Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 16 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Deep geological disposal is the engineering discipline of isolating high-level radioactive waste in stable rock formations for periods measured in tens of thousands of years. The patent activity tracked here centres on the engineered barrier system — the canister, bentonite buffer, backfill and surrounding host rock — and on the operational constraints that govern it: canister corrosion, swelling pressure, thermal load limits, repository gas generation, retrievability requirements and the overarching safety case that regulators require before a repository can be licensed.
The scope is narrow by design: 16 published records sit at the intersection of geological disposal and these specific engineering failure modes, rather than the broader universe of nuclear waste management filings. That narrowness is itself informative — it shows how few organisations are actively patenting at this specific technical intersection, and how concentrated the activity is once they do.
Sixteen records published between 2015 and the July 2026 data cut-off, spread across a small number of IPC subclasses and receiving offices.
Filings peaked at 4 in 2020, the highest single year in the window. From 2021 to 2024 filings dropped 100%, a decline that should be read cautiously: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and are not yet evidence of a genuine slowdown.
G21F (radiation protection and shielding) appears in 81.3% of the 16 records in scope, confirming that most filings frame their claims around shielding and containment rather than around drilling (E21B, 18.8%), solid waste disposal methods (B09B, 18.8%) or materials testing (G01N, 12.5%). Because a single record can carry more than one IPC class, these shares add up to more than 100% and should not be summed.
Shares are the percentage of the 16 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about deep geological disposal and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing describes an engineered barrier built from four layers: a canister with a first membrane layer for withstanding corrosion and pressure, a buffer that delays nuclide migration once a canister leaks, a backfill that further limits nuclide migration, and a supercontainer with a second membrane layer combining corrosion resistance with low heat conduction.Filed by Korea Radioactive Waste Agency, published 2026-04-30 — assignee, filing number and date are rendered above.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20200194140A1 | Radioactive waste repository systems and methods | 24 |
| 2 | CN108693020A | 一种缓冲材料膨胀力及饱和渗透试验方法 | 15 |
| 3 | US5464473A | Backfill for engineered barrier | 13 |
| 4 | US20220367080A1 | Storing hazardous waste material | 6 |
| 5 | US11158434B2 | Radioactive waste repository systems and methods | 6 |
| 6 | US20240105353A1 | Hazardous waste disposal using salt | 4 |
| 7 | US20220157482A1 | Radioactive waste repository systems and methods | 4 |
| 8 | WO2021071972A1 | Storing hazardous waste material | 1 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus tend to favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations; treat this table as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (8 of 8 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the records are grouped by assignee, technology class and receiving office.
The leading assignee alone accounts for 11 of the 16 records in scope, and the top five combined reach 93.8% of all records. Fifth place holds just 1 record, meaning the entire field outside the leader is thin. A new entrant is not competing against a crowded market — it is competing against one dominant filer plus a handful of single-digit players.
Radiation protection and shielding (G21F) appears in more than four out of five records, far ahead of drilling (E21B), solid waste disposal methods (B09B) and materials testing (G01N), each near or under 19%. Ceramics and containers appear in only a single record each, suggesting these adjacent material and packaging angles are rarely the primary claim focus.
Nine of the 16 records in scope were filed through the United States, more than the EPO, WIPO/PCT, China, South Korea and Sweden combined. That skew matters for freedom-to-operate work: a search limited to a single jurisdiction would miss over a third of the documented activity.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to deep geological disposal, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked leaders here are only 6 companies — this is the complete assignee ranking the dataset returns, not a filtered top slice.
The top-ranked filer holds 11 of the 16 records in scope, dwarfing every other assignee. Recent-year momentum for this filer, like the rest of the field, sits at zero for the latest year, consistent with the publication-lag effect rather than a confirmed pullback.
Korea Radioactive Waste Agency and a Korean atomic energy research body both appear in the ranking, reflecting how deep geological disposal patenting is often driven by state-backed waste management programmes rather than purely commercial vendors.
Beyond the leader, the remaining five assignees in the ranking each hold single-digit counts, with fifth place at just 1 record. This is a field where a modest filing programme can still land among the ranked leaders.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Deep Isolation, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute | 0 | — |
| Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology | 0 | — |
| TSAI CHAO MING | 0 | — |
| SVENSK KARNBRANSLEHANTERING | 0 | — |
| KOREA RADIOACTIVE WASTE AGENCY | 0 | -100% |
The dataset points to a concentrated field with a thin trailing group — the next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing or new claim positioning.
With 11 of 16 records held by one assignee, a freedom-to-operate check should start by reading that assignee's independent claims in full, not just the abstracts, before drafting around canister or buffer designs.
Explore in EurekaRepository gas generation, retrievability mechanisms and supercontainer membrane layers each carry only one or two records. A first claim in these areas may face less crowded prior art than a shielding-focused filing.
Explore in EurekaThe apparent 100% drop from 2021 to 2024 reflects a real completed trend, but 2025 and 2026 are still filling in under an 18-month publication lag. Re-run this landscape in a few quarters before concluding the field has gone cold.
Explore in EurekaThe dataset's assignee ranking shows one filer well ahead of the rest, holding 11 of the 16 records in scope. The remaining five ranked assignees hold small, mostly single-digit counts, with the fifth-place holder at just 1 record. This means the field has a clear leader but a very thin trailing group rather than several closely matched competitors.
Filings peaked at 4 in 2020 and fell to 0 by 2024, a 100% drop over that three-year span. However, patent publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the low counts in 2025 and 2026 mostly reflect applications still working through the publication pipeline rather than a confirmed halt in R&D. Any conclusion about a slowdown should rest on 2024 and earlier data, not the most recent two years.
Most records, 81.3% of the 16 in scope, are classified under G21F, which covers radiation protection and shielding — this includes canister, buffer and backfill engineering. Smaller shares sit in earth and rock drilling (E21B, 18.8%), solid waste disposal methods (B09B, 18.8%) and materials analysis and testing (G01N, 12.5%), with ceramics and container packaging each appearing in only a single record.
The United States receiving office accounts for 9 of the 16 records in scope, more than all other offices combined. The European Patent Office and WIPO's PCT route each show 2 records, and China, South Korea and Sweden each show 1. A search strategy focused only on one non-US jurisdiction would miss the majority of documented activity in this dataset.
The dataset shows dense claim activity around G21F radiation shielding and containment, held largely by one leading assignee. Sub-areas such as repository gas generation, retrievability mechanism design and supercontainer membrane layering appear in only one or two records each, suggesting less crowded prior art. A first claim targeting one of these narrower mechanisms is likely to face fewer blocking references than a broad canister or buffer shielding claim.
Go past this page: query the whole deep geological disposal corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page