DMA & Night Flow Analysis Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- A small, concentrated field. 29 published families sit behind this search, with one assignee holding 7 of the ranked filings and a long tail of single- and double-filing entrants below it.
- Testing and business-data classes co-dominate. G01M (testing/structure balance) and G06Q (business data processing) each cover 41.4% of the 29 records, showing that flow-balance detection and commercial billing/analytics logic are claimed together as often as separately.
- 2019 was the high-water mark for filing. Filings peaked at 9 in 2019; the 2021-to-2024 span the dataset can treat as complete shows a fall from 1 filing to 0, a -100% change over that window.
Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
What this patent set covers
District metered areas (DMAs) split a water distribution network into hydraulically isolated zones so that inflow can be balanced against modelled or metered consumption. Minimum night flow analysis reads the flow into a DMA during the low-demand overnight window as a proxy for background leakage and undetected bursts. This search combines those two concepts with the supporting claim language — flow balance, boundary valve control, burst detection, meter accuracy and background leakage modelling — that turns a bare DMA concept into an enforceable method or system claim.
The 29 records in scope span academic assignees, specialist leak-analytics vendors and at least one large diversified technology company, filed through national offices and the PCT route between 2015 and mid-2026. Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend here will read lower than the eventual filing total once the backlog clears.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 29-record corpus: the filing trend by year, and the IPC subclasses that recur across those records.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings rose to a peak of 9 in 2019, then thinned out. The 2021-to-2024 span, the last the dataset can treat as filing-complete, moved from 1 filing to 0 — a -100% change. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are still filling in under the publication lag and should not be read as a continued decline.
IPC subclass composition
G01M and G06Q each appear on 41.4% of the 29 records, followed by E03B water supply and distribution at 31.0%. G01F, G06F and G06N each sit at 17.2%, with G01D and G01R at 6.9%. Records commonly carry more than one class, so these shares sum above 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 29 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on District Metered Areas and Night Flow Analysis with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about district metered areas and night flow analysis and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative and most-cited filings
EP4159935A1 — Online flow survey and dysfunction monitoring for drinking water distribution networks
The present invention concerns a computer implemented system and method for continuous online flow survey and dysfunction monitoring whereby dysfunction includes flow values resulting from abnormal consumption events and leaks sized and ranged according to the characteristics of the surveyed District Metered Area of water distributing networks. The present invention further concerns the use of the computer implemented method to produce a consumption model ready for use in off-line hydraulic network modelling and preferably use this model as a tool for design of network extensions or improvements of the network.Filed by EN.CON BVBA, published 2023-04-05.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US8341106B1 | System and method for identifying related events in a resource network monitoring system | 81 |
| 2 | US20130332090A1 | System and method for identifying related events in a resource network monitoring system | 37 |
| 3 | WO2010131001A1 | Anomaly detection based in baysian inference | 32 |
| 4 | GB2553833A | Pipe condition assessment device and system | 18 |
| 5 | WO2019007497A1 | Non-intrusive vibrational method and apparatus of a centralized system for water distribution network pipelin… | 14 |
| 6 | WO2018051287A1 | Pipe condition assessment device and system | 12 |
| 7 | WO2013084068A2 | System and method for identifying related events in a resource network monitoring system | 6 |
| 8 | US20210357547A1 | Computer-implemented method of modelling a hydraulic network | 3 |
| 9 | US20170089798A1 | Water leakage detection based on smart electricity meter | 3 |
| 10 | EP4159935A1 | A system and a method for online flow survey and dysfunctions monitoring of drinking water distribution netwo… | 2 |
Citation counts accumulate over time, so older records such as the two 'identifying related events' filings lead the table by influence rather than by current filing activity.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend and the class composition are read together.
One assignee sets the pace, the rest file thinly
The leading assignee holds 7 of the ranked filings, fifth place holds 2, and tenth place holds just 1. That shape — one clear leader over a long tail of single- and double-filing entrants — is typical of a technical niche still being staked out rather than one dominated by a handful of blocking portfolios.
Detection hardware and billing logic are claimed together
G01M testing/structure-balance claims and G06Q business-data-processing claims each cover 41.4% of the 29 records, which means many filings bundle the physical flow-balance detection method with the commercial or operational data logic in the same claim set. A narrower filing that isolates just the detection method, or just the analytics layer, sits in a smaller, less crowded slice.
Filing has thinned since the 2019 peak
Activity peaked at 9 filings in 2019. Across the 2021-to-2024 window that the dataset can treat as complete, filings moved from 1 to 0, a fall the hero figures confirm directly. Because 2025-2026 publications are still arriving, this should be read as a lull after a peak, not as proof the field has closed.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to district metered areas and night flow analysis, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee landscape
The ranking spans academic groups, specialist analytics vendors and one large diversified technology company, with filing concentrated at the top and thin below it.
The top-ranked assignee
The leading assignee in this search holds 7 of the ranked filings, well ahead of the rest of the field, and its portfolio anchors the flow-balance and burst-detection claim space that other filers build around.
University groups file jointly
Two university assignees appear together on 4 filings, the strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset, pointing to a sustained joint research programme rather than one-off collaboration.
Most filers hold a single family
Below the top few positions, ranked assignees drop quickly to one or two filings each, consistent with a field where specialist vendors and research groups test a single claim rather than build a defensive thicket.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| TaKaDu Ltd | 0 | — |
| Inflowmatix Ltd | 0 | — |
| Stellenbosch University | 0 | — |
| University of Cape Town | 0 | — |
| UNIV OF CAPE TOWN & STELLENBOSCH UNIV | 0 | — |
| University of Exeter | 0 | — |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 0 | — |
| Invenio Systems Ltd | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The dataset points to a field with room to file cleanly, provided the claim is drawn narrower than the bundled detection-plus-analytics pattern seen across the top classes.
Check the boundary-valve and meter-accuracy branches
These sub-areas show no dense filing cluster in this dataset, based on the class composition and co-filing evidence, making them a reasonable starting point for a freedom-to-operate check ahead of drafting.
Explore white space in EurekaMap claims against the leading portfolio directly
With one assignee holding 7 of the 13 ranked positions, a claim chart against that portfolio specifically — rather than the field in general — will tell you faster whether a proposed filing is genuinely open.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaWatch for the 2025-2026 publication catch-up
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, filings made in 2024 and 2025 are still arriving in the record. Re-checking the trend in six to twelve months will give a truer read on whether the post-2019 lull has ended.
Track filings in EurekaCommon questions on DMA and night flow patents
Most filings in this space claim a method or system for isolating a section of a water distribution network — the district metered area, or DMA — and using flow measurements at its boundary to infer leakage or abnormal consumption. The claims typically cover how inflow is balanced against modelled or metered demand, and how boundary valves or meters are configured to make that isolation hydraulically reliable. In this dataset, 31.0% of the 29 records also carry an E03B water-supply-and-distribution classification alongside the measurement classes, reflecting that the physical network configuration is often claimed together with the analysis method.
Minimum night flow analysis specifically uses the low-demand overnight window, when legitimate consumption is at its lowest, to isolate background leakage and small bursts from the flow signal entering a DMA. General leak detection can rely on pressure transients, acoustic sensing or vibration monitoring at any time of day. The search behind this landscape combines minimum night flow with flow balance, burst detection and background leakage terms specifically, which is why testing/structure-balance (G01M) and water-supply (E03B) classes dominate over purely acoustic or vibrational method classes.
The ranking returned for this search covers 13 assignees, with the top-ranked filer holding 7 of the ranked filings and a sharp drop to 2 filings by fifth place and 1 by tenth. That shape — a single leader over a long tail — suggests the field is not yet dominated by a small group of blocking portfolios, though the leader's position is significant enough to warrant a direct claim comparison before filing something similar. The mix includes academic groups, specialist leak-analytics vendors and at least one large diversified technology company.
Filing peaked at 9 in 2019 and, across the 2021-to-2024 window this dataset can treat as filing-complete, moved from 1 filing to 0, a -100% change. That looks like a genuine lull rather than the field closing outright, and figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because patent publication typically lags the actual filing date by around 18 months. A shorter apparent decline in the most recent one or two years of any patent trend should always be read with that lag in mind rather than as a firm signal of falling interest.
Based on the class composition in this dataset, boundary-valve state verification, meter-accuracy drift correction and AI-based background-leakage estimation each appear across only a handful of the smaller subclasses (G01D, G01R, G06N each cover 6.9% to 17.2% of the 29 records) rather than forming a dense cluster. That suggests these are narrower, less-claimed branches compared with the bundled flow-balance-plus-analytics claims that dominate G01M and G06Q. A first claim drawn tightly around one of these narrower mechanisms, rather than repeating the common bundled pattern, is more likely to clear existing art cleanly.
Research District Metered Areas and Night Flow Analysis in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole district metered areas and night flow analysis corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.