Directional Drilling Trajectory Control Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
Directional Drilling Trajectory Control Patents: Who Holds the Claims
Filings grew 140% from 2021 to 2024 (5 to 12 records), the last span with complete publication data — a genuine acceleration, not an artefact of the lag. Filings peaked at 12 in 2017, dipped, then rebuilt to 12 again by 2024 — a 140% rise from 2021's 5 filings over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 show fewer records only because publication has not caught up with filing; they should not be read as a decline.
- 1SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP36
- 2LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORP33
- 3SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY BV20
- 4SERVICES PETROLIERS SCHLUMBERGER SA16
- 5HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC16
See the full directional drilling trajectory control analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on this landscape
Who holds the most patents in directional drilling trajectory control?
One corporate family, made up of several related entities filing under different corporate names, tops the ranking with 36 records and also holds the strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset with 15 shared filings. A second tier exists too: the fifth-ranked assignee holds 16 records, which is a meaningful competing position rather than a token filer. Below that the ranking tapers quickly to a long tail of single-record entrants, so freedom-to-operate work should focus first on the leading family’s closed-loop control claims and then check the mid-tier filer for adjacent coverage.
Is patent filing in directional drilling trajectory control growing or slowing?
Filings grew 140% from 2021 (5 records) to 2024 (12 records), which is the most recent span the data can support as complete. Counts drop in 2025 and 2026, but that reflects the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication rather than a real slowdown, so those two years should not be read as a trend reversal. The field’s actual peak so far was 2017 at 12 filings, meaning 2024 matched but did not yet exceed that earlier high.
What does AU2013399137B2 actually claim, and does it block new filings?
The patent claims a computer system that takes rotational drilling time and slide drilling time for a wellpath, calculates a tortuosity value from that split, checks it against a threshold, and automatically changes a drilling parameter when the threshold is exceeded. It is a specific method tied to a defined input pair and an automatic response, filed by Landmark Graphics Corporation and published mid-2016. It would most directly constrain new filings that use the same rotational-versus-slide time ratio as the trigger for parameter changes; approaches using different tortuosity inputs or manual rather than automatic adjustment sit further from its scope.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Directional Drilling Trajectory Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.