Defect Engineering after Implantation Patents: Who Leads 2026
Defect Engineering after Implantation: Patents Mapped Across Assignees and Claim Space
17.6% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees hold 266 of the 1,512 records in scope — a real lead, but not a lock on the field. Filings rose to 55 in 2017, the high point of the window, then eased. The clearest complete-year comparison is 2021 to 2024, where annual filings fell from 28 to 8 — a -71% move. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as still filling in, not as confirmation the field has gone quiet.
- 1TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD4.5%
- 2KK TOSHIBA4.0%
- 3FUJI ELECTRIC CO LTD3.2%
- 4GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC3.0%
- 5VARIAN SEMICON EQUIP ASSC INC2.9%
See the full defect engineering after implantation analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on this landscape
What counts as “defect engineering after implantation” in a patent search?
It covers methods and devices addressing damage created by ion implantation into semiconductor substrates, and the techniques used to manage or repair that damage during subsequent annealing. This includes transient enhanced diffusion of dopants, interstitial cluster formation, amorphization thresholds, solid phase epitaxy regrowth, carbon co-implantation as a diffusion suppressant, and the resulting leakage current effects in finished devices. The 1,512 records in this dataset were identified using search terms spanning both the damage mechanisms and the specific mitigation techniques, so the scope is mechanism-and-remedy paired rather than a single keyword.
Who are the leading patent filers in this space?
The ranked list covers 100 companies, with the leading assignee holding 68 records and the fifth-place company holding 44. Semiconductor manufacturers, equipment makers and a small number of specialist annealing and implantation firms appear across the top ranks. No single company dominates outright — the top 5 combined account for 17.6% of the 1,512 records in scope, meaning most of the field’s filings sit outside the leading group.
Is patent filing activity in this area growing or shrinking?
Based on complete-year data, filing activity has declined: 2021 saw 28 filings, falling to 8 by 2024, a -71% drop over that span. The overall peak in the dataset was 2017, at 55 filings. That said, publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete and should not be read as confirmation the field has stalled further than the 2021-2024 data already shows.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Defect Engineering after Implantation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.