Book a demo

EDLC Supercapacitor Electrode Materials Patent Landscape

EDLC Supercapacitor Electrode Materials Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
EDLC / Supercapacitor Electrode Materials Patent Landscape in 2026

The EDLC and supercapacitor electrode materials field encompasses 4,945 patent families and is in a mature phase, with annual filings plateaued near their 2018 peak rather than continuing to climb. Activity is fragmented across a large pool of mostly academic filers in China, with Panasonic Holdings leading the top-100 applicants by patent families.

4,945
Patent families in scope
14%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-8%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Panasonic leads a fragmented field dominated by Chinese universities

Panasonic Holdings Corp holds the top position with 107 patent families among the ranked applicants, followed closely by Guilin University of Electronic Technology at 93 and Honda Motor Co. at 78. The top five filers account for 14% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, signaling a moderately fragmented competitive structure rather than a winner-takes-all market.

No single entity commands a decisive lead: the gap between the first-ranked applicant (107 patent families) and the twentieth-ranked applicant (Fastcap Ultracapacitors LLC at 41 patent families) is relatively narrow, and Chinese universities fill positions 2, 4, 6, 8, and most of the top twenty. This academic-heavy composition is unusual compared with semiconductor or battery landscapes where industrial assignees dominate.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Panasonic Holdings Corp107
2Guilin University of Electronic Technology93
3Honda Motor Co. Ltd.78
4Jiangsu University76
5AGC Inc.73
6Zhejiang University63
7Kyocera AVX Components Corp59
8Beijing University of Chemical Technology59
9Corning Inc.57
10Elna Co. Ltd.56
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11South China University of Technology54
12Donghua University54
13Jilin University52
14Shanghai Institute of Technology50
15Fuzhou University48
16Dalian University of Technology47
17Tongji University45
18Guangdong University of Technology44
19HARBIN UNIV OF SCI & TECH42
20FastCap Ultracapacitors LLC41
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Panasonic’s and Honda’s positions as the two leading non-academic filers suggest that established Japanese electronics and automotive companies retain meaningful IP depth in core capacitor architectures, even as Chinese universities drive volume. Entrants lacking strong H01G foundations will face a crowded baseline but may find differentiated footholds in adjacent material classes.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and likely under-represent actual 20242025 activity; interpret the apparent 2024–2025 trough with caution. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filings plateaued after a 2018 peak; capacitor IPC class overwhelmingly dominant

The annual filing trend and the technology-class composition together reveal a field that is structurally mature at its core but retains meaningful secondary branches in carbon chemistry and nanotechnology.

Annual filing trend

Filings peaked at 747 patent families in 2018, then stepped down to a plateau in the 400–550 range through 2023–2024. The 2025 and 2026 figures (410 and 78 respectively) are materially incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read as a further decline. The multi-year window shows a net reduction of 8% in recent growth, consistent with a mature field rather than an emerging one.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 747 in 2018.649201774720185742019552202047120215212022467202347620244102025782026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01G (Capacitors) is the dominant IPC class by a wide margin, reflecting deep focus on electrode architecture and dielectric layers. C01B (Non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds, primarily carbon materials) ranks second, underscoring the centrality of activated carbon and graphene precursors. B82Y (Nanotechnology applications) and H01M (Batteries, cells and fuel cells) appear as meaningful secondary branches, pointing to crossover work in nano-structured electrodes and hybrid energy storage. Polymer-related classes (C08G, C08L, C08J, C08K) collectively indicate a growing body of binder and electrolyte-adjacent work.

Technology compositionH01G · Capacitors leads with 7,226; C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds 1,147.H01G · Capacitors7,226C01B · Non-metallic elem…1,147B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…691H01M · Batteries, cells …637C01G · Compounds of othe…284C08G · Condensation poly…131B01J · Chemical/physical…107H01B · Cables, conductor…71↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250385053A1Published 2025-12-18

Positive-electrode sheet for capacitor, manufactur…

Eve Energy CO., LTD.

A positive-electrode sheet for a capacitor includes a first active substance layer. The first active substance layer comprises a positive-electrode active material, a carbon electrode material, a positive-electrode conductive agent, and a positive-electrode binder. A method of manufacturing the positive-electrode sheet for the capacitor includes: mixing the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Positive-electrode sheet for capacitor, manufactur… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Electric double-layer capacitor361
2Electric double-layer capacitor226
3Electric double-layer capacitor and carbon materia…175
4Supercapacitor using electrode of new material and…129
5Electric double-layer capacitor and method for mak…128
6Supercapacitor with high energy density119
7Electric double-layer capacitor and carbon materia…106
8Bifunctional electrode for an electrochemical cell…104

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the structure means for electrode-materials R&D investment

Four structural observations shape where IP risk is concentrated and where room remains for differentiated research programs.

Maturity

Field is mature; core capacitor architecture is heavily covered

The lifecycle stage is Maturity: annual filings have plateaued near the 2018 peak of 747 patent families and have not resumed a growth trajectory. Incremental improvements to standard activated-carbon electrodes or conventional EDLC cell designs now enter a congested space with high prior-art density. R&D investment is best directed toward differentiated material chemistries or hybrid architectures rather than core EDLC cell configurations.

Lifecycle: Mature
Concentration

Top-five filers hold 14% share of the top-100 — moderate fragmentation

With the top five applicants capturing 14% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, no single player controls the agenda. The field is split between a handful of Japanese industrial players (Panasonic, Honda, AGC, Kyocera AVX) and a long tail of Chinese academic institutions. This fragmentation creates risk of freedom-to-operate complexity across many small patent families but also means that no blocking portfolio is yet entrenched in most sub-areas.

Fragmented
Collaboration

AGC–Elna and Honda–Kuraray Chemical are the most active co-filing pairs

The most intense co-filing relationship is between AGC Inc. (Asahi Glass) and Elna Co. Ltd., with 54 jointly filed patent families — by far the largest collaboration count in the dataset. Honda Motor Co. and Kuraray Chemical have co-filed 23 patent families, indicating a material-supplier pairing focused on carbon precursors. Jiangsu University and Changzhou University (6 joint families) represent the most active academic–academic collaboration. These pairings suggest that key material know-how is being developed and locked up in bilateral industrial partnerships rather than through open consortia.

Bilateral partnerships
Geography

China is the dominant filing jurisdiction; US and Japan are secondary

China accounts for the largest share of patent records by jurisdiction, followed by the United States and Japan. South Korea and India are notable secondary markets, each ahead of the European Patent Office. The concentration in China reflects both the volume of Chinese academic filers and China’s strategic emphasis on energy-storage materials. Organizations seeking global freedom to operate should ensure US, Japan, and EPO coverage in addition to CNIPA filings, as Chinese-origin families are not always extended internationally.

China-centric
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
AGC Inc.Elna Co. Ltd.54
Honda Motor Co. Ltd.Kuraray Chemical Co. Ltd.23
Jiangsu UniversityChangzhou University6
Zhejiang UniversityBeihai Xingshi Carbon Material Technology Co. Ltd.4
Beijing University of Chemical TechnologyShenzhen Tianzhenglong Technology Co. Ltd.3
Beijing University of Chemical TechnologyState Grid Corporation of China3
Beijing University of Chemical TechnologyChina Electric Power Research Institute Co. Ltd.3
Jiangsu UniversityJiangsu Suopei Engineering Technology Co. Ltd.2
Jiangsu UniversityJiangsu Suopei (Group) Co. Ltd.2
Honda Motor Co. Ltd.Kashima Oil Co. Ltd.2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration counts reflect jointly named applicants on the same patent families.Explore insights →
Leaders

Panasonic and Guilin University of Electronic Technology lead by different routes

The top two applicants illustrate the industrial-versus-academic divide: Panasonic brings deep H01G capacitor architecture coverage with a stable portfolio, while Guilin University of Electronic Technology is the fastest-growing academic filer and diversifies into carbon-material and nanotechnology branches.

Leader · Panasonic Holdings Corp

Panasonic Holdings Corp

Panasonic holds 107 patent families and concentrates almost entirely on H01G 11 (electrochemical capacitors) and H01G 9 (electrolytic capacitors), indicating a focus on device-level electrode architecture rather than upstream material synthesis. Momentum data for Panasonic is not broken out in the available evidence, but the breadth of its H01G coverage signals a defensive position built over decades rather than a recent acceleration.

families: 107
Challenger · Guilin University of Electronic Technology

Guilin University of Electronic Technology

Guilin University of Electronic Technology holds 93 patent families and is the only top applicant showing positive recent momentum at +62% versus the prior three-year window, with 34 families filed in the recent period. Its technology emphasis spans H01G 11 capacitor architectures, C01B 32 carbon materials, and B82Y 30 nanotechnology applications — a broader materials-science footprint than most peers. This trajectory makes it the most active rising challenger in the academic cohort.

families: 93
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access detailed filing counts, technology focus, and momentum trends for all ranked applicants.
Honda Motor Co. Ltd.AGC Inc.+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Guilin University of Electronic Technology34▲ +62%
Jiangsu University16▼ -36%
FastCap Systems Corp10▼ -44%
Zhejiang University12▼ -29%
Beijing University of Chemical Technology3▼ -82%
Kyocera AVX Components Corp6▼ -62%
South China University of Technology14▼ -33%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Patent family counts are drawn from the applicant ranking within the top-100 list.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in nanotechnology and metal-compound chemistry

The whitespace analysis identifies IPC branches that are adjacent to the dominant H01G core but carry meaningfully lower filing density, suggesting areas where incremental R&D could establish early IP positions before crowding increases.

B82Y · Nanotechnology applications

B82Y accounts for 691 patent records and 6% of the branch mix — substantial in absolute terms but sparse relative to the H01G core. Nano-structured electrode materials (graphene foams, carbon nanotubes, MXene composites) sit in this branch, and the crossover with supercapacitor performance is technically well established. The entry path for new applicants involves combining novel nanostructure synthesis routes with demonstrated capacitance and cycle-life data, areas where academic groups and specialty chemical firms have realistic capability gaps to fill.

Search this in Eureka →

C01G · Compounds of other metals

C01G (compounds of other metals, covering transition-metal oxides and hydroxides) shows only 284 patent records and a 2% share — low given that metal-oxide pseudocapacitive materials such as RuO₂, MnO₂, and NiCo layered double hydroxides are active research subjects. The relative sparsity may reflect that pseudocapacitor work is often classified under H01M rather than C01G, but it also indicates room for applicants to build targeted compound-synthesis claims in this branch. Organizations with inorganic chemistry capabilities and access to scalable hydrothermal or sol–gel processes have a plausible route to establishing differentiated positions here.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See filing density, key assignees, and entry-path analysis across all adjacent IPC branches.
C08G · Condensation polymers (conductive polymer binders)B01J · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis (electrode synthesis routes)+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; share figures are relative to total records across all IPC branches in scope.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH01G 11 · CapacitorsC01B 32 · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compoundsH01G 9 · CapacitorsB82Y 30 · Nanotechnology applicationsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cells
Panasonic Holdings CorpStrong · 108AbsentStrong · 102AbsentAbsent
Honda Motor Co. Ltd.Strong · 77AbsentStrong · 56AbsentAbsent
AGC Inc.Strong · 73AbsentStrong · 59AbsentAbsent
Guilin University of Electronic TechnologyStrong · 93Emerging · 18AbsentEmerging · 13Absent
Jiangsu UniversityStrong · 89Emerging · 10AbsentEmerging · 11Absent
Zhejiang UniversityStrong · 63Moderate · 15AbsentEmerging · 7Absent
Beijing University of Chemical TechnologyStrong · 59Moderate · 14AbsentAbsentEmerging · 9
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own supercapacitor electrode landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.