Book a demo

E-Textile Manufacturing Automation Patent Snapshot

E-Textile Manufacturing Automation Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
E-Textile Manufacturing Automation Patent Snapshot in 2026

The e-textile manufacturing automation patent corpus is highly concentrated, with Porcher Industries holding 9 of 10 patent families in scope and all filing activity recorded in a single year. The field is nascent and structurally dominated by one applicant, with woven-fabric integration as the near-exclusive technical route.

10
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

One applicant commands the field; the corpus is nascent and sharply concentrated

Porcher Industries holds 9 of 10 patent families in scope, placing it in a category of its own at the top of the ranking. The Industrial Technology Research Institute, Van Os Koen, and Koninklijke Philips NV each hold 1 patent family, rounding out a four-applicant corpus.

The top five filers account for 100% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, signalling extreme concentration with no meaningful second tier. There is no discernible gap between a leader and a challenger — Porcher Industries simply stands alone.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Porcher Industries9
2Industrial Technology Research Institute1
3Van Os Koen1
4Koninklijke Philips NV1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Porcher Industries’ visible position reflects a deliberate focus on woven-fabric integration (D03D), suggesting that automated weaving processes for functional textiles are its core IP thesis. The remaining applicants approach the space from electronics integration and medical sensing angles, pointing to genuinely different entry paths.

The corpus is small (10 patent families) and all recorded filing activity falls in 2022; given standard publication lag, the true breadth of recent activity may not yet be fully visible. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Activity concentrated in 2022; weaving dominates the technology mix

The annual filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that emerged in a single recorded burst rather than through sustained growth, with woven-fabric engineering as the overwhelmingly visible technical branch.

Annual filing trend

All 10 patent families in scope were recorded in 2022, with zero filings shown in all surrounding years. This spike pattern most likely reflects a coordinated family filing by Porcher Industries rather than a sudden market event; given publication lag, activity from 2023 onward may not yet be fully indexed.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 10 in 2022.020170201802019020200202110202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

D03D (Woven fabrics and weaving) accounts for all 10 records, establishing it as the structural core of this corpus. H05K (Printed circuits and assemblies) appears in 3 records, reflecting the electronics integration layer. A61B (Diagnosis and surgery) and B29C (Shaping of plastics) each appear in 1 record, representing adjacent but sparse application branches.

Technology compositionD03D · Woven fabrics & weaving leads with 10; H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies 3.D03D · Woven fabrics & w…10H05K · Printed circuits …3A61B · Diagnosis & surgery1B29C · Shaping of plastics1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2010052627A1Published 2010-05-14

Electronic textile

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

The invention relates to an electronic textile comprising a textile and an electronic component, wherein the textile comprises a designated position for mounting the electronic component such that the electronic component can be electrically addressed via the textile. The textile further comprises a first region completely overlapping the designated… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Electronic textile — patent drawingElectronic textile — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Electronic textile2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Porcher Industries

Porcher Industries

Porcher Industries holds 9 patent families in scope, all concentrated in D03D (Woven fabrics and weaving) across multiple sub-classes including D03D 1, D03D 13, and D03D 15. Its momentum is classified as a new entrant with 9 recent-period families, indicating that its entire recorded IP position was established in the most recent filing window. This suggests a deliberate, concentrated IP filing program rather than a gradual build.

families: 9
Challenger · Industrial Technology Research Institute

Industrial Technology Research Institute

The Industrial Technology Research Institute holds 1 patent family in scope, with technology emphasis spanning A61B 5 (Diagnosis and surgery), H05K 1, and H05K 3 (Printed circuits and assemblies). Its momentum is also classified as a new entrant with 1 recent-period family. Its focus on medical sensing and printed circuit integration distinguishes it clearly from Porcher Industries’ weaving-automation route, representing a different technical entry path into the field.

families: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Koninklijke Philips NVVan Os Koen+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.