recent 18–24 months should be treated as preliminary due to standard patent publication lag; the apparent absence of very recent grants may therefore understate current activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2021 burst of activity has given way to a quieter phase; additive manufacturing dominates the technology mix

Annual filing volume and the technology branch breakdown together reveal a field that mobilised quickly around 2021 and is now consolidating, with additive manufacturing process codes anchoring nearly every filing.

Annual filing trend

Filings were sporadic from 2017 onward, spiked to 4 families in 2021, then returned to near-zero. The 2025 single filing should be read cautiously given publication lag. The overall pattern is consistent with a post-peak lifecycle stage rather than sustained growth.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 4 in 2021.22017020180201912020420210202202023020241202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B33Y (additive manufacturing / 3D printing) appears across all 8 patent families, confirming it as the anchoring technology class. B29C (shaping of plastics), B22F (powder metallurgy), and G06N (AI-based computing) each appear in 5–6 records, reflecting the process-simulation and defect-detection focus of the corpus. G06T (image data processing) and several application-sector codes remain sparse, marking adjacent branches with lower coverage.

Technology compositionB33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D printing) leads with 8; B29C · Shaping of plastics 6.B33Y · Additive manufact…8B29C · Shaping of plastics6B22F · Powder metallurgy5G06N · Computing based o…5G05B · Control & regulat…4G06T · Image data proces…2A61B · Diagnosis & surgery1A61F · Implants & prosth…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
GB2568536APublished 2019-05-22

Defect detection and correction

Gkn Aerospace Services Limited

Boundary detection for an object manufactured by 3D printing comprises receiving 21 an, IR or near-infrared, first image of a first layer of the object. A computer aided design (CAD) model representing the object is sliced 23 into slices, a slice corresponding to the first layer is selected 24 and output 25 as a second image having a border representing an… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Defect detection and correction — patent drawingDefect detection and correction — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Method for simulating properties of an additively …4
2Structural simulation of additively manufactured c…2
3Defect detection and correction2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · BAE Systems PLC

BAE Systems PLC

BAE Systems holds 5 patent families — the largest position in this 8-family corpus. Its technical emphasis centres on B33Y (additive manufacturing / 3D printing), B22F (powder metallurgy), and B29C (shaping of plastics), reflecting a focus on process simulation and materials-level inspection for DED workflows. No momentum data is available to assess recent trajectory.

families: 5
Challenger · GKN Aerospace Services Ltd

GKN Aerospace Services Ltd

GKN Aerospace Services holds 2 patent families, differentiating from the leader through a notably stronger emphasis on G06T (image data processing and generation) alongside shared coverage of B29C and B33Y. This image-processing angle suggests a focus on automated visual or CT-derived defect detection rather than purely process-simulation approaches. No momentum data is available.

families: 2
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
BAE Systems PLCGKN Aerospace Services Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.