Book a demo

Desalination Pretreatment Patents: Who Leads, White Space 2026

Desalination Pretreatment Patents: Who Leads, White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/desalination-pretreatment-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Desalination Pretreatment
Desalination Pretreatment Patents: Filing Trends and Where the Claim Space Is Still Open
  • One leader, then a long tail. the top-ranked assignee holds 13 records against a fifth-place figure of just 2, across 9 ranked companies total.
  • Filing peaked in 2017 at 6 records and the 2021-to-2024 span (the last complete years) shows a -50% change, from 2 down to 1.
  • Control and monitoring classes are catching up with filtration. G05D (control of non-electric variables) appears in 32.3% of records, nearly matching G01N testing at 38.7%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
31
Published Records
-50%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
9
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the desalination pretreatment patent record shows

Desalination pretreatment covers the filtration, flotation and monitoring steps that condition seawater before it reaches a reverse-osmosis or thermal desalination stage — dissolved air flotation, ultrafiltration pretreatment, silt density index measurement, algal bloom response and coagulant dosing all sit inside this scope. The dataset behind this page holds 31 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, indexed against the same 9 ranked assignees that anchor the competitive picture below. It is a small, technically dense field rather than a sprawling one: most records carry a C02F water-treatment classification, and a majority also carry a B01D separation-process classification, meaning the two disciplines are usually claimed together rather than separately.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend understate real filing activity — treat 2025 and 2026 figures as still filling in, not as a genuine drop-off.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1Gaveish-Galilee Bio Applications Ltd.13
  2. 2Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd.8
  3. 3Environmental Water Minerals Company3
  4. 4Shenzhen China General Nuclear Engineering Design Co., Ltd.2
  5. 5China General Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd.2
  6. 6WOO SUNG WOO2
  7. 7Suzhou Kehuan Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.1
  8. 8Suzhou Five Stars Special Ultrafiltration Membrane Technology Co., Ltd.1
  9. 9KEY SOLUTIONS1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Desalination Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 31-record set: how filing activity moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filing peaked at 6 records in 2017. The most recent complete comparison — 2021's 2 records against 2024's 1 — shows a -50% change; years after 2024 are still incomplete because of publication lag and should not be read as a continued decline.

Filing trend, 2017–202602356620172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) appears in 93.5% of the 31 records, and B01D (separation processes including filtration) in 61.3% — confirming that most filings combine a treatment claim with a physical separation mechanism. Monitoring and control classes (G01N, G05D, G05B) together account for a meaningful share, pointing to a real sub-cluster of sensing and automation claims rather than pure hardware claims. Shares sum above 100% because records commonly carry more than one class.

IPC subclass compositionC02F · Water & wastewater treatment2993.5%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1961.3%G01N · Material analysis & testing1238.7%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…1032.3%G05B · Control & regulating systems516.1%B03D · Flotation39.7%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …26.5%G06F · Electric digital data processi…26.5%Other412.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 31 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Desalination Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Desalination Pretreatment with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about desalination pretreatment and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in scope

Representative filing
US20180072588A12018-03-15

Apparatus and method for analyzing influence variable on membrane fouling of seawater desalination system

DOOSAN HEAVY INDUSTRIES & CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD.

Filed by Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction, this application (US20180072588A1) describes selecting the dominant variables that drive membrane fouling in a seawater desalination system and deriving an equation from them, discarding low-influence variables along the way. It positions monitoring and predictive modelling as a distinct claim layer sitting on top of the physical filtration hardware.Published 2018-03-15

US20180072588A1 — patent drawing 1US20180072588A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5316682AGas micronizer and purification system and related methods108
2US20140014562A1Dissolved air flotation-type pretreatment apparatus16
3US20230294038A1Sustainable desalination systems and methods14
4US20180072588A1Apparatus and method for analyzing influence variable on membrane fouling of seawater desalination system12
5WO2021226275A1Sustainable desalination systems and methods10
6EP3293151A1Apparatus and method for analyzing membrane fouling of seawater desalination system9
7US20160207803A1Method for pretreatment of wastewater and recreational water with nanocomposites and bridging polymers9
8US9440864B2Dissolved air flotation-type pretreatment apparatus7
9US10472254B2Apparatus and method for analyzing influence variable on membrane fouling of seawater desalination system6
10WO2015022695A1Method for pretreatment of wastewater and recreational water with nanocomposites and bridging polymers5

Citation counts inside this corpus reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a signal of influence on the field's prior art, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Desalination Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three findings worth acting on before drafting new claims in this space.

Concentration
13 vs 2
leader vs fifth place

One assignee well ahead, then a thin field

The top-ranked assignee holds 13 records; by fifth place the count is down to 2. With only 9 companies in the ranked set, this is a field where a single active filer can dominate the visible prior art in a given sub-branch, but where most other participants have filed only once or twice.

Ranking covers 9 companies, counted in records.
Filing momentum
-50%
2021 → 2024

Activity has thinned since the 2017 peak

Filing peaked at 6 records in 2017 and, using the last two complete years available, moved from 2 in 2021 to 1 in 2024 — a -50% change. Momentum data for the ranked assignees confirms flat or -100% year-on-year activity for several of the more active filers, though 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete.

2024 is the last year treated as complete due to publication lag.
Technology mix
38.7% / 32.3%
G01N / G05D share of records

Monitoring and control claims are a real second cluster

Beyond the dominant C02F and B01D treatment classes, G01N (testing, including silt density index work) and G05D (non-electric variable control) each cover roughly a third of the 31 records. That is a meaningful share for what is often treated as a peripheral topic to core filtration hardware.

Shares are of all 31 records; a record can carry multiple classes.
Geography
US 8 / EPO 6
leading receiving offices

Filing is spread across a handful of offices, not concentrated in one

United States (8) and the European Patent Office (6) lead receiving-office counts, with China (4), Germany (3), Austria (2) and Australia (2) also represented. No single office dominates the way the top assignee dominates the company ranking.

Counts are of published records by receiving office.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to desalination pretreatment, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Desalination Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked assignee set is small — 9 companies — and recent-year momentum has gone flat or negative across the most active of them, which is itself informative for anyone deciding whether to enter now.

Leader
13 records
top of 9 ranked assignees

A clear leader without a comparable second filer

The top-ranked assignee's 13 records sit well above the field; the next tier of activity drops sharply, down to 2 records by fifth place. That gap suggests the leader has staked out a defensible position in at least one sub-branch rather than the field being contested at the top.

Ranking counted in patent families/records.
Momentum
0 in latest year
across most ranked assignees

Recent-year activity has gone quiet across the ranked set

Several of the more active assignees, including the pairing behind the strongest co-assignee link in the dataset, show 0 filings in the latest year and a -100% year-on-year change. This is consistent with the overall -50% filing trend from 2021 to 2024, though the newest years are still filling in due to publication lag.

Momentum figures reflect the latest tracked year per assignee.
Collaboration
1 pair
strongest co-assignee link

Co-filing is rare in this dataset

Only one co-assignee pairing recurs with a count above one, linking two related engineering entities on shared filings. Outside that pair, the ranked assignees appear to file independently rather than in joint ventures or cross-licensed programmes.

Based on co-assignee pair frequency across records.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a freedom-to-operate check
These sub-areas sit inside the dataset's technology mix but carry comparatively few dedicated records — worth checking before assuming the space is open.
Algal bloom early-warning sensingCoagulant dose auto-adjustment loopsBackwash frequency optimisation algorithmsSilt density index predictive modellingDissolved air flotation bubble-size control
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Gaveish-Galilee Bio Applications Ltd.0
Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd.0
Environmental Water Minerals Company0
Shenzhen China General Nuclear Engineering Design Co., Ltd.0-100%
China General Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd.0-100%
WOO SUNG WOO0
Suzhou Kehuan Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.0-100%
Suzhou Five Stars Special Ultrafiltration Membrane Technology Co., Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Desalination Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated leader, a thinning filing trend through 2024, and a real monitoring/control sub-cluster alongside the core filtration claims.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 13 of the ranked records, any new filing in dissolved air flotation or ultrafiltration pretreatment should be checked against that portfolio specifically, not just the field average.

Run a freedom-to-operate scan in Eureka

Track the monitoring and control sub-cluster separately

G01N and G05D classes cover roughly a third of records each — treat membrane-fouling prediction and dosing control as a distinct claim strategy from the physical filtration hardware.

Explore this cluster in Eureka

Re-check filing momentum once 2025-2026 data settles

Publication lag means the current -50% (2021-2024) reading is the most reliable growth figure available; revisit once more recent years complete.

Set an alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Desalination Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about desalination pretreatment patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Desalination Pretreatment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Desalination Pretreatment in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole desalination pretreatment corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.