Book a demo

Drill Tool Testing & Inspection Patent Snapshot 2026

Drill Tool Testing & Inspection Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Drill Tool Testing & Inspection Patent Snapshot in 2026

The drill tool testing and inspection patent space is tightly concentrated, with Halliburton Energy Services holding the largest single share among the top filers and the Schlumberger group collectively challenging across multiple entities. Activity peaked around 2018 and has plateaued since, signalling a maturing field where incremental differentiation rather than broad claim staking defines current strategy.

15
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Halliburton leads a highly concentrated field dominated by three oilfield-services majors

Halliburton Energy Services ranks first with 14 patent records among the top filers, followed by Schlumberger Tech Corp at 5 and Baker Hughes at 4. The top five filers collectively account for 79% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, indicating a field where three established oilfield-services majors and their affiliates hold decisive coverage.

The tier gap is pronounced: the gap between Halliburton’s 14 records and the next-ranked applicant’s 5 records is substantial for a corpus of this size, reinforcing a two-tier structure in which a single incumbent holds roughly twice the patent records of its nearest rival. Below the top three, all remaining filers hold only one record each.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Halliburton Energy Services Inc14
2Schlumberger Tech Corp5
3Baker Hughes Company4
4Schlumberger Technology BV3
5Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA1
6Lanpec Technologies Limited1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
7Shanghai Lanbin Petrochem Equipment Co Ltd1
8Schlumberger Canada Ltd1
9Xu Changxu1
10CHENGDU HAOHAN WELL COMPLETION & LOGGING SCI & TECH1
11Yangtze University1
12China University of Petroleum (East China)1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Halliburton’s position implies deep, layered coverage across both E21B downhole-drilling subclasses and G01V geophysics subclasses. Challengers seeking freedom to operate should map their inventions carefully against that dual-domain coverage before committing R&D resources.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and likely understate true activity; conclusions about recent-period volume should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2018 filing peak followed by plateau, anchored in well-drilling and geophysics classes

The annual trend chart reveals where activity accelerated and where it has since eased; the technology composition chart shows which IPC classes underpin the field and which remain sparsely populated.

Annual filing trend

Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of five in 2018, dipped in 2019, recovered to five in 2022, then show zero for 2023–2026 — a pattern consistent with a maturity-phase plateau. Years from 2023 onward are subject to publication lag and should not be read as a real decline; actual recent activity is likely higher than recorded.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 5 in 2018.12017520184201902020020215202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

E21B (Earth and rock drilling — wells) and G01V (Geophysics and gravity surveying) together are visible in the IPC distribution, reflecting the field’s core focus on in-situ downhole measurement and acoustic/seismic sensing. Secondary classes — H10N, B06B, H02N, G01N, and G21K — each hold very small shares, pointing to under-served adjacent branches in solid-state sensing, vibration generation, and material analysis.

Technology compositionE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells) leads with 30; G01V · Geophysics & gravity surveying 23.E21B · Earth & rock dril…30G01V · Geophysics & grav…23H10N · Other electric so…4B06B · Generating mechan…2H02N · Electric machines…2G01N · Material analysis…1G21K · Particle & radiat…1H01L · Semiconductor dev…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20190004205A1Published 2019-01-03

Downhole tool apparatus, system, and methods

Halliburton Energy SERVICES, INC.

A downhole tool can include a photon beam source configured to transmit a photon beam into materials lining a wellbore. The materials may comprise fluid, casing, and cement. A photon detector in the tool is configured to count detected photons received at a predetermined angle from the materials. The density of the borehole material may be determined in… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Downhole tool apparatus, system, and methods — patent drawingDownhole tool apparatus, system, and methods — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Downhole tool39
2Guided mode beamforming for probing open-hole and …23
3Piezoelectric actuator for downhole applications21
4Downhole tool14
5Guided mode beamforming for probing open-hole and …13
6旋转导向钻井工具系统加速度计间歇故障检测方法11
7Downhole tool apparatus, system, and methods9
8一种可溶桥塞性能测试装置8

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Halliburton Energy Services

Halliburton Energy Services

Halliburton Energy Services holds 14 patent records, the largest count among all filers. Its technology focus spans E21B 47 (downhole measurements while drilling), G01V 1 (seismic), and G01V 5 (nuclear geophysics), indicating layered coverage across sensing modalities. Applicant-momentum data does not flag a recent acceleration for Halliburton, consistent with a mature, established position rather than an expansion phase.

14 patent records
Challenger · Schlumberger Tech Corp

Schlumberger Tech Corp

Schlumberger Tech Corp holds 5 patent records and is classified as a new entrant in the most recent filing window, suggesting recent activity despite a smaller cumulative count. Its focus spans E21B 47, G01V 1, and E21B 49 (sampling of earth formations), reflecting a balanced drilling-measurement and formation-evaluation strategy that complements the broader Schlumberger-group portfolio of 10 combined records across all affiliated entities.

5 patent records
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Baker HughesYangtze University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.