Book a demo

Dendrite Suppression Patent Landscape 2026

Dendrite Suppression Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Dendrite Suppression Patent Landscape in 2026

LG Energy Solution leads a moderately concentrated field, holding the largest share among the top hundred filers, with Korean industry and North American universities forming the two dominant tiers. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis—recent-window growth at 65% above the prior period—though annual volume has eased from its 2022 peak and publication lag understates the most recent years.

444
Patent families in scope
32%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+65%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

LG Energy Solution leads a field shaped by industry-academia collaboration

LG Energy Solution holds the top position among the hundred largest filers, followed closely by LG Chem and the Regents of the University of California, forming a first tier of commercial and academic applicants each pursuing broad battery-cell and electrolyte strategies.

The top five filers account for 32% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating moderate concentration—no single player dominates, and a deep mid-tier of universities and specialist startups sustains competitive pressure.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1LG Energy Solution Ltd82
2LG Chem Ltd30
3Regents of the University of California29
4KOREA ADVANCED INST OF SCI & TECH18
5United States of America as represented by the Secretary (Federal Agency)17
6Regents of the University of Michigan17
7Group14 Technologies Inc15
8Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)15
9Samsung SDI Co Ltd15
10Samsung Electronics Co Ltd14
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Offgrid Energy Labs Inc12
12Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University12
13Lyten Inc11
14Government of the United States as represented by a Federal Agency10
15Ionic Materials Inc8
16SES Holding Pte Ltd8
17Robert Bosch GmbH8
18Carnegie Mellon University8
19Corning Inc8
20Ampcera Inc7
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leadership positions of LG Energy Solution and LG Chem together signal that advanced lithium-metal cell development is driving the bulk of industrial activity, while the prominence of the University of California and MIT in the top ten reflects a strong academic pipeline that industry routinely draws from through co-filing.

Patent publication typically lags filing by 18–24 months, so activity recorded for 20242026 understates true recent output; the corpus covers global filings in scope as indexed. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year expansion continues, overwhelmingly anchored in battery-cell technology

The annual filing trend reveals a field that grew sharply to a 2022 peak before settling at sustained elevated levels, while the technology composition chart shows how completely the H01M battery-cell class dominates the research agenda.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed to a peak in 2022, moderated in 2023, then recovered toward 2024–2025 levels; the 2025–2026 bars are meaningfully understated by publication lag and should not be read as a decline. The three-year recent window sits 65% above the prior three-year window, confirming multi-year growth.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 71 in 2022.63201761201831201938202025202171202234202350202467202542026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) accounts for the overwhelming majority of classified records, confirming that dendrite suppression activity is almost entirely expressed through battery-cell engineering. Adjacent classes—C01B (non-metallic/inorganic compounds), H01G (capacitors), C23C (coating and surface deposition) and C08L (polymer compositions)—each represent small single-digit shares, pointing to secondary research threads in materials synthesis, surface engineering and polymer electrolytes.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 507; C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds 19.H01M · Batteries, cells …507C01B · Non-metallic elem…19H01G · Capacitors17C23C · Coating & surface…14C08L · Polymer compositi…11H02J · Power supply & gr…11C08J · Polymer processin…10C25C · Electrolytic meta…10↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20170133662A1Published 2017-05-11

Composite lithium metal anodes for lithium batteri…

The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University

A lithium battery includes a cathode, a composite lithium metal anode, and an electrolyte in contact with the cathode and the composite lithium metal anode. The composite lithium metal anode includes a porous matrix and lithium metal disposed within the porous matrix. (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Composite lithium metal anodes for lithium batteri… — patent drawingComposite lithium metal anodes for lithium batteri… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Composite lithium metal anodes for lithium batteri…130
2Lithium metal battery108
3Lithium secondary cell and method for manufacturin…82
4Gels and nanocomposites containing anfs48
5All-solid state li ion batteries comprising mechan…47
6Electrolytes for dendrite-free energy storage devi…47
7Bendable, creasable, and printable batteries with …41
8Lithium ion conducting protective film and method …39

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

Moderate concentration, active industry-academia co-filing, and a dominant battery-cell focus together define the strategic context for new entrants and incumbents alike.

Growth

Growth stage—multi-year expansion with a past-2022 peak

The field is classified as Growth: the recent three-year filing window sits 65% above the prior three-year window, confirming continued expansion on a multi-year basis. Annual volume eased from its 2022 peak, but this partly reflects publication lag in the most recent data. Teams entering now face an active, competitive landscape rather than a nascent one.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a strong mid-tier

The top five filers hold 32% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers—concentrated enough that the leaders shape technical norms, but open enough for challengers. The mid-tier includes well-funded startups (Group14 Technologies, Lyten, SES Holding) and prestigious research universities, sustaining broad inventive diversity. Differentiated materials or electrolyte approaches can still carve out defensible positions.

Moderate HHI
Collaboration

LG Energy Solution–UC and LG Chem–KAIST are the field’s dominant co-filing axes

The most active co-filing pair is LG Energy Solution and the Regents of the University of California, with 28 jointly attributed records—by far the largest single collaboration in this corpus. LG Chem and Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology form the second axis with 11 records, followed by LG Energy Solution with KAIST at 7. Samsung SDI co-files with both Samsung Electronics and Georgia Tech Research Corporation. These pairings show that deep industry-university ties are a structural feature of the field, not an outlier.

Industry-academia
Geography

US filings dominate; EPO and PCT provide secondary international reach

The United States leads all jurisdictions, followed by Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT). India ranks fourth, notably ahead of China and South Korea at the national filing level, suggesting active domestic patenting by Indian academic and government institutions. China’s low national count—despite CATL’s presence in the applicant list—may reflect a corpus scope weighted toward US and European prosecution.

US-centric
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
LG Energy Solution LtdRegents of the University of California28
LG Chem LtdKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)11
LG Energy Solution LtdKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)7
Samsung SDI Co LtdSamsung Electronics Co Ltd6
Samsung Electronics Co LtdMassachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)6
Group14 Technologies IncSES AI Corporation (SES Holding)5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)Carnegie Mellon University3
LG Energy Solution LtdGeorgia Tech Research Corporation2
Samsung SDI Co LtdGeorgia Tech Research Corporation2
Offgrid Energy Labs IncOffgrid Energy Labs Pte Ltd1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a single family can appear in multiple jurisdictions.Explore insights →
Leaders

LG Energy Solution and LG Chem anchor the field; universities and startups fill the challenger tier

The top two applicants are both LG affiliates, together accounting for a substantial share of the first tier; the University of California and KAIST represent the strongest academic challengers, while Group14 Technologies stands out among startups.

Leader · LG Energy Solution

LG Energy Solution

LG Energy Solution leads with 82 patent records, concentrated across battery-cell architecture (H01M 10 and H01M 4) and cell-component engineering (H01M 50). Its momentum is classified as a new entrant in the most recent tracking window, suggesting recent filing activity is still being indexed rather than reflecting a strategic pullback. The close co-filing relationship with the University of California (28 joint records) extends its technology reach into advanced electrolyte and anode research.

patent records: 82
Challenger · Group14 Technologies

Group14 Technologies

Group14 Technologies holds 15 patent records with a momentum classification of new entrant in the recent window, suggesting it is building its portfolio rapidly from a specialist silicon-carbon anode materials base. Its technology focus spans H01M 4 (electrode materials), C01B 32 and C01B 33 (non-metallic and inorganic compounds), differentiating it sharply from the electrolyte-heavy approaches of the LG entities and placing it in the underserved inorganic-materials adjacent space.

patent records: 15
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked filers, their technology focus, and recent momentum trends in PatSnap Eureka.
Samsung SDI Co LtdMassachusetts Institute of Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
LG Energy Solution Ltd10▲ new entrant
Regents of the University of California11▲ new entrant
Samsung SDI Co Ltd5▲ new entrant
Group14 Technologies Inc15▲ new entrant
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd2▲ new entrant
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)2▲ new entrant
Offgrid Energy Labs Inc1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player counts are patent records from the top-100 applicant ranking.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the H01M core

Several IPC classes adjacent to the dominant H01M battery-cell core carry low record counts relative to the field total, representing observations of relative sparsity that may warrant closer examination for teams with specific technical approaches.

C23C · Coating and surface deposition

With 14 records, coating and surface deposition sits well below the H01M core. Thin-film and atomic-layer deposition techniques are mechanistically relevant to dendrite suppression—protective coatings on lithium anodes or separator surfaces directly impede dendrite nucleation. The sparse count suggests that applicants are primarily classifying such work under H01M rather than C23C, leaving the coating-specific framing relatively open. Teams specializing in vapor-phase or physical deposition processes could stake out differentiated claims here.

Search this in Eureka →

C08L / C08J · Polymer compositions and processing

Polymer electrolyte and separator engineering is a recognized route to dendrite suppression, yet C08L (polymer compositions, 11 records) and C08J (polymer processing, 10 records) together account for a small fraction of the corpus. Given that solid and gel polymer electrolytes are an active research direction—evidenced by top-cited work on gels and nanocomposites—the low patent count in these polymer classes may indicate an opportunity for applicants who can anchor claims in polymer chemistry rather than only in cell architecture.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
PatSnap Eureka maps all adjacent IPC branches with filing density, top cited art, and entry-path analysis.
B82Y · Nanotechnology applicationsC04B · Ceramics, cement and refractories+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; sparse branches are observations of relative filing density, not validated commercial opportunities.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders diverge across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 50 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 12 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 2 · Batteries, cells & fuel cells
LG Chem LtdStrong · 58Strong · 73Emerging · 6AbsentEmerging · 3
LG Energy Solution LtdStrong · 35Strong · 30AbsentAbsentAbsent
Regents of the University of MichiganStrong · 17Strong · 12Strong · 11Emerging · 2Moderate · 8
Regents of the University of CaliforniaStrong · 28Strong · 21AbsentAbsentAbsent
Samsung Electronics Co LtdAbsentStrong · 14Strong · 8Strong · 8Moderate · 4
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)Strong · 15Strong · 18AbsentAbsentAbsent
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)AbsentStrong · 12Strong · 7Moderate · 6Moderate · 5
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own dendrite suppression landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.