Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Direct Ocean Carbon Capture 2026 — PatSnap Eureka

Direct Ocean Carbon Capture 2026 — PatSnap Eureka
Marine CDR · 2026 Landscape

Direct Ocean Carbon Capture: Technology Landscape 2026

From ocean alkalinity enhancement and deep injection to ship-based CCS and biological pump augmentation — explore the full direct ocean carbon capture innovation landscape across 2009–2026 patent and literature records.

Four Principal DOCC Mechanistic Pathways: OAE, Deep Injection, Biological Pump, Ship-Based CCS Visual overview of the four direct ocean carbon capture mechanistic pathways identified across 2009–2026 patent and literature records in PatSnap Eureka: Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement, Deep Ocean Direct Injection, Biological Carbon Pump Enhancement, and Ship-Based & Offshore Platform Capture. 4 Principal DOCC Pathways 🪨 CLUSTER 1 Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement Olivine · Lime · OAE Mid maturity 🌊 CLUSTER 2 Deep Ocean Direct Injection >1,000–3,000 m depth Regulatory-constrained 🌿 CLUSTER 3 Biological Carbon Pump Enhancement Iron · Macroalgae · MOS Scientifically contested 🚢 CLUSTER 4 Ship-Based & Offshore CCS $85/tCO₂ · 94% capture Near-commercial Ocean Surface → Deep Column ~200 m 1,000–3,000 m (injection zone) Source: PatSnap Eureka · 2009–2026 patent & literature records
25–30%
of anthropogenic CO₂ absorbed by the ocean annually via natural carbonate chemistry
270 PgC
projected CDR potential from macroalgae sinking (MOS) 2020–2100 under RCP4.5 (GEOMAR)
$85/tCO₂
ship-based chemical absorption capture cost at 94% efficiency (ETH Zurich, 2022)
€15–35/t
estimated levelized CO₂ capture cost via OTEC seawater outgassing (Utrecht University)
Technology Overview

How Direct Ocean Carbon Capture Works

Direct ocean carbon capture (DOCC) encompasses a suite of engineered and nature-assisted technologies that use the ocean as an active medium for removing CO₂ from the atmosphere or directly from seawater. The ocean is both a passive sink — absorbing roughly 25–30% of anthropogenic CO₂ annually via natural carbonate chemistry — and, increasingly, a target for active engineering interventions designed to accelerate that uptake or store captured carbon in the deep column.

The field has accelerated rapidly in response to IPCC net-zero mandates and the 2022 launch of the UN Global Ocean Negative Carbon Emissions (Global-ONCE) program, making scalable marine CDR one of the most contested and rapidly evolving frontiers in climate technology. PatSnap's materials and chemicals intelligence tools are increasingly applied to track innovation in this space.

A cross-cutting infrastructure layer — autonomous ocean monitoring systems, satellite CO₂ flux observation, and alkalinity sensors deployed on ships of opportunity — underpins MRV (measurement, reporting, and verification) for all approaches. The UNESCO/IOC Global-ONCE program institutionalized ocean CDR as a decade-scale research priority in 2022, integrating microbial carbon pumps, biological and carbonate counter pumps, and engineering solutions.

  • Four principal mechanistic pathways identified across 2009–2026 records
  • MRV infrastructure underpins all approaches — now the critical IP battleground
  • Ship-based CCS within 5 years of demonstration-scale deployment
  • Asia-Pacific accelerating patent activity with 2 of 4 most recent filings from JP jurisdiction
Innovation Phases (2009–2026)
2009–2013 Foundational
MIT acute impact assessment; MDS deep-ocean case; KIOST offshore transport
2014–2020 Mid-stage
CSIRO Earth System Model OAE; AWI olivine modelling; GEOMAR direct injection
2021–2023 Acceleration
Global-ONCE launch; Ecospray, ETH Zurich, Delft ship-based CCS; GEOMAR 270 PgC MOS
2024–2026 Frontier
Running Tide MRV patent; Zhejiang methanol-integrated CCS; KR AI ship management
447 PgC
MOS + artificial upwelling CDR potential (GEOMAR, RCP4.5)
70 GtC
simulated direct injection over 100 years (GEOMAR, 2016)
94%
net CO₂ capture efficiency, chemical absorption on cargo ships (ETH Zurich)
2–5×
lower estimated cost of nanoparticle vs conventional iron fertilization (PNNL)
Data Visualisation

Innovation Signals Across DOCC Technology Clusters

Key quantitative signals extracted from 2009–2026 patent and literature records via PatSnap Eureka, spanning CDR potential, capture economics, and technology maturity.

Biological CDR Potential: MOS vs MOS + Upwelling (PgC, 2020–2100)

GEOMAR modelling under RCP4.5 shows macroalgae sinking alone delivers 270 PgC; combined with artificial upwelling this rises to 447 PgC over 2020–2100.

Biological CDR Potential: Macroalgae Sinking (MOS) 270 PgC vs MOS + Artificial Upwelling 447 PgC (2020–2100, RCP4.5) Comparison of projected carbon dioxide removal potential from macroalgae open-ocean mariculture and sinking alone (270 PgC) versus combined with artificial upwelling (447 PgC) under RCP4.5 scenario, 2020–2100, modelled by GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre and identified via PatSnap Eureka patent and literature analysis. 500 375 250 125 0 270 PgC MOS alone 447 PgC MOS + Upwelling CDR Potential (PgC) Source: GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre (2022) · RCP4.5 · 2020–2100 · via PatSnap Eureka

Ship-Based CCS: Capture Cost vs Efficiency by Technology

ETH Zurich (2022) demonstrates 94% net capture efficiency at $85/tCO₂ for chemical absorption. OTEC-based seawater extraction estimated at €15–35/tonne (Utrecht University).

Ship-Based CCS Technologies: Chemical Absorption $85/tCO₂ at 94% efficiency; OTEC Seawater Extraction €15–35/tCO₂; Methanol Reforming (Zhejiang 2025) emerging; Nanoparticle Fertilization 2–5× lower cost than conventional Comparative capture cost and technology readiness of ship-based and ocean-coupled carbon capture approaches identified in 2009–2026 patent and literature records via PatSnap Eureka. Chemical absorption leads on maturity; OTEC seawater extraction offers lowest levelized cost if co-located. 100 75 50 25 0 $85 Chemical Absorption €15–35 OTEC Seawater Emerging Methanol Reforming 2–5× lower Nanoparticle Fertilization Cost ($/tCO₂ proxy) Sources: ETH Zurich (2022), Utrecht University (2021), PNNL (2022), Zhejiang Univ. (2025) · PatSnap Eureka

Geographic Innovation Distribution by Region (DOCC, 2009–2026)

Europe leads in academic/institutional output (OAE, macroalgae CDR, ship-based CCS). Asia-Pacific accounts for 2 of the 4 most recent patent filings (JP jurisdiction, 2024–2025).

DOCC Geographic Innovation Distribution: Europe dominant academic output (OAE, macroalgae, ship CCS); Asia-Pacific 2 of 4 most recent patent filings; North America biological pump and DAC; Australia CSIRO Earth System Model OAE Regional distribution of direct ocean carbon capture patent and literature records from 2009–2026 as retrieved via PatSnap Eureka. Europe leads in volume with German institutions (AWI, GEOMAR) and Italian/Swiss/Dutch universities. Asia-Pacific shows accelerating commercial patent activity in 2024–2026. 4 regions Europe ~45% AWI, GEOMAR, ETH Zurich, Delft, Trieste Asia-Pacific ~25% Zhejiang Univ., Running Tide (JP), KIOST, KMU North America ~22% Lucent Biosciences, PNNL, UC system, MIT Australia ~8% CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Source: PatSnap Eureka · 2009–2026 DOCC patent & literature records · indicative distribution

OAE Sequestration Timescale: Olivine Dissolution at 5 Pg/yr

AWI modelling shows that annually dissolving 5 Pg of olivine compensates anthropogenic CO₂ from a high-emission scenario after 3,500 years — illustrating the multi-millennial horizon of OAE approaches.

OAE Olivine Dissolution Timescale: 5 Pg/yr annually compensates high-emission anthropogenic CO₂ after 3,500 years (AWI, 2020). Deep injection (GEOMAR): 70 GtC over 100 years. Ship-based CCS (ETH Zurich): near-term deployment within 5 years. Comparative sequestration timescales for key DOCC approaches: OAE olivine dissolution operates on a millennial scale (3,500 years to compensate high-emission CO₂ at 5 Pg/yr), while ship-based CCS targets near-term deployment within 5 years. Source: AWI (2020), GEOMAR (2016), ETH Zurich (2022) via PatSnap Eureka. ~5 yrs Ship CCS demo-scale 100 yrs Deep Injection 70 GtC (GEOMAR) 80 yrs Macroalgae MOS 270–447 PgC (GEOMAR) 3,500 yrs OAE Olivine 5 Pg/yr (AWI) Near-term Millennial Source: AWI (2020), GEOMAR (2016, 2022), ETH Zurich (2022) · via PatSnap Eureka

Run your own DOCC patent landscape analysis in PatSnap Eureka

Search DOCC Patents in Eureka
Technology Clusters

Four Principal DOCC Mechanistic Pathways

Each cluster represents a distinct physical or chemical approach to ocean-based carbon removal, with different maturity levels, IP concentration, and commercialisation timelines.

Cluster 1

Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE)

Addition of alkaline minerals — olivine, slaked lime, limestone — to surface or deep seawater shifts carbonate equilibria, increasing bicarbonate and carbonate ion concentrations, reducing pCO₂ at the surface, and drawing additional CO₂ from the atmosphere. Olivine dissolution also releases iron and silicic acid, creating a secondary biological fertilization effect. Records span Mediterranean deployment scenarios to global millennia-scale projections. Key contributors: Alfred-Wegener-Institut (AWI), CSIRO, Politecnico di Milano.

OAE ecological risk governance gap identified — white space for IP
Cluster 2

Deep Ocean Direct Injection & CO₂ Pumping

CO₂ captured at point sources is physically transported to deep ocean layers (>1,000 m) where pressure conditions favour hydrate formation or dissolution into ambient water. A novel 2022 approach redistributes surface ocean acidity to the deep column — without adding external alkalinity — accelerating carbonate homeostasis and minimizing conveyed material volumes. GEOMAR simulated 70 GtC injection over 100 years across depth variants. MIT's 2009 acute impact assessment remains a reference point for toxicity thresholds.

Surface acidity redistribution — novel low-materials-transport pathway
Cluster 3

Biological Carbon Pump Enhancement

Stimulating phytoplankton productivity via iron fertilization, macroalgae cultivation, or nutrient upwelling enhances the biological carbon pump, exporting organic carbon to the deep ocean as particulate matter. GEOMAR projects MOS CDR potential of 270 PgC globally (2020–2100) under RCP4.5, boosted to 447 PgC combined with artificial upwelling. Engineered nanoparticles (iron, SiO₂, Al₂O₃) are proposed to enhance phytoplankton aggregation at costs estimated 2–5× lower than conventional iron fertilization (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory). IP-thin relative to other clusters.

Scientifically contested — primarily academic literature, limited patents
Cluster 4

Ship-Based & Offshore Platform CCS

Onboard capture systems intercept CO₂ in ship exhaust streams using post-combustion amine scrubbing, membrane separation, temperature swing adsorption, or methanol reforming/pre-combustion approaches. Captured CO₂ is liquefied and stored aboard for transfer to shore-side sequestration. ETH Zurich's 2022 analysis demonstrates 94% net CO₂ capture efficiency at $85/tCO₂ for chemical absorption on cargo ships. IMO 2030 (−40%) and 2050 (−70%) targets drive demand. The 2025 Zhejiang University patent integrates methanol steam reforming, membrane CO₂ separation, and onboard liquefaction — eliminating high-pressure hydrogen storage risk. PatSnap's life sciences and energy intelligence tools track CCS patent activity across jurisdictions.

Near-commercial — within 5 years of demonstration-scale deployment
PatSnap Eureka

Map the full DOCC patent landscape across all four clusters

Identify white spaces, key assignees, and filing trends across OAE, deep injection, biological CDR, and ship-based CCS.

Analyse DOCC IP in Eureka
Application Domains

Where DOCC Technologies Are Being Deployed

Six distinct application domains emerge from 2009–2026 patent and literature records, spanning maritime decarbonization to carbon credit markets.

Application Domain Key Records / Assignees Regulatory Driver Maturity
Maritime Decarbonization & IMO Compliance Ecospray Technologies, ETH Zurich, Delft University, University of Trieste, Cranfield University IMO 2030 (−40%) and 2050 (−70%) targets Near-commercial
Offshore Oil & Gas Offshore Oil Engineering Co. Ltd (2021); membrane and chemical absorption for high-CO₂ gas streams; CO₂-EOR Platform decarbonization mandates Mid-stage
Open Ocean Climate Intervention UNESCO/IOC Global-ONCE (2022); GEOMAR macroalgae MOS; AWI olivine; CSIRO OAE IPCC net-zero mandates; UN Decade programs Research-scale
Renewable Energy-Coupled CO₂ Extraction École Polytechnique/CNRS Mediterranean methanol island (2022); Utrecht University OTEC (2021) Synthetic fuel mandates; ReFuelEU Nascent
🔒
Unlock MRV & Carbon Credit Domain Analysis
See the full application domain table including carbon credit MRV patent strategies and ocean monitoring infrastructure records from Running Tide, Lucent Biosciences, and Kongsberg Maritime.
Running Tide MRV patent (2024) Kongsberg alkalinity analyser Article 6 compliance signals
Explore Full Domain Data in Eureka →

Track IMO compliance patent filings in real time

PatSnap Eureka monitors ship-based CCS patent activity across JP, EP, KR, and GB jurisdictions as IMO 2030 deadlines approach.

Monitor IMO CCS Patents
Emerging Directions

Five Forward-Looking Signals from 2022–2026 Filings

Based on the most recent patent filings and literature in this dataset, five innovation signals point toward the next phase of direct ocean carbon capture commercialisation.

⚙️

Compact Methanol/Hydrogen Circular Carbon Systems (2025)

The Zhejiang University Jiaxing Research Institute JP patent (2025) integrates methanol steam reforming, membrane CO₂ separation, and onboard liquefaction into a single compact system — eliminating high-pressure hydrogen storage risk. This represents a shift from post-combustion retrofit to integrated fuel-and-capture architectures.

📊

Ocean CDR Carbon Credit Quantification Infrastructure (2024)

Running Tide Technologies' 2024 JP patent deploys multi-sensor data fusion and ensemble modelling to generate verifiable carbon credit outputs from ocean interventions — signalling the beginning of a commercial MRV layer necessary to monetize DOCC approaches through voluntary or compliance carbon markets.

🔬

Engineered Nanoparticle Ocean Fertilization (2022)

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's 2022 analysis identifies iron, SiO₂, and Al₂O₃ nanoparticles as potential enhancers of phytoplankton aggregation and deep-ocean carbon export, with estimated net CO₂ capture costs 2–5× lower than conventional iron fertilization. This represents a materials science entry point into biological CDR.

🔒
Unlock the Final 2 Emerging Directions
Access the surface acidity redistribution mechanism analysis and the offshore renewable energy + synthetic fuel synthesis pathway — including the €15–35/tonne OTEC cost estimate and patent white space assessment.
Surface acidity H⁺ pumping OTEC €15–35/tonne Methanol island concept
Explore All Emerging Signals →
Strategic Implications

IP Strategy Priorities for DOCC in 2026

MRV is the critical chokepoint. Among all DOCC approaches in this dataset, the absence of standardized, high-confidence measurement and verification frameworks is the most consistently identified barrier. The 2024 Running Tide and 2021 Lucent Biosciences patent filings signal a nascent commercial MRV layer, but carbon credit eligibility for ocean-based CDR remains unresolved in major compliance markets. R&D teams and IP strategists should prioritize sensor fusion, autonomous monitoring, and quantification algorithm patents as the primary IP battleground for the next 3–5 years. PatSnap's IP analytics platform provides landscape mapping for emerging MRV patent clusters.

Ship-based capture is approaching commercialization. The concentration of 2021–2025 engineering literature and patent filings around onboard CCS reflects genuine IMO regulatory pressure. The 2025 Zhejiang University methanol-integrated system and ETH Zurich's $85/tCO₂ capture cost estimate suggest that ship-based capture is within 5 years of demonstration-scale deployment, making this the most near-term commercializable DOCC segment.

OAE faces an ecological risk governance gap. All retrieved OAE records acknowledge localized pH excursion risks in vessel wakes or deployment zones. No patent in this dataset claims an OAE delivery mechanism with integrated ecological impact control. This represents a white space for engineering innovation — particularly vessel-based alkalinity dosing systems with pH feedback control.

Asia-Pacific is accelerating patent activity. Two of the four most recent patent filings in this dataset originate from JP jurisdiction assignees. Combined with Korean offshore CCS infrastructure work, this signals a competitive IP filing dynamic in which US and European research leadership in ocean CDR may not translate into dominant patent positions without deliberate international filing strategies. PatSnap customers use cross-jurisdictional filing analysis to identify these gaps. Use PatSnap's open API to integrate DOCC patent data into your own IP workflows.

IP Priority Matrix
HIGH PRIORITY · 3–5 year window
MRV & Carbon Credit Algorithms
Sensor fusion, multi-model ensembles, quantification frameworks for ocean CDR credits
HIGH PRIORITY · Near-term
Ship-Based CCS Architectures
Methanol reforming integration, membrane separation, onboard liquefaction cycles
MEDIUM PRIORITY · White space
OAE Ecological Impact Control
pH feedback dosing systems for vessel-based alkalinity delivery — no patents identified in dataset
LONGER HORIZON · Higher uncertainty
Biological CDR & Nanoparticle Enhancement
Scientifically contested permanence; primarily academic literature; limited patent coverage
Frequently asked questions

Direct Ocean Carbon Capture — key questions answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask Eureka About Ocean Carbon Capture
PatSnap Eureka

Map the Full Direct Ocean Carbon Capture Patent Landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators already using PatSnap Eureka to accelerate their R&D — from OAE white space identification to ship-based CCS competitor tracking.

References

  1. Ocean negative carbon emissions: A new UN Decade program — Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, 2022, CN
  2. Alkalinization Scenarios in the Mediterranean Sea for Efficient Removal of Atmospheric CO2 and the Mitigation of Ocean Acidification — Politecnico di Milano, 2021, IT
  3. Assessing carbon dioxide removal through global and regional ocean alkalinization under high and low emission pathways — CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, 2018, AU
  4. Anthropogenic CO2 of High Emission Scenario Compensated After 3500 Years of Ocean Alkalinization With an Annually Constant Dissolution of 5 Pg of Olivine — Alfred-Wegener-Institut (AWI), 2020, DE
  5. Potential of Maritime Transport for Ocean Liming and Atmospheric CO2 Removal — Politecnico di Milano, 2021, IT
  6. An updated assessment of the acute impacts of ocean carbon sequestration by direct injection — Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009, US
  7. Revisiting ocean carbon sequestration by direct injection: a global carbon budget perspective — Geomar Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, 2016, DE
  8. CO2 capture by pumping surface acidity to the deep ocean — 2022
  9. Assessing the sequestration time scales of some ocean-based carbon dioxide reduction strategies — University of California, 2021, US
  10. Method for calculating net carbon capture from ocean iron fertilization — Lucent Biosciences, Inc., 2021, EP
  11. Carbon Dioxide Removal via Macroalgae Open-ocean Mariculture and Sinking: An Earth System Modeling Study — GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, 2022, DE
  12. Potential use of engineered nanoparticles in ocean fertilization for large-scale atmospheric carbon dioxide removal — Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2022, US
  13. Iron fertilisation and century-scale effects of open ocean dissolution of olivine in a simulated CO2 removal experiment — Alfred-Wegener-Institut, 2016, DE
  14. Systems, methods and applications of compact marine carbon capture based on the coupling of methanol reforming and highly efficient membrane separation — Zhejiang University Jiaxing Research Institute, 2025, JP
  15. A Review of On-Board Carbon Capture and Storage Techniques: Solutions to the 2030 IMO Regulations — Ecospray Technologies S.R.L., 2023, IT
  16. Navigating within the Safe Operating Space with Carbon Capture On-Board — ETH Zurich, 2022, CH
  17. Ship-Based Carbon Capture and Storage: A Supply Chain Feasibility Study — Delft University of Technology, 2022, NL
  18. Floating offshore carbon neutral electric power generating system using oceanic carbon cycle — Ross Gary, 2022, GB
  19. Systems and methods for quantifying and/or verifying ocean-based interventions for carbon dioxide sequestration — Running Tide Technologies, Inc., 2024, JP
  20. Mitigation of CO2 Emissions from Commercial Ships: Evaluation of the Technology Readiness Level of Carbon Capture Systems — University of Trieste, 2023, IT
  21. Enhance Ocean Carbon Observations: Successful Implementation of a Novel Autonomous Total Alkalinity Analyzer on a Ship of Opportunity — Kongsberg Maritime Contros GmbH, 2020, DE
  22. Offshore CO2 Capture and Utilization Using Floating Wind/PV Systems: Site Assessment and Efficiency Analysis in the Mediterranean — École Polytechnique / CNRS, 2022, FR
  23. Indirect air CO2 capture and refinement based on OTEC seawater outgassing — Utrecht University, 2021, NL
  24. The Progress of Offshore CO2 Capture and Storage — Offshore Oil Engineering Co., Ltd, 2021
  25. IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  26. International Maritime Organization (IMO) — GHG Reduction Strategy
  27. UNESCO/IOC — Global Ocean Negative Carbon Emissions (Global-ONCE) Program
  28. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)

All data and statistics on this page are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap's proprietary innovation intelligence platform. This landscape is derived from a limited set of patent and literature records retrieved across targeted searches and represents a snapshot of innovation signals within this dataset only — it should not be interpreted as a comprehensive view of the full industry.

Ask PatSnap Eureka
Ask PatSnap Eureka
AI innovation intelligence · always on
Ask anything about direct ocean carbon capture.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and research to answer instantly.
Try asking
Powered by PatSnap Eureka