Book a demo

Distribution Automation Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Distribution Automation Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/distribution-automation-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Smart Grid & Power Systems
Distribution Automation Patents: Who Holds the Claims and Where the Field Is Still Open
  • 72.2% concentration. The top five assignees hold 285 of 395 records in scope — a field where filing decisions by a handful of companies set the terms for everyone else.
  • Filings down 48% from peak. Annual filings fell from 46 in 2021 to 24 in 2024, the last year with a complete count — a real pullback, not a data artefact.
  • One leader dwarfs the rest. The top assignee alone accounts for 196 of the 395 records in scope, with a sharp drop to 11 at fifth place and 6 by tenth.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
395
Published Records
72%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-48%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (46 records) with 2024 (24) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 395 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this dataset covers

This landscape covers 395 published records matching distribution automation control terms — control parameter, process variable, controller output, equipment state, frequency control and protection relay — filed or published between 2015 and the 2026-08-31 cut-off. The search combines grid-level distribution automation language with the specific control and protection vocabulary that separates automated feeder and substation control from generic grid-management filings.

Records are drawn from receiving offices led by the United States, followed by Europe, China, WIPO and India, so the picture skews toward jurisdictions where distribution utilities and equipment vendors file defensively as well as commercially. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend will read lower than they will eventually settle.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1CAUSAM ENERGY INC196
  2. 2PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP OF AMERICA47
  3. 3MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP18
  4. 4HUAWEI TECH CO LTD13
  5. 5SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING LABORATORIES INC11
  6. 6STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA11
  7. 7ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG10
  8. 8EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD7
  9. 9ABB TECHNOLOGY AG7
  10. 10COOPER TECH CO6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Automation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 395 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend: rise, peak, pullback

Annual filings climbed from 26 in 2017 to a peak of 46 in 2021, then fell to 24 by 2024 — a 48% decline over that three-year span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as a continuation of the decline.

Filing trend: rise, peak, pullback013253850262017201820192020462021202220232024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H02J (power supply and grid systems) and H04L (digital information transmission) each cover close to or above four in ten of the 395 records, confirming that distribution automation filings are as much about communications infrastructure as about power switching. G05B, G06Q and G05F each cover a quarter or more of records, reflecting heavy overlap between control-loop claims and the commerce/metering layer built on top of them. Records can carry several IPC classes, so these shares add to well over 100%.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH02J · Power supply & grid systems18947.8%H04L · Digital information transmissi…17043.0%G05B · Control & regulating systems11128.1%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…10225.8%G05F · Electric/magnetic variable con…9524.1%H04W · Wireless communication networks7318.5%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…5814.7%G07F · Coin-freed & vending apparatus4310.9%Other23258.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 395 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Automation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Distribution Automation Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about distribution automation patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this landscape

Representative record
US20080211511A12008-09-04

Method of Generating Fault Indication in Feeder Remote Terminal Unit for Power Distribution Automation System

MYONGJI UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY AND ACADEMIA COOPERATION FOUNDATION

Describes fault indication generated at feeder remote terminal units that measure voltage, current and phase difference along a distribution line, with a central control unit determining fault occurrence from zero-sequence current and voltage phase comparison across the network of terminal units.Filed by Myongji University Industry and Academia Cooperation Foundation, published 2008 — an early academic filing that predates most of the commercial activity in this dataset and still sits upstream of feeder-level fault detection claims.

US20080211511A1 — patent drawing 1US20080211511A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20140018969A1Method and Apparatus for Actively Managing Electric Power Supply for an Electric Power Grid509
2US8588991B1System, method, and apparatus for electric power grid and network management of grid elements494
3US8583520B1System, method, and apparatus for settlement for participation in an electric power grid312
4US7702424B2Utility load control management communications protocol268
5US20140277788A1System, method, and data packets for messaging for electric power grid elements over a secure internet protoc…246
6US20140039699A1System, method, and apparatus for electric power grid and network management of grid elements168
7US20190305589A1Distribution network risk identification system and method and computer storage medium165
8US20140039703A1System, method, and apparatus for electric power grid and network management of grid elements161
9US5732193AMethod and apparatus for behavioristic-format coding of quantitative resource data/distributed automation pro…141
10US9465397B2System, method, and apparatus for electric power grid and network management of grid elements128

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat this as a signal of influence, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Automation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the records are broken down by assignee, technology class and year.

Concentration
72.2%
of 395 records held by top 5

A small group sets the claim boundaries

With 285 of 395 records held by the top five assignees, and the leader alone holding 196, most of the addressable claim space in core distribution automation control is already occupied by a handful of filers. New entrants need to look past the obvious control-loop claims these firms have staked out.

Top 10 combined reach 82.5% of records.
Momentum
46 → 24
peak-year filings to 2024

Filing activity has cooled from its 2021 peak

Annual filings dropped 48% from the 2021 peak of 46 to 24 in 2024, the last year with a reliable count. That is a genuine pullback in new filing activity rather than noise from publication lag, since 2024 is far enough back to be considered complete.

2025-2026 counts are still filling in and understate true filing activity.
Technology mix
47.8% / 43.0%
H02J / H04L share of records

Control claims are inseparable from communications claims

H02J (power supply and grid systems) and H04L (digital information transmission) each touch close to half of the 395 records, meaning most distribution automation filings pair a power-control mechanism with a specific data-transport or protocol claim rather than filing either alone.

G05B, G06Q and G05F each cover a quarter or more of records.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to distribution automation patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Automation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

The ranking covers 83 companies returned by the data endpoint — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the full set of ranked assignees for this search.

Leader
196
records held

One assignee dominates the ranked field

The top-ranked assignee holds 196 of the 395 records in scope, more than five times the fifth-place count of 11. That gap suggests a single company built a defensive filing programme around distribution automation control years before most competitors treated it as a distinct claim area.

Fifth place holds 11 records; tenth place holds 6.
Long tail
83
ranked assignees

A long tail of smaller and single-filing entrants

Below the top ten, the ranking spreads across dozens of assignees including utilities, university foundations and equipment vendors, most holding only a handful of records each. That tail is where narrow, defensible claims on specific sub-components are still being filed.

Top 10 combined hold 82.5% of all 395 records.
Collaboration
10
co-assignee pairs

Co-filing is rare and concentrated in one utility group

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in this dataset, and the strongest pairing links a national grid operator with one of its regional marketing and research subsidiaries. Cross-company co-filing between unrelated entities is essentially absent.

Strongest pair recurs 4 times; the next two pairs recur twice each.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show lower claim density in the IPC composition and momentum data, making them worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming they are occupied.
Feeder-level fault-direction detectionZero-sequence phase-comparison protection logicVending/coin-operated metering interfaces (G07F)Non-electric variable control tie-ins (G05D)Wireless mesh backhaul for feeder terminal units
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
CAUSAM ENERGY INC1-50%
Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America1-83%
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation0
FORBES JR JOSEPH W0
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.0-100%
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.0
Cooper Technologies Company0
State Grid Corporation of China0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Automation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trends above point to a field with an occupied core and an open edge. Two directions make sense from here.

Map claims against the top assignee's portfolio

With 196 of 395 records held by one company, any new filing in core feeder control or fault indication should be checked against that portfolio specifically before drafting claims.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Track the 2025-2026 filing signal as it fills in

The apparent decline from the 2021 peak is real through 2024, but 2025-2026 counts are still incomplete due to publication lag; re-checking this trend in the next data cut will show whether filing is stabilising or continuing to fall.

Set up a filing-trend alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Automation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Questions practitioners ask about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Automation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Distribution Automation Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole distribution automation patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.