Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
- Filing has cooled since 2022. The peak year so far is 2022 at 131 filings, and the count has not returned to that level since — a sign the core DAS/DTS claim space is filling up rather than expanding.
- Vibration and acoustic sensing dominate the IPC mix. G01H (measuring vibrations & sound) appears in 965 of 1,181 records, far ahead of G01D general measurement (539) and geophysics (289), showing where the bulk of claims actually sit.
- The United States leads filing venues by a wide margin. 387 records were filed at the US receiving office, ahead of WIPO/PCT (172), Europe (156), China (133), the UK (107) and Canada (65).
What the distributed fiber-optic sensing patent record shows
Distributed fiber-optic sensing covers technologies that turn an ordinary optical fiber into a continuous line of sensors — distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), distributed temperature sensing (DTS), and the underlying Rayleigh and Brillouin backscatter methods that make both possible. The 1,181 patent families in this dataset span classifiers built for vibration and sound measurement, general measurement and recording, geophysics, and downhole well monitoring, which reflects how the same fiber and the same backscatter physics get claimed differently depending on whether the end use is pipeline monitoring, seismic surveying, perimeter security, or oilfield completions.
Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2022, and has not climbed back to that level since — publication lag of roughly 18 months means the last year or two will always look thinner than it eventually turns out to be, but the multi-year plateau before that is real. The concentration of records in E21B (earth and rock drilling) alongside G01H and G01V confirms that well and reservoir monitoring is one of the dataset's largest applied fields, not a side branch.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 1,181-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings split across the IPC subclasses that define the technology's applied edges.
Filing trend, 2017–2026
Filings ran at 103 in 2017 and climbed toward a peak of 131 in 2022, the high point of the series so far. The count by 2026 sits at 12, but that year is only partially published under the 18-month lag typical of patent data — treat the last one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.
IPC subclass composition
G01H (vibrations and sound) is the largest single subclass at 965 of 1,181 records, meaning most families claim some form of acoustic or vibration detection over distance. G01D (general measuring/recording) and G01V (geophysics) follow, with E21B (well drilling) at 178 confirming a substantial downhole-monitoring cluster; G02B (optics), G01K (temperature), G01N (material analysis) and G01L (pressure) round out smaller but active branches.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,181 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Technology Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about distributed fiber-optic sensing technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe records anchoring this landscape
Well monitoring via distributed acoustic sensing subsystem and distributed temperature sensing subsystem
A production monitoring system includes a distributed acoustic sensing subsystem that includes a first optical fiber for a distributed acoustic sensing signal and a distributed temperature sensing subsystem that includes a second optical fiber for a distributed temperature sensing signal. The production monitoring system also includes a cable positioned in a wellbore penetrating through one or more subterranean formations. The distributed acoustic sensing subsystem is communicatively coupled to the cable through the distributed temperature sensing subsystem. The cable includes one or more optical fibers used to obtain optical fiber measurements pertaining to the distributed acoustic sensing.Filed by Halliburton Energy Services, dated 2021-06-10 — combines DAS and DTS subsystems on a single downhole cable architecture.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20180342156A1 | Monitoring Traffic Flow | 99 |
| 2 | US5191206A | Distributed fiber optic sensor using clad material light backscattering | 85 |
| 3 | US20150000415A1 | Detecting Train Separation | 71 |
| 4 | US20190025094A1 | Distributed Fibre Optic Sensing | 67 |
| 5 | CN107664541A | 一种分布式光纤振动和温度融合传感系统及方法 | 66 |
| 6 | EP2418466A2 | Fiber optic cable for distributed acoustic sensing with increased acoustic sensitivity | 66 |
| 7 | US20150114127A1 | Distributed acoustic sensing systems and methods employing under-filled multi-mode optical fiber | 58 |
| 8 | US20120152024A1 | Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS)-based flowmeter | 56 |
| 9 | CN104180833A | 温度和应变同时传感的光时域反射计 | 51 |
| 10 | US20130151203A1 | Detection of Moving Objects | 51 |
Citation counts reflect influence inside this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; a low count on a recent family says little about its current importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three findings that change where a team should file next, drawn directly from the trend, IPC and receiving-office data above.
Growth has plateaued, not accelerated
Filings rose from 103 in 2017 to a peak of 131 in 2022 and have not exceeded that level since. That pattern — a rise followed by a flat or softening period — points to a maturing core claim space in DAS/DTS rather than an emerging one, even allowing for publication lag understating the most recent years.
Acoustic and vibration sensing is the crowded lane
Over 80% of records touch G01H, the vibration and sound measurement subclass. New filings aimed squarely at acoustic-based DAS detection methods are competing against the densest part of the prior art; differentiation is more likely to survive in the smaller subclasses.
The US anchors filing strategy, but PCT usage is heavy
The United States receiving office accounts for the largest single share of filings, with WIPO/PCT close behind at 172 — well ahead of Europe, China, the UK and Canada. That gap between US-direct and PCT filing suggests many applicants are still deciding on final jurisdictions rather than committing early.
Collaboration is narrow and inventor-anchored
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links pair a single corporate assignee with a named inventor across multiple filings rather than joint ventures between companies. Cross-company collaboration is the exception here, not the norm.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to distributed fiber-optic sensing technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claim space, and where momentum has stalled
Recent-year momentum figures for the top assignees show declines or flat activity across the board, which is consistent with the plateau visible in the overall filing trend.
Even the most active recent filer is slowing
Fiber Sense Ltd filed 1 record in the latest year, down 50% year over year — the smallest recent-year count among tracked assignees is still the highest of the group, underlining how thin near-term activity has become across the board.
Several established filers show no recent activity
NEC Laboratories America and Sintela Ltd both show 0 filings in the latest year with a -100% year-over-year change, while Halliburton, OptaSense (光感控股) and Silixa (希里克萨) also register zero in the latest year without a prior comparison figure. None of this rules out filings still working through publication lag.
The tightest collaboration pattern is inventor-led
The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset links a single corporate assignee with one named inventor across 6 shared filings, with two other pairs tied to the same corporate assignee and different named inventors. This points to concentrated inventive teams rather than broad corporate partnerships.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| FIBER SENSE LTD | 1 | -50% |
| NEC Laboratories America, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | 0 | — |
| OptaSense Holdings Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Silixa Ltd. | 0 | — |
| SINTELA LTD | 0 | -100% |
| SubCom, LLC | 0 | -100% |
| ConocoPhillips Company | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The trend and IPC data point to a maturing core and a handful of lighter-claimed branches. The next step is testing a specific claim idea against that record.
Check freedom-to-operate before drafting
Run a candidate claim against the dense G01H and G01D clusters before committing engineering time, since acoustic and general-measurement approaches carry the heaviest prior art load in this dataset.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaTrack the assignees still filing
Recent-year momentum is negative or flat across every top assignee tracked here; watching which of them resumes filing first is a useful early signal for where the field moves next.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaExplore the under-claimed branches directly
Multi-parameter calibration, hybrid Brillouin-Rayleigh demodulation and subsea applications show lighter filing density than the DAS/DTS core and may offer more room for a defensible first claim.
Explore white space in EurekaCommon questions on distributed fiber-optic sensing patents
Distributed fiber-optic sensing uses a single optical fiber as a continuous sensing element, detecting acoustic, vibration, temperature or strain events at every point along its length rather than at discrete sensor locations. It typically relies on Rayleigh or Brillouin backscatter analysis of light traveling through the fiber, which is why patent claims in this space are classified under vibration measurement (G01H), general measurement (G01D) and temperature measurement (G01K) depending on the signal being extracted. The practical advantage over point sensors is continuous coverage over long distances — pipelines, wellbores, subsea cables — without installing thousands of discrete devices.
The dataset shows filing activity concentrated among a mix of oilfield services companies, dedicated fiber-sensing specialists, and telecom-adjacent players, with well-monitoring applications forming a particularly dense cluster under E21B. Recent-year momentum has been flat or declining across nearly every tracked assignee, including firms that were highly active earlier in the series. That decline does not necessarily mean disengagement — it may partly reflect publication lag on the most recent filings — but it does mean no single assignee is currently accelerating filing pace.
Filing peaked at 131 records in 2022 and has not returned to that level in the years since, which typically signals that the core claim space — particularly acoustic and vibration-based DAS methods under G01H — is becoming saturated. It can also reflect a maturing market moving from patenting foundational methods toward trade secrets or product differentiation. Readers should treat the most recent one to two years of any trend cautiously, since patent publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures will rise as records continue to publish.
The heaviest filing density sits in G01H (vibration/sound) and G01D (general measurement), while smaller subclasses such as G01L (pressure), G01N (material analysis) and parts of G02B (optics) carry comparatively lighter claim coverage. Specific under-claimed branches include multi-parameter cable calibration methods, hybrid Brillouin-Rayleigh demodulation schemes, and subsea cable monitoring applications. These branches sit adjacent to the dense DAS/DTS core rather than outside it, which is exactly why they are worth checking before assuming the field is fully occupied.
A representative filing in this space, US20210173111A1, claims a production monitoring system combining a distributed acoustic sensing subsystem and a distributed temperature sensing subsystem on a shared downhole cable, with the DAS subsystem communicatively coupled through the DTS subsystem. That architecture — two sensing modalities on one cable in a wellbore penetrating subterranean formations — is a specific combination claim, not a claim over DAS or DTS individually. Anyone designing a downhole monitoring cable should check whether their coupling architecture and cable layout differ meaningfully from this combination before assuming they are clear of it.
Research Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole distributed fiber-optic sensing technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.