Book a demo

Dyes, Pigments & Colorants Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026

Dyes, Pigments & Colorants Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/dyes-pigments-and-colorants-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Dyes, Pigments & Colorants
Dyes, Pigments & Colorants Patents: Where Filing Concentrated and Where It Stopped
  • 88.8% sits with five filers. The top five assignees account for 214 of the 241 records in scope — a field with a small leading group and a long tail of single-filing entrants.
  • Filings fell -93% after 2021. From a peak of 59 records in 2021 to 4 in 2024, the most recent complete year — a sharp contraction in new claim activity on this exact search combination.
  • Claims skew toward formulation, not pigment synthesis. 80.5% of records carry an A61K medicinal-preparations classification, versus under 6% for polymer-composition (C08L) claims.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
241
Published Records
89%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-93%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
WO
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (59 records) with 2024 (4) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 241 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

How this field is structured

Filing in this search combination is heavily concentrated: the top five assignees hold 88.8% of the 241 records in scope, and the ranking’s remaining companies each contribute a small, mostly single-digit share. The technology mix leans toward formulation and activity claims rather than classical dye or pigment synthesis, with A61K medicinal-preparations classifications present in four out of five records.

Filing activity rose sharply through the late 2010s, peaked in 2021 at 59 records, then contracted to 4 by 2024 — the last year that can be treated as a complete count given normal publication lag. That contraction, combined with the concentration at the top of the assignee ranking, points to a field where the core claim space around a small number of leading filers has already been substantially staked out.

Filing volume and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1EVELO BIOSCIENCES INC198
  2. 2TAYA CANVAS SHANGHAI CO LTD5
  3. 3TUFTS UNIV4
  4. 4HODODI ANDREI4
  5. 5ANDREI HODODI3
  6. 6BIVICTRIX LTD3
  7. 7TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE3
  8. 8AUCKLAND UNISERVICES LTD2
  9. 9ALAN TRAVERS2
  10. 10KAPLAN DAVID2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dyes, Pigments & Colorants Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing concentration and technology mix

241 published records sit in scope for this search across 2015 through the partial 2026 year. The assignee ranking and IPC composition below use that same 241-record denominator throughout.

Filing trend: a sharp rise, then a sharp fall

Filings climbed to a peak of 59 in 2021, then dropped to 4 by 2024 — a -93% move over that three-year span. 2025 and later years are still filling in because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so do not read the most recent bars as a decline in real filing activity.

Filing trend: a sharp rise, then a sharp fall01530456002017201820192020592021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Where the claims sit

A61K (medicinal preparations) covers 80.5% of the 241 records and A61P (therapeutic activity) 63.9%, showing this corpus is dominated by formulation and activity claims rather than classical pigment or dye synthesis. C08L (polymer compositions) and C07K (peptides & proteins) sit under 6% each, marking the thinnest-claimed branches in scope.

Where the claims sitA61K · Medicinal preparations19480.5%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…15463.9%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…6527.0%C12R · Microorganisms (index)2510.4%G01N · Material analysis & testing208.3%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus187.5%C07K · Peptides & proteins145.8%C08L · Polymer compositions93.7%Other8133.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 241 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dyes, Pigments & Colorants Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Dyes, Pigments & Colorants Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about dyes, pigments & colorants patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited record in this corpus

Representative Record
US20100068740A12010-03-18

Microfluidic device with a cylindrical microchannel and a method for fabricating same

TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE

A method of manufacturing a microfluidic device having at least one cylindrical microchannel includes providing a substrate, casting an uncured polymer matrix solution onto the substrate, embedding an elongated rod in the uncured polymer matrix solution, curing the polymer matrix solution to form a solidified body, and extracting the elongated rod to form the cylindrical microchannel in the solidified body. A variant forms an optical feature on the device surface.Filed by Trustees of Tufts College, published 2010-03-18. Cited 115 times within this corpus, with its priority filing WO2008127405A2 close behind at 114.

US20100068740A1 — patent drawing 1US20100068740A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2019051380A1Bacterial extracellular vesicles118
2US20100068740A1Microfluidic device with a cylindrical microchannel and a method for fabricating same115
3WO2008127405A2Microfluidic device with a cylindrical microchannel and a method for fabricating same114
4WO2019051381A1Extracellular vesicles from prevotella49
5WO2020172492A2Bacterial membrane preparations27
6WO2019010255A1Compositions and methods of treating cancer using bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis26
7US20200254028A1Bacterial extracellular vesicles24
8US20140334005A1Signal enhancement by silk photonic crystals22
9WO2013130156A2Signal enhancement by silk photonic crystals22
10WO2019099482A1Compositions and methods for treating disease using a blautia strain21

Ranked by citation count within this search; older records accumulate more citations by nature of being searchable longer, so treat this as a signal of influence rather than current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dyes, Pigments & Colorants Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal

What the filing pattern tells you

Three figures from this dataset matter more than the rest for anyone deciding where to file or where to look for freedom to operate.

Concentration
88.8%
of 241 records held by top 5

A small leading group, then a long tail

The top five assignees combine for 214 of the 241 records in scope, and the top ten reach 93.8%. The remaining 22 ranked companies each hold a small share, so diligence effort is best spent on the leading group rather than spread evenly across the ranking.

Based on the full 32-company assignee ranking.
Momentum
-93%
2021 → 2024 filing change

A filing burst that has largely ended

Filings rose to a peak of 59 in 2021 and fell to 4 by 2024. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and later data points are still incomplete and should not be read as an ongoing decline — but the 2021-2024 trajectory itself is real.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete.
Composition
80.5%
of 241 records classed A61K

Formulation claims dominate over pigment synthesis

A61K (medicinal preparations) and A61P (therapeutic activity) cover 80.5% and 63.9% of records respectively, while polymer-composition claims under C08L sit at only 3.7%. That gap marks where colorant-carrier formulation work remains lightly claimed.

Shares exceed 100% combined because records carry multiple IPC classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to dyes, pigments & colorants patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dyes, Pigments & Colorants Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where it thins out

32 companies and institutions make up the full assignee ranking behind this search. Activity is dominated by a small leading group, and recent-year momentum has gone flat across nearly every one of them — a pattern consistent with the 2021 filing peak having already passed.

Leader
198 records
held by the top assignee

One filer dominates the ranking

The leading assignee alone holds 198 of the 241 records in scope, dwarfing the fifth-place holder at 3 and tenth place at 2. Any competitive assessment of this field starts with understanding that single filer's portfolio in detail before looking at anyone else.

Based on the 32-company assignee ranking.
Momentum
0
latest-year filings across leading assignees

Recent-year activity has gone quiet

Every one of the leading assignees tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year, including a -100% year-on-year change for the top filer. Combined with the 2021 peak and subsequent drop, this points to a claim space that filled quickly and then stopped.

Momentum figures cover the most recent tracked year.
Collaboration
9 pairs
co-assignee combinations found

Joint filing is rare

Only 9 co-assignee pairs appear across the entire dataset, and the strongest of them repeat the same lead assignee with different individual co-inventors. There is no dense collaborative network to navigate here — most filings are solo efforts.

Counted across all 241 records in scope.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches sit well below the dominant A61K/A61P classes and show little co-assignee activity, based on the IPC composition above.
Polymer-carrier colorant stabilisation (C08L)Peptide-linked colorant conjugates (C07K)Bioreactor-scale pigment production (C12M)Additive-concentration purity controlsMicroorganism-index colorant production (C12R)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Evelo Biosciences, Inc.0-100%
Taya Canvas (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.0
Tufts University0
HODODI ANDREI0
BiVictriX Ltd.0
Trustees of Tufts College0
ANDREI HODODI0
Massachusetts Institute of Technology0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dyes, Pigments & Colorants Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The figures above describe where filing has concentrated and where it has thinned. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper on specific claims and specific assignees.

Check the leading assignee's full portfolio

With 198 of 241 records held by a single filer, understanding the exact claim scope of that portfolio is the first step before assessing where else to file.

Search assignee portfolios in Eureka

Track the post-2021 filing pattern as it fills in

2025 and later data points are still incomplete due to publication lag. Revisit the trend once another 12-18 months of publications have landed.

Set up filing alerts in Eureka

Map the under-claimed polymer-carrier branch

C08L classifications sit at just 3.7% of records in scope. A targeted search on polymer-composition claims tied to colorant stability could surface open claim space.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dyes, Pigments & Colorants Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Dyes, Pigments & Colorants Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Dyes, Pigments & Colorants Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole dyes, pigments & colorants patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.