Book a demo

Drilling & Geosteering AI Patent Landscape 2026

Drilling & Geosteering AI Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Drilling / Geosteering AI Patent Landscape in 2026

The Drilling/Geosteering AI patent field is dominated by a single corporate family — Schlumberger and its affiliated entities — which holds the commanding majority of activity, leaving Halliburton and Baker Hughes as distant challengers. The field is in a Growth stage with a 30% expansion over the recent window, concentrated overwhelmingly in the United States as the primary filing jurisdiction.

120
Patent families in scope
81%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+30%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Schlumberger entities command the field; Halliburton is the closest challenger

Schlumberger Technology Corp leads all applicants, followed by Halliburton Energy Services and a cluster of affiliated Schlumberger entities — Services Petroliers Schlumberger, GeoQuest Systems, and Schlumberger Canada — that collectively reinforce the group’s dominance across the ranking.

The top five filers account for 81% of the combined patent records held by the hundred largest filers, signaling an exceptionally concentrated competitive structure. The gap between the Schlumberger cluster and the next independent competitor (Halliburton) is wide, and between Halliburton and Baker Hughes it widens further, suggesting a three-tier hierarchy.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Schlumberger Technology Corp56
2Halliburton Energy Services Inc26
3Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA25
4GeoQuest Systems BV23
5Schlumberger Canada Ltd17
6Landmark Graphics Corp10
7Baker Hughes Co7
8Schlumberger Technology BV5
9Vermeer Manufacturing Co2
10Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11PRAD RES & DEV LTD1
12TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY1
13Cyentech Consulting LLC1
14Sinopec North China Petroleum Engineering Co Ltd1
15University of Houston System1
16Sichuan Zhihui Xingkong Technology Co Ltd1
17Schlumberger Holdings Ltd1
18Beijing Silitong Control Technology Co Ltd1
19Sinopec Oilfield Service Corporation1
20Reliance Minerals Ltd1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Such concentration means that the Schlumberger network effectively sets the technological vocabulary of the field. Entrants and challengers must navigate a dense Schlumberger portfolio particularly in core E21B drilling-trajectory and measurement sub-classes before reaching defensible whitespace.

Filing counts for approximately the most recent 18–24 months are understated due to publication lag; the apparent plateau in 20252026 data does not reflect actual filing pace. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Sustained growth from 2019 onward; E21B drilling methods dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that ignited around 2019 and has maintained elevated activity, with AI computing (G06N) and geophysics (G01V) as meaningful but still secondary branches alongside a dominant E21B core.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible before 2018, then jumped sharply in 2019 and have held at an elevated plateau through 2024. The 2025–2026 bars are understated by publication lag and should not be read as a slowdown; the lifecycle evidence confirms the field is still in a Growth stage.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 24 in 2024.02017220182020198202016202117202216202324202416202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

E21B (Earth and rock drilling — wells) is overwhelmingly the primary class, reflecting that AI applications are being patented as integrated drilling-system inventions rather than as standalone AI methods. G06N (AI computing models) and G01V (geophysics and gravity surveying) appear as secondary branches, indicating that foundational machine-learning and subsurface-sensing framing is present but not yet dominant.

Technology compositionE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells) leads with 123; G06N · Computing based on AI models 24.E21B · Earth & rock dril…123G06N · Computing based o…24G01V · Geophysics & grav…13G05B · Control & regulat…5G06F · Electric digital …4G08B · Signalling & alar…2G01H · Measuring vibrati…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
GB2596676BPublished 2023-07-19

Predicting downhole tool behaviour using a trained…

Geoquest Systems B.V.
Predicting downhole tool behaviour using a trained… — patent drawingPredicting downhole tool behaviour using a trained… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Determining Drilling State for Trajectory Control77
2Drilling system44
3Drilling system33
4Model-based parameter estimation for directional d…29
5Approaches to directional drilling22
6Determining drilling state for trajectory control22
7Hybrid physics-based and machine learning reservoi…17
8Inferring wellsite operations from power consumpti…16

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, active growth, and strong intra-Schlumberger co-filing defines specific strategic risks and entry considerations for any new participant in this space.

Growth

Growth stage: activity expanding, not yet mature

The lifecycle evidence classifies this field as Growth, with annual filings still rising and the 30% recent-window increase not yet eroded by saturation. The 2019 inflection point aligns with broader industry adoption of machine-learning tools in wellbore navigation. Teams entering now face an expanding prior-art landscape but also find that many application niches remain thinly filed.

Growth · +30% recent window
Concentration

Extreme concentration around one corporate family

The top five filers account for 81% of patent records among the hundred largest filers, and all five are either Schlumberger entities or their close affiliates. Halliburton, at 26 patent records, is the first genuinely independent competitor, followed by Baker Hughes at 7. Any freedom-to-operate analysis must begin with a systematic mapping of the Schlumberger portfolio across E21B sub-classes 44, 47, and 7.

81% top-5 share
Collaboration

Co-filing is intra-Schlumberger; external partnerships are rare

The most active co-filing pairs are Services Petroliers Schlumberger / GeoQuest Systems (20 joint records), Schlumberger Technology Corp / Schlumberger Canada (15), and Schlumberger Technology Corp / Services Petroliers Schlumberger (15). GeoQuest Systems and Schlumberger Canada also co-file actively (11 records). The only non-Schlumberger pairing observed is Schlumberger Technology Corp with PRAD Research and Development (1 record), indicating the ecosystem is almost entirely self-contained within the Schlumberger network.

Intra-Schlumberger ecosystem
Geography

US-centric filing with selective PCT and EPO coverage

The United States is the dominant jurisdiction by patent records, followed by WIPO PCT filings and then the European Patent Office. The United Kingdom, Canada, and China each carry a small number of records, and Norway and Saudi Arabia appear at the margin — the latter two reflecting strategic filing in key hydrocarbon-producing regions. Any commercial protection strategy should prioritize US prosecution and PCT entry before targeting regional offices.

US-led · PCT & EPO secondary
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SAGeoQuest Systems BV20
Schlumberger Technology CorpSchlumberger Canada Ltd15
Schlumberger Technology CorpServices Petroliers Schlumberger SA15
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SASchlumberger Canada Ltd15
Schlumberger Technology CorpGeoQuest Systems BV11
GeoQuest Systems BVSchlumberger Canada Ltd11
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SASchlumberger Technology BV5
Schlumberger Technology CorpSchlumberger Technology BV4
Schlumberger Canada LtdSchlumberger Technology BV4
Schlumberger Technology CorpPRAD Research & Development Ltd1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Insight cards synthesize lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence from the same patent corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Schlumberger Technology Corp leads on volume and momentum; Halliburton is the primary independent challenger

The applicant ranking is structured as a dominant Schlumberger cluster at the top and a smaller but growing Halliburton position in second, with Baker Hughes a distant third. Momentum data indicate all leading entities have been filing more actively in the recent period.

Leader · Schlumberger Technology Corp

Schlumberger Technology Corp

Schlumberger Technology Corp holds 56 patent records — more than twice the next individual ranked entity — and shows a trajectory of +190% in recent filings versus the prior period. Its technology emphasis is concentrated in E21B 44 (drilling parameter optimization), E21B 47 (wellbore measurement and logging), and E21B 7 (directional drilling methods), covering the full stack of AI-assisted trajectory control. Multiple affiliated entities reinforce this position across the ranking.

patent records: 56
Challenger · Halliburton Energy Services

Halliburton Energy Services

Halliburton Energy Services holds 26 patent records and shows a +50% filing trend in the recent period, signaling accelerating investment. Its technology coverage mirrors Schlumberger’s in emphasis — E21B 44, E21B 7, and E21B 47 — suggesting a direct competitive strategy targeting the same trajectory-control and measurement problem space rather than differentiated niches. Landmark Graphics Corp, a Halliburton subsidiary, adds further records with a distinct G06N (AI models) and E21B 43 emphasis, indicating some investment in pure AI-model framing.

patent records: 26
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked applicants, their technology focus, and filing momentum in PatSnap Eureka.
Baker Hughes CoGeoQuest Systems BV+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Schlumberger Technology Corp29▲ +190%
Halliburton Energy Services Inc15▲ +50%
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA13▲ new entrant
GeoQuest Systems BV13▲ new entrant
Schlumberger Canada Ltd9▲ new entrant
Landmark Graphics Corp2▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent-record counts from the applicant ranking; momentum trends are from the recent-vs-prior filing comparison.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Control systems and geophysical sensing are under-served relative to core drilling AI

Beyond the dominant E21B drilling class, several adjacent IPC branches carry sparse filings relative to their plausible technical relevance, representing areas where the incumbent portfolio is thinner and differentiated entry may be more accessible.

G05B · Control & Regulating Systems

G05B accounts for only 5 patent records (3% share among the whitespace candidates), despite automated closed-loop control being a natural extension of AI-driven geosteering. As real-time drilling decisions move toward autonomous execution, control-systems framing — covering feedback loops, real-time adaptive algorithms, and safety interlocks — represents an under-served adjacent branch. Entrants with expertise in industrial control or robotics could stake claims here without colliding immediately with the core Schlumberger E21B portfolio.

Search this in Eureka →

G01V · Geophysics & Gravity Surveying

G01V carries 13 patent records (8% share), the largest of the whitespace candidates but still sparse relative to the dominant E21B cluster. AI-enhanced subsurface imaging, formation evaluation from seismic data, and real-time petrophysical inference are all active research directions that map naturally to G01V but are thinly represented in this corpus. The most-cited patent on hybrid physics-based and machine-learning reservoir modeling suggests the technical appetite exists; the filing volume does not yet reflect it, pointing to a plausible entry path for geoscience-focused AI developers.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
PatSnap Eureka maps all adjacent IPC branches against applicant coverage to surface defensible filing opportunities.
G06F · Electric digital data processingG01H · Measuring vibrations & sound+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. White-space branches are IPC classes with lower filing density relative to the dominant E21B class; sparsity is an observation, not a guaranteed opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across E21B sub-classes and AI branches

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerE21B 44 · Earth & rock drilling (wells)E21B 7 · Earth & rock drilling (wells)E21B 47 · Earth & rock drilling (wells)E21B 49 · Earth & rock drilling (wells)G06N 20 · Computing based on AI models
Schlumberger Technology CorpStrong · 52Strong · 36Strong · 38Moderate · 21Emerging · 5
Halliburton Energy Services IncStrong · 24Strong · 18Strong · 13Emerging · 3Moderate · 7
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SAStrong · 24Moderate · 12Strong · 15Emerging · 4Emerging · 4
GeoQuest Systems BVStrong · 22Strong · 13Strong · 13AbsentEmerging · 4
Schlumberger Canada LtdStrong · 15Strong · 8Strong · 10Moderate · 4Emerging · 2
Baker Hughes CoStrong · 5Strong · 5AbsentAbsentAbsent
Schlumberger Technology BVStrong · 5AbsentStrong · 4AbsentAbsent
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.