Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 14 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Display module testing and mura compensation patents cover how manufacturers detect luminance non-uniformity across a panel and correct for it electronically before or during use. The dataset in scope holds 14 published records filed between 2015 and 2026, concentrated almost entirely in G09G display-control-circuit classifications rather than in image-processing or semiconductor-device art.
The receiving-office spread — United States, China and Europe each carrying a meaningful share, with single filings in Germany and via the WIPO PCT route — points to a technology that is filed for global display supply chains rather than one dominated by a single jurisdiction's manufacturing base.
Two views of the same 14-record dataset: how filings moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims fall into.
Filings peaked at 5 records in 2017 and have declined since; the 2026 figure is partial because the dataset cut-off is 2026-07-31 and publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so recent-year counts understate actual filing activity.
G09G (display control circuits) appears in 100.0% of the 14 records in scope, making it effectively a prerequisite classification for this search string. G06T (image data processing) and H01L (semiconductor devices) each appear in only 7.1% of records, indicating that most inventive activity is claimed at the display-driving level rather than in upstream image processing or panel fabrication.
Shares are the percentage of the 14 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about display module testing and mura compensation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA Mura compensation module includes a DBV setting unit for setting one of a plurality of luminance bands as a set luminance band; a memory storing a reference Mura compensation value for each grayscale from a reference luminance band; and a Mura compensation value determination unit for determining an input Mura compensation value of a first input grayscale value in the set luminance band, on the basis of the reference Mura compensation value for each grayscale from the reference luminance band.Filed by LX Semicon, published 2025-11-13 — one of the most recent records in the dataset.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20170206821A1 | Method of compensating for an excimer laser annealing MURA and display device employing the same | 42 |
| 2 | CN106328083A | 一种液晶显示器及其补偿数据存储方法 | 17 |
| 3 | US20180218693A1 | A liquid crystal display and a compensation data storage method thereof | 16 |
| 4 | CN111681588A | 显示面板的驱动装置和驱动方法 | 6 |
| 5 | US20230289942A1 | Image processing method, optical compensation method, and optical compensation system | 2 |
| 6 | US10319315B2 | Liquid crystal display and a compensation data storage method thereof | 2 |
| 7 | US20250349237A1 | Mura compensation module, display control apparatus including same, and mura compensation method using the sa… | 1 |
| 8 | EP3525202A1 | Liquid crystal display and compensation data storage method therefor | 1 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on subsequent filings, not as a measure of current commercial importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (8 of 8 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-outs from the dataset that matter more than the raw counts.
All 14 records in scope trace to just five ranked assignees, with the leader alone holding 6. There is no fragmented population of single-filing entrants here — this is a small, closely held claim set.
Every record in the dataset carries a G09G display-control-circuit classification. Image-processing (G06T) and semiconductor-device (H01L) classes each touch only one record, so the compensation-value logic itself — not the camera or the panel — is where the claim density is.
Filings peaked in 2017 and have not returned to that level. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2026 figure of 0 should not be read as the field going quiet — it more likely reflects records not yet published.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to display module testing and mura compensation, with the prior art for and against each one.
Five assignees account for the entire ranked field, with filing activity flat across all of them in the most recent year.
The top-ranked assignee holds 6 of the 14 records in scope, more than any other party, but recent-year momentum for this assignee shows 0 filings in the latest year — consistent with the field-wide slowdown rather than a company-specific pullback.
The ranking returns only five assignees, and together they cover 100.0% of the 14 records in scope. There is no visible long tail of one-off filers behind them in this dataset.
Every ranked assignee shows 0 filings in the latest year, and the one assignee with a stated year-over-year figure recorded -100% YoY. Read this alongside the publication lag: some of this is real cooling, some is simply unpublished pipeline.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| TCL China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Samsung Display Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| LX Semicon Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Kunshan Industrial Technology Research Institute New Display Technology Center Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a narrow, control-circuit-dominated field with a small set of holders — useful starting points for deeper diligence.
With one assignee holding 6 of 14 records, understanding exactly how its compensation-value determination claims are worded is the fastest way to see where a new filing would or would not overlap.
Explore claim scope in EurekaCamera calibration, test-time reduction and defect classification each show minimal direct coverage in this dataset relative to the core G09G driving-circuit claims.
Run a white space search in EurekaBecause publication lag means recent years are undercounted, revisit this dataset in six to twelve months to see whether the apparent slowdown holds or reverses.
Set up monitoring in EurekaThe ranked field in this dataset contains only five assignees, and together they account for all 14 records in scope. The single leader holds 6 of those 14 records, making it the largest holder by a clear margin, while the remaining four assignees hold smaller shares down to a single record each. This is a concentrated field rather than one with a long tail of occasional filers, so due diligence can focus on a short list of parties rather than a broad market scan.
Every one of the 14 records in scope carries a G09G display-control-circuit classification, meaning the claims are almost entirely about how compensation values are generated, stored and applied at the driving-circuit level. Image-data-processing (G06T) and semiconductor-device (H01L) classifications each touch only one record apiece, so camera-side image processing and physical panel fabrication are comparatively under-represented relative to the compensation logic itself. A search focused only on G09G would still capture nearly the entire field.
Filing peaked in 2017 at 5 records and has not returned to that level since, with the most recent year showing 0 records. Growth cannot be reliably calculated for this dataset because there are fewer than four complete years once the roughly 18-month publication lag is accounted for. Readers should treat the apparent recent slowdown with caution rather than concluding the field has gone dormant, since 2025-2026 filings may simply not be published yet.
US20250349237A1, filed by LX Semicon and published in November 2025, claims a Mura compensation module built around a DBV setting unit, a memory storing reference Mura compensation values per grayscale for a reference luminance band, and a determination unit that derives an input compensation value for a different luminance band from that stored reference. In practice this blocks approaches that derive a target luminance band's grayscale compensation values from a stored reference band using an equivalent lookup-and-derive structure. Anyone implementing a comparable per-grayscale, per-luminance-band compensation scheme should review this claim set closely before finalising a design.
Based on the IPC composition in this dataset, the white space sits outside the dominant G09G driving-circuit cluster: camera-based calibration workflows, test-time reduction methods for gamma uniformity checks, and defect classification approaches for mura patterns each show minimal direct representation. Compensation-data storage architecture and cross-panel calibration transfer are similarly thin. These are reasonable starting points for a freedom-to-operate review precisely because the concentrated leader and the other ranked assignees have filed comparatively little there.
Go past this page: query the whole display module testing and mura compensation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page