Book a demo

Distribution State Estimation Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Distribution State Estimation Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/distribution-network-state-estimation-with-limited-sensing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Power Electronics & Grid · Patent Landscape
Distribution network state estimation patents: limited-sensing techniques under review
  • Filings nearly tripled in three years — from 6 in 2021 to 16 in 2024, a +167% rise, before the most recent two years understate activity due to publication lag.
  • Ownership is concentrated but not locked — the top 5 assignees hold 35.0% of all 80 records, and the top 10 hold 58.8%, leaving a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
  • Filing is overwhelmingly China-centred — 72 of the receiving-office records sit in China, against single-digit counts across WIPO, the US, Europe, India and Japan combined.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
80
Published Records
35%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+167%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (6 records) with 2024 (16) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 80 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Distribution network state estimation with limited sensing addresses a structural problem: distribution feeders carry far fewer meters and sensors than transmission networks, so operators must infer voltages, currents and loading from sparse, noisy or pseudo-measurements. The patent activity captured here spans pseudo-measurement modelling, low-observability estimation algorithms, and the software and AI layers built around them, drawn from 80 published records filed between 2015 and 2026.

The dataset is dominated by grid operators and university-affiliated research institutes rather than component vendors, which shapes the claim style: many filings protect estimation methods and data-processing pipelines rather than physical sensing hardware. That matters for freedom-to-operate work, because method claims tied to specific algorithmic steps are often easier to design around than hardware claims, but they can still block a particular computational approach outright.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015-2026
  1. 1STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA7
  2. 2NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIV6
  3. 3HOHAI UNIV5
  4. 4STATE GRID JIANGSU ELECTRIC POWER CO LTD5
  5. 5SOUTHEAST UNIV5
  6. 6DANMARKS TEKNISKE UNIV4
  7. 7TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY4
  8. 8STATE GRID JIANGSU ELECTRIC POWER CO LTD RESEARCH INSTITUTE4
  9. 9ELECTRIC POWER RES INST CHINA SOUTHERN POWER GRID CO LTD4
  10. 10STATE GRID INFORMATION & TELECOMM GRP CO LTD3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Network State Estimation with Limited Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 80 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Annual filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 16 in 2024, with the 2021-2024 span alone showing a +167% increase. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the apparent slowdown in the most recent two years should not be read as a real drop in activity.

Filing trend, 2017-20260510152022017201820192020202120222023162024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

H02J (power supply and grid systems) appears in 98.8% of the 80 records, confirming this is fundamentally a grid-systems field rather than a pure measurement or software field. G06F (electric digital data processing) reaches 50.0%, and G06Q and G06N each clear roughly a quarter of records, showing that estimation methods are increasingly wrapped in data-processing and AI-model claims rather than filed as standalone grid hardware. G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) sits lower at 15.0%, and B60L, H03H and H04L each appear only once, marking them as fringe rather than core to this corpus.

IPC subclass distributionH02J · Power supply & grid systems7998.8%G06F · Electric digital data processi…4050.0%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…2227.5%G06N · Computing based on AI models2126.3%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement1215.0%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion11.3%H03H · Impedance networks & filters11.3%H04L · Digital information transmissi…11.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 80 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Network State Estimation with Limited Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Distribution Network State Estimation with Limited Sensing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about distribution network state estimation with limited sensing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
WO2015083472A12015-06-11

WO2015083472A1 — Power distribution system state estimation device, state estimation method, and state estimation program

HITACHI, LTD.

Filed by Hitachi in 2015, this filing estimates individual sensor errors within a distribution system across multiple time cross-sections, using stored measurement values, system configuration data and per-node maximum error bounds to compute weighting factors and iteratively refine state estimates.One of the earliest filings in this dataset and a useful reference point for how sensor-error weighting has been claimed before later AI-driven approaches.

WO2015083472A1 — patent drawing 1WO2015083472A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN107425520A一种含节点注入功率不确定性的主动配电网三相区间状态估计方法34
2CN105633956A一种基于Spiking神经网络伪量测建模的配电网三相状态估计方法24
3WO2016078477A1一种变电站三相线性广义状态估计方法23
4CN105391059A一种基于电流量测变换的分布式发电系统状态估计方法17
5CN114389312A一种配电网分布式状态估计方法15
6CN105701568A一种启发式的配电网状态估计量测位置快速优化方法13
7CN105375484A一种基于PMU的电力系统分布式动态状态估计方法13
8WO2015083472A1Power distribution system state estimation device, state estimation method, and state estimation program12
9CN108649574A一种基于三种量测数据的配电网快速状态估计方法11
10CN105071388A一种基于极大似然估计的配电网状态估计方法11

Citation counts reward earlier filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not a ranking of current importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Network State Estimation with Limited Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern signals

Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are set against each other: where filings sit technically, how concentrated ownership is, and where geography narrows the field.

Technology Mix
50.0%
of records carry a G06F class

Estimation is increasingly a software claim

Half of the 80 records carry a G06F (digital data processing) class alongside H02J, and over a quarter carry G06N (AI models). That means a growing share of new filings protect the computation around state estimation rather than sensing hardware itself, which raises the bar for anyone hoping to design around an existing method purely by changing sensor placement.

Class shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Concentration
58.8%
of records held by top 10 assignees

A leading cluster, then a long tail

The top 5 assignees account for 35.0% of all 80 records, and the top 10 account for 58.8%. With 74 companies ranked overall, the remaining share is spread thin, so most organisations in this field hold only one or two filings — useful context when judging whether a given applicant is a strategic filer or an opportunistic one.

Ranking covers 74 assignees; leader holds 7 records, fifth place holds 5.
Geography
72 of receiving offices
filed via China

Filing is concentrated in one jurisdiction

China accounts for the large majority of receiving-office filings, with WIPO, the United States, Europe, India and Japan each recording only a handful. Anyone assessing global freedom-to-operate risk in this field should weight Chinese prior art heavily, since the density of domestic filing there is not matched elsewhere.

Receiving offices: China 72, WIPO 3, US 2, EPO 1, India 1, Japan 1.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to distribution network state estimation with limited sensing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Network State Estimation with Limited Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who Is Filing

Assignee landscape and where activity is moving

Grid operators and university research institutes dominate the ranked list, with co-filing patterns showing operator-institute pairs working together rather than pure corporate competition.

Leader
7 records
top-ranked assignee

A single leader, no runaway share

The top-ranked assignee holds 7 of the 80 records, with fifth place at 5 and tenth place at 3. The gap from first to fifth is narrow enough that no single organisation controls the field outright, even though the top 10 together hold 58.8% of all records.

Based on the 74-assignee ranking returned by the dataset.
Momentum
0 in latest year
for several leading filers

Recent-year activity has cooled among top filers

Several of the most active historical assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year, including a -100% year-on-year drop for the overall leader. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this likely reflects incomplete recent data rather than a genuine pullback, but it is worth monitoring rather than assuming continuity.

Momentum figures cover the most recent year in the dataset, which is still filling in.
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
identified in the dataset

Operator-institute pairings recur

Co-assignee pairs in this dataset repeatedly link a grid operator with an affiliated research institute or provincial power company, each pairing appearing twice. That points to internal R&D-to-operations pipelines rather than cross-company joint ventures as the dominant collaboration model here.

Strongest pairs each appear in 2 co-filed records.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
These sub-areas sit outside the dense core of H02J/G06F filings and show comparatively little claim density in this dataset.
EV-load-aware pseudo-measurement generationimpedance-network-based observability filterscommunication-latency-tolerant estimatorscross-feeder measurement transfer models
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Hohai University1
State Grid Corporation of China0-100%
North China Electric Power University0
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd.0
Southeast University0
Tsinghua University0
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd. Research Institute0
Electric Power Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid Co., Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Network State Estimation with Limited Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field where software and AI-layer claims are growing faster than hardware claims, and where geographic concentration leaves clear gaps for review.

Map claim scope against the top 10 assignees

Concentration at 58.8% among 10 assignees makes a targeted claim-chart review of that group a practical starting point before broader freedom-to-operate work.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Track the AI-model class as it grows

G06N already touches 26.3% of records; watching new filings in this class closely could reveal where estimation methods are shifting fastest.

Set up a monitoring search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Network State Estimation with Limited Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Distribution Network State Estimation with Limited Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Distribution Network State Estimation with Limited Sensing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole distribution network state estimation with limited sensing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.