Book a demo

Electric Double-Layer Capacitor Cell Design Patent Snapshot

Electric Double-Layer Capacitor Cell Design Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Electric Double-Layer Capacitor Cell Design Patent Snapshot in 2026

The electric double-layer capacitor (EDLC) cell design field is Japan-dominated and moderately concentrated, with Panasonic Holdings leading a roster of established Japanese electronics and automotive suppliers. The field is in a growth phase on a multi-year basis, though annual filing volume has eased from its 2017 peak and the most recent years remain understated by publication lag.

28
Patent families in scope
42%
Top visible applicants share
+50%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Japan
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Panasonic leads a Japan-anchored, moderately concentrated field

Panasonic Holdings Corp ranks first with 103 patent records, followed by Tokin Corp (83), NEC Corp (62), Meidensha Corp (53), and AGC Inc (49). These five leaders together account for 42% of the combined total across the ranked applicants visible in this query, signaling meaningful but not overwhelming concentration.

A clear tier gap separates the top five from the next tier — Elna Co Ltd (48), Honda Motor Co Ltd (37), UD Trucks Corp (35), Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd (29), and Kyocera Corp (26) — indicating that a second cohort of capable competitors exists but at materially lower volume.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Panasonic Holdings Corp103
2Tokin Corp83
3NEC Corporation62
4Meidensha Corporation53
5AGC Inc49
6Elna Co Ltd48
7Honda Motor Co Ltd37
8UD Trucks Corporation35
9Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd29
10Kyocera Corporation26
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Nisshinbo Industries Inc18
12Maxell Ltd18
13Seiko Instruments Inc16
14Power Systems Co Ltd15
15Japan Radio Co Ltd15
16Isuzu Motors Ltd14
17TDK Corporation12
18Sanyo Electric Co Ltd11
19Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd10
20Mitsubishi Electric Corporation9
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Panasonic’s lead, combined with the breadth of Japanese industrial names in the top twenty, indicates that the core cell design know-how is held primarily by domestic Japanese electronics and automotive-adjacent firms, creating a structurally high barrier for new entrants seeking to challenge the front-runners in core capacitor technology.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are understated due to publication lag and should be read as a floor rather than a ceiling; the visible assignee structure described here reflects the accumulated record to date.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth persists, anchored by core capacitor IP

Two charts together show the pace of new filings over time and the distribution of technology sub-areas, revealing both where the field is heading and where the bulk of existing IP sits.

Annual filing trend

Filings peaked in 2017, then eased sharply, with scattered activity in 2019, 2023, and 2024. The recent three-year window sits well above the prior three-year window — a 50% uplift — confirming net multi-year growth, but the low absolute counts in 2024–2026 are largely an artifact of publication lag and should not be read as a sustained decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 12 in 2017.122017020184201922020020210202242023520241202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01G (Capacitors) is visible in overwhelmingly, reflecting the core nature of this landscape. Secondary branches — H01M (Batteries, cells & fuel cells), H02J (Power supply & grid systems), C01B (Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds), and B60L (Electric vehicle propulsion) — each hold a small share, pointing to application adjacencies in energy storage systems and EV integration.

Technology compositionH01G · Capacitors leads with 809; H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells 93.H01G · Capacitors809H01M · Batteries, cells …93H02J · Power supply & gr…37C01B · Non-metallic elem…22B60L · Electric vehicle …12B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…11C08L · Polymer compositi…7G01R · Electric & magnet…7↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US4827380APublished 1989-05-02

Electric double-layer capacitor

Murata Manufacturing CO., LTD.

An electric double-layer capacitor includes one or a group of electric double-layer capacitor element(s), an electrode structural member comprising of electrode plates and an insulating plate, stacked on the electric double-layer capacitor element(s), and a case for enclosing the electric double-layer capacitor element(s) and the electrode structural… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Electric double-layer capacitor — patent drawingElectric double-layer capacitor — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Carbon material for electric double-layer capacito…189
2Electric double-layer capacitor125
3Electric double-layer capacitor and manufacture th…84
4Electric double layer capacitor83
5Active carbon electrode and its manufacturing meth…77
6Electric double-layer capacitor66
7Multi-layer type electric double-layer capacitor63
8Electric double-layer capacitor63

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural lenses — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — help an R&D team locate where effort is likely to yield differentiated IP versus where established players hold decisive positions.

Growth

Growth phase, past annual peak

The lifecycle stage is Growth. Recent three-year filings are 50% above the prior three-year window, so the field continues to expand on a multi-year basis. However, annual volume has eased from its 2017 peak, meaning the window for establishing foundational positions has narrowed; incremental and application-layer filings now represent the more accessible entry points.

Growth · post-2017 peak
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a clear second tier

The top five filers hold 42% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, a level that signals meaningful incumbent strength without full lock-in. The second tier — six to ten ranked applicants — retains significant volume, suggesting the field rewards focused specialization. An entrant targeting a specific sub-architecture or material system can still accumulate a defensible position.

Top-5 share: 42%
Collaboration

AGC–Elna partnership is visible in co-filing activity

The most active co-filing pair is AGC Inc (Asahi Glass) and Elna Co Ltd, with 36 joint patent records — far exceeding any other pairing. NEC Corp co-files with Japan Science and Technology Agency (6 records) and with NEC Tokin Ceramics (3 records). Tokin Corp also collaborates with NEC Tokin Ceramics (3 records). These relationships suggest that materials-to-component integration and public-private R&D are the primary collaborative axes in this field.

AGC–Elna: 36 joint records
Geography

Japan-centric, with secondary US and Asian filing

Japan leads jurisdiction filings by a wide margin, followed by the United States, China, South Korea, and Europe (EPO). WIPO PCT filings are present but modest. This geographic skew means that IP protection outside Japan — particularly in China and South Korea, which are growing EDLC manufacturing bases — may be underserved relative to the underlying technology activity, presenting a gap for applicants with global ambitions.

Lead office: Japan
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
AGC IncElna Co Ltd36
NEC CorporationJapan Science and Technology Agency6
NEC CorporationNEC Tokin Ceramics Co Ltd3
Tokin CorpNEC Tokin Ceramics Co Ltd3
AGC IncOkamura Research Institute Co Ltd3
Elna Co LtdOkamura Research Institute Co Ltd3
Meidensha CorporationChubu Electric Power Co Inc2
NEC CorporationHyogo NEC Co Ltd1
Honda Motor Co LtdJapan Carlit Co Ltd1
Honda Motor Co LtdKuraray Chemical Co Ltd1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant rankings, collaboration pairs, lifecycle analysis, and jurisdiction distribution in the evidence dataset.Explore insights →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Panasonic Holdings Corp

Panasonic Holdings Corp

Panasonic Holdings Corp leads the field with 103 patent records, focused tightly on H01G 11 (104 records) and H01G 9 (98 records) — the two core capacitor sub-classes — with a minor extension into H01G 13 (4 records). This concentration indicates deep, narrow expertise in fundamental cell architecture. Applicant momentum data is not available in the current evidence set, so trajectory cannot be confirmed.

patent records: 103
Challenger · Tokin Corp

Tokin Corp

Tokin Corp holds 83 patent records and, like Panasonic, concentrates in H01G 11 (65 records) and H01G 9 (49 records), but also shows a secondary presence in H01M 10 (Batteries, cells & fuel cells, 4 records), suggesting some cross-technology exploration into hybrid energy storage. Applicant momentum data is not available in the current evidence set, so trajectory cannot be confirmed.

patent records: 83
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
NEC CorpMeidensha Corp+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own EDLC Patent Snapshot?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.