Book a demo

Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/distributed-fiber-optic-sensing-technology-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Sensors & MEMS · Patent Landscape
Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Slowing
  • Filing has cooled since 2022. The peak year so far is 2022 at 131 filings, and the count has not returned to that level since — a sign the core DAS/DTS claim space is filling up rather than expanding.
  • Vibration and acoustic sensing dominate the IPC mix. G01H (measuring vibrations & sound) appears in 965 of 1,181 records, far ahead of G01D general measurement (539) and geophysics (289), showing where the bulk of claims actually sit.
  • The United States leads filing venues by a wide margin. 387 records were filed at the US receiving office, ahead of WIPO/PCT (172), Europe (156), China (133), the UK (107) and Canada (65).
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,181
Published Records
42%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-16%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the distributed fiber-optic sensing patent record shows

Distributed fiber-optic sensing covers technologies that turn an ordinary optical fiber into a continuous line of sensors — distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), distributed temperature sensing (DTS), and the underlying Rayleigh and Brillouin backscatter methods that make both possible. The 1,181 patent families in this dataset span classifiers built for vibration and sound measurement, general measurement and recording, geophysics, and downhole well monitoring, which reflects how the same fiber and the same backscatter physics get claimed differently depending on whether the end use is pipeline monitoring, seismic surveying, perimeter security, or oilfield completions.

Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2022, and has not climbed back to that level since — publication lag of roughly 18 months means the last year or two will always look thinner than it eventually turns out to be, but the multi-year plateau before that is real. The concentration of records in E21B (earth and rock drilling) alongside G01H and G01V confirms that well and reservoir monitoring is one of the dataset's largest applied fields, not a side branch.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1OPTASENSE HOLDINGS LIMITED157
  2. 2HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC136
  3. 3NEC CORP79
  4. 4NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA INC75
  5. 5FIBER SENSE LTD45
  6. 6SILIXA43
  7. 7SINTELA LTD43
  8. 8SUBCOM LLC32
  9. 9CONOCOPHILLIPS CO31
  10. 10WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC30
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,181-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings split across the IPC subclasses that define the technology's applied edges.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings ran at 103 in 2017 and climbed toward a peak of 131 in 2022, the high point of the series so far. The count by 2026 sits at 12, but that year is only partially published under the 18-month lag typical of patent data — treat the last one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing trend, 2017–202603875113150103201720182019202020211312022202320242025122026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

G01H (vibrations and sound) is the largest single subclass at 965 of 1,181 records, meaning most families claim some form of acoustic or vibration detection over distance. G01D (general measuring/recording) and G01V (geophysics) follow, with E21B (well drilling) at 178 confirming a substantial downhole-monitoring cluster; G02B (optics), G01K (temperature), G01N (material analysis) and G01L (pressure) round out smaller but active branches.

IPC subclass compositionG01H · Measuring vibrations & sound96581.7%G01D · Measuring (general) & recording53945.6%G01V · Geophysics & gravity surveying28924.5%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)17815.1%G02B · Optical elements & systems1159.7%G01K · Temperature measurement917.7%G01N · Material analysis & testing897.5%G01L · Force & pressure measurement675.7%Other53245.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,181 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Technology Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about distributed fiber-optic sensing technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records anchoring this landscape

Representative Filing
US20210173111A12021-06-10

Well monitoring via distributed acoustic sensing subsystem and distributed temperature sensing subsystem

HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

A production monitoring system includes a distributed acoustic sensing subsystem that includes a first optical fiber for a distributed acoustic sensing signal and a distributed temperature sensing subsystem that includes a second optical fiber for a distributed temperature sensing signal. The production monitoring system also includes a cable positioned in a wellbore penetrating through one or more subterranean formations. The distributed acoustic sensing subsystem is communicatively coupled to the cable through the distributed temperature sensing subsystem. The cable includes one or more optical fibers used to obtain optical fiber measurements pertaining to the distributed acoustic sensing.Filed by Halliburton Energy Services, dated 2021-06-10 — combines DAS and DTS subsystems on a single downhole cable architecture.

US20210173111A1 — patent drawing 1US20210173111A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing in Eureka
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20180342156A1Monitoring Traffic Flow99
2US5191206ADistributed fiber optic sensor using clad material light backscattering85
3US20150000415A1Detecting Train Separation71
4US20190025094A1Distributed Fibre Optic Sensing67
5CN107664541A一种分布式光纤振动和温度融合传感系统及方法66
6EP2418466A2Fiber optic cable for distributed acoustic sensing with increased acoustic sensitivity66
7US20150114127A1Distributed acoustic sensing systems and methods employing under-filled multi-mode optical fiber58
8US20120152024A1Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS)-based flowmeter56
9CN104180833A温度和应变同时传感的光时域反射计51
10US20130151203A1Detection of Moving Objects51

Citation counts reflect influence inside this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; a low count on a recent family says little about its current importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three findings that change where a team should file next, drawn directly from the trend, IPC and receiving-office data above.

Filing Momentum
131 in 2022
peak year filings

Growth has plateaued, not accelerated

Filings rose from 103 in 2017 to a peak of 131 in 2022 and have not exceeded that level since. That pattern — a rise followed by a flat or softening period — points to a maturing core claim space in DAS/DTS rather than an emerging one, even allowing for publication lag understating the most recent years.

Trend data, 2017–2026
Claim Density
965 of 1,181
records in G01H

Acoustic and vibration sensing is the crowded lane

Over 80% of records touch G01H, the vibration and sound measurement subclass. New filings aimed squarely at acoustic-based DAS detection methods are competing against the densest part of the prior art; differentiation is more likely to survive in the smaller subclasses.

IPC composition
Venue Concentration
387 US filings
vs. 65 in Canada

The US anchors filing strategy, but PCT usage is heavy

The United States receiving office accounts for the largest single share of filings, with WIPO/PCT close behind at 172 — well ahead of Europe, China, the UK and Canada. That gap between US-direct and PCT filing suggests many applicants are still deciding on final jurisdictions rather than committing early.

Receiving office data
Co-Filing Pattern
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is narrow and inventor-anchored

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links pair a single corporate assignee with a named inventor across multiple filings rather than joint ventures between companies. Cross-company collaboration is the exception here, not the norm.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to distributed fiber-optic sensing technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Key Players

Who holds the claim space, and where momentum has stalled

Recent-year momentum figures for the top assignees show declines or flat activity across the board, which is consistent with the plateau visible in the overall filing trend.

Momentum Watch
-50% YoY
Fiber Sense Ltd, latest year

Even the most active recent filer is slowing

Fiber Sense Ltd filed 1 record in the latest year, down 50% year over year — the smallest recent-year count among tracked assignees is still the highest of the group, underlining how thin near-term activity has become across the board.

Recent-year momentum
Momentum Watch
-100% YoY
Multiple assignees at zero

Several established filers show no recent activity

NEC Laboratories America and Sintela Ltd both show 0 filings in the latest year with a -100% year-over-year change, while Halliburton, OptaSense (光感控股) and Silixa (希里克萨) also register zero in the latest year without a prior comparison figure. None of this rules out filings still working through publication lag.

Recent-year momentum
Collaboration
6 shared filings
strongest co-assignee pair

The tightest collaboration pattern is inventor-led

The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset links a single corporate assignee with one named inventor across 6 shared filings, with two other pairs tied to the same corporate assignee and different named inventors. This points to concentrated inventive teams rather than broad corporate partnerships.

Co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before you file
These sit adjacent to the dense G01H/G01D core and carry comparatively lighter filing density in this dataset.
Multi-parameter fiber cable calibrationBrillouin-Rayleigh hybrid demodulationDAS signal-to-event machine classificationFiber sensing for subsea cable monitoringDownhole DTS-DAS cable co-packaging
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
FIBER SENSE LTD1-50%
NEC Laboratories America, Inc.0-100%
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.0
OptaSense Holdings Ltd.0
Silixa Ltd.0
SINTELA LTD0-100%
SubCom, LLC0-100%
ConocoPhillips Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and IPC data point to a maturing core and a handful of lighter-claimed branches. The next step is testing a specific claim idea against that record.

Check freedom-to-operate before drafting

Run a candidate claim against the dense G01H and G01D clusters before committing engineering time, since acoustic and general-measurement approaches carry the heaviest prior art load in this dataset.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Track the assignees still filing

Recent-year momentum is negative or flat across every top assignee tracked here; watching which of them resumes filing first is a useful early signal for where the field moves next.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Explore the under-claimed branches directly

Multi-parameter calibration, hybrid Brillouin-Rayleigh demodulation and subsea applications show lighter filing density than the DAS/DTS core and may offer more room for a defensible first claim.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on distributed fiber-optic sensing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole distributed fiber-optic sensing technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.