Book a demo

Distillation Column Internals Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Distillation Column Internals Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/distillation-column-internals-and-packing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Chemical Process Engineering
Distillation Column Internals and Packing Patents: Who Holds the Ground and Where It's Open
  • Filing activity has flattened, not grown. Filings peaked at 57 in 2020 and had fallen to a partial 2 by 2026, with the 2022 midpoint at 18 — a mature claim landscape rather than an expanding one.
  • Claims cluster heavily in catalysis-adjacent chemistry. B01J (chemical/physical processes & catalysis) appears in 860 of 999 records, well ahead of core separation IPC B01D at 544, showing most packing and internals claims are filed alongside reaction or catalytic process chemistry.
  • The most-cited prior art is decades old. The top-cited record, US5632934A on rectification packing capacity, carries 122 citations — a reminder that citation counts here measure historical influence, not what is being actively filed today.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
999
Published Records
47%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-74%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (27 records) with 2024 (7) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 999 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent set covers

This landscape covers patents and applications where the claims or description combine structured packing, distillation trays, or column internals with performance terms such as pressure drop, mass transfer efficiency, flooding capacity, liquid distributor design, or HETP. The IPC scope spans B01D3 (distillation), B01J19 (chemical/physical apparatus) and B01D53 (separation of gases or vapours), which is why the dataset pulls in a large share of catalytic and reactive-distillation filings alongside conventional separation hardware.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, drawing on 999 published records and an equal count of patent families in the assignee ranking, meaning duplicate-family inflation is minimal here. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend line will understate true filing activity for those years.

Filing volume and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1AIR PROD & CHEM INC127
  2. 2PRAXAIR TECH INC107
  3. 3KOCH GLITSCH INC103
  4. 4BOC GROUP INC76
  5. 5SULZER MANAGEMENT AG54
  6. 6ABB LUMMUS GLOBAL INC36
  7. 7ZONEFLOW REACTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC28
  8. 8SULZER CHEMTECH AG24
  9. 9TIANJIN UNIV23
  10. 10YARA INTERNATIONAL ASA19
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distillation Column Internals and Packing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 999-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

A peak in 2020, then decline

Filings rose from 12 in 2017 to a peak of 57 in 2020, then eased back toward 18 at the 2022 midpoint and down to 2 in the still-partial 2026 count. Read the tail years cautiously given publication lag, but the shape from peak to midpoint is a genuine flattening, not a data artefact.

A peak in 2020, then decline015304560122017201820195720202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Catalysis and gas separation dominate the classification mix

B01J (860 records) and B01D (544) together account for the bulk of the corpus, with F25J gas liquefaction and separation contributing 280 — evidence that a large share of column-internals filings are tied to reactive or cryogenic process chemistry rather than standalone hardware. F28F heat-exchanger details, B01F mixing, C01B inorganic chemistry, C07C hydrocarbons and F28D heat exchange apparatus make up smaller, more specialised slices.

Catalysis and gas separation dominate the classification mixB01J · Chemical/physical processes & …86086.1%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…54454.5%F25J · Gas liquefaction & separation28028.0%F28F · Heat-exchanger details747.4%B01F · Mixing & stirring676.7%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…444.4%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds272.7%F28D · Heat-exchange apparatus191.9%Other15315.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 999 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distillation Column Internals and Packing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Distillation Column Internals and Packing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about distillation column internals and packing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The prior art that shapes freedom-to-operate

Representative Filing
US20140158519A12014-06-12

US20140158519A1 — Structured packing and method (Praxair Technology)

PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

A structured packing built from corrugated, rectangular sheets whose end regions carry straight, parallel corrugations running inward from opposed edges at right angles, reducing pressure drop at the interfaces between packing layers and increasing hydraulic capacity. A main region uses corrugations at an acute angle to the edges to promote liquid-vapor contact, with arcuate transition sections connecting the two zones.Filed by Praxair Technology; illustrates the geometry-based approach to reconciling pressure drop with mass-transfer contact that recurs across this corpus.

US20140158519A1 — patent drawing 1US20140158519A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5632934APacking with improved capacity for rectification systems122
2US5368691AReactive distillation process and apparatus for carrying it out98
3US20040150123A1Method for carrying out the distillation or reactive distillation of a mixture containing at least one toxic …90
4WO1997016247A1Structured packing81
5US4847430AProcess for manufacturing a tertiary alkyl ether by reactive distillation79
6US6206349B1Fluid-fluid contacting apparatus78
7US5921109AMethod for operating a cryogenic rectification column76
8US4678648AMethod and apparatus for selective absorption of hydrogen sulphide from gas streams containing hydrogen sulph…74
9US6534022B1Conversion of nitrogen oxides in the presence of a catalyst supported on a mesh-like structure68
10US20080247942A1Method and Reactor for Carrying Out Endothermic Catalytic Reactions65

Citation counts accumulate over time, so older grants dominate this list; treat it as a map of foundational prior art rather than a ranking of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distillation Column Internals and Packing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three signals from the corpus that matter more than the raw record count when deciding where to file or where to look for licensing risk.

Filing Momentum
57 → 2
peak year (2020) vs. 2026 (partial)

The technology has stopped accelerating

Filing volume peaked in 2020 and had fallen sharply by the 2022 midpoint of 18. Combined with publication lag, the recent-year drop is steeper on paper than in reality, but the direction from peak to midpoint is a real deceleration in new claim activity.

Trend data, 2017-2026
Classification Density
860 of 999
records touching B01J

Packing claims travel with catalytic chemistry

Nearly all records classify under B01J, chemical/physical processes and catalysis, more than the 544 under core separation class B01D. Most structured-packing and internals claims are being filed as part of reactive or catalytic process patents, not as pure hardware patents.

IPC composition, full corpus
Zero Momentum at the Top
0 in latest year
for multiple leading assignees

Established holders have gone quiet recently

Several of the assignees with the deepest historical filing records show zero filings in the latest year, one with a -100% year-over-year change. That is consistent with a mature, already-claimed technology base rather than active new competition among incumbents.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Prior Art Concentration
122 citations
top-cited record

Foundational patents still anchor freedom-to-operate review

The most-cited record, US5632934A on rectification packing capacity, sits well ahead of the next entries. Any new packing geometry claim should be checked against this and the other highly-cited 1980s-1990s filings before assuming clear space.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to distillation column internals and packing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distillation Column Internals and Packing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space

Receiving-office data and co-filing pairs point to a corpus led by industrial gas and packing specialists, with academic-industrial co-assignee pairs concentrated in China.

Receiving Offices
189 US / 180 CN
top two offices

Filing is split evenly between the US and China

The United States (189) and China (180) lead receiving-office counts, followed by the EPO (148), Canada (92), WIPO/PCT (61) and Australia (54). No single office dominates the corpus, which points to genuinely global commercial interest in column internals rather than a regionally confined technology.

Receiving office counts, full corpus
Co-Filing Pairs
6 filings
strongest co-assignee pair

Industrial gas incumbents co-file with their own subsidiaries

Of 10 identified co-assignee pairs, the strongest links a major chemical-technology group with its own management entity at 6 joint filings, while Chinese university-contractor pairs and a US inventor-company pair each show 4. Co-filing here mostly reflects corporate structure, not open collaboration between competitors.

Co-assignee pair counts
Recent Momentum
-100% YoY
one leading assignee

Several deep-portfolio holders show no recent filings

Assignees with historically strong positions in industrial gas and packing hardware report zero filings in the latest year, and at least one shows a full year-over-year decline. That combination — deep back catalogue, no new activity — is the clearest sign the core geometry claims are already staked out.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Sub-areas that look under-claimed
Branches where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the corpus as a whole.
Liquid distributor design for high-viscosity feedsHeat-exchanger-integrated packing (F28F/F28D overlap)Mixing-assisted mass transfer internals (B01F overlap)Reactive distillation for toxic or hazardous constituentsCryogenic packing for gas separation (F25J overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.0
Koch-Glitsch, LP0-100%
Praxair Technology, Inc.0
The BOC Group, Inc. (USA)0
Sulzer Chemtech Ltd.0
ABB Lummus Global Inc.0
Sulzer Management AG0-100%
Tianjin University0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distillation Column Internals and Packing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and classification data point to a mature but still commercially active field. These are the follow-up questions worth running before committing filing budget.

Check freedom-to-operate against the cited core

Before filing a new packing geometry or distributor design, run a citation-tree check against the most-cited records in this corpus, several of which remain active reference points despite their age.

Explore prior art with Patsnap Eureka

Watch for revival among quiet incumbents

Multiple leading assignees show zero recent filings. A sudden resumption from any of them would be a meaningful competitive signal worth tracking rather than a one-off.

Set up assignee monitoring in Patsnap Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

Liquid distributor design and heat-exchanger-integrated packing show thinner filing density than the core geometry claims. A targeted search would confirm how much genuine white space remains before drafting.

Run a white-space search in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distillation Column Internals and Packing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distillation Column Internals and Packing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Distillation Column Internals and Packing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole distillation column internals and packing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.