Book a demo

E-Textile Simulation Patent Snapshot 2026

E-Textile Simulation Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
E-Textile Simulation Patent Snapshot in 2026

E-textile simulation is a nascent, highly concentrated field with a single filer—Myant Inc.—holding all 6 patent families in scope, with activity concentrated in a single filing year. The field is technically diverse across printed circuits, textile finishing, and sensing modalities, but overall volume remains very small and annual activity has eased from its 2020 peak.

6
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Myant Inc. holds the entire field with 6 patent families

The e-textile simulation corpus is extremely small: 6 patent families in scope, all attributed to a single applicant, Myant Inc. There is no tier structure—one organization defines the competitive frontier.

The top five filers’ share of the ranked applicants visible in this query is 100%, which in practice collapses to a single-entity monopoly within the ranked applicant pool. No second-tier challengers are identifiable from the evidence.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Myant Inc.6
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Myant Inc.’s sole ownership of this space means that any new entrant would be building into a field with an established IP block from one focused player. The breadth of IPC classes covered by Myant’s filings—spanning printed circuits, textile finishing, navigation, temperature, and velocity sensing—suggests a platform-level strategy rather than point-solution patenting.

Filings from the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and may understate actual activity in that window. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

All activity concentrated in 2020; technology mix spans circuits, sensing, and textiles

The annual filing trend and technology composition together reveal a field that erupted in a single year and has not seen recorded follow-on filings, while the IPC mix shows that the underlying inventions are multidisciplinary.

Annual filing trend

All 6 patent families were filed in 2020; no filings appear in any adjacent year within the evidence window. Years from 2022 onward are subject to publication lag and cannot be read as confirmed zero-activity periods, but the 2020 concentration is clear. The lifecycle stage is Decline, with annual volume having eased from the 2020 peak.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 6 in 2020.02017020180201962020020210202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H05K (printed circuits and assemblies) is the visible branch, appearing across all 6 patent records. D06C (textile finishing, mechanical), G01C (distance, navigation, and gyroscopes), G01K (temperature measurement), G01P (velocity and acceleration), and H01R (connectors and current collectors) each appear across 4 records, indicating multi-sensor integration as a core theme. A61B (diagnosis and surgery) appears in 2 records, signaling a medical application dimension.

Technology compositionH05K · Printed circuits & assemblies leads with 6; D06C · Textile finishing (mechanical) 4.H05K · Printed circuits …6D06C · Textile finishing…4G01C · Distance, navigat…4G01K · Temperature measu…4G01P · Velocity & accele…4H01R · Connectors & curr…4A61B · Diagnosis & surgery2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20220346227A1Published 2022-10-27

Electronics-to-textile interconnection method and …

Myant INC.

An electronic textile system and a docking assembly for the electronic textile system. The system includes a textile substrate, an input device attached to the textile substrate, and a docking assembly attached to the textile substrate for removably receiving a controller device. The docking assembly includes a first electrical interface for mating with a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Electronics-to-textile interconnection method and … — patent drawingElectronics-to-textile interconnection method and … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Electronics-to-textile interconnection method and …6
2Electronics-to-textile interconnection method and …4

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Myant Inc.

Myant Inc.

Myant Inc. holds all 6 patent families in scope, with technology focus concentrated in H05K 1 (printed circuits and assemblies, 6 records), D06C 29 (textile finishing mechanical, 4 records), and G01C 19 (distance, navigation, and gyroscopes, 4 records). Applicant momentum data is not available in the evidence, so trajectory cannot be quantified beyond the observed 2020 filing concentration. The platform-breadth of the IPC coverage points to a systems-level, rather than component-level, IP strategy.

families: 6
Challenger · Evidence pending

No challenger identified

No second applicant appears in the ranked data. Any organization active in e-textile simulation outside this corpus—whether through trade secrets, unpublished filings, or activity in jurisdictions not captured—would not be visible in the current evidence. Monitoring new PCT and EPO publications is the most practical way to detect emerging challengers.

families: —
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Myant Inc.Evidence pending+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.