Edible Oil Refining Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026
- 37.5% concentration at the top. The top 5 assignees account for 51 of the 136 records in scope — a leader with 28 filings sits well ahead of a long tail of single-digit and one-off filers.
- Filing accelerated after a slow start. Activity ran near zero through 2017-2018, spiked to 38 records in 2019, and the underlying trend is still climbing past the 2022 midpoint — though the newest years are undercounted due to publication lag.
- China dominates the receiving offices. 65 of the tracked filings entered through China, more than five times the next-largest office (EPO at 13), pointing to where enforcement and freedom-to-operate checks matter most.
What this landscape covers
Edible oil refining spans the sequence of steps that turn crude vegetable oil into a stable, food-grade product: degumming and neutralization, bleaching with adsorbent earths, and deodorization under vacuum and heat. This dataset also captures a food-safety flashpoint inside that sequence — 3-MCPD and glycidyl ester mitigation, the class of contaminants formed during high-temperature deodorization that regulators now scrutinize closely. Filing activity concentrates in C11B, the core fatty-oils production class, with secondary claims reaching into edible-oil formulation, separation equipment and fermentation-based processing routes.
The 136 records in scope span 2015 through the middle of 2026, giving a decade-scale view of who is patenting refining process improvements, equipment configurations and contaminant-mitigation methods, and where the claim space is still open.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 136 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings were negligible through 2017-2018, jumped to a peak of 38 records in 2019, and dipped near the 2022 midpoint before resuming an upward trend. The most recent year is partial and will read low until later publications catch up — publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
IPC subclass composition
Every record in scope carries a C11B classification (fatty oils and waxes production), the anchor class for this search. Secondary classes are thinner: A23D (edible oils and fats) and B01D (separation processes) each cover 11.8% of records, C12N and C12P (microbial and enzymatic routes) each cover 8.8%, and C11C, A61K and B01J trail further behind — since records can carry multiple classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the 136-record total.
Shares are the percentage of the 136 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Edible Oil Refining with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about edible oil refining and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative filing and most-cited prior art
Use of a vegetable oil refining industry co-product to obtain a purified unsaponifiable fraction
The present invention relates to the use of at least one vegetable oil refining industry by-product to obtain a purified total unsaponifiable of vegetable oil cleared of the impurities initially present in the said by-product, advantageously cleared of sapid and odorous compounds and/or chemical compounds resulting from the deterioration and degradation of vegetable oils. The invention further relates to a method for obtaining a purified total unsaponifiable of vegetable oil from at least one vegetable oil refining industry by-product, and to a purified total unsaponifiable product obtainable by this method, as well as compositions containing it.US20130289009A1 — Laboratoires Expanscience — filed 2013-10-31


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6844458B2 | Vegetable oil refining | 49 |
| 2 | WO2009081094A2 | Process for edible oil refining using a lipid acyltransferase | 47 |
| 3 | US20030050492A1 | Vegetable oil refining | 39 |
| 4 | US4154750A | Activated carbon improved vegetable oil refining process | 26 |
| 5 | US4150045A | MgO Impregnated activated carbon and its use in an improved vegetable oil refining process | 26 |
| 6 | CN103740462A | 一种油脂精制方法 | 21 |
| 7 | CN103805337A | 一种米糠油精制方法 | 21 |
| 8 | CN101649250A | 不饱和酸含量高的植物油脱臭工艺 | 17 |
| 9 | WO2021109835A1 | 植物油连续无皂脱胶、精炼工艺及其设备 | 12 |
| 10 | CN111117766A | 食用油精炼方法和食用油精炼系统 | 11 |
Citation counts reflect influence inside the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data signals for R&D and IP strategy
Three patterns stand out once filing volume, technology composition and receiving offices are read together.
A single leader, then a steep drop-off
The leading assignee holds 28 records on its own, while fifth place sits at just 3 and tenth place at 2. That gap between the leader and the rest means most of the claim space outside the top handful is held thinly, one or two filings at a time.
China is the dominant receiving office by a wide margin
China's 65 filings dwarf the next largest office, EPO at 13, followed closely by the US at 12. Any freedom-to-operate review for refining process or equipment claims should start with Chinese-language prior art and Chinese national filings.
Equipment and separation claims sit alongside core refining chemistry
Beyond the universal C11B classification, the next-largest secondary classes are A23D (edible oil formulation) and B01D (separation/filtration equipment), each at 11.8% of records. Microbial and enzymatic routes (C12N, C12P) each cover 8.8%, showing a smaller but real presence of biological alternatives to chemical refining.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to edible oil refining, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the field is still open
Filing activity is led by established edible oil majors and processing-equipment specialists, with a long tail of regional oil producers and individual inventors filing once or twice.
One filer well ahead of the pack
The top-ranked assignee's 28 records more than double the next tier of filers, reflecting sustained investment in refining process patents across multiple years rather than a single filing burst.
A long tail of single- and double-digit filers
Below the top 10, the ranking thins quickly into regional oil producers, equipment makers and individual inventors, many holding just one or two records. This fragmentation suggests localized process patents rather than platform-level IP.
Co-filing is rare and mostly individual-to-individual
Only 7 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest is a pairing of two individual inventors sharing 3 records. Corporate co-filing between distinct companies is essentially absent, meaning most refining IP is developed and held by a single entity.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Cargill Incorporated | 0 | — |
| International Nutrition and Health Denmark ApS | 0 | — |
| 邦奇公司 | 0 | — |
| CEREOL NOEVENYOLAJIPARI | 0 | — |
| Chen Hanqing | 0 | — |
| 迈安德集团有限公司 | 0 | — |
| 卡尔贡公司 | 0 | — |
| 佛山市正德机械设备有限公司 | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or competitor tracking.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on China filings
With 65 of 136 records entering through China, any new refining process or equipment claim should be checked against Chinese national filings before development proceeds.
Explore China filings in EurekaMap the enzymatic and microbial refining branch
C12N and C12P together cover a smaller share of records than the core chemistry classes, suggesting biological refining routes remain comparatively open for new claims.
Analyze this branch in EurekaTrack the leading assignee's recent filings
The top-ranked assignee holds 28 records; monitoring its filing cadence year over year flags where it is doubling down versus stepping back.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaCommon questions about edible oil refining patents
One assignee leads the field with 28 of the 136 records in scope, well ahead of the rest of the ranked list, which covers 81 companies in total. The next four assignees combined bring the top 5 to 51 records, or 37.5% of all records in scope. Beyond the top 10, which together hold 47.8% of records, filing activity thins quickly into a long tail of companies and individual inventors holding just one or two patents each. This pattern suggests a small number of established players hold durable process IP while most other activity is localized or opportunistic.
The core classification, C11B (fatty oils and waxes production), covers all 136 records in scope, reflecting the search scope's focus on degumming, neutralization, bleaching and deodorization steps. Secondary classifications extend into edible oil formulation (A23D) and separation equipment (B01D), each covering 11.8% of records, and into microbial or enzymatic processing routes (C12N and C12P), each at 8.8%. Smaller pockets of activity touch fatty acid derivatives (C11C), medicinal preparations (A61K) and catalytic processes (B01J). Because a single record can carry multiple classifications, these shares add up to more than 100% of the record total.
China is by far the largest receiving office in this dataset, with 65 of the tracked filings, more than five times the next largest office. The European Patent Office follows with 13 filings and the United States with 12, while Australia, India and the WIPO/PCT route each carry 7. For companies assessing freedom-to-operate or planning where to file defensively, China should be the first jurisdiction reviewed given the concentration of activity there.
Filing activity accelerated sharply after 2017-2018, when annual filings were near zero, reaching a peak of 38 records in 2019. Activity dipped toward the 2022 midpoint but the underlying trend continued climbing afterward, indicating the field is still active rather than settled. The most recent year in the dataset will understate true activity, since patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2025-2026 filings are not yet fully visible in the record.
US20130289009A1, assigned to Laboratoires Expanscience, claims a method for using a vegetable oil refining industry by-product to obtain a purified unsaponifiable fraction of vegetable oil, cleared of odorous and degraded compounds, along with compositions containing that purified product. It is narrowly scoped to unsaponifiable-fraction recovery from refining by-products rather than to refining process steps themselves such as degumming or deodorization. Work on core refining chemistry, equipment configurations, or contaminant mitigation methods like 3-MCPD reduction sits outside its claim scope, though anyone working specifically with unsaponifiable fractions recovered from refining waste streams should review its claims closely before designing a process around similar recovery methods.
Research Edible Oil Refining in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole edible oil refining corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.