Book a demo

Dust Control in Mining Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Dust Control in Mining Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/dust-control-in-mining-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Mine Safety & Ventilation
Dust Control in Mining Patents: Who's Filing and Where the Claims Concentrate
  • 48.6% concentration. The top 5 of 53 ranked assignees hold 86 of the 177 records in scope — nearly half the field sits with a handful of filers.
  • Measurement, not mitigation, dominates. 58.8% of records fall under G01N material analysis and testing, versus just 11.3% under E21F mine safety and ventilation equipment.
  • Filing has cooled sharply since the 2018 peak. From 5 filings in 2021 to 1 in 2024 — an 80% drop over that complete window, with 2025-26 still understated by publication lag.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
177
Published Records
49%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-80%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 177 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent landscape covers

This landscape covers 177 published records filed between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from filings that combine dust-control terms — respirable dust, dust suppression, mine dust control — with exposure and equipment terms such as silica exposure, personal sampler, scrubber efficiency and haul road treatment. The scope spans both underground and surface operations, and pulls in adjacent oilfield proppant-handling filings where the same silica-dust exposure problem applies.

Filing activity is uneven across the technology stack: measurement and exposure-testing claims outnumber suppression chemistry and ventilation-equipment claims by a wide margin, and a small group of assignees accounts for close to half of all records. The sections below break down the concentration, the technology composition, and the branches that remain lightly claimed.

Records by filing year, 2017-2026
  1. 1EP MINERALS LLC30
  2. 2ECOLAB USA INC18
  3. 3THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES15
  4. 4APPLIED PARTICLE TECHNOLOGY INC12
  5. 5INTEGRITY BIO CHEMICALS LLC11
  6. 6SANDBOX ENTERPRISES LLC9
  7. 7ISTITUT NAZ PER LASSICURAZIONE CONTRO GLI INFORTUNI SUL LAVORO8
  8. 8OREN TECHNOLOGIES LLC8
  9. 9FOND INST ITAL DI TECH8
  10. 10BOORTZ CHRISTOPHER LEE7
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dust Control in Mining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The 177 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with publication lag meaning the most recent two years are still filling in. The technology mix shows where inventive effort has actually concentrated versus where the search terms merely touch.

Filing activity peaked in 2018, then cooled

Filings ran from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 23 in 2018. The 2021-to-2024 span shows a drop from 5 to 1 filing, an 80% decline over that complete three-year window; 2025 and 2026 figures are not yet reliable because of publication lag.

Filing activity peaked in 2018, then cooled06131925142017232018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Measurement and testing dominate the IPC spread

G01N (material analysis and testing) appears in 58.8% of the 177 records, far ahead of C09K suppression-chemistry materials (18.6%) and B01D separation processes (13.6%). Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares sum to more than 100%; mine safety and ventilation itself, E21F, appears in only 11.3% of records.

Measurement and testing dominate the IPC spreadG01N · Material analysis & testing10458.8%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…3318.6%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …2916.4%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories2715.3%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…2413.6%E21F · Mine safety & ventilation2011.3%B65G · Conveying & material handling137.3%B65D · Containers & packaging126.8%Other9252.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 177 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dust Control in Mining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Dust Control in Mining with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about dust control in mining and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US20220162487A12022-05-26

Compositions and methods for reducing airborne particulate matter

WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING LLC

Dust suppression agents and methods of use, e.g., to reduce operator exposure to particulate matter released during machining of a material, are described. The method may include providing a retained dust suppression agent proximate to a surface of the material and machining the material at the surface with a tool having a mechanized motion. The mechanized motion of the tool may release at least a portion of the retained dust suppression agent to reduce operator exposure to respirable particulate matter from the material as compared to machining the material at the surface absent the retained dust suppression agent.Filed by Westlake Royal Roofing LLC, published 2022-05-26 (US20220162487A1).

US20220162487A1 — patent drawing 1
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US9340353B2Methods and systems to transfer proppant for fracking with reduced risk of production and release of silica d…103
2US4473296ASystem and method and apparatus for a continuous aerosol monitor (CAM) using electro-optical weighing for gen…91
3US20160031658A1Proppant Discharge and Storage System70
4US9969564B2Methods and systems to transfer proppant for fracking with reduced risk of production and release of silica d…62
5US20150360856A1Methods and systems to transfer proppant for fracking with reduced risk of production and release of silica d…60
6US4487615AMethod of reducing mine dust48
7US20160046438A1Methods and systems to transfer proppant for fracking with reduced risk of production and release of silica d…39
8US20190277822A1Wireless exposure monitor38
9US4881957AAir filtration units and methods employing dust as filtration media and air flow rate as a directly controlle…38
10US20160068342A1Methods and systems to transfer proppant for fracking with reduced risk of production and release of silica d…36

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dust Control in Mining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern tells you

Reading the IPC spread, the citation leaders and the concentration figures together points to where claim space is defensible and where it is still open.

Concentration
48.6%
of 177 records held by top 5 of 53 assignees

Filing is concentrated at the top

The leading assignee alone holds 30 records; by the tenth-ranked filer that figure has fallen to 7. Anyone assessing freedom-to-operate should weight the leaders heavily rather than treating the ranked list as evenly spread.

Source: assignee ranking, 53 companies
Technology mix
58.8%
of records under G01N material analysis and testing

Monitoring claims outnumber mitigation claims

Measurement and exposure-testing claims (G01N) far exceed suppression chemistry (C09K, 18.6%) and ventilation equipment (E21F, 11.3%) combined. Most inventive effort has gone into proving dust levels, not removing dust at source.

Source: IPC subclass distribution, 177 records
Momentum
-80%
filing change, 2021 to 2024

Filing has slowed from its 2018 peak

Filings peaked at 23 in 2018 and the complete 2021-2024 window shows a drop from 5 to 1. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-26 figures should not yet be read as confirming a continued decline.

Source: filing trend, 2017-2026
Influence
103 cites
on the most-cited record, US9340353B2

Citation weight sits with older proppant-handling claims

The most-cited records in this dataset address silica dust released during fracking proppant transfer, not underground ventilation. High citation counts here reflect age and reuse within a searched corpus more than current commercial priority.

Source: most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to dust control in mining, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dust Control in Mining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and what's still open

The ranked assignee list runs to 53 companies, but the field is far from evenly split — a handful of filers hold most of the volume, while dozens appear with only one or two records each.

Leader
30 records
held by the top-ranked assignee

A single filer sets the pace

The leading assignee's 30 records are more than double the fifth-place holder's 11, and nearly triple the tenth-place holder's 7. That gap is the first thing to check before assuming the field is open.

Source: assignee ranking
Long tail
53 companies
in the full ranked list

Most assignees hold only a handful of filings

Beyond the top 10 (which together hold 71.2% of all 177 records), the remaining assignees thin out quickly, many with single-digit or single filings. That long tail is where licensing-in opportunities and acquisition targets tend to sit.

Source: assignee ranking, 53 companies
Collaboration
7 pairs
co-assignee relationships recorded

Joint filing is rare in this field

Only 7 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest link tying an Italian research foundation to Italy's national occupational-insurance institute at 8 shared filings. Most other assignees file solo.

Source: co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking first
These branches show filing well below the measurement and chemistry categories that dominate the dataset — worth a closer look before assuming the space is crowded.
Conveyor-transfer suppression meteringHaul-road surfactant treatment formulationsCeramic/refractory filter media for scrubbersVentilation-integrated real-time exposure sensingContainer-level dust containment for bulk handling
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
EP Minerals LLC0
Ecolab USA Inc0
Oren Technologies LLC0
The Government of the United States of America as represented by the Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services0
APPLIED PARTICLE TECHNOLOGY INC0
Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia0
ISTITUT NAZ PER LASSICURAZIONE CONTRO GLI INFORTUNI SUL LAVORO0
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dust Control in Mining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The figures above establish the shape of the field. The next steps depend on whether you're clearing a filing, scouting acquisition targets, or deciding where to invest R&D.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top 5 assignees

With 48.6% of the 177 records held by five companies, any new filing in suppression chemistry or monitoring should be checked against their claim scope first.

Run a claim comparison

Explore the under-claimed conveyor and containment branches

B65G and B65D classes sit well below the dominant G01N and C09K categories, suggesting room for narrowly drafted claims in material-handling dust control.

Map the white space

Track the assignees still filing post-2021

Momentum has cooled overall, but individual assignee activity in the most recent complete years shows who is still investing versus who has stopped.

View assignee momentum
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dust Control in Mining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on dust control patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dust Control in Mining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Dust Control in Mining in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole dust control in mining corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.