Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Depth filtration and harvest clarification sit at the interface of upstream cell culture and downstream purification: removing cells, debris and colloidal material from a bioreactor harvest before chromatography. This dataset tracks 39 published records filed between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, indexed under separation-process and bioreactor IPC classes and matched against language covering turbidity reduction, filter capacity, host cell protein removal, single-use format and yield loss. It is a narrow, well-defined slice of bioprocessing IP rather than a broad filtration category.
Because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent filing years in this dataset understate real activity — a flat or declining trend line through 2025-2026 should be read with that lag in mind, not taken as a literal drop-off in R&D.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 39 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filings rose to a peak of 17 records in 2019, then fell back; by the 2022 midpoint the annual count was down to 5. The trend line does not show a recovery through the most recent full years, though the 18-month publication lag means the last one or two years are always undercounted.
B01D (separation processes) appears in 94.9% of the 39 records and C12M (bioreactors and enzyme apparatus) in 76.9%, confirming this is core filtration-and-culture-vessel territory. B01J and C07K each cover roughly half of records, reflecting overlap with catalytic media and protein-specific claims, while B32B, G01F, A61M and C12P each cover a smaller minority — these are the adjacent classes worth checking for white space.
Shares are the percentage of the 39 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about depth filtration and harvest clarification and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe present invention relates to methods of cell culture clarification. In particular the present invention discloses methods of cell culture clarification useful in the manufacturing process of biopharmaceutical molecules, such as antibodies.Filed by Ichnos Sciences, published 2022-03-17.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20200056144A1 | Cell culture clarification | 19 |
| 2 | US5308508A | High capacity filter media, method of use in filtration and method of formation | 19 |
| 3 | WO2018178376A1 | Cell culture clarification | 14 |
| 4 | WO2019227095A1 | Tangential flow filtration systems and methods | 5 |
| 5 | WO2023025906A1 | Depth filter media | 1 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings — treat them as a signal of influence within this dataset, not of current commercial importance.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once you set the raw counts against the record totals.
The top 5 assignees combined account for 33 of the 39 records in scope, and the top 10 reach 97.4%. A field this concentrated leaves little room for a new entrant to claim broad depth-filtration methods outright; differentiation has to come from a specific format, media chemistry or process step.
The peak year of 17 records was followed by a decline to 5 by the 2022 midpoint, with no rebound visible in the years since. Recent-year momentum by assignee also shows zero filings in the latest year across the named leaders, though the publication lag means the most recent one to two years are undercounted.
Nearly all records touch separation processes (B01D) or bioreactor apparatus (C12M), the two anchor classes for this space. Classes like A61M (body-fluid devices) and C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis) each appear in only 12.8% of records, marking the thinner edges of the claim map.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to depth filtration and harvest clarification, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing in this niche is led by a small set of bioprocessing and pharma names, with a long tail of single-record filers behind them.
The leading assignee in the ranking holds 14 of the 39 records in scope, well ahead of the rest of the field. That volume signals a filer treating clarification methods as core IP rather than incidental disclosure.
Fifth place in the ranking sits at just 3 records, meaning the gap between the leader and the rest of the top 5 is substantial. Beyond fifth place, filings thin quickly toward single-digit and single-record entrants.
Tenth place in the ranking holds just 1 record, consistent with a field where most named assignees appear once. Co-assignee pairs are rare — only 4 across the dataset — suggesting most filings are made without external collaborators.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Repligen Corp | 0 | — |
| IGI Therapeutics SA | 0 | — |
| Univercells SA | 0 | — |
| Merck Patent GmbH | 0 | — |
| Exothera SA | 0 | — |
| Song Xianhong | 0 | — |
| Song Zhili | 0 | — |
| Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0 | — |
The landscape points to a concentrated core and a thinner edge — the next steps depend on whether you are checking freedom to operate or scouting open claim space.
With 84.6% of records held by five assignees, any new filing in core depth-filtration methods should be checked against their claim scope first, not the long tail.
Run an FTO check in EurekaClasses covering single-use formats, flow sensing and fermentation-integrated clarification carry lower record shares and may offer more room for a defensible first claim.
Explore white space in EurekaRecent-year momentum shows zero new filings from the named leaders in the latest year across this dataset, but the publication lag means that could change once 2025-2026 filings surface.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaThe dataset's assignee ranking covers 14 companies, and it is led by a single filer with 14 of the 39 records in scope. The top 5 assignees combined account for 84.6% of all records, so ownership is heavily concentrated rather than spread evenly. Beyond the top 10, which together hold 97.4% of records, filers typically appear only once, forming a long tail of single-patent entrants rather than active programmes.
Filing peaked at 17 records in 2019 and had fallen to 5 by the 2022 midpoint, with no rebound visible through the most recent full years in the dataset. That said, publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the last one to two years in any trend chart will understate real activity rather than reflect a genuine drop. Treat the apparent decline as a signal to watch, not a confirmed end to R&D investment.
Separation processes (IPC class B01D) appear in 94.9% of the 39 records in scope, and bioreactor and enzyme apparatus (C12M) appear in 76.9%, making these the two anchor classes for the field. Roughly half of records also touch B01J (chemical and physical processes) or C07K (peptides and proteins), reflecting overlap with catalytic media and protein-specific process claims. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% and should not be read as mutually exclusive categories.
The thinner IPC branches in this dataset are A61M (devices for body fluids) and C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis), each covering only 12.8% of the 39 records, alongside B32B (layered products) and G01F (flow and volume measuring) at 20.5% each. These lower shares suggest less claim density around single-use body-fluid-contact formats, fermentation-integrated clarification steps, and in-line flow or turbidity sensing tied to filter media. A first claim combining one of these thinner branches with the dominant B01D separation methods is more likely to find open space than a claim in the core filtration method itself.
US20220081666A1, filed by Ichnos Sciences and published 2022-03-17, discloses methods of cell culture clarification used in manufacturing biopharmaceutical molecules such as antibodies. Its abstract frames the invention specifically around clarification methods within the biopharmaceutical manufacturing process, rather than filter media or hardware design generically. Anyone developing a clarification method for antibody or similar biologic manufacturing should review its claims directly, since method-level filings in this exact use case are one of the more concentrated areas identified in this dataset.
Go past this page: query the whole depth filtration and harvest clarification corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.