https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/deep-geological-disposal-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Deep geological disposal patents: engineered barriers, canister corrosion and the safety case
  • One assignee dominates. the leading filer holds 11 of 16 records in scope, with the top 5 combined accounting for 93.8% of all records.
  • Filing has gone quiet, not necessarily cooled. 2021 to 2024 filings fell 100%, but publication lag of roughly 18 months means 2025-2026 activity is still filling in.
  • Radiation protection classes dominate the claim space. G21F covers 81.3% of all 16 records, while drilling, materials testing and ceramics classes each sit under 20%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
16
Published Records
94%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 16 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent landscape covers

Deep geological disposal is the engineering discipline of isolating high-level radioactive waste in stable rock formations for periods measured in tens of thousands of years. The patent activity tracked here centres on the engineered barrier system — the canister, bentonite buffer, backfill and surrounding host rock — and on the operational constraints that govern it: canister corrosion, swelling pressure, thermal load limits, repository gas generation, retrievability requirements and the overarching safety case that regulators require before a repository can be licensed.

The scope is narrow by design: 16 published records sit at the intersection of geological disposal and these specific engineering failure modes, rather than the broader universe of nuclear waste management filings. That narrowness is itself informative — it shows how few organisations are actively patenting at this specific technical intersection, and how concentrated the activity is once they do.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1Deep Isolation, Inc.11
  2. 2Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute1
  3. 3Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology1
  4. 4TSAI CHAO MING1
  5. 5SVENSK KARNBRANSLEHANTERING1
  6. 6KOREA RADIOACTIVE WASTE AGENCY1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Deep Geological Disposal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Sixteen records published between 2015 and the July 2026 data cut-off, spread across a small number of IPC subclasses and receiving offices.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings peaked at 4 in 2020, the highest single year in the window. From 2021 to 2024 filings dropped 100%, a decline that should be read cautiously: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and are not yet evidence of a genuine slowdown.

Filing trend, 2017-2026012341201720182019420202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

G21F (radiation protection and shielding) appears in 81.3% of the 16 records in scope, confirming that most filings frame their claims around shielding and containment rather than around drilling (E21B, 18.8%), solid waste disposal methods (B09B, 18.8%) or materials testing (G01N, 12.5%). Because a single record can carry more than one IPC class, these shares add up to more than 100% and should not be summed.

Technology composition by IPC subclassG21F · Radiation protection & shieldi…1381.3%B09B · Solid waste disposal318.8%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)318.8%G01N · Material analysis & testing212.5%B65D · Containers & packaging16.3%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories16.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 16 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Deep Geological Disposal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Deep Geological Disposal with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about deep geological disposal and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this landscape

Representative Filing
US20260120907A12026-04-30

Deep geological disposal facility for spent nuclear fuel and a simulating apparatus for deep geological disposal facilities of spent nuclear fuel

KOREA RADIOACTIVE WASTE AGENCY

The filing describes an engineered barrier built from four layers: a canister with a first membrane layer for withstanding corrosion and pressure, a buffer that delays nuclide migration once a canister leaks, a backfill that further limits nuclide migration, and a supercontainer with a second membrane layer combining corrosion resistance with low heat conduction.Filed by Korea Radioactive Waste Agency, published 2026-04-30 — assignee, filing number and date are rendered above.

US20260120907A1 — patent drawing 1US20260120907A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20200194140A1Radioactive waste repository systems and methods24
2CN108693020A一种缓冲材料膨胀力及饱和渗透试验方法15
3US5464473ABackfill for engineered barrier13
4US20220367080A1Storing hazardous waste material6
5US11158434B2Radioactive waste repository systems and methods6
6US20240105353A1Hazardous waste disposal using salt4
7US20220157482A1Radioactive waste repository systems and methods4
8WO2021071972A1Storing hazardous waste material1

Citation counts inside a searched corpus tend to favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations; treat this table as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (8 of 8 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Deep Geological Disposal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the records are grouped by assignee, technology class and receiving office.

Concentration
93.8%
of 16 records held by top 5 assignees

A single-leader field with a long tail

The leading assignee alone accounts for 11 of the 16 records in scope, and the top five combined reach 93.8% of all records. Fifth place holds just 1 record, meaning the entire field outside the leader is thin. A new entrant is not competing against a crowded market — it is competing against one dominant filer plus a handful of single-digit players.

Based on the assignee ranking of 6 companies
Technology Focus
81.3%
of records classed under G21F

Claims cluster on shielding and containment

Radiation protection and shielding (G21F) appears in more than four out of five records, far ahead of drilling (E21B), solid waste disposal methods (B09B) and materials testing (G01N), each near or under 19%. Ceramics and containers appear in only a single record each, suggesting these adjacent material and packaging angles are rarely the primary claim focus.

Shares sum to more than 100% because records can carry multiple IPC classes
Geography
9 of 16
records filed via the United States receiving office

Filing activity is US-weighted with a thin international spread

Nine of the 16 records in scope were filed through the United States, more than the EPO, WIPO/PCT, China, South Korea and Sweden combined. That skew matters for freedom-to-operate work: a search limited to a single jurisdiction would miss over a third of the documented activity.

Receiving office counts: US 9, EPO 2, WIPO 2, China 1, South Korea 1, Sweden 1
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to deep geological disposal, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Deep Geological Disposal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

The ranked leaders here are only 6 companies — this is the complete assignee ranking the dataset returns, not a filtered top slice.

Leader
11
records held

One assignee sets the pace

The top-ranked filer holds 11 of the 16 records in scope, dwarfing every other assignee. Recent-year momentum for this filer, like the rest of the field, sits at zero for the latest year, consistent with the publication-lag effect rather than a confirmed pullback.

Momentum: 0 in the latest year
State research bodies
2 agencies
national nuclear waste organisations in the ranking

National agencies hold a meaningful share

Korea Radioactive Waste Agency and a Korean atomic energy research body both appear in the ranking, reflecting how deep geological disposal patenting is often driven by state-backed waste management programmes rather than purely commercial vendors.

Both show 0 filings in the latest year
Long tail
1 record
held by the fifth-ranked assignee

Everyone below the leader files thinly

Beyond the leader, the remaining five assignees in the ranking each hold single-digit counts, with fifth place at just 1 record. This is a field where a modest filing programme can still land among the ranked leaders.

Total ranked assignees: 6
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches sit below the dominant G21F shielding claims and carry only one or two records each in this dataset.
Repository gas generation ventingCanister supercontainer membrane layersBackfill nuclide migration limiting materialsRetrievability mechanism designBentonite buffer swelling pressure control
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Deep Isolation, Inc.0-100%
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute0—
Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology0—
TSAI CHAO MING0—
SVENSK KARNBRANSLEHANTERING0—
KOREA RADIOACTIVE WASTE AGENCY0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Deep Geological Disposal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated field with a thin trailing group — the next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing or new claim positioning.

Map the leader's full claim scope

With 11 of 16 records held by one assignee, a freedom-to-operate check should start by reading that assignee's independent claims in full, not just the abstracts, before drafting around canister or buffer designs.

Explore in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

Repository gas generation, retrievability mechanisms and supercontainer membrane layers each carry only one or two records. A first claim in these areas may face less crowded prior art than a shielding-focused filing.

Explore in Eureka

Re-check 2025-2026 filings as they publish

The apparent 100% drop from 2021 to 2024 reflects a real completed trend, but 2025 and 2026 are still filling in under an 18-month publication lag. Re-run this landscape in a few quarters before concluding the field has gone cold.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Deep Geological Disposal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about deep geological disposal patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Deep Geological Disposal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Deep Geological Disposal in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole deep geological disposal corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.