https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/dry-granulation-and-roller-compaction-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Dry granulation and roller compaction patents: mapping the leaders and the open claim space
  • Concentrated at the top. The top 5 assignees hold 30.4% of all 542 records in scope, and the top 10 hold 45.4% — a dense core with a long tail behind it.
  • Filings have flattened, not grown. Filing activity peaked at 26 records in 2017, sat at 26 again at the 2022 midpoint, and has since declined toward 4 in the most recent (partial) year.
  • Excipient compressibility patents still anchor the field. The most-cited record in the corpus, US5585115A, has 287 citations — more than any process or equipment patent in the set.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
542
Published Records
30%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+43%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape covers 542 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that describe dry granulation, roller compaction and ribbon compaction processes for pharmaceutical manufacturing, together with the excipients, sealing systems and moisture-control measures that make those processes work at scale. The search targets title and abstract language on the process itself and claim/description language on the operational detail — ribbon density uniformity, fines recycle, roll surface condition, sealing systems and moisture-sensitive API handling — so the set skews toward records where the granulation step is a stated part of the invention rather than an incidental manufacturing note.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year in the trend line is necessarily undercounted and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1GENENTECH INC41
  2. 2TAKEDA AS37
  3. 3J RETTENMAIER & SOHNE GMBH CO KG33
  4. 4GLAXO GROUP LTD29
  5. 5GILEAD SCIENCES INC25
  6. 6GILEAD SCIENCES LLC24
  7. 7PAUL WURTH SA15
  8. 8TRADICHEM IND SERVICES SL15
  9. 9NV ORGANON14
  10. 10GERTEIS PAUL13
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dry Granulation and Roller Compaction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 542 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the records sit in.

A peak in 2017, then a flat-to-declining line

Filings hit 26 in 2017, the peak so far, matched again at the 2022 midpoint before easing off toward 4 in the most recent partial year. Read the tail end cautiously given the publication lag — the last one to two years will fill in further as more records publish — but the shape from 2017 to 2022 is already flat rather than growing, which is unusual for a manufacturing technique still under active development.

A peak in 2017, then a flat-to-declining line08152330262017201820192020202126202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Medicinal preparations dominate the classification mix

A61K (medicinal preparations) covers 76.4% of the 542 records and A61P (therapeutic activity of compounds) covers 25.8%, confirming that most filings frame dry granulation as a formulation and dosage-form problem rather than a pure equipment problem. Smaller but non-trivial clusters sit in C07D (heterocyclic compounds, 5.5%), B01J (chemical/physical processes, 5.4%) and A61J (containers for medicine, 3.1%) — each a narrower angle on the same core process. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add up to well over 100% of the record total and should be read as overlapping lenses, not a partition.

Medicinal preparations dominate the classification mixA61K · Medicinal preparations41476.4%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…14025.8%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds305.5%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …295.4%C21B · Iron production (blast furnace)285.2%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories244.4%C22B · Metal extraction & refining234.2%A61J · Containers for medicine173.1%Other17331.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 542 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dry Granulation and Roller Compaction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Dry Granulation and Roller Compaction with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about dry granulation and roller compaction and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in the corpus

Representative record
US20050075335A12005-04-07

Pharmaceutical composition comprising a piboserod derivative prepared by dry granulation (US20050075335A1)

GLAXO GROUP LIMITED

Filed by Glaxo Group Limited, this record describes forming a piboserod-type active pharmaceutical ingredient into granules by a dry granulation process, preferably roller compaction followed by milling to a target particle size, before combining the granulate with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients into a finished composition.Useful as a template for how process claims in this space are typically structured: an active ingredient, a named dry granulation route, and a downstream particle-size or milling step tied to a specific dosage form.

US20050075335A1 — patent drawing 1US20050075335A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records, 2015-2026 scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5585115APharmaceutical excipient having improved compressability287
2US5725883APharmaceutical excipient having improved compressibility150
3US6122601ACompacted material density measurement and compaction tracking system133
4US6103219APharmaceutical excipient having improved compressibility117
5US4551177ACompressible starches as binders for tablets or capsules115
6US20070099902A1Unitary pharmaceutical dosage form103
7US20070077295A1Method and composition for pharmaceutical product94
8US6217909B1Pharmaceutical excipient having improved compressibility93
9US5725884APharmaceutical excipient having improved compressibility83
10US20050220865A1Compressed composition comprising magnesium salt80

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings, since they have had more years to accumulate citations — treat this table as a signal of influence on the field, not a ranking of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dry Granulation and Roller Compaction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Three read-outs from the dataset that matter more for filing strategy than the headline counts.

Concentration
30.4% / 45.4%
share held by top 5 / top 10 of 542 records

A dense core, then a long tail

The top 5 assignees account for 30.4% of all 542 records and the top 10 account for 45.4%. That leaves more than half the corpus spread across a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, which is where most freedom-to-operate work will actually need to happen.

Based on the full 100-company ranked list.
Filing trend
26 → 4
records in 2017 vs. most recent partial year

Momentum has cooled since 2017

The peak year was 2017 at 26 records, matched again at the 2022 midpoint, with the count easing toward 4 in the latest partial year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, the true recent-year figure is understated, but the flat 2017-2022 stretch already signals a mature, not expanding, filing pattern.

Coverage: 2015-01-01 to 2026-07-31.
Citation leaders
287 citations
US5585115A, the most-cited record

Excipient compressibility still sets the reference point

The five most-cited records in the set are dominated by pharmaceutical excipient compressibility patents (US5585115A at 287 citations, US5725883A at 150, US6103219A at 117) alongside a compaction-density measurement patent (US6122601A at 133). Newer process patents in the corpus have not displaced these as the reference point other filers build on.

Citation counts favour older records; read as influence, not current relevance.
Filing geography
US 88 / EPO 74
leading receiving offices

US and Europe lead, but the spread is wide

The United States (88) and the European Patent Office (74) receive the most filings, with WIPO/PCT (40), Canada (39), China (38) and India (38) close behind one another. That relatively even spread across six offices suggests applicants are pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than concentrating on a single home market.

Receiving office counts, not family counts.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to dry granulation and roller compaction, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dry Granulation and Roller Compaction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it's still open

The ranked leader holds 41 records; fifth place holds 25 and tenth place holds 13 — a steep drop-off that opens up real space below the top tier.

Leader
41 records
records held by the top-ranked assignee

One clear leader, then a steep drop

The leading assignee holds 41 records, well ahead of fifth place at 25 and tenth place at 13. That gap between first and fifth is the clearest sign of a genuinely dominant filer rather than a cluster of near-equal competitors.

Ranked across 100 companies, counted in records.
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is limited and concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest of them is far ahead of the rest — a sign that most filers in this space protect inventions solo rather than through joint filings, with a small number of exceptions tied to specific corporate relationships.

Strongest pair recorded at 8 shared filings.
Recent activity
0 in latest year
for several previously active assignees

Momentum has stalled even among established filers

Several assignees that appear among the more active historical filers show zero records in the latest year of the dataset. Combined with the flat-to-declining overall trend, this points to a field where established players are not currently pressing their position, which is itself an opening for a new entrant with a genuinely differentiated process claim.

Recent-year momentum reflects the partial latest year in scope.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas that sit inside this landscape's IPC spread but carry comparatively few records — worth checking before assuming the space is occupied.
ribbon density uniformity sensingroll surface texturing for fines controlmoisture-sensitive API sealing systemsin-line fines recycle control loopscontainer closure systems for granulate (A61J)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Genentech, Inc.0
Edward Mendell Co., Inc.0
Bristol-Myers Squibb & Gilead Sciences LLC0
Glaxo Group Limited0
Gilead Sciences, Inc.0
Takeda AS0
Nycomed Pharma AS0
TRADICHEM IND SERVICES SL0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dry Granulation and Roller Compaction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with dense coverage at the excipient and formulation level, and thinner coverage on process control and sealing hardware.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top 10

With 45.4% of all 542 records held by the top 10 assignees, any new filing on core roller compaction or granule formulation should be checked against that concentrated set before it is checked against the long tail.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Draft claims around the under-claimed branches

Ribbon density sensing, roll surface treatment and moisture-sensitive sealing systems show up in the search scope but carry comparatively few dedicated records, which is where a first-mover claim is more likely to stand.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the excipient citation cluster

The most-cited records in the corpus are excipient compressibility patents from outside the most recent filing wave. Any new formulation claim should be benchmarked against that older, heavily cited prior art before drafting.

Review key patents in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dry Granulation and Roller Compaction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dry Granulation and Roller Compaction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Dry Granulation and Roller Compaction in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole dry granulation and roller compaction corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.