Book a demo

Dispersants for Pigments and Fillers Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Dispersants for Pigments and Fillers Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/dispersants-for-pigments-and-fillers-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Chemical Additives
Dispersants for Pigments and Fillers: Patent Filing Trends and Who Leads
  • Concentrated at the top. The five leading assignees hold 147 of 305 records in scope (48.2%), and the top ten hold 190 (62.3%) — a steep drop-off from a leader at 77 filings to fifth place at 10.
  • Filing has flattened, not grown. Activity peaked at 10 records in 2019; the 2022 midpoint sits at just 2, and none of the six most-active assignees show any filings in the latest year.
  • Coatings dominate the class mix. C09D (coatings, paints & inks) appears on 78.0% of the 305 records, more than 24 points ahead of the next most common class, C09B (organic dyes & pigments) at 53.1%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
305
Published Records
48%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Dispersants for pigments and fillers sit at the intersection of coatings chemistry and polymer additive science: molecules engineered to wet a pigment or filler surface, prevent flocculation, and hold particles in stable suspension through steric stabilization or resin-compatible anchoring groups. This landscape covers 305 published records filed between 2015 and 2026, drawn from patents whose title or abstract references pigment dispersants, wetting-and-dispersing agents or polymeric dispersants, and whose claims touch grinding efficiency, color strength development, flocculation control or resin compatibility. Coverage runs to a data cut-off of 2026-07-31; because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend understate real filing activity.

The dataset spans eight IPC subclasses, from coatings and inks through addition polymers, condensation polymers and inorganic pigment treatment, reflecting how dispersant chemistry is claimed both as a standalone additive and as part of a formulated coating or ink system.

Records in scope by filing year, 2017-2026
  1. 1EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO77
  2. 2ROHM & HAAS CO22
  3. 3CLARIANT PRODUKTE (DEUTSCHLAND) GMBH GROUP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY21
  4. 4DAINICHISEIKA COLOR & CHEMICALS MFG CO LTD17
  5. 5AGFA NV10
  6. 6CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS HOLDING INC10
  7. 7BASF COATINGS GMBH9
  8. 8SILBERLINE MFG CO INC9
  9. 9WOLFE MICHAEL STEPHEN8
  10. 10FUJIFILM IMAGING COLORANTS7
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dispersants for Pigments and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing & Classification Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 305 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims fall under.

A flat-to-declining trend since 2019

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 10 in 2019, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 2. With no assignee among the six most active showing filings in the latest year, the near-term data reads as consolidation around existing claim positions rather than fresh entry — though the newest one to two years are still filling in as publications catch up to filing dates.

A flat-to-declining trend since 201903581022017201810201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Coatings and pigment classes carry the bulk of the claims

C09D (coatings, paints & inks) touches 78.0% of the 305 records and C09B (organic dyes & pigments) 53.1%, confirming that most dispersant claims are drafted inside a coatings or colorant system rather than as a bare chemical composition. Polymer-side classes — C08K, C08F, C08L and C08G — each cover roughly a quarter to a third of records, showing dispersants are also frequently claimed through the host polymer or additive package. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares add up to well over 100% of the 305-record base and should be read individually, not summed.

Coatings and pigment classes carry the bulk of the claimsC09D · Coatings, paints & inks23878.0%C09B · Dyes & pigments (organic)16253.1%C08K · Use of additives in polymers9330.5%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)8527.9%C08L · Polymer compositions8126.6%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…7424.3%C09C · Inorganic pigments & treatment7023.0%C08G · Condensation polymers4314.1%Other17858.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 305 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dispersants for Pigments and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Dispersants for Pigments and Fillers with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about dispersants for pigments and fillers and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Foundational Filings

The most-cited records in this space

Representative Recent Filing
US20210332194A12021-10-28

US20210332194A1 — Pigment dispersant for coating (BASF Coatings GmbH, 2021-10-28)

BASF COATINGS GMBH

Described herein is a polymeric pigment dispersant, a process for preparation of the polymeric pigment dispersant and a pigment dispersion including the pigment dispersant that is used for coating and in printing ink, automotive basecoat, automotive clearcoat, mill base, furniture coatings and wood coatings.Its claim scope spans printing ink through automotive basecoat and clearcoat, mill base, and furniture and wood coatings — a breadth typical of dispersant filings that protect a single chemistry across many downstream end uses.

US20210332194A1 — patent drawing 1US20210332194A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing details
Highest-cited patents in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6262152B1Particles dispersed w/polymer dispersant having liquid soluble and cross-linkable insoluble segments256
2JP2000239554APigment dispersant, pigment dispersion composition containing the same and colored photosensitive composition133
3US4243430APigment dispersant for aqueous paints112
4WO2000020520A1Dispersions having improved stability104
5US20030144399A1Polymeric stabilizer for pigment dispersions68
6US6472463B1Graft copolymer pigment dispersant63
7WO1993012183A1Aqueous dispersion of composite particles including polymeric latex62
8US20060014855A1Pigment dispersion with polymeric dispersant59
9US6599973B1Aqueous graft copolymer pigment dispersants47
10US20130072614A1Ink composition for continuous inkjet printing46

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; treat the ranking as a signal of influence on subsequent drafting, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dispersants for Pigments and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Landscape Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Four read-throughs from the concentration, trend and classification data above.

Concentration
48.2% held by top 5
of 305 records in scope

A steep drop from leader to long tail

The leading assignee alone holds 77 records, more than seven times fifth place at 10. With the top 10 combined covering 62.3% of the 305 records, the remaining field of ranked companies files thinly and infrequently — useful context before assuming a crowded space is evenly contested.

Based on the 99-company ranked field
Momentum
Peak 10 in 2019
vs. 2 at the 2022 midpoint

No sign of renewed filing from the leaders

None of the six most-active assignees recorded a filing in the latest year. Combined with a filing count that has drifted down from its 2019 peak, this reads less like a shrinking market and more like incumbents holding position on claims filed several years ago.

Recency affected by publication lag
Classification
78.0% carry C09D
of the 305 records in scope

Coatings systems dominate the claim style

Dispersant chemistry here is overwhelmingly claimed inside a coatings, paint or ink system (C09D) rather than as a stand-alone compound, with organic pigment classification (C09B) the second most common tag at 53.1%. A filer targeting a bare-dispersant composition claim is working against a smaller, less occupied precedent set.

Classes overlap; shares exceed 100%
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair: 10 shared records

Collaboration is limited and concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairings appear across the dataset, and the strongest pairing accounts for 10 shared records. Co-filing is not a common pattern in this field; most records carry a single assignee, which raises the bar for identifying joint-development targets.

Pairs drawn from named co-assignee records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to dispersants for pigments and fillers, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dispersants for Pigments and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who holds the claim space, and where it is thin

The ranked field covers 99 companies counted by record. Filing is heavily weighted toward a small number of long-established names, with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants below them.

Leader
77 records
single leading assignee

One filer sets the pace by a wide margin

The top-ranked assignee holds 77 of the 305 records in scope, more than the next four combined would need to match the top-5 share. That scale suggests a filer defending a broad, long-running portfolio rather than one making an opportunistic entry.

Leader vs. fifth place: 77 vs. 10
Mid-field
10 at fifth, 7 at tenth
of 305 records

A short shoulder before the tail begins

Filing counts fall quickly after the leader — fifth place holds 10 records and tenth place 7 — before flattening into a long tail of smaller filers. This shoulder is where a challenger with a differentiated chemistry could plausibly compete for visibility.

Ranked among 99 companies
Collaboration pattern
10 pairs total
strongest: 10 shared filings

Named-inventor pairs outweigh corporate co-filing

The strongest co-assignee relationships in the dataset pair individual named inventors with each other and with a major corporate assignee, rather than showing two companies co-filing directly. That points to inventor mobility or licensing arrangements as a more likely explanation than joint ventures.

Based on 10 identified co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth scouting
Sub-areas where the classification data shows thinner coverage relative to the coatings-heavy core.
Filler-specific (non-pigment) dispersant claimsCondensation-polymer (C08G) backbone dispersantsInorganic pigment surface treatment (C09C) combinationsMisc.-application materials (C09K) crossover claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.0
Rohm & Haas Co.0
Dainichiseika Color & Chemicals Mfg. Co., Ltd.0
Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH0
Clariant AG0
WOLFE MICHAEL STEPHEN0
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Holding Inc.0
LEE HEE HYUN0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dispersants for Pigments and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature, concentrated field with a thin but real gap below the coatings-heavy core.

Map the leader's claim boundaries

With one assignee holding 77 of 305 records, the practical first step is charting exactly which claim elements that portfolio covers before drafting anywhere near steric stabilization or resin-compatibility language.

Explore assignee claim maps in Eureka

Test a filler-specific composition claim

Coverage skews heavily toward pigment and coatings systems; a composition claim scoped tightly to non-pigment filler dispersion may sit on less occupied ground.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing activity

Filing has been flat since 2019 with no recent activity from the most active assignees; a filing uptick in newly published records would be an early signal worth monitoring given the 18-month publication lag.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dispersants for Pigments and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions on dispersant patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dispersants for Pigments and Fillers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Dispersants for Pigments and Fillers in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole dispersants for pigments and fillers corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.