Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Digital Battery Passport Traceability — PatSnap Eureka

Digital Battery Passport Traceability — PatSnap Eureka
EU Battery Regulation · Digital Passport

Digital Battery Passport Technology for End-of-Life Material Traceability

The EU Battery Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2023/1542) mandates traction battery passports encoding full lifecycle data by 2026–2027. Blockchain-anchored digital battery passports, decentralized identifiers, and field-deployable diagnostics now form the technical core enabling regulatory-compliant end-of-life material traceability.

DBP Technical Architecture

Six core components enabling EU Battery Regulation compliance

Digital Battery Passport Architecture: Blockchain Immutability, DID/VC Identity, Digital Twin Modeling, Impedance Diagnostics, Carbon Footprint Calculation, Data Completeness Validation Six technical layers of a compliant digital battery passport system derived from patent analysis via PatSnap Eureka, spanning identity, data integrity, health assessment, and carbon tracking. Tamper-resistant records Pseudonymized sharing Predictive modeling EoL pathway allocation Mandatory declaration Issuance gate Blockchain DID/VC Digital Twin Diagnostics Carbon Validation
20+
Relevant technical sources surveyed across global jurisdictions
2026
EU Battery Regulation passport mandate deadline for traction batteries
54
Data points assessed by AVL across four DBP information categories
2024
Year EU carbon footprint declarations became mandatory for EV batteries
Core Architecture

How Digital Battery Passports Enable Lifecycle Traceability

The digital battery passport concept centers on creating a persistent, tamper-resistant digital identity for each battery that accumulates data throughout its lifecycle — from raw material sourcing through manufacturing, operation, and ultimately end-of-life recycling. The World Economic Forum's systems and methods for processing battery passports establish the foundational architecture: battery-related data encompassing value chain provenance and lifecycle metrics is received, aggregated, and processed into a sustainability assessment that is embedded in the passport and accessible across all batteries carrying such credentials.

Blockchain consensus mechanisms are the dominant technical instrument for guaranteeing data integrity across the supply chain. Chinese firm Nanjing Fuchuang Intelligent Manufacturing Technology deployed patents on a blockchain-based battery digital passport system that employs a first and second attestation module to record every production-phase data point and passport information on-chain, then consolidates this via a summary module onto a public trust blockchain. The system offers both horizontal traceability — recovering all detailed data at each link in the battery passport — and vertical traceability of historical modification records. This dual-axis traceability architecture directly addresses EU Battery Regulation requirements for material origin documentation and version control.

BASF SE advanced the passport generation mechanism by introducing a data completeness metric. Their validation apparatus measures the quantity and quality of accessible data before generating or updating a passport, ensuring that only data-complete passports proceed to the next lifecycle stage. Their companion Korean filing further specifies assigning a physical identifier to a decentralized identifier (DID) to generate the passport, linking the physical battery component to its on-chain credential. This DID-based architecture is critical for EU compliance because it enables pseudonymized but auditable data sharing among regulators, recyclers, and manufacturers without centralizing sensitive supply chain information.

Root Lab's method extends the architecture by issuing the digital product passport as an NFT on a public blockchain, expanding the unique battery identifier into a decentralized identifier and verifiable credential (VC) pair. This NFT-encoded DPP enables safe and automated processing of the entire battery lifecycle — from registration, tracking, authentication, ownership transfer, and disposal — and critically supports the EU Battery Regulation's requirement for accessible, publicly queryable battery data. Learn more about patent landscape analysis for battery technologies on the PatSnap platform.

Key Technical Pillars
  • Blockchain-anchored tamper-resistant lifecycle records
  • Decentralized identifiers (DIDs) for pseudonymized sharing
  • Verifiable credentials (VCs) and NFT-based ownership
  • Data completeness validation before passport issuance
  • Digital twin integration for predictive modeling
  • Carbon footprint calculation embedded in passport
2027
Carbon performance thresholds phase-in deadline
Art. 77
EU Regulation article mandating unique battery ID with SoH data
6+
Jurisdictions active in DBP patent filings
2019
Year earliest blockchain battery traceability architecture was demonstrated
Patent Intelligence

Innovation Landscape: Key Assignees and Filing Trends

Patent and literature data surveyed reveals a rapidly expanding innovation ecosystem spanning approximately 20 directly relevant technical sources across the EU, US, South Korea, China, India, and international PCT filings.

Key Assignees in DBP Patent Landscape

Most patent-prolific assignees specifically in blockchain DBP and lifecycle traceability work, by number of active filings.

Key Assignees in DBP Patent Landscape: Nanjing Fuchuang 2 patents, World Economic Forum 2 patents, BASF SE 2 patents, Stellantis Europe 2 patents, Bull SAS 1 patent, CEA France 1 patent, Root Lab 1 patent, TVS Motor 1 patent Patent filing counts for major assignees in digital battery passport and lifecycle traceability technology, based on patent analysis via PatSnap Eureka. Nanjing Fuchuang, WEF, BASF SE, and Stellantis each hold 2 active filings in core DBP architecture. 2 Nanjing Fuchuang 2 World Econ. Forum 2 BASF SE 2 Stellantis Europe 1 Bull SAS 1 CEA France 1 Root Lab 1 TVS Motor 1 patent 2 patents

DBP Innovation Timeline by Technical Focus

Clear progression from basic blockchain attestation (2019–2021) through carbon integration (2022–2024) to compliance schema enforcement (2025–2026).

DBP Innovation Timeline: 2019 basic blockchain attestation, 2021 blockchain traceability management strategy, 2022–2024 carbon footprint + digital twins + DID identity, 2025–2026 data completeness validation + regulatory schema + multi-manufacturer coordination + field diagnostics Innovation progression in digital battery passport patent filings from 2019 to 2026, showing three distinct eras of technical maturity as identified through PatSnap Eureka patent analysis. 2019–2021 Basic blockchain attestation for battery state data Wuhan University · Shanghai Polytechnic 2022–2024 Carbon footprint, digital twins, DID-based identity WEF · Nanjing Fuchuang · BASF KR · Stellantis · TVS 2025–2026 Completeness validation, schema enforcement, field diagnostics BASF WO · Bull SAS · CEA · China Auto IT · Root Lab · IN

Map the full digital battery passport patent landscape with PatSnap Eureka

Run a Live Patent Search in Eureka
End-of-Life Traceability

Recycling Pathway Allocation and Material Recovery

The end-of-life phase represents the most technically demanding segment for passport-enabled traceability, requiring accurate state-of-health (SoH) assessment to allocate batteries between second-life applications and material recovery recycling.

Field Diagnostics · IN 2026

Field-Deployable Impedance Spectroscopy for EoL Allocation

A system filed by Amartya Krishnaditya (IN, 2026) deploys an active diagnostic hardware unit that injects composite multi-frequency excitation waveforms with simultaneous thermal stabilization to acquire high-fidelity broadband impedance spectra under real dismantling-yard conditions. A physics-constrained degradation modeling unit running on an edge processor enforces fixed electrochemical governing equations within a cell-graph architecture to produce uncertainty-bounded health predictions. A hierarchical allocation unit derives a safety-risk index from impedance morphology and selects the optimal second-life or recycling pathway — the cryptographic output is directly linkable to the battery's digital passport.

Regulators can verify EoL routing on defensible technical grounds
Cell-Level Health · CEA US 2025

SoH History Fingerprinting via CC-CV Cycle Decomposition

The Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique (CEA) contributed a complementary mechanism at the cell level. Their US 2025 patent generates the passport as a computer file containing incidence values representing the history of state-of-health over the cell's service life. For each CV phase across a series of CC-CV charging cycles, the method collects floating current signals, derives them, decomposes the derivative into empirical modes, and determines an incidence value for that cycle. The resulting health history timeline embedded in the passport is precisely the type of structured, quantitative lifecycle record that recycling operators need to determine residual material value and that EU authorities need to verify compliance with minimum recycled content requirements.

Structured SoH fingerprint for residual material valuation
Multi-Actor Logistics · Wuhan University 2019

Blockchain-Networked Recycling Coordination Platform

Wuhan University's study demonstrated a blockchain-networked platform connecting manufacturers, dealers, users, charging stations, and recycling centers. The battery's built-in BMS and wireless communication terminal feed real-time performance parameters; when recycling thresholds are met, the battery is automatically dispatched to a waste treatment center using alkaline precipitation processing. This early architecture prefigured the now-mandatory EU passport requirement by showing that blockchain-mediated traceability could coordinate multi-actor recycling logistics.

Prefigured EU passport mandate by 7 years
OEM Lifecycle Management · Stellantis WO 2024

Digital Identity with Operational Data for Downstream Actors

Stellantis Europe's WO 2024 patent operationalizes lifecycle management by generating a digital identity with a unique identification code for each battery element on a digital platform. As the battery accumulates operational data — maintenance events, recharge event data, state of health — these are associated with the digital identity, forming "offer data" that downstream actors such as second-life operators or recyclers can query when the battery approaches end of first life. This directly satisfies the EU Battery Regulation's Article 77 requirement for a battery passport linked to a unique identifier containing data on SoH, capacity fade, and maintenance history.

Directly satisfies EU Battery Regulation Article 77
PatSnap Eureka

Find Every EoL Battery Diagnostics Patent in Minutes

Search across 120+ countries of patent data with AI-powered semantic search

Search Battery Recycling Patents Now
Carbon Footprint Integration

Automated Carbon Tracking Within the Passport Framework

The EU Battery Regulation mandates carbon footprint declarations for industrial and EV batteries from 2024, with performance thresholds phased in from 2027. Several patent families directly address automated carbon footprint calculation within the passport framework.

🔋

China Automotive Information Technology (CN, 2026)

Constructs a full-lifecycle data system that binds multi-source supplier data to a unique battery identifier via blockchain consensus. A digital twin engine built on electrochemical and thermal runaway models predicts operating conditions. Carbon footprint data and compliance certification information are incorporated into the passport template alongside lifecycle state data, with versioned updates published on-chain — architecturally aligned with the EU Battery Regulation's requirement for continuously updated passport data.

🌿

Nihon Sogo Kenkyusho (CN, 2023)

Computes lifecycle CO₂ from manufacturing through operation, updating lifecycle carbon emission values as battery usage history accumulates. The system applies for eco-certification through a battery authentication server that evaluates lifecycle carbon scores, prefiguring the EU Battery Regulation's "green label" concept for batteries meeting performance thresholds.

🔒
Unlock Full Carbon Passport IP Analysis
Explore the complete set of carbon footprint integration patents and LCA management systems mapped to EU compliance timelines.
KR LCA system (2025) Token incentive mechanism Recycling rate indicators + more
Explore Carbon Passport Patents →
Key Players

Leading Assignees in Digital Battery Passport IP

The patent landscape reveals a geographically distributed but technically convergent innovation ecosystem. European OEM and institutional IP activity is accelerating, with compliance-oriented filings directly aligned with Battery Regulation passport mandates.

Assignee Jurisdiction Core Contribution Filing Year
World Economic Forum US / WO Battery passport processing system with sustainability scoring and value chain data aggregation 2023
BASF SE WO / KR Data completeness validation system and DID-linked battery passport device 2024–2025
Bull SAS EP Multi-manufacturer architecture tracing raw material origins and ensuring environmental compliance — most EU-compliance-explicit patent in dataset 2025
Nanjing Fuchuang CN Blockchain DBP system with dual-axis traceability (horizontal supply chain + vertical historical revisions) 2024
Stellantis Europe / FCA Italy WO / IT European OEM lifecycle management methods with proprietary digital identity platforms aligned to EU Battery Regulation obligations 2024–2025
🔒
Unlock Full Assignee Intelligence
Access complete filing details, claim summaries, and competitive positioning for all key DBP assignees in PatSnap Eureka.
CEA France (US 2025) TVS Motor (IN 2024) Root Lab NFT-DPP + more
View All Assignees in Eureka →

Track Competitor DBP Patent Activity in Real Time

Monitor new filings from BASF, Stellantis, Bull SAS, and emerging Asian players with PatSnap Eureka alerts

Set Up Patent Monitoring
Lifecycle Flow

From Raw Material to Recycling: DBP Data Journey

The digital battery passport accumulates data at every stage. Understanding this flow is critical for designing systems compliant with environmental regulatory frameworks and the EU Battery Regulation's Article 77 requirements.

Production Phase
Raw Material Sourcing
Supplier data bound to unique battery ID via blockchain consensus
Manufacturing Attestation
First and second attestation modules record every production-phase data point on-chain
DID Assignment
Physical identifier linked to decentralized identifier (DID) generating on-chain credential
Data Completeness Check
Validation apparatus measures quantity and quality of accessible data before passport issuance
Operational Phase
SoH Monitoring
BMS and wireless terminal feed real-time performance parameters; CC-CV cycle incidence values recorded
Maintenance Events
Recharge events, capacity fade, and maintenance history associated with digital identity
Carbon Footprint Updates
Lifecycle CO₂ values updated as usage history accumulates; versioned updates published on-chain
Digital Twin Modeling
Electrochemical and thermal runaway models predict operating conditions and generate warning threshold data
End-of-Life Phase
Impedance Diagnostics
Multi-frequency excitation waveforms acquire broadband impedance spectra at dismantling yard
Pathway Allocation
Safety-risk index derived from impedance morphology selects second-life or recycling pathway
Cryptographic Output
Allocation decision linked to digital passport — regulators verify routing on defensible technical grounds
Recycling Dispatch
When thresholds met, battery automatically dispatched to waste treatment center; material recovery documented
Data Challenge

Multi-Actor Data Divergence Remains a Structural Challenge

The AVL List GmbH study (2023) surveyed value chain actors through focus group workshops and expert interviews on 54 data points across four information categories. The study found diverging perspectives on data needs and availability attributable to different actors' roles — a finding that has direct implications for passport schema design and the selective disclosure mechanisms required to balance commercial confidentiality with regulatory transparency. Learn how PatSnap supports life sciences and materials R&D teams navigating complex regulatory data landscapes.

Technical Depth

Compliance Architecture: Component Distribution and Jurisdictional Spread

Patent data from approximately 20 directly relevant sources reveals how technical components map to compliance requirements and how innovation is distributed geographically.

Patent Filing Jurisdictions in DBP Landscape

Innovation spans EU, US, South Korea, China, India, and international PCT filings — reflecting global regulatory anticipation.

DBP Patent Filing Jurisdictions: China CN multiple filings, Korea KR multiple filings, International PCT/WO multiple filings, US multiple filings, Europe EP/IT multiple filings, India IN filing Geographic distribution of digital battery passport patent filings across global jurisdictions, based on approximately 20 technical sources analysed via PatSnap Eureka. China and Korea are the most active jurisdictions by filing volume. 6+ Jurisdictions China (CN) ~35% Korea (KR) ~20% PCT / WO ~20% United States ~10% Europe EP/IT ~10% India (IN) ~5%

DBP Technical Capability Depth by Era

Relative technical sophistication of patent filings across three innovation eras, from basic attestation to full regulatory schema enforcement.

DBP Technical Capability by Era: 2019–2021 Blockchain Attestation depth 3/10, 2022–2024 Carbon + Digital Twin + DID depth 7/10, 2025–2026 Full Compliance Schema + Field Diagnostics depth 10/10 Relative technical capability depth of digital battery passport patents across three innovation eras (2019–2021, 2022–2024, 2025–2026), illustrating the rapid maturation from basic blockchain attestation to comprehensive regulatory compliance architecture, based on PatSnap Eureka patent analysis. 10 7.5 5 2.5 0 3/10 2019–2021 Basic Attestation 7/10 2022–2024 Carbon + DID + Twin 10/10 2025–2026 Full Compliance Schema

Analyse DBP patent trends across all jurisdictions and filing eras

Build Your Patent Landscape in Eureka
Frequently asked questions

Digital Battery Passport Technology — key questions answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask PatSnap Eureka About Battery Passport IP
PatSnap Eureka

Accelerate Your EU Battery Regulation Compliance Strategy

Join 18,000+ innovators already using PatSnap Eureka to accelerate their R&D. Explore the full digital battery passport patent landscape across all jurisdictions — from blockchain architectures to carbon footprint integration.

References

  1. System and method for processing a battery passport — World Economic Forum, 2023
  2. System and method for processing a battery passport (WO) — World Economic Forum, 2023
  3. Method and System for managing batteries using Blockchain-based Digital Product Passports — Root Lab Co., Ltd., 2026
  4. Blockchain-based battery digital passport system — Nanjing Fuchuang Intelligent Manufacturing Technology Co., Ltd., 2024
  5. 一种基于区块链的电池数字护照系统 — Nanjing Fuchuang Intelligent Manufacturing Technology Co., Ltd., 2024
  6. Systems and methods for validating and generating battery passports — BASF SE, 2025
  7. Battery passport — BASF SE, 2024
  8. Management system for managing digital battery passports — Bull SAS, 2025
  9. Field-deployable battery lifecycle intelligence system and method for post-vehicle-life management — Amartya Krishnaditya, 2026
  10. Method and device for generating a digital passport of a lithium-ion battery cell — CEA, 2025
  11. Method and system for life cycle management of a battery element used in an electric vehicle — Stellantis Europe S.P.A., 2024
  12. Procedure and system for managing the life cycle of a battery element used in an electric vehicle — FCA Italy S.P.A., 2025
  13. Power battery passport management method — China Automotive Information Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd., 2026
  14. Battery information management method — Shenzhen Point-Chain Technology Co., Ltd., 2023
  15. Battery LCA management system based on blockchain — Lee Dong-wook, 2025
  16. Information processing method for battery lifecycle CO₂ tracking — Nihon Sogo Kenkyusho, 2023
  17. A method for traceability of each of rechargeable battery — TVS Motor Company Limited, 2024
  18. Data requirements and availabilities for a digital battery passport – A value chain actor perspective — AVL List GmbH, 2023
  19. Evaluation and recovery of power batteries based on trusted blockchain traceability — School of Electronic Information, Wuhan University, 2019
  20. Traceability Management Strategy of the EV Power Battery Based on the Blockchain — School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Polytechnic University, 2021
  21. Bridging Tools to Better Understand Environmental Performances and Raw Materials Supply of Traction Batteries in the Future EU Fleet — European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 2020
  22. EU Battery Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2023/1542) — Official Journal of the European Union
  23. World Economic Forum — Battery Passport Initiative
  24. AVL List GmbH — Battery Technology Research

All data and statistics on this page are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap's proprietary innovation intelligence platform.

Ask PatSnap Eureka
Ask PatSnap Eureka
AI innovation intelligence · always on
Ask anything about digital battery passports.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and research to answer instantly.
Try asking
Powered by PatSnap Eureka