Book a demo

Direct Air Capture Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Direct Air Capture Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/direct-air-capture-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Direct Air Capture
Direct air capture patents: sorbent, solvent and contactor claims mapped across the filing record
  • Filing peaked in 2024 at 37 records, then the pace flattened rather than kept climbing — the technology is occupied, not accelerating.
  • 173 families sit almost entirely inside B01D and B01J, with only single-digit counts reaching into polymer, electrolytic or water-treatment adjacencies.
  • The most-cited grant, US11389761B1, draws 23 citations, while recent-year momentum has gone flat or negative for several of the historically active filers.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
173
Published Records
38%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+42%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (26 records) with 2024 (37) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 173 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the direct air capture patent record actually covers

Direct air capture (DAC) patenting in this dataset centres on two mechanical routes: solid sorbent contactors that cycle amine-functionalised materials through adsorption and thermal or humidity-swing regeneration, and liquid solvent systems that scrub CO2 from ambient air before stripping it out in a separate desorption stage. The search string isolates records that combine direct air capture language with claims on sorbent regeneration, air contactor design or CO2 removal from air, filtered to the separation and sorption IPC classes that dominate the field. Almost every record falls under B01D or B01J, which tells you where the claim space is dense before you look at a single assignee name.

The 173 families span receiving offices led by the United States, with meaningful PCT, European, Australian and Canadian filing alongside a smaller Israeli cohort. That spread points to a technology still being routed internationally rather than one settled into a single home jurisdiction, which matters for freedom-to-operate work that assumes US-only exposure.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1ROBERT BOSCH GMBH17
  2. 2ATWOOD MATTHEW16
  3. 38 RIVERS CAPITAL LLC13
  4. 4HEIRLOOM CARBON TECHNOLOGIES INC10
  5. 5GLOBAL THERMOSTAT OPERATIONS LLC9
  6. 6AIR TO EARTH HLDG LLC8
  7. 7AIRMYNE INC8
  8. 8SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV7
  9. 9EQUINOR LOW CARBON UK LTD7
  10. 10RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA7
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Direct Air Capture Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Publication counts by year and by IPC subclass, drawn directly from the 173 families in this search.

A flat-to-declining curve after a 2024 peak

Filings ran from zero in 2017 to a peak of 37 in 2024, with the 2022 midpoint at 25. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures are understated in this trend and should not yet be read as a slowdown in actual filing activity.

A flat-to-declining curve after a 2024 peak01020304002017201820192020202120222023372024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Separation and sorption classes dominate

B01D covers all but one of the 173 records and B01J appears in 78, confirming that contactor and sorbent-cycle mechanics carry almost the entire claim burden. C01B, C08G, C25B, C08J, C02F and F01K each register only single digits, marking those as adjacent rather than core to how this technology has been claimed so far.

Separation and sorption classes dominateB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…17299.4%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …7845.1%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…137.5%C08G · Condensation polymers74.0%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…74.0%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions63.5%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment52.9%F01K · Steam & thermal power plants42.3%Other3218.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 173 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Direct Air Capture Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Direct Air Capture Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about direct air capture landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art and a representative recent filing

Representative Recent Filing
US20250144558A12025-05-08

US20250144558A1 — Extreme temperature direct air capture solvent

UT-BATTELLE, LLC

A solvent formulation for the direct air capture of carbon dioxide is provided. The solvent formulation includes an amino acid salt, a polar solvent and an antifreeze agent. A direct air capture system for the direct air capture of carbon dioxide is further provided. The direct air capture system includes a desorption column, a gas separator, and an air contactor. The desorption column, gas-liquid separator, and air contactor are in fluid communication. The air contactor includes the solvent formulation.Filed by UT-Battelle, LLC, published 2025-05-08 — pairs an antifreeze-modified amino acid salt solvent with a defined desorption-column and air-contactor architecture.

US20250144558A1 — patent drawing 1US20250144558A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US11389761B1System and method for improving the performance and lowering the cost of atmospheric carbon dioxide removal b…23
2US20240252983A1Atmospheric carbon dioxide capture system21
3WO2021111366A1Direct capture of carbon dioxide16
4US20240252984A1Atmospheric carbon dioxide capture system14
5US20240139705A1Direct air capture co2 removal system and process13
6US11612853B1Fully automated direct air capture carbon dioxide processing system12
7US11266951B1System and method for improving the performance and lowering the cost of atmospheric carbon dioxide removal b…12
8US20230001351A1Direct capture of carbon dioxide10
9WO2021102385A1Rotating continuous multi-capture systems and apparatus for improved direct air capture of carbon dioxide (DA…10
10US20230213247A1Using Carbon Dioxide From A Direct Air Capture System As A Low Global Warming Car And Industrial Refrigerant9

Citation counts reward age within a searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Direct Air Capture Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern signals for teams entering this space

Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC spread and the citation data, aimed at where to spend diligence effort.

Filing Momentum
37 in 2024
peak year filings

Growth has plateaued, not accelerated

The climb from 0 in 2017 to a peak of 37 in 2024 looks steep in isolation, but the 2022 midpoint of 25 shows the curve flattening well before the peak, and several previously active assignees show zero or -100% year-on-year movement in the latest year.

Read alongside the 18-month publication lag before assuming a decline.
Claim Density
172 of 173
records tagged B01D

Separation-class claims are nearly universal

With B01D present in all but one record, contactor geometry and separation-stage mechanics are the most heavily claimed surface in this dataset. B01J's 78 records show catalytic and sorbent-material claims as the second-densest layer, leaving the six other IPC classes as comparatively open ground.

New filings inside B01D/B01J face the deepest prior art.
Citation Signal
23 citations
top-cited record

Influence concentrates in a small cluster of grants

US11389761B1 leads at 23 citations, with a small group of atmospheric carbon dioxide capture system filings close behind. That clustering suggests later filers are designing in reference to a handful of system-level architectures rather than a broad, evenly-cited base.

Citation counts favour older records; use as a map of influence, not current merit.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to direct air capture landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare and concentrated
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Global Thermostat Operations, LLCEISENBERGER PETER7
Global Thermostat Operations, LLCPETER EISENBERGER3
ATWOOD MATTHEWCarbon Capture, LLC2
ATWOOD MATTHEWMATTHEW ATWOOD2
EISENBERGER PETERPETER EISENBERGER2
ATWOOD MATTHEWMatthew Atwood1
Global Thermostat Operations, LLCEisenberger Peter1
EISENBERGER PETEREisenberger Peter1

Only 9 co-assignee pairs appear across 173 families, and the strongest pairing links a single organisation with an individual inventor at 7 shared records — collaboration here is the exception, not the norm.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Direct Air Capture Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where activity has cooled

Recent-year momentum diverges sharply from historical activity: several of the assignees with the largest historical footprints show no filings in the latest year.

Momentum Leader
2 in latest year
most recent filings

University of California system stays active

Among the tracked assignees, the University of California regents show 2 filings in the latest year — the only entry in this group with any recent-year activity at all, against a field where most peers register zero.

Worth tracking for where academic filing moves next.
Flat Activity
0 in latest year
Matthew Atwood

Individual-inventor filing has gone quiet

Matthew Atwood, tied to one of the dataset's co-assignee pairs, shows no filings in the latest year, consistent with a broader cooling among the historically active names in this corpus.

Historical volume does not guarantee continued output.
Declining Filers
-100% YoY
three assignees

Several established filers dropped to zero

Robert Bosch, Eight Rivers Capital and Heirloom Carbon Technologies each show a -100% year-on-year change, moving from prior activity to zero filings in the latest year — a pattern to check against licensing or divestment activity before assuming exit.

Confirm via non-patent sources before reading as market exit.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
IPC classes with single-digit representation relative to the B01D/B01J core suggest claim space that has not been heavily contested.
Amine-functionalised polymer sorbent synthesis (C08G)Electrolytic CO2/solvent regeneration coupling (C25B)Polymer solution processing for contactor membranes (C08J)Waste-heat integration for desorption columns (F01K)Combined CO2 removal and water treatment loops (C02F)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
The Regents of the University of California2
ATWOOD MATTHEW0
Robert Bosch GmbH0-100%
Eight Rivers Capital, LLC0-100%
Heirloom Carbon Technologies0-100%
Global Thermostat Operations, LLC0
EISENBERGER PETER0
AIRMYNE INC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Direct Air Capture Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The published record gives a structural map; the next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing or R&D targeting.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on B01D/B01J claims

Given how densely both classes are claimed, any new sorbent or contactor design should be checked specifically against the highest-cited grants before development spend commits to a specific mechanical architecture.

Explore claims in Eureka

Track the assignees showing zero recent-year filings

A -100% year-on-year drop can mean a shift to trade secrecy, licensing-out, or genuine exit — worth confirming with corporate filings or news before adjusting a competitive watch list.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka

Scope the under-claimed adjacent classes

C08G, C25B, C08J, C02F and F01K each carry only a handful of records; a novelty search focused there is more likely to find open claim space than one aimed at the B01D core.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Direct Air Capture Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on direct air capture patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Direct Air Capture Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Direct Air Capture Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole direct air capture landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.