https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/depth-filtration-and-harvest-clarification-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Bioprocessing · Patent Landscape
Depth Filtration and Harvest Clarification Patents: Concentration at the Top, a Long Tail Behind
  • 84.6% concentration. The top 5 assignees hold 33 of 39 records in scope — filing in this niche is dominated by a handful of bioprocessing incumbents.
  • Filing peaked in 2019. Activity reached 17 records that year and has not returned to that level since, with the 2022 midpoint sitting at just 5.
  • Separation and bioreactor classes dominate. B01D and C12M together cover most of the 39 records, while adjacent classes like A61M and C12P appear in only a small minority.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
39
Published Records
85%
Top-5 Share of All Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
14
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Depth filtration and harvest clarification sit at the interface of upstream cell culture and downstream purification: removing cells, debris and colloidal material from a bioreactor harvest before chromatography. This dataset tracks 39 published records filed between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, indexed under separation-process and bioreactor IPC classes and matched against language covering turbidity reduction, filter capacity, host cell protein removal, single-use format and yield loss. It is a narrow, well-defined slice of bioprocessing IP rather than a broad filtration category.

Because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent filing years in this dataset understate real activity — a flat or declining trend line through 2025-2026 should be read with that lag in mind, not taken as a literal drop-off in R&D.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1REPLIGEN CORP14
  2. 2ICHNOS SCIENCES SA7
  3. 3MERCK PATENT GMBH5
  4. 4UNIVERCELLS SA4
  5. 5EXOTHERA SA3
  6. 6EMD MILLIPORE CORP1
  7. 7IGI THERAPEUTICS SA1
  8. 8MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC1
  9. 9Song Xianhong1
  10. 10CARRIGAN KEVIN C1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Depth Filtration and Harvest Clarification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 39 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend: a 2019 peak, then decline

Filings rose to a peak of 17 records in 2019, then fell back; by the 2022 midpoint the annual count was down to 5. The trend line does not show a recovery through the most recent full years, though the 18-month publication lag means the last one or two years are always undercounted.

Filing trend: a 2019 peak, then decline0510152002017201817201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition: separation and bioreactor classes dominate

B01D (separation processes) appears in 94.9% of the 39 records and C12M (bioreactors and enzyme apparatus) in 76.9%, confirming this is core filtration-and-culture-vessel territory. B01J and C07K each cover roughly half of records, reflecting overlap with catalytic media and protein-specific claims, while B32B, G01F, A61M and C12P each cover a smaller minority — these are the adjacent classes worth checking for white space.

IPC composition: separation and bioreactor classes dominateB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…3794.9%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus3076.9%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …2051.3%C07K · Peptides & proteins1948.7%B32B · Layered products & laminates820.5%G01F · Flow, level & volume measuring820.5%A61M · Devices for body fluids512.8%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…512.8%Other820.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 39 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Depth Filtration and Harvest Clarification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Depth Filtration and Harvest Clarification with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about depth filtration and harvest clarification and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this dataset

Representative Filing
US20220081666A12022-03-17

Methods of cell culture clarification (US20220081666A1)

ICHNOS SCIENCES SA

The present invention relates to methods of cell culture clarification. In particular the present invention discloses methods of cell culture clarification useful in the manufacturing process of biopharmaceutical molecules, such as antibodies.Filed by Ichnos Sciences, published 2022-03-17.

US20220081666A1 — patent drawing 1US20220081666A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records, 2015-2026
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20200056144A1Cell culture clarification19
2US5308508AHigh capacity filter media, method of use in filtration and method of formation19
3WO2018178376A1Cell culture clarification14
4WO2019227095A1Tangential flow filtration systems and methods5
5WO2023025906A1Depth filter media1

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings — treat them as a signal of influence within this dataset, not of current commercial importance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Depth Filtration and Harvest Clarification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once you set the raw counts against the record totals.

Concentration
84.6% of 39 records
held by top 5 assignees

Ownership is tight at the top

The top 5 assignees combined account for 33 of the 39 records in scope, and the top 10 reach 97.4%. A field this concentrated leaves little room for a new entrant to claim broad depth-filtration methods outright; differentiation has to come from a specific format, media chemistry or process step.

Based on the assignee ranking of 14 companies.
Filing momentum
17 in 2019 vs 5 at 2022 midpoint
peak vs midpoint filings

Activity has cooled since 2019

The peak year of 17 records was followed by a decline to 5 by the 2022 midpoint, with no rebound visible in the years since. Recent-year momentum by assignee also shows zero filings in the latest year across the named leaders, though the publication lag means the most recent one to two years are undercounted.

Trend covers 2015-01-01 to the 2026-07-31 data cut-off.
Technology mix
94.9% B01D, 76.9% C12M
share of 39 records

Core classes are crowded, edges are thinner

Nearly all records touch separation processes (B01D) or bioreactor apparatus (C12M), the two anchor classes for this space. Classes like A61M (body-fluid devices) and C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis) each appear in only 12.8% of records, marking the thinner edges of the claim map.

A record can carry multiple IPC classes, so shares sum to more than 100%.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to depth filtration and harvest clarification, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Depth Filtration and Harvest Clarification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

Filing in this niche is led by a small set of bioprocessing and pharma names, with a long tail of single-record filers behind them.

Leader
14 records
leading assignee

One filer sets the pace

The leading assignee in the ranking holds 14 of the 39 records in scope, well ahead of the rest of the field. That volume signals a filer treating clarification methods as core IP rather than incidental disclosure.

Ranking covers 14 companies, counted in records.
Mid-tier
3 records
fifth-ranked assignee

A tight cluster behind the leader

Fifth place in the ranking sits at just 3 records, meaning the gap between the leader and the rest of the top 5 is substantial. Beyond fifth place, filings thin quickly toward single-digit and single-record entrants.

Top 5 combined: 33 of 39 records (84.6%).
Long tail
1 record
tenth-ranked assignee

Single-filing entrants make up the tail

Tenth place in the ranking holds just 1 record, consistent with a field where most named assignees appear once. Co-assignee pairs are rare — only 4 across the dataset — suggesting most filings are made without external collaborators.

Top 10 combined: 38 of 39 records (97.4%).
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking
Adjacent branches with thinner IPC coverage in this dataset, based on the composition breakdown above.
single-use clarification formatstangential flow / depth filter hybridsin-line turbidity sensing (G01F overlap)fermentation-integrated clarification (C12P)body-fluid contact clarification devices (A61M)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Repligen Corp0
IGI Therapeutics SA0
Univercells SA0
Merck Patent GmbH0
Exothera SA0
Song Xianhong0
Song Zhili0
Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Depth Filtration and Harvest Clarification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The landscape points to a concentrated core and a thinner edge — the next steps depend on whether you are checking freedom to operate or scouting open claim space.

Check freedom to operate against the top 5

With 84.6% of records held by five assignees, any new filing in core depth-filtration methods should be checked against their claim scope first, not the long tail.

Run an FTO check in Eureka

Probe the thinner IPC branches

Classes covering single-use formats, flow sensing and fermentation-integrated clarification carry lower record shares and may offer more room for a defensible first claim.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the leader's recent filings

Recent-year momentum shows zero new filings from the named leaders in the latest year across this dataset, but the publication lag means that could change once 2025-2026 filings surface.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Depth Filtration and Harvest Clarification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Depth Filtration and Harvest Clarification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Depth Filtration and Harvest Clarification in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole depth filtration and harvest clarification corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.