Book a demo

Edible Oil Refining Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026

Edible Oil Refining Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/edible-oil-refining-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Food Processing
Edible Oil Refining Patents: Who Files, What They Claim, and Where the Gaps Sit
  • 37.5% concentration at the top. The top 5 assignees account for 51 of the 136 records in scope — a leader with 28 filings sits well ahead of a long tail of single-digit and one-off filers.
  • Filing accelerated after a slow start. Activity ran near zero through 2017-2018, spiked to 38 records in 2019, and the underlying trend is still climbing past the 2022 midpoint — though the newest years are undercounted due to publication lag.
  • China dominates the receiving offices. 65 of the tracked filings entered through China, more than five times the next-largest office (EPO at 13), pointing to where enforcement and freedom-to-operate checks matter most.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
136
Published Records
38%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+38%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Edible oil refining spans the sequence of steps that turn crude vegetable oil into a stable, food-grade product: degumming and neutralization, bleaching with adsorbent earths, and deodorization under vacuum and heat. This dataset also captures a food-safety flashpoint inside that sequence — 3-MCPD and glycidyl ester mitigation, the class of contaminants formed during high-temperature deodorization that regulators now scrutinize closely. Filing activity concentrates in C11B, the core fatty-oils production class, with secondary claims reaching into edible-oil formulation, separation equipment and fermentation-based processing routes.

The 136 records in scope span 2015 through the middle of 2026, giving a decade-scale view of who is patenting refining process improvements, equipment configurations and contaminant-mitigation methods, and where the claim space is still open.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1CARGILL INC28
  2. 2INT N&H DENMARK APS12
  3. 3BUNGE ZRT5
  4. 4CEREOL NOEVENYOLAJIPARI3
  5. 5SHIRDI SAI NUTRACEUTICALS PVT LTD3
  6. 6Chen Hanqing3
  7. 7FOSHAN GENTLE MECHANICAL EQUIP CO LTD3
  8. 8TOKAREV VLADIMIR DMITIRIEVICH3
  9. 9TOKAREV PAVEL VLADIMIROVICH3
  10. 10SHANDONG XINGQUAN GREASE CO LTD2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edible Oil Refining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 136 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings were negligible through 2017-2018, jumped to a peak of 38 records in 2019, and dipped near the 2022 midpoint before resuming an upward trend. The most recent year is partial and will read low until later publications catch up — publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

Filing trend, 2017-202601020304012017201838201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

Every record in scope carries a C11B classification (fatty oils and waxes production), the anchor class for this search. Secondary classes are thinner: A23D (edible oils and fats) and B01D (separation processes) each cover 11.8% of records, C12N and C12P (microbial and enzymatic routes) each cover 8.8%, and C11C, A61K and B01J trail further behind — since records can carry multiple classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the 136-record total.

IPC subclass compositionC11B · Fatty oils & waxes production136100.0%A23D · Edible oils & fats1611.8%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1611.8%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…128.8%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…128.8%C11C · Fatty acids & candles64.4%A61K · Medicinal preparations53.7%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …32.2%Other1914.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 136 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edible Oil Refining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Edible Oil Refining with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about edible oil refining and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Record
US20130289009A12013-10-31

Use of a vegetable oil refining industry co-product to obtain a purified unsaponifiable fraction

LABORATOIRES EXPANSCIENCE

The present invention relates to the use of at least one vegetable oil refining industry by-product to obtain a purified total unsaponifiable of vegetable oil cleared of the impurities initially present in the said by-product, advantageously cleared of sapid and odorous compounds and/or chemical compounds resulting from the deterioration and degradation of vegetable oils. The invention further relates to a method for obtaining a purified total unsaponifiable of vegetable oil from at least one vegetable oil refining industry by-product, and to a purified total unsaponifiable product obtainable by this method, as well as compositions containing it.US20130289009A1 — Laboratoires Expanscience — filed 2013-10-31

US20130289009A1 — patent drawing 1US20130289009A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6844458B2Vegetable oil refining49
2WO2009081094A2Process for edible oil refining using a lipid acyltransferase47
3US20030050492A1Vegetable oil refining39
4US4154750AActivated carbon improved vegetable oil refining process26
5US4150045AMgO Impregnated activated carbon and its use in an improved vegetable oil refining process26
6CN103740462A一种油脂精制方法21
7CN103805337A一种米糠油精制方法21
8CN101649250A不饱和酸含量高的植物油脱臭工艺17
9WO2021109835A1植物油连续无皂脱胶、精炼工艺及其设备12
10CN111117766A食用油精炼方法和食用油精炼系统11

Citation counts reflect influence inside the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edible Oil Refining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data signals for R&D and IP strategy

Three patterns stand out once filing volume, technology composition and receiving offices are read together.

Concentration
37.5%
of 136 records held by top 5 assignees

A single leader, then a steep drop-off

The leading assignee holds 28 records on its own, while fifth place sits at just 3 and tenth place at 2. That gap between the leader and the rest means most of the claim space outside the top handful is held thinly, one or two filings at a time.

Top 10 combined reach 47.8% of all records.
Geography
65 filings
entered through China

China is the dominant receiving office by a wide margin

China's 65 filings dwarf the next largest office, EPO at 13, followed closely by the US at 12. Any freedom-to-operate review for refining process or equipment claims should start with Chinese-language prior art and Chinese national filings.

Australia, India and WIPO/PCT each carry 7 filings.
Technology mix
11.8%
of records also classified in B01D (separation)

Equipment and separation claims sit alongside core refining chemistry

Beyond the universal C11B classification, the next-largest secondary classes are A23D (edible oil formulation) and B01D (separation/filtration equipment), each at 11.8% of records. Microbial and enzymatic routes (C12N, C12P) each cover 8.8%, showing a smaller but real presence of biological alternatives to chemical refining.

Class shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to edible oil refining, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edible Oil Refining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

Filing activity is led by established edible oil majors and processing-equipment specialists, with a long tail of regional oil producers and individual inventors filing once or twice.

Leader
28 records
held by the top-ranked assignee

One filer well ahead of the pack

The top-ranked assignee's 28 records more than double the next tier of filers, reflecting sustained investment in refining process patents across multiple years rather than a single filing burst.

Ranked among 81 companies total in this landscape.
Long tail
81 companies
make up the full ranking

A long tail of single- and double-digit filers

Below the top 10, the ranking thins quickly into regional oil producers, equipment makers and individual inventors, many holding just one or two records. This fragmentation suggests localized process patents rather than platform-level IP.

Tenth place holds just 2 records.
Collaboration
7 pairs
of co-assignee filings identified

Co-filing is rare and mostly individual-to-individual

Only 7 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest is a pairing of two individual inventors sharing 3 records. Corporate co-filing between distinct companies is essentially absent, meaning most refining IP is developed and held by a single entity.

No dominant joint-venture pattern emerges from the pairs.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth watching
Sub-areas with thin filing density relative to the core refining classes.
Enzymatic degumming alternatives3-MCPD/glycidyl ester mitigation methodsContinuous physical refining equipmentMicrobial deodorization byproduct valorizationLow-temperature bleaching earth substitutes
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Cargill Incorporated0
International Nutrition and Health Denmark ApS0
邦奇公司0
CEREOL NOEVENYOLAJIPARI0
Chen Hanqing0
迈安德集团有限公司0
卡尔贡公司0
佛山市正德机械设备有限公司0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edible Oil Refining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or competitor tracking.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on China filings

With 65 of 136 records entering through China, any new refining process or equipment claim should be checked against Chinese national filings before development proceeds.

Explore China filings in Eureka

Map the enzymatic and microbial refining branch

C12N and C12P together cover a smaller share of records than the core chemistry classes, suggesting biological refining routes remain comparatively open for new claims.

Analyze this branch in Eureka

Track the leading assignee's recent filings

The top-ranked assignee holds 28 records; monitoring its filing cadence year over year flags where it is doubling down versus stepping back.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edible Oil Refining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about edible oil refining patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edible Oil Refining covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Edible Oil Refining in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole edible oil refining corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.