Book a demo

Quantum Dot Display Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Quantum Dot Display Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/displays-and-optoelectronics-quantum-dot-display-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Displays & Optoelectronics
Quantum Dot Display Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Concentrated

A data-backed look at quantum dot display patents: who holds the concentrated filing share, how filing volume has moved since 2017, and where the IPC classes show under-claimed white space.

4,825
Published Records
48%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-58%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (498 records) → 2024 (210); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 4,825 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the quantum dot display patent record shows

Quantum dot display technology sits at the intersection of semiconductor materials, optical modulation and display panel engineering, and the patent record reflects that spread: records in this dataset carry classifications across eight distinct IPC subclasses, from core semiconductor device structures to lighting components and nanotechnology-specific materials claims. The filing pattern is not evenly distributed. A small group of assignees accounts for roughly half of everything filed, which means most technical routes into the field are already claimed by a handful of large display manufacturers rather than open to a long tail of independent entrants.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-08-31 cut-off, giving a decade-long view of when filing accelerated, where it peaked, and which receiving offices carried the bulk of the activity.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015 to present
  1. 1SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD891
  2. 2BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD619
  3. 3SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD498
  4. 4LG DISPLAY CO LTD174
  5. 5SHELTERED WINGS INC D B A VORTEX OPTICS144
  6. 6BEIJING BOE TECH DEV CO LTD141
  7. 7TCL CHINA STAR OPTOELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD131
  8. 8SHARP KK119
  9. 9DUK SAN NEOLUX107
  10. 10SHENZHEN CHINA STAR OPTOELECTRONICS SEMICON DISPLAY TECH CO LTD105
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Displays & Optoelectronics: Quantum Dot Display Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 4,825-record dataset: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the technical weight.

Filing rose sharply, peaked in 2019, then pulled back

Annual filings climbed from 404 records in 2017 to a peak of 591 in 2019. The 2021-to-2024 window, the most recent span that can be read as complete once publication lag is accounted for, shows filings falling from 498 to 210 — a 58% decline. Figures from 2025 onward are still filling in and should not be read as a continuation of that decline.

Filing rose sharply, peaked in 2019, then pulled back0150300450600404201720185912019202020212022202320242025182026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Semiconductor and optical-modulation classes dominate

H01L (semiconductor devices) appears on 34.7% of records and G02F (optical control and modulation) on 30.4%, with H10K (organic semiconductors, including OLED-adjacent structures) close behind at 27.9%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to well over 100% of the 4,825-record base — they describe overlap in claim scope, not a partition of the field.

Semiconductor and optical-modulation classes dominateH01L · Semiconductor devices1,67634.7%G02F · Optical control & modulation1,46730.4%H10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED e…1,34527.9%G02B · Optical elements & systems62212.9%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…61812.8%F21V · Lighting device components4559.4%G09G · Display control circuits4449.2%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications2525.2%Other3,00862.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 4,825 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Displays & Optoelectronics: Quantum Dot Display Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Displays & Optoelectronics: Quantum Dot Display Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about displays & optoelectronics: quantum dot display patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A representative filing and the most-cited records

Representative Filing
US11803079B22023-10-31

Quantum dot display panel, quantum dot display device, and preparation method thereof (US11803079B2)

WUHAN CHINA STAR OPTOELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

The patent covers a quantum dot display panel built from an array substrate and a color film substrate with liquid crystal between them, where the color film substrate stacks a cover plate, light-cutoff layer, quantum dot pixel layer, blocking layer, reflection layer, coating layer, built-in polarizing layer, isolation unit and polyimide layer.Filed by Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Technology, published 2023-10-31.

US11803079B2 — patent drawing 1US11803079B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20160307189A1System, method, and apparatus for a dynamic transaction card369
2US20170154328A1Dynamic transaction card protected by gesture and voice recognition356
3US9978058B2System, method, and apparatus for a dynamic transaction card288
4US20130242228A1Liquid crystal display and manufacturing method thereof267
5WO2017149526A2A method and apparatus for cooperative usage of multiple distance meters252
6WO2016168394A1A system, method, and apparatus for a dynamic transaction card239
7US20090314991A1Quantum dot ink composition for inkjet printing and electronic device using the same237
8US20130016292A1Eyepiece for near-to-eye display with multi-reflectors234
9US8786686B1Head mounted display eyepiece with integrated depth sensing219
10US20170153382A1Quantum dot composite material and manufacturing method and application thereof180

Citation counts favour older, earlier-published records inside this searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence within the field rather than a measure of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Displays & Optoelectronics: Quantum Dot Display Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the concentration and composition mean for filing strategy

Three figures from this dataset carry direct implications for anyone deciding where to file next or who to watch.

Concentration
48.2%
of 4,825 records held by top 5 assignees

Filing share sits with a small group

Just five assignees account for 48.2% of all 4,825 records in scope, and the top ten extend that to 60.7%. That level of concentration means most core structural claims around quantum dot display panels are already occupied by large display manufacturers, and new entrants are more likely to find room in adjacent processing or materials claims than in core panel architecture.

Based on the assignee ranking across 4,825 records.
Filing trend
-58%
published filings, 2021 to 2024

Volume has pulled back from its 2019 peak

Filing peaked at 591 records in 2019 and published volume in the 2021-to-2024 window fell 58%, from 498 to 210. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete and should not be read as evidence the field is cooling further.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete for this comparison.
Technology mix
5.2%
of records carry nanotechnology class B82Y

Nanotechnology-specific claims are comparatively sparse

While H01L and G02F cover roughly a third of records each, B82Y — the IPC subclass specific to nanotechnology applications — appears on only 5.2% of the 4,825 records. Given that quantum dots are inherently nanomaterials, this gap suggests many filings claim the display architecture around the dots rather than the nanomaterial synthesis or structure itself.

IPC shares are computed against the full 4,825-record base and overlap by design.
Co-filing
96
shared records, strongest co-assignee pair

Corporate group filing patterns are visible in co-assignee data

The strongest co-assignee pairing in this dataset shares 96 records, consistent with a parent-subsidiary filing structure rather than an arm's-length collaboration. Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear at all, indicating that joint filing across unrelated organisations is rare in this field.

Counted from the 10 co-assignee pairs identified in the dataset.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to displays & optoelectronics: quantum dot display patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Displays & Optoelectronics: Quantum Dot Display Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific follow-up questions worth running before committing filing budget.

Map the white space inside G02B and F21V

G02B (optical elements) and F21V (lighting components) sit well below the top classes at 12.9% and 9.4% of records. Both intersect with quantum dot display work but carry lighter claim density, which is worth checking against your own technical roadmap before assuming the space is occupied.

Explore optical and lighting claims

Track the concentrated leaders' recent filings

With 60.7% of records held by the top ten assignees, understanding what those organisations are filing now — not just historically — is more useful than a broad field scan for anyone assessing freedom to operate.

Review leader filing activity

Re-run the trend once 2025-2026 data settles

Publication lag means the most recent two years understate real filing activity. A follow-up check in twelve months will give a clearer read on whether the 2021-2024 decline continued or reversed.

Revisit the filing trend
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Displays & Optoelectronics: Quantum Dot Display Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about quantum dot display patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Displays & Optoelectronics: Quantum Dot Display Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Displays & Optoelectronics: Quantum Dot Display Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole displays & optoelectronics: quantum dot display patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.