Book a demo

EDLC Nano-Carbon Electrode Patent Landscape 2026

EDLC Nano-Carbon Electrode Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
EDLC Nano-Carbon Electrode Patent Landscape in 2026

The EDLC nano-carbon electrode patent space is concentrated, with a single commercial entity holding a dominant share among the top filers; the field has reached a maturity plateau following a 2018 peak, with annual volume easing since but multi-year activity remaining substantive. Academic institutions and university spinouts are the second most active tier, signaling that fundamental innovation remains research-driven even as commercial filings stabilize.

227
Patent families in scope
25%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-6%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Nanotek Instruments leads a field split between one commercial frontrunner and a broad academic tier

Nanotek Instruments Group LLC sits clearly at the top of the applicant ranking with 40 patent records, more than three times the count of the next-ranked filers. The Regents of the University of California and Avery Dennison Retail Information Services each follow with 12 patent records, placing them as co-second-tier challengers at roughly one-third the leader’s volume.

The top five filers together account for 25% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating moderate concentration: one entity dominates, but the remaining share is distributed across a diverse set of universities, national laboratories, and smaller commercial players. No single challenger has yet mounted a filing campaign of comparable scale to the leader.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Nanotek Instruments Group LLC40
2Avery Dennison Retail Information Services LLC12
3Regents of the University of California12
4The Research Foundation for the State University of New York7
5Analog Devices Inc6
6University of Technology Sydney6
7University of Washington6
8Massachusetts Institute of Technology6
9Pocell Tech Ltd6
10Honeycomb Battery Co5
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11COUNCIL OF SCI & IND RES5
12Nanotek Instruments Inc4
13Energ2 Inc4
14National University of Defense Technology4
15Harbin Institute of Technology4
16Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee4
17Fudan University4
18KOREA ADVANCED INST OF SCI & TECH4
19Korea Electric Power Corporation4
20KOREA INST OF CERAMIC ENG & TECH4
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Nanotek’s position implies deep, sustained investment in EDLC electrode architecture and graphene-based capacitor materials, while the broad academic presence — MIT, University of Washington, University of Technology Sydney, and several Korean and Chinese institutions — signals that the knowledge frontier remains partially open to new entrants with differentiated synthesis or materials routes.

Filing data for approximately the last 18 to 24 months should be treated as incomplete due to standard patent publication lag; apparent softness in the most recent years does not necessarily indicate reduced inventive activity.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Activity plateaued after a 2018 peak; capacitor IPC classes dominate with nanotechnology and carbon chemistry as secondary branches

The annual filing trend reveals a field that surged to a 2018 high and has since settled into a lower, irregular annual cadence. The technology composition is heavily anchored in H01G (Capacitors) with meaningful secondary coverage in B82Y (Nanotechnology applications) and C01B (Non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds), reflecting the dual electrochemistry and materials-science character of the domain.

Annual filing trend

Filings peaked in 2018 and have oscillated at reduced levels since; the 2023–2026 data should be read cautiously given publication lag — the apparent trough in those years likely understates true filing activity.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 42 in 2018.37201742201819201921202024202123202213202324202418202562026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01G (Capacitors) is the dominant IPC branch by a wide margin, underscoring the primary supercapacitor application; B82Y (Nanotechnology applications) and C01B (Non-metallic elements) form a secondary cluster reflecting carbon nanomaterial synthesis work, while H01M (Batteries, cells and fuel cells) records a notable share, pointing to hybrid energy-storage architectures.

Technology compositionH01G · Capacitors leads with 339; B82Y · Nanotechnology applications 88.H01G · Capacitors339B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…88C01B · Non-metallic elem…76H01M · Batteries, cells …74C01G · Compounds of othe…16C08G · Condensation poly…7C23C · Coating & surface…7B32B · Layered products …6↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2013080054A3Published 2013-09-06

Method for selecting nanoporous carbon material fo…

Yunasko Limited

A method of selecting the nanoporous carbon material for at least one of the polarizable electrodes (positive and/or negative) of EDLC with given organic electrolyte is suggested. The method includes providing of a number of nanoporous carbon materials, which can potentially be used for manufacturing the EDLC electrodes, impregnating the materials with the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Supercapacitor using electrode of new material and…129
2Process for producing graphene foam supercapacitor…101
3Production process for a supercapacitor having a h…75
4一种钴插层硫化钼二次电池材料及其制备方法和应用70
5Supercapacitor having an integral 3D graphene-carb…58
6Supercapacitor devices having composite electrodes…57
7Electric double layer capacitance device50
8Surface-mediated lithium ion-exchanging energy st…46

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a mature filing curve, a dominant single incumbent, active academic co-development, and a US-China duopoly in jurisdictional coverage defines the strategic landscape. Engineers evaluating entry points should weigh the incumbent’s depth in core graphene-capacitor claims against the relative openness of adjacent materials and system-integration branches.

Maturity

Field has plateaued near its 2018 filing peak

The lifecycle stage is Maturity: annual filings have plateaued near their peak, which was reached in 2018. This means the core EDLC nano-carbon electrode design space is largely staked out by existing filers, and incremental claims in the dominant H01G branch face a dense prior-art environment. New entrants are more likely to find freedom-to-operate in adjacent materials classes or system-level integration rather than in core electrode architecture.

Mature / plateaued
Concentration

One dominant commercial player, fragmented academic second tier

Nanotek Instruments Group LLC holds 40 patent records — roughly three times the next-ranked filers — giving it a commanding position in the core capacitor branch. However, the top five filers account for only 25% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, meaning the remaining 75% is spread across dozens of universities and smaller companies. This fragmentation below the leader creates both freedom-to-operate zones and potential acquisition or licensing targets among the academic spinouts.

Moderate-to-high concentration
Collaboration

University–industry co-development is a visible feature at the top tier

The most active co-filing relationship is between the University of Washington and Energ2 Inc, with 8 joint records, suggesting a tight academic–startup pipeline for activated-carbon electrode materials. MIT and Analog Devices Inc have co-filed 6 records, indicating an industry pull toward advanced capacitor integration with mixed-signal electronics. Individual inventors Zhamu Aruna and Jang Bor Z each have one co-filed record with Nanotek Instruments, reflecting the company’s roots in founder-driven graphene research.

Collaborative ecosystem
Geography

US and China dominate filings; India and PCT routes are meaningful secondary channels

The United States leads jurisdictional coverage followed closely by China, together accounting for the large majority of patent-record filings. India ranks third, reflecting strong academic filing activity from Indian technical institutes visible in the applicant ranking. WIPO PCT filings and South Korean records form a secondary protective ring, while European EPO coverage is comparatively limited — a potential gap for applicants seeking broad protection in EU markets.

US–China duopoly
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
University of WashingtonEnerg2 Inc8
Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAnalog Devices Inc6
ZHAMU ARUNANanotek Instruments Inc1
JANG BOR ZNanotek Instruments Inc1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Insight cards draw on applicant ranking, lifecycle assessment, collaboration pairs, and jurisdictional filing data from the evidence set.Explore insights →
Leaders

Nanotek Instruments leads on volume; MIT and Analog Devices are new entrants with hybrid focus

The leader tier is defined by Nanotek Instruments’ deep concentration in capacitor architecture, while the most notable momentum signals come from newer academic and commercial entrants emphasizing hybrid energy-storage and system-integration themes.

Leader · Nanotek Instruments Group LLC

Nanotek Instruments Group LLC

With 40 patent records, Nanotek Instruments Group LLC holds the largest position in this corpus by a substantial margin. Its technology focus is concentrated in H01G 11 (Capacitors, 26 records), with secondary coverage in condensation polymers (C08G 61) and battery electrode materials (H01M 4), reflecting a deliberate effort to cover graphene-based electrode formulations across both supercapacitor and hybrid-cell applications. Momentum data does not flag a recent surge, consistent with the incumbent building a broad, stable portfolio over multiple years rather than an accelerating push.

patent records: 40
Challenger · Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

MIT enters the evidence set with 6 patent records and is flagged as a new entrant in the recent filing window, co-filing with Analog Devices Inc (6 joint records together). Its technology emphasis spans H01G 11 (Capacitors, 6 records), H01M 4 (battery/cell electrodes, 5 records), and B82Y 30 (nanotechnology applications), indicating a hybrid energy-storage orientation that bridges supercapacitors and advanced battery chemistries. This academic–commercial pairing suggests a route toward near-term commercialization of novel nano-carbon electrode architectures.

patent records: 6
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 100 applicants, including Korean institutes, Chinese universities, and defense research organizations.
Analog Devices IncHoneycomb Battery Co+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Printed Energy Pty Ltd4▲ new entrant
Massachusetts Institute of Technology3▲ new entrant
Analog Devices Inc3▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player cards combine applicant ranking counts, technology focus breakdowns, and recent-window filing momentum from the evidence set.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant capacitor core

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant H01G capacitor class carry low patent-record counts and low share relative to the total, suggesting areas where the patent landscape is less densely occupied. The observations below reflect relative sparsity; technical and commercial value should be validated independently before treating them as investment priorities.

C23C · Coating and surface deposition

With only 7 patent records and a 1% share among the top branches, surface deposition methods for nano-carbon electrode layers are sparsely covered. Atomic-layer deposition and chemical vapor deposition of functional carbon coatings on current collectors or separator interfaces could improve capacitance uniformity and cycle stability. Existing work in H01G and C01B provides a technical foundation, and entry would likely require differentiating on deposition process parameters or novel precursor chemistries rather than on carbon material composition alone.

Search this in Eureka →

H02J · Power supply and grid systems

Only 6 patent records address power supply and grid integration — a branch with direct relevance to EDLC deployment in fast-response grid buffers, regenerative braking, and UPS systems. The sparsity here likely reflects that most filers have focused on the electrode material rather than the system-level integration. As EDLC cells move from component to subsystem, power-management and balancing circuit claims under H02J could represent a relatively open route, particularly for applicants with both materials and power-electronics expertise.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all identified adjacent branches ranked by sparsity and technical adjacency, including B32B layered laminates and C08G condensation polymer binders.
B32B · Layered products and laminatesC08G · Condensation polymers+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Adjacent-branch observations are based on relative IPC-class patent-record counts within the corpus; sparsity alone does not confirm commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH01G 11 · CapacitorsB82Y 30 · Nanotechnology applicationsC01B 32 · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compoundsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsB82Y 40 · Nanotechnology applications
Nanotek Instruments IncStrong · 26AbsentEmerging · 5Moderate · 6Absent
Regents of the University of CaliforniaStrong · 10Strong · 7Strong · 9AbsentStrong · 7
Printed Energy Pty LtdStrong · 14AbsentAbsentStrong · 14Absent
Energ2 IncStrong · 8AbsentModerate · 4AbsentAbsent
University of WashingtonStrong · 8AbsentModerate · 4AbsentAbsent
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.